* 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34
@ 2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.33 regressions introduced before
2.6.34, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.33 regressions, please let us know
either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2010-06-21 114 36 28
2010-06-13 111 40 34
2010-05-09 80 27 24
2010-05-04 76 26 22
2010-04-20 64 35 34
2010-04-07 48 35 33
2010-03-21 15 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16254
Subject : TCP stream performance regression due to c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6
Submitter : Alex,Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-06-18 7:17 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6
Message-ID : <1276845448.2118.346.camel@debian>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127684931020672&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16233
Subject : Fwd: [2.6.34] INFO: task rsync:20019 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Submitter : Jan De Luyck <mailinglists+linuxkernel_20080830@kcore.org>
Date : 2010-06-14 19:49 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTimutyh3WIALv3NIxA8Xt5JtU6tp4EWOnuSqhdyD@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127654498016377&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16207
Subject : Suspend hangs since 2.6.34
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel+xorg@tikei.de>
Date : 2010-06-09 17:53 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <20100609175356.GA17332@x61.home>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610606214060&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16206
Subject : PROBLEM: PPP and other serial port related application hangs in kernel space
Submitter : Ales Teska <ales.teska@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-09 20:46 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <900E3B14-5B92-4A37-9581-049DB40F4D1C@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611640301071&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16170
Subject : Leadtek Winfast DTV Dongle (STK7700P based) is not working in 2.6.34
Submitter : <macjariel@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-09 11:11 (12 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16162
Subject : SSD + sata_nv + btrfs oops
Submitter : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-01 3:04 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTilqsIdlzZgUf7TMLHYKqHDZoVkcs42vcG8wXKEr@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127536149022333&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16158
Subject : winxp guest hangs after idle for ~30 minutes
Submitter : <brimhall@pobox.com>
Date : 2010-06-08 17:52 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16139
Subject : wait_even_interruptible_timeout(), signal, spin_lock() = system hang
Submitter : Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-28 16:44 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTiliRFydAhxH2-Dp1RKuz6sq7vgWIcMvLMi68ftg@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127506510328758&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16137
Subject : Ooops in BTRFS in 2.6.34 / x86_64 when mounting subvolume by name
Submitter : armin walland <a.walland@focusmr.com>
Date : 2010-05-27 12:27 (25 days old)
Message-ID : <201005271428.01239.a.walland@focusmr.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127496434110736&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16135
Subject : [BUG] kacpi_notify goes into an infinite loop (luckly it calls cond_resched)
Submitter : Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date : 2010-05-29 1:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fa80945269f312bc609e8384302f58b03c916e12
Message-ID : <1275094882.22648.607.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127509490405845&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111
Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
Submitter : Petr Pisar <petr.pisar@atlas.cz>
Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16097
Subject : 2.6.34 on Samsung P460: reset after "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated"
Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
Date : 2010-05-25 9:12 (27 days old)
Message-ID : <4BFB947E.9080509@aixigo.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127477877432254&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16084
Subject : iwl3945 bug in 2.6.34
Submitter : Satish Eerpini <eerpini@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-23 6:37 (29 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTik_7rxDBc0TKlAfoYyM5S6Cf_Hyxbr4W5ORnTsq@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127459596015626&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16082
Subject : host panic on kernel 2.6.34
Submitter : Hao, Xudong <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Date : 2010-05-24 8:23 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E04DCCCE242@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127468951208864&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16050
Subject : The ibmcam driver is not working
Submitter : Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Date : 2010-05-25 23:02 (27 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16035
Subject : Incorrect initial resolution of (external) vga monitor with KMS
Submitter : <andreas.eckstein@gmx.net>
Date : 2010-05-23 12:28 (29 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16034
Subject : 2.6.34: dlm: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
Date : 2010-05-21 6:59 (31 days old)
Message-ID : <20100521065933.GH2657@zip.com.au>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127442519608471&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15977
Subject : WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:866 check_for_stack
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-14 8:56 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTikyx2eaxaiUCFDSfpmn1UG0t2GOxArz6F4wp1LJ@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127382742729825&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15936
Subject : Suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.34-rc6 boot on PPC64/p5 processor
Submitter : Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2010-05-06 7:29 (46 days old)
Message-ID : <1273130279.4898.5.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127313031922395&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15924
Subject : kacpid consumes ~100% CPU, system freezes randomly
Submitter : Jaroslav Kameník <jaroslav@kamenik.cz>
Date : 2010-05-06 21:12 (46 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862
Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
Subject : reiserfs locking
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (67 days old)
Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2
Handled-By : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
Subject : bluetooth oops
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (99 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (82 days old)
Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673
Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (85 days old)
Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (86 days old)
Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (105 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (81 days old)
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16147
Subject : ksoftirq hogs the CPU
Submitter : Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
Date : 2010-06-07 15:17 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/ae74e823cb7d4cd476f623fce9a38f625f6c09a8
Handled-By : Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26732
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16138
Subject : PCMCIA regression
Submitter : Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Date : 2010-05-25 20:25 (27 days old)
Message-ID : <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005251619020.12278@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127481913909672&w=2
Handled-By : Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26685
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16054
Subject : UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
Submitter : Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-23 21:40 (29 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005231149100.605@parag-laptop>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127465083806617&w=2
Handled-By : Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Patch : http://git.kernel.org/tip/055c47272b8f5679d08ccc57efea3cb4aaeb5fc6
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16040
Subject : kacpid consumes ~40% of cpu all the time beginning with 2.6.34
Submitter : Mehmet Giritli <mehmet@giritli.eu>
Date : 2010-05-24 07:32 (28 days old)
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104903/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104912/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104909/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104911/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104910/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16007
Subject : x86/pci Oops with CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL
Submitter : Graham Ramsey <ramsey.graham@ntlworld.com>
Date : 2010-05-19 17:09 (33 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105662/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951
Subject : commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff
Submitter : Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Date : 2010-04-01 13:39 (81 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9630bdd9b15d2f489c646d8bc04b60e53eb5ec78
Message-ID : <20100401133923.GA4104@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127012918316305&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106701/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/96096/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310
Please let the tracking teak know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34
@ 2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.33 regressions introduced before
2.6.34, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.33 regressions, please let us know
either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2010-06-21 114 36 28
2010-06-13 111 40 34
2010-05-09 80 27 24
2010-05-04 76 26 22
2010-04-20 64 35 34
2010-04-07 48 35 33
2010-03-21 15 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16254
Subject : TCP stream performance regression due to c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6
Submitter : Alex,Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-06-18 7:17 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6
Message-ID : <1276845448.2118.346.camel@debian>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127684931020672&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16233
Subject : Fwd: [2.6.34] INFO: task rsync:20019 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Submitter : Jan De Luyck <mailinglists+linuxkernel_20080830@kcore.org>
Date : 2010-06-14 19:49 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTimutyh3WIALv3NIxA8Xt5JtU6tp4EWOnuSqhdyD@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127654498016377&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16207
Subject : Suspend hangs since 2.6.34
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel+xorg@tikei.de>
Date : 2010-06-09 17:53 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <20100609175356.GA17332@x61.home>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610606214060&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16206
Subject : PROBLEM: PPP and other serial port related application hangs in kernel space
Submitter : Ales Teska <ales.teska@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-09 20:46 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <900E3B14-5B92-4A37-9581-049DB40F4D1C@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611640301071&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16170
Subject : Leadtek Winfast DTV Dongle (STK7700P based) is not working in 2.6.34
Submitter : <macjariel@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-09 11:11 (12 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16162
Subject : SSD + sata_nv + btrfs oops
Submitter : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-01 3:04 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTilqsIdlzZgUf7TMLHYKqHDZoVkcs42vcG8wXKEr@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127536149022333&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16158
Subject : winxp guest hangs after idle for ~30 minutes
Submitter : <brimhall@pobox.com>
Date : 2010-06-08 17:52 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16139
Subject : wait_even_interruptible_timeout(), signal, spin_lock() = system hang
Submitter : Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-28 16:44 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTiliRFydAhxH2-Dp1RKuz6sq7vgWIcMvLMi68ftg@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127506510328758&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16137
Subject : Ooops in BTRFS in 2.6.34 / x86_64 when mounting subvolume by name
Submitter : armin walland <a.walland@focusmr.com>
Date : 2010-05-27 12:27 (25 days old)
Message-ID : <201005271428.01239.a.walland@focusmr.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127496434110736&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16135
Subject : [BUG] kacpi_notify goes into an infinite loop (luckly it calls cond_resched)
Submitter : Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date : 2010-05-29 1:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fa80945269f312bc609e8384302f58b03c916e12
Message-ID : <1275094882.22648.607.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127509490405845&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111
Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
Submitter : Petr Pisar <petr.pisar@atlas.cz>
Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16097
Subject : 2.6.34 on Samsung P460: reset after "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated"
Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
Date : 2010-05-25 9:12 (27 days old)
Message-ID : <4BFB947E.9080509@aixigo.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127477877432254&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16084
Subject : iwl3945 bug in 2.6.34
Submitter : Satish Eerpini <eerpini@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-23 6:37 (29 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTik_7rxDBc0TKlAfoYyM5S6Cf_Hyxbr4W5ORnTsq@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127459596015626&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16082
Subject : host panic on kernel 2.6.34
Submitter : Hao, Xudong <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Date : 2010-05-24 8:23 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E04DCCCE242@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127468951208864&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16050
Subject : The ibmcam driver is not working
Submitter : Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Date : 2010-05-25 23:02 (27 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16035
Subject : Incorrect initial resolution of (external) vga monitor with KMS
Submitter : <andreas.eckstein@gmx.net>
Date : 2010-05-23 12:28 (29 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16034
Subject : 2.6.34: dlm: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
Date : 2010-05-21 6:59 (31 days old)
Message-ID : <20100521065933.GH2657@zip.com.au>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127442519608471&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15977
Subject : WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:866 check_for_stack
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-14 8:56 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTikyx2eaxaiUCFDSfpmn1UG0t2GOxArz6F4wp1LJ@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127382742729825&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15936
Subject : Suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.34-rc6 boot on PPC64/p5 processor
Submitter : Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2010-05-06 7:29 (46 days old)
Message-ID : <1273130279.4898.5.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127313031922395&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15924
Subject : kacpid consumes ~100% CPU, system freezes randomly
Submitter : Jaroslav Kameník <jaroslav@kamenik.cz>
Date : 2010-05-06 21:12 (46 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862
Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
Subject : reiserfs locking
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (67 days old)
Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2
Handled-By : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
Subject : bluetooth oops
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (99 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (82 days old)
Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673
Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (85 days old)
Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (86 days old)
Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (105 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (81 days old)
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16147
Subject : ksoftirq hogs the CPU
Submitter : Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
Date : 2010-06-07 15:17 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/ae74e823cb7d4cd476f623fce9a38f625f6c09a8
Handled-By : Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26732
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16138
Subject : PCMCIA regression
Submitter : Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Date : 2010-05-25 20:25 (27 days old)
Message-ID : <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005251619020.12278@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127481913909672&w=2
Handled-By : Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26685
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16054
Subject : UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
Submitter : Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-23 21:40 (29 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005231149100.605@parag-laptop>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127465083806617&w=2
Handled-By : Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Patch : http://git.kernel.org/tip/055c47272b8f5679d08ccc57efea3cb4aaeb5fc6
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16040
Subject : kacpid consumes ~40% of cpu all the time beginning with 2.6.34
Submitter : Mehmet Giritli <mehmet@giritli.eu>
Date : 2010-05-24 07:32 (28 days old)
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104903/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104912/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104909/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104911/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104910/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16007
Subject : x86/pci Oops with CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL
Submitter : Graham Ramsey <ramsey.graham@ntlworld.com>
Date : 2010-05-19 17:09 (33 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105662/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951
Subject : commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff
Submitter : Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Date : 2010-04-01 13:39 (81 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9630bdd9b15d2f489c646d8bc04b60e53eb5ec78
Message-ID : <20100401133923.GA4104@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127012918316305&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106701/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/96096/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310
Please let the tracking teak know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau,
Jindřich Makovička, Michael Ellerman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau,
Jindřich Makovička, Michael Ellerman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh-JsoAwUIsXov1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.orgl.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>
Jindřich Makovička <makovick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15671] intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jesse Barnes, Norbert Preining
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (86 days old)
Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15664] Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Villacis Lasso, Chris Wilson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (81 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-21 10:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sergey Senozhatsky
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (82 days old)
Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15669] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (105 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-21 15:55 ` Pavel Machek
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Marcel Holtmann, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
Subject : bluetooth oops
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (99 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15805] reiserfs locking
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alexander Beregalov,
Frederic Weisbecker
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
Subject : reiserfs locking
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (67 days old)
Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2
Handled-By : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15673] 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Thomas Meyer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673
Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (85 days old)
Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15664] Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Villacis Lasso, Chris Wilson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci-x0m+Mc+nT7uljOmnV8AmnkElSqmLX1BE@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (81 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15669] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (105 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15805] reiserfs locking
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alexander Beregalov,
Frederic Weisbecker
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
Subject : reiserfs locking
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (67 days old)
Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2
Handled-By : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15936] Suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.34-rc6 boot on PPC64/p5 processor
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Subrata Modak
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15936
Subject : Suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.34-rc6 boot on PPC64/p5 processor
Submitter : Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2010-05-06 7:29 (46 days old)
Message-ID : <1273130279.4898.5.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127313031922395&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15924] kacpid consumes ~100% CPU, system freezes randomly
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jaroslav Kameník
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15924
Subject : kacpid consumes ~100% CPU, system freezes randomly
Submitter : Jaroslav Kameník <jaroslav@kamenik.cz>
Date : 2010-05-06 21:12 (46 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15862] 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Nico Schottelius
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862
Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane, Paul E. McKenney
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/96096/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane, Paul E. McKenney
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/96096/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15862] 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Nico Schottelius
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862
Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (55 days old)
Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261-9ll+q7fL1vOwdVNcq5OhcUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15924] kacpid consumes ~100% CPU, system freezes randomly
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jaroslav Kameník
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15924
Subject : kacpid consumes ~100% CPU, system freezes randomly
Submitter : Jaroslav Kameník <jaroslav-FZZqD5xcwZ7rBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-05-06 21:12 (46 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15936] Suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.34-rc6 boot on PPC64/p5 processor
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Subrata Modak
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15936
Subject : Suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.34-rc6 boot on PPC64/p5 processor
Submitter : Subrata Modak <subrata-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-05-06 7:29 (46 days old)
Message-ID : <1273130279.4898.5.camel-NRFfyExJdYpgXGGE5LP+UZlqa2bBAFbm0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127313031922395&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16007] x86/pci Oops with CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Graham Ramsey, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16007
Subject : x86/pci Oops with CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL
Submitter : Graham Ramsey <ramsey.graham@ntlworld.com>
Date : 2010-05-19 17:09 (33 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105662/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15977] WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:866 check_for_stack
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15977
Subject : WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:866 check_for_stack
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-14 8:56 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTikyx2eaxaiUCFDSfpmn1UG0t2GOxArz6F4wp1LJ@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127382742729825&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15951] commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jesse Barnes,
Matthew Garrett, Michal Hocko, Rafael J. Wysocki, Tony Vroon
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951
Subject : commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff
Submitter : Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Date : 2010-04-01 13:39 (81 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9630bdd9b15d2f489c646d8bc04b60e53eb5ec78
Message-ID : <20100401133923.GA4104@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127012918316305&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106701/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16034] 2.6.34: dlm: possible circular locking dependency detected
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, CaT, Joel Becker, Wengang Wang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16034
Subject : 2.6.34: dlm: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
Date : 2010-05-21 6:59 (31 days old)
Message-ID : <20100521065933.GH2657@zip.com.au>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127442519608471&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16050] The ibmcam driver is not working
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bill Davidsen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16050
Subject : The ibmcam driver is not working
Submitter : Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Date : 2010-05-25 23:02 (27 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16040] kacpid consumes ~40% of cpu all the time beginning with 2.6.34
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Mehmet Giritli
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16040
Subject : kacpid consumes ~40% of cpu all the time beginning with 2.6.34
Submitter : Mehmet Giritli <mehmet@giritli.eu>
Date : 2010-05-24 07:32 (28 days old)
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104903/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104912/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104909/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104911/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104910/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16035] Incorrect initial resolution of (external) vga monitor with KMS
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, andreas.eckstein
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16035
Subject : Incorrect initial resolution of (external) vga monitor with KMS
Submitter : <andreas.eckstein@gmx.net>
Date : 2010-05-23 12:28 (29 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16034] 2.6.34: dlm: possible circular locking dependency detected
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, CaT, Joel Becker, Wengang Wang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16034
Subject : 2.6.34: dlm: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : CaT <cat-LJ1TwQYPT6cQrrorzV6ljw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-05-21 6:59 (31 days old)
Message-ID : <20100521065933.GH2657-LJ1TwQYPT6cQrrorzV6ljw@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127442519608471&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16035] Incorrect initial resolution of (external) vga monitor with KMS
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, andreas.eckstein
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16035
Subject : Incorrect initial resolution of (external) vga monitor with KMS
Submitter : <andreas.eckstein@gmx.net>
Date : 2010-05-23 12:28 (29 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16084] iwl3945 bug in 2.6.34
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Satish Eerpini
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16084
Subject : iwl3945 bug in 2.6.34
Submitter : Satish Eerpini <eerpini@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-23 6:37 (29 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTik_7rxDBc0TKlAfoYyM5S6Cf_Hyxbr4W5ORnTsq@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127459596015626&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16054] UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Borislav Petkov, Parag Warudkar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16054
Subject : UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
Submitter : Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-23 21:40 (29 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005231149100.605@parag-laptop>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127465083806617&w=2
Handled-By : Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Patch : http://git.kernel.org/tip/055c47272b8f5679d08ccc57efea3cb4aaeb5fc6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16082] host panic on kernel 2.6.34
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Hao, Xudong
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16082
Subject : host panic on kernel 2.6.34
Submitter : Hao, Xudong <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Date : 2010-05-24 8:23 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E04DCCCE242@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127468951208864&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16054] UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Borislav Petkov, Parag Warudkar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16054
Subject : UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
Submitter : Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-05-23 21:40 (29 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005231149100.605@parag-laptop>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127465083806617&w=2
Handled-By : Borislav Petkov <bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://git.kernel.org/tip/055c47272b8f5679d08ccc57efea3cb4aaeb5fc6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16111] hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Petr Pisar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111
Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
Submitter : Petr Pisar <petr.pisar@atlas.cz>
Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16135] [BUG] kacpi_notify goes into an infinite loop (luckly it calls cond_resched)
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Steven Rostedt, Thomas Renninger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16135
Subject : [BUG] kacpi_notify goes into an infinite loop (luckly it calls cond_resched)
Submitter : Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date : 2010-05-29 1:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fa80945269f312bc609e8384302f58b03c916e12
Message-ID : <1275094882.22648.607.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127509490405845&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16097] 2.6.34 on Samsung P460: reset after "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated"
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Harald Dunkel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16097
Subject : 2.6.34 on Samsung P460: reset after "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated"
Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
Date : 2010-05-25 9:12 (27 days old)
Message-ID : <4BFB947E.9080509@aixigo.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127477877432254&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16111] hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Petr Pisar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111
Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
Submitter : Petr Pisar <petr.pisar-a4qEbw8STSk@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16135] [BUG] kacpi_notify goes into an infinite loop (luckly it calls cond_resched)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Steven Rostedt, Thomas Renninger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16135
Subject : [BUG] kacpi_notify goes into an infinite loop (luckly it calls cond_resched)
Submitter : Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-05-29 1:01 (23 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fa80945269f312bc609e8384302f58b03c916e12
Message-ID : <1275094882.22648.607.camel-f9ZlEuEWxVcI6MkJdU+c8EEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127509490405845&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16097] 2.6.34 on Samsung P460: reset after "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated"
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Harald Dunkel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16097
Subject : 2.6.34 on Samsung P460: reset after "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated"
Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel-N2c6Q/boOuSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-05-25 9:12 (27 days old)
Message-ID : <4BFB947E.9080509-N2c6Q/boOuSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127477877432254&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16137] Ooops in BTRFS in 2.6.34 / x86_64 when mounting subvolume by name
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, armin walland
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16137
Subject : Ooops in BTRFS in 2.6.34 / x86_64 when mounting subvolume by name
Submitter : armin walland <a.walland@focusmr.com>
Date : 2010-05-27 12:27 (25 days old)
Message-ID : <201005271428.01239.a.walland@focusmr.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127496434110736&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16138] PCMCIA regression
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dominik Brodowski, Mikulas Patocka
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16138
Subject : PCMCIA regression
Submitter : Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Date : 2010-05-25 20:25 (27 days old)
Message-ID : <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005251619020.12278@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127481913909672&w=2
Handled-By : Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26685
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16139] wait_even_interruptible_timeout(), signal, spin_lock() = system hang
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Shirish Pargaonkar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16139
Subject : wait_even_interruptible_timeout(), signal, spin_lock() = system hang
Submitter : Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-05-28 16:44 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTiliRFydAhxH2-Dp1RKuz6sq7vgWIcMvLMi68ftg@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127506510328758&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16139] wait_even_interruptible_timeout(), signal, spin_lock() = system hang
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Shirish Pargaonkar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16139
Subject : wait_even_interruptible_timeout(), signal, spin_lock() = system hang
Submitter : Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-05-28 16:44 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTiliRFydAhxH2-Dp1RKuz6sq7vgWIcMvLMi68ftg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127506510328758&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16170] Leadtek Winfast DTV Dongle (STK7700P based) is not working in 2.6.34
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, macjariel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16170
Subject : Leadtek Winfast DTV Dongle (STK7700P based) is not working in 2.6.34
Submitter : <macjariel@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-09 11:11 (12 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16158] winxp guest hangs after idle for ~30 minutes
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, brimhall
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16158
Subject : winxp guest hangs after idle for ~30 minutes
Submitter : <brimhall@pobox.com>
Date : 2010-06-08 17:52 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16162] SSD + sata_nv + btrfs oops
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dave Airlie
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16162
Subject : SSD + sata_nv + btrfs oops
Submitter : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-01 3:04 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTilqsIdlzZgUf7TMLHYKqHDZoVkcs42vcG8wXKEr@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127536149022333&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16206] PROBLEM: PPP and other serial port related application hangs in kernel space
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Ales Teska
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16206
Subject : PROBLEM: PPP and other serial port related application hangs in kernel space
Submitter : Ales Teska <ales.teska@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-09 20:46 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <900E3B14-5B92-4A37-9581-049DB40F4D1C@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611640301071&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16147] ksoftirq hogs the CPU
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
Corey Minyard, Linus Torvalds, Martin Wilck, Thomas Jarosch
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16147
Subject : ksoftirq hogs the CPU
Submitter : Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
Date : 2010-06-07 15:17 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/ae74e823cb7d4cd476f623fce9a38f625f6c09a8
Handled-By : Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26732
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16170] Leadtek Winfast DTV Dongle (STK7700P based) is not working in 2.6.34
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, macjariel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16170
Subject : Leadtek Winfast DTV Dongle (STK7700P based) is not working in 2.6.34
Submitter : <macjariel@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-06-09 11:11 (12 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16206] PROBLEM: PPP and other serial port related application hangs in kernel space
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Ales Teska
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16206
Subject : PROBLEM: PPP and other serial port related application hangs in kernel space
Submitter : Ales Teska <ales.teska-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-06-09 20:46 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <900E3B14-5B92-4A37-9581-049DB40F4D1C-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611640301071&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16158] winxp guest hangs after idle for ~30 minutes
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, brimhall
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16158
Subject : winxp guest hangs after idle for ~30 minutes
Submitter : <brimhall@pobox.com>
Date : 2010-06-08 17:52 (13 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16207] Suspend hangs since 2.6.34
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Tino Keitel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16207
Subject : Suspend hangs since 2.6.34
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel+xorg@tikei.de>
Date : 2010-06-09 17:53 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <20100609175356.GA17332@x61.home>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610606214060&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16254] TCP stream performance regression due to c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex,Shi, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16254
Subject : TCP stream performance regression due to c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6
Submitter : Alex,Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-06-18 7:17 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6
Message-ID : <1276845448.2118.346.camel@debian>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127684931020672&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16233] Fwd: [2.6.34] INFO: task rsync:20019 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jan De Luyck
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16233
Subject : Fwd: [2.6.34] INFO: task rsync:20019 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Submitter : Jan De Luyck <mailinglists+linuxkernel_20080830@kcore.org>
Date : 2010-06-14 19:49 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTimutyh3WIALv3NIxA8Xt5JtU6tp4EWOnuSqhdyD@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127654498016377&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16233] Fwd: [2.6.34] INFO: task rsync:20019 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jan De Luyck
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16233
Subject : Fwd: [2.6.34] INFO: task rsync:20019 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Submitter : Jan De Luyck <mailinglists+linuxkernel_20080830-gY0FE6dpLprYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-06-14 19:49 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <AANLkTimutyh3WIALv3NIxA8Xt5JtU6tp4EWOnuSqhdyD-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127654498016377&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #16207] Suspend hangs since 2.6.34
@ 2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Tino Keitel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16207
Subject : Suspend hangs since 2.6.34
Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel+xorg-rAwCM5oiXHA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-06-09 17:53 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <20100609175356.GA17332-dW8JlKMZij8@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610606214060&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16054] UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
[not found] ` <AANLkTiks4DUvSLQLHb1Tr6cO_Mma-9UcDRqJ5uafdt1R@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2010-06-21 6:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-06-23 22:28 ` Parag Warudkar
[not found] ` <20100621063552.GA16491-f9CnO7I+Q6zU6FkGJEIX5A@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2010-06-21 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Parag Warudkar
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Maciej Rutecki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
From: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:48:55PM -0400
> Still broken. Borislav's fix on top of git a few days ago doesn't seem to
> cure it.
Everyone else has reported that
http://git.kernel.org/tip/055c47272b8f5679d08ccc57efea3cb4aaeb5fc6 fixes
the boot issue for them.
One problem with testing this patch was making sure you do a completely
clean build by removing the old build files through a 'make mrproper.'
So, after applying this patch do (after having copied your .config to a
safe place :))
make mrproper
and just to make sure no arch_hweight stuff is left, do
grep -EriIn 'x86.*hweight\.h' arch/um/
You shouldn't be getting any matches. If you do, than try to find out
why you do because all those intermediary *.o.cmd files shouldn't
contain any hweight-include files from arch/x86/.
> On Jun 20, 2010 6:45 PM, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16054
> Subject : UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
> Submitter : Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-05-23 21:40 (29 days old)
> Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005231149100.605@parag-laptop>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127465083806617&w=2
> Handled-By : Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Patch :
> http://git.kernel.org/tip/055c47272b8f5679d08ccc57efea3cb4aaeb5fc6
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-21 10:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-06-21 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Sergey Senozhatsky
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2568 bytes --]
On (06/21/10 00:34), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (82 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
>
>
Hello,
[10117.304064] pktgen 2.73: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
[10153.013177] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[10153.013189] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:258 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129()
[10153.013193] Hardware name: F3JC
[10153.013197] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
[10153.013200] Modules linked in: pktgen fuse usb_storage ipv6 snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_hwdep snd_pcm_oss asus_laptop sparse_keymap sdhci_pci sdhci snd_mixer_oss mmc_core led_class
snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel psmouse snd_hda_codec snd_pcm sg snd_timer rng_core i2c_i801 evdev serio_raw snd_page_alloc snd soundcore r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod usbcore cdrom sd_mod ata_piix
[10153.013267] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.35-rc3-dbg-00106-ga75e02b-dirty #57
[10153.013271] Call Trace:
[10153.013279] [<c102e3ba>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7a
[10153.013284] [<c12694af>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
[10153.013290] [<c102e433>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x26/0x2a
[10153.013295] [<c12694af>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
[10153.013302] [<c10370fb>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x22b
[10153.013307] [<c1037154>] run_timer_softirq+0x18f/0x22b
[10153.013312] [<c10370fb>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x22b
[10153.013318] [<c12693ee>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x129
[10153.013324] [<c1032c7d>] __do_softirq+0x88/0x10c
[10153.013330] [<c1032d30>] do_softirq+0x2f/0x47
[10153.013335] [<c1032fed>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75
[10153.013340] [<c10159a8>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5f/0x6d
[10153.013347] [<c12c7192>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c
[10153.013354] [<c104007b>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x24/0x3d
[10153.013360] [<c11dd662>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x117/0x14b
[10153.013367] [<c124691d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x6a/0xa0
[10153.013372] [<c100170d>] cpu_idle+0x89/0xbe
[10153.013379] [<c12c1ce3>] start_secondary+0x1f4/0x1fb
[10153.013384] ---[ end trace 3fa0d4e1d1133bed ]---
[10153.027032] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
[10165.025777] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
Sergey
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
@ 2010-06-21 10:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-06-21 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Sergey Senozhatsky
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2623 bytes --]
On (06/21/10 00:34), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (82 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
>
>
Hello,
[10117.304064] pktgen 2.73: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
[10153.013177] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[10153.013189] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:258 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129()
[10153.013193] Hardware name: F3JC
[10153.013197] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
[10153.013200] Modules linked in: pktgen fuse usb_storage ipv6 snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_hwdep snd_pcm_oss asus_laptop sparse_keymap sdhci_pci sdhci snd_mixer_oss mmc_core led_class
snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel psmouse snd_hda_codec snd_pcm sg snd_timer rng_core i2c_i801 evdev serio_raw snd_page_alloc snd soundcore r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod usbcore cdrom sd_mod ata_piix
[10153.013267] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.35-rc3-dbg-00106-ga75e02b-dirty #57
[10153.013271] Call Trace:
[10153.013279] [<c102e3ba>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7a
[10153.013284] [<c12694af>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
[10153.013290] [<c102e433>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x26/0x2a
[10153.013295] [<c12694af>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
[10153.013302] [<c10370fb>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x22b
[10153.013307] [<c1037154>] run_timer_softirq+0x18f/0x22b
[10153.013312] [<c10370fb>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x22b
[10153.013318] [<c12693ee>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x129
[10153.013324] [<c1032c7d>] __do_softirq+0x88/0x10c
[10153.013330] [<c1032d30>] do_softirq+0x2f/0x47
[10153.013335] [<c1032fed>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75
[10153.013340] [<c10159a8>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5f/0x6d
[10153.013347] [<c12c7192>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c
[10153.013354] [<c104007b>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x24/0x3d
[10153.013360] [<c11dd662>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x117/0x14b
[10153.013367] [<c124691d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x6a/0xa0
[10153.013372] [<c100170d>] cpu_idle+0x89/0xbe
[10153.013379] [<c12c1ce3>] start_secondary+0x1f4/0x1fb
[10153.013384] ---[ end trace 3fa0d4e1d1133bed ]---
[10153.027032] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
[10165.025777] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
Sergey
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-21 15:55 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2010-06-21 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Marcel Holtmann
On Mon 2010-06-21 00:34:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Did not see this one for long long time, so it was probably fixed.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
> Subject : bluetooth oops
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (99 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
> Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops
@ 2010-06-21 15:55 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2010-06-21 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Marcel Holtmann
On Mon 2010-06-21 00:34:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Did not see this one for long long time, so it was probably fixed.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
> Subject : bluetooth oops
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (99 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
> Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel-kz+m5ild9QBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-06-21 18:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-06-21 22:01 ` Pavel Roskin
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 147+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-06-21 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless, linux-bluetooth
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, reinette chatre, j, adobriyan, tj,
Satish Eerpini, Petr Pisar, Pavel Machek
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message contains a list of some post-2.6.33 regressions introduced before
> 2.6.34, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>
> If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.33 regressions, please let us know
> either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
> of the entries below are invalid.
>
> Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
> this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
> issue.
>
>
> Listed regressions statistics:
>
> Date Total Pending Unresolved
> ----------------------------------------
> 2010-06-21 114 36 28
> 2010-06-13 111 40 34
> 2010-05-09 80 27 24
> 2010-05-04 76 26 22
> 2010-04-20 64 35 34
> 2010-04-07 48 35 33
> 2010-03-21 15 13 10
I'm going to just leave in the 802.11, Bluetooth and PCMCIA ones below:
> Unresolved regressions
> ----------------------
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111
> Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
> Submitter : Petr Pisar <petr.pisar@atlas.cz>
> Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
The last entry on this one says we are not sure how to fix this...
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16084
> Subject : iwl3945 bug in 2.6.34
> Submitter : Satish Eerpini <eerpini@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-05-23 6:37 (29 days old)
> Message-ID : <AANLkTik_7rxDBc0TKlAfoYyM5S6Cf_Hyxbr4W5ORnTsq@mail.gmail.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127459596015626&w=2
This is getting some love by Reinette.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
> Subject : bluetooth oops
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (99 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
> Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Pavel, is this still happening or was just spurious on 2.6.34-rc1?
> Regressions with patches
> ------------------------
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16138
> Subject : PCMCIA regression
> Submitter : Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Date : 2010-05-25 20:25 (27 days old)
> Message-ID : <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005251619020.12278@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127481913909672&w=2
> Handled-By : Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26685
Linville, are you to get PCMCIA stuff now? Anyway Rafael, please
remove this, this is fixed.
> For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
> references.
>
> As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
> There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
> between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310
>
> Please let the tracking teak know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
> should be added to the list in there.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
@ 2010-06-21 18:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Senozhatsky
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Monday, June 21, 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/21/10 00:34), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> > Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (82 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
> >
> >
>
> Hello,
>
> [10117.304064] pktgen 2.73: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
> [10153.013177] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [10153.013189] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:258 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129()
> [10153.013193] Hardware name: F3JC
> [10153.013197] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
> [10153.013200] Modules linked in: pktgen fuse usb_storage ipv6 snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_hwdep snd_pcm_oss asus_laptop sparse_keymap sdhci_pci sdhci snd_mixer_oss mmc_core led_class
> snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel psmouse snd_hda_codec snd_pcm sg snd_timer rng_core i2c_i801 evdev serio_raw snd_page_alloc snd soundcore r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod usbcore cdrom sd_mod ata_piix
> [10153.013267] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.35-rc3-dbg-00106-ga75e02b-dirty #57
> [10153.013271] Call Trace:
> [10153.013279] [<c102e3ba>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7a
> [10153.013284] [<c12694af>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
> [10153.013290] [<c102e433>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x26/0x2a
> [10153.013295] [<c12694af>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
> [10153.013302] [<c10370fb>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x22b
> [10153.013307] [<c1037154>] run_timer_softirq+0x18f/0x22b
> [10153.013312] [<c10370fb>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x22b
> [10153.013318] [<c12693ee>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x129
> [10153.013324] [<c1032c7d>] __do_softirq+0x88/0x10c
> [10153.013330] [<c1032d30>] do_softirq+0x2f/0x47
> [10153.013335] [<c1032fed>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75
> [10153.013340] [<c10159a8>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5f/0x6d
> [10153.013347] [<c12c7192>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c
> [10153.013354] [<c104007b>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x24/0x3d
> [10153.013360] [<c11dd662>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x117/0x14b
> [10153.013367] [<c124691d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x6a/0xa0
> [10153.013372] [<c100170d>] cpu_idle+0x89/0xbe
> [10153.013379] [<c12c1ce3>] start_secondary+0x1f4/0x1fb
> [10153.013384] ---[ end trace 3fa0d4e1d1133bed ]---
> [10153.027032] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [10165.025777] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
@ 2010-06-21 18:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Senozhatsky
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Monday, June 21, 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/21/10 00:34), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> > Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (82 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
> >
> >
>
> Hello,
>
> [10117.304064] pktgen 2.73: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
> [10153.013177] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [10153.013189] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:258 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129()
> [10153.013193] Hardware name: F3JC
> [10153.013197] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
> [10153.013200] Modules linked in: pktgen fuse usb_storage ipv6 snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_hwdep snd_pcm_oss asus_laptop sparse_keymap sdhci_pci sdhci snd_mixer_oss mmc_core led_class
> snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel psmouse snd_hda_codec snd_pcm sg snd_timer rng_core i2c_i801 evdev serio_raw snd_page_alloc snd soundcore r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod usbcore cdrom sd_mod ata_piix
> [10153.013267] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.35-rc3-dbg-00106-ga75e02b-dirty #57
> [10153.013271] Call Trace:
> [10153.013279] [<c102e3ba>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7a
> [10153.013284] [<c12694af>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
> [10153.013290] [<c102e433>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x26/0x2a
> [10153.013295] [<c12694af>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
> [10153.013302] [<c10370fb>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x22b
> [10153.013307] [<c1037154>] run_timer_softirq+0x18f/0x22b
> [10153.013312] [<c10370fb>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x22b
> [10153.013318] [<c12693ee>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x129
> [10153.013324] [<c1032c7d>] __do_softirq+0x88/0x10c
> [10153.013330] [<c1032d30>] do_softirq+0x2f/0x47
> [10153.013335] [<c1032fed>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75
> [10153.013340] [<c10159a8>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5f/0x6d
> [10153.013347] [<c12c7192>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c
> [10153.013354] [<c104007b>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x24/0x3d
> [10153.013360] [<c11dd662>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x117/0x14b
> [10153.013367] [<c124691d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x6a/0xa0
> [10153.013372] [<c100170d>] cpu_idle+0x89/0xbe
> [10153.013379] [<c12c1ce3>] start_secondary+0x1f4/0x1fb
> [10153.013384] ---[ end trace 3fa0d4e1d1133bed ]---
> [10153.027032] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [10165.025777] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34
2010-06-21 18:32 ` 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2010-06-21 22:01 ` Pavel Roskin
2010-06-21 22:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 147+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Roskin @ 2010-06-21 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: linux-wireless, Rafael J. Wysocki, j, Tim Gardner
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:32 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111
> > Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
> > Submitter : Petr Pisar <petr.pisar@atlas.cz>
> > Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
>
> The last entry on this one says we are not sure how to fix this...
That was a patch posted for that by Tim Gardner:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105008/
The patch is applied to wireless-testing
(d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46)
$ git describe d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46
v2.6.34-4694-gd6a574f
I understand it was applied after 2.6.34, so it should be backported to
2.6.34 and whatever older kernels are affected.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34
2010-06-21 22:01 ` Pavel Roskin
@ 2010-06-21 22:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-06-22 0:14 ` Tim Gardner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 147+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-06-21 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Roskin; +Cc: linux-wireless, Rafael J. Wysocki, j, Tim Gardner
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:32 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111
>> > Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
>> > Submitter : Petr Pisar <petr.pisar@atlas.cz>
>> > Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
>>
>> The last entry on this one says we are not sure how to fix this...
>
> That was a patch posted for that by Tim Gardner:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105008/
>
> The patch is applied to wireless-testing
> (d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46)
>
> $ git describe d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46
> v2.6.34-4694-gd6a574f
>
> I understand it was applied after 2.6.34, so it should be backported to
> 2.6.34 and whatever older kernels are affected.
Tim can this be sent for stable?
Luis, a stable whore
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2010-06-21 22:19 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-06-21 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 147+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-06-21 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1155 bytes --]
Hi
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
> Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
At least the effects on b2c2-flexcop-pci are still valid, in linux-2.6
HEAD and linux-next (next-20100621).
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-21 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
> > Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> > Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> > Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
> > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
>
> At least the effects on b2c2-flexcop-pci are still valid, in linux-2.6
> HEAD and linux-next (next-20100621).
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-21 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
> > Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> > Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>
> > Jindøich Makovièka <makovick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
> > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
>
> At least the effects on b2c2-flexcop-pci are still valid, in linux-2.6
> HEAD and linux-next (next-20100621).
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34
2010-06-21 22:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2010-06-22 0:14 ` Tim Gardner
2010-06-22 0:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 147+ messages in thread
From: Tim Gardner @ 2010-06-22 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: Pavel Roskin, linux-wireless, Rafael J. Wysocki, j
On 06/21/2010 04:18 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Pavel Roskin<proski@gnu.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:32 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111
>>>> Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
>>>> Submitter : Petr Pisar<petr.pisar@atlas.cz>
>>>> Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
>>>
>>> The last entry on this one says we are not sure how to fix this...
>>
>> That was a patch posted for that by Tim Gardner:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105008/
>>
>> The patch is applied to wireless-testing
>> (d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46)
>>
>> $ git describe d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46
>> v2.6.34-4694-gd6a574f
>>
>> I understand it was applied after 2.6.34, so it should be backported to
>> 2.6.34 and whatever older kernels are affected.
>
> Tim can this be sent for stable?
>
> Luis, a stable whore
>
Luis,
The patch that I sent John is already Cc stable@kernel.org, though it
may not now apply after 56bf882230d2266a2e07b7f404dc96d157a65daa 'Revert
"wireless: hostap, fix oops due to early probing interrupt"'. I'll check
in the morning and craft a backported patch if necessary.
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34
2010-06-22 0:14 ` Tim Gardner
@ 2010-06-22 0:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-06-22 19:36 ` Tim Gardner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 147+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-06-22 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tim.gardner; +Cc: Pavel Roskin, linux-wireless, Rafael J. Wysocki, j
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com> wrote:
> On 06/21/2010 04:18 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Pavel Roskin<proski@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:32 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111
>>>>> Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
>>>>> Submitter : Petr Pisar<petr.pisar@atlas.cz>
>>>>> Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
>>>>
>>>> The last entry on this one says we are not sure how to fix this...
>>>
>>> That was a patch posted for that by Tim Gardner:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105008/
>>>
>>> The patch is applied to wireless-testing
>>> (d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46)
>>>
>>> $ git describe d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46
>>> v2.6.34-4694-gd6a574f
>>>
>>> I understand it was applied after 2.6.34, so it should be backported to
>>> 2.6.34 and whatever older kernels are affected.
>>
>> Tim can this be sent for stable?
>>
>> Luis, a stable whore
>>
>
> Luis,
>
> The patch that I sent John is already Cc stable@kernel.org, though it may
> not now apply after 56bf882230d2266a2e07b7f404dc96d157a65daa 'Revert
> "wireless: hostap, fix oops due to early probing interrupt"'. I'll check in
> the morning and craft a backported patch if necessary.
Sweet thanks for the heads up!
Luis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops
@ 2010-06-22 13:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-22 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Marcel Holtmann
On Monday, June 21, 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2010-06-21 00:34:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
> Did not see this one for long long time, so it was probably fixed.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops
@ 2010-06-22 13:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-22 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Marcel Holtmann
On Monday, June 21, 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2010-06-21 00:34:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
> Did not see this one for long long time, so it was probably fixed.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34
2010-06-22 0:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2010-06-22 19:36 ` Tim Gardner
2010-06-28 18:22 ` Tim Gardner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 147+ messages in thread
From: Tim Gardner @ 2010-06-22 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: Pavel Roskin, linux-wireless, Rafael J. Wysocki, j
On 06/21/2010 06:26 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Tim Gardner<tim.gardner@canonical.com> wrote:
>> On 06/21/2010 04:18 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Pavel Roskin<proski@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:32 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111
>>>>>> Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
>>>>>> Submitter : Petr Pisar<petr.pisar@atlas.cz>
>>>>>> Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
>>>>>
>>>>> The last entry on this one says we are not sure how to fix this...
>>>>
>>>> That was a patch posted for that by Tim Gardner:
>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105008/
>>>>
>>>> The patch is applied to wireless-testing
>>>> (d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46)
>>>>
>>>> $ git describe d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46
>>>> v2.6.34-4694-gd6a574f
>>>>
>>>> I understand it was applied after 2.6.34, so it should be backported to
>>>> 2.6.34 and whatever older kernels are affected.
>>>
>>> Tim can this be sent for stable?
>>>
>>> Luis, a stable whore
>>>
>>
>> Luis,
>>
>> The patch that I sent John is already Cc stable@kernel.org, though it may
>> not now apply after 56bf882230d2266a2e07b7f404dc96d157a65daa 'Revert
>> "wireless: hostap, fix oops due to early probing interrupt"'. I'll check in
>> the morning and craft a backported patch if necessary.
>
> Sweet thanks for the heads up!
>
> Luis
>
Hmm, looks like I'm gonna have to write some backport patches. I'll wait
until this appears in Linus' tree so I can feed stable the right SHA1 info.
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-22 21:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-06-22 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Miles Lane
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
We have been knocking these off as they appear. There is one or two
that the relevant maintainers have been ignoring, but that always seems
to be the case. ;-)
Your choice as to whether you want to track the group...
Thanx, Paul
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
> Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (55 days old)
> Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
> Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/96096/
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
@ 2010-06-22 21:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-06-22 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Miles Lane
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
We have been knocking these off as they appear. There is one or two
that the relevant maintainers have been ignoring, but that always seems
to be the case. ;-)
Your choice as to whether you want to track the group...
Thanx, Paul
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
> Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (55 days old)
> Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
> Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/96096/
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
@ 2010-06-22 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-22 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Miles Lane
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
> We have been knocking these off as they appear. There is one or two
> that the relevant maintainers have been ignoring, but that always seems
> to be the case. ;-)
>
> Your choice as to whether you want to track the group...
I think I'll simply leave that one bug open until all known instances have been
dealt with.
Please let me know when that happens. :-)
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
@ 2010-06-22 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-22 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Miles Lane
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
> We have been knocking these off as they appear. There is one or two
> that the relevant maintainers have been ignoring, but that always seems
> to be the case. ;-)
>
> Your choice as to whether you want to track the group...
I think I'll simply leave that one bug open until all known instances have been
dealt with.
Please let me know when that happens. :-)
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
@ 2010-06-22 22:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-06-22 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Miles Lane
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:49:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> > We have been knocking these off as they appear. There is one or two
> > that the relevant maintainers have been ignoring, but that always seems
> > to be the case. ;-)
> >
> > Your choice as to whether you want to track the group...
>
> I think I'll simply leave that one bug open until all known instances have been
> dealt with.
>
> Please let me know when that happens. :-)
So if I am sufficiently forgetful, I can just ask you to close the
bug immediately?
Sorry, but you really couldn't expect me to pass up that kind of
loophole! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
@ 2010-06-22 22:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-06-22 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Miles Lane
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:49:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> > We have been knocking these off as they appear. There is one or two
> > that the relevant maintainers have been ignoring, but that always seems
> > to be the case. ;-)
> >
> > Your choice as to whether you want to track the group...
>
> I think I'll simply leave that one bug open until all known instances have been
> dealt with.
>
> Please let me know when that happens. :-)
So if I am sufficiently forgetful, I can just ask you to close the
bug immediately?
Sorry, but you really couldn't expect me to pass up that kind of
loophole! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
@ 2010-06-23 0:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-23 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Miles Lane
On Wednesday, June 23, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:49:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> > > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > >
> > > We have been knocking these off as they appear. There is one or two
> > > that the relevant maintainers have been ignoring, but that always seems
> > > to be the case. ;-)
> > >
> > > Your choice as to whether you want to track the group...
> >
> > I think I'll simply leave that one bug open until all known instances have been
> > dealt with.
> >
> > Please let me know when that happens. :-)
>
> So if I am sufficiently forgetful, I can just ask you to close the
> bug immediately?
>
> Sorry, but you really couldn't expect me to pass up that kind of
> loophole! ;-)
OK, closed.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
@ 2010-06-23 0:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-23 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Miles Lane
On Wednesday, June 23, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:49:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> > > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > >
> > > We have been knocking these off as they appear. There is one or two
> > > that the relevant maintainers have been ignoring, but that always seems
> > > to be the case. ;-)
> > >
> > > Your choice as to whether you want to track the group...
> >
> > I think I'll simply leave that one bug open until all known instances have been
> > dealt with.
> >
> > Please let me know when that happens. :-)
>
> So if I am sufficiently forgetful, I can just ask you to close the
> bug immediately?
>
> Sorry, but you really couldn't expect me to pass up that kind of
> loophole! ;-)
OK, closed.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16054] UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
2010-06-21 6:35 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2010-06-23 22:28 ` Parag Warudkar
[not found] ` <20100621063552.GA16491-f9CnO7I+Q6zU6FkGJEIX5A@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Parag Warudkar @ 2010-06-23 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Parag Warudkar, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Maciej Rutecki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> From: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:48:55PM -0400
> make mrproper
>
> and just to make sure no arch_hweight stuff is left, do
>
> grep -EriIn 'x86.*hweight\.h' arch/um/
>
> You shouldn't be getting any matches. If you do, than try to find out
> why you do because all those intermediary *.o.cmd files shouldn't
> contain any hweight-include files from arch/x86/.
>
Ok. That solves the cfq related crash due to hweight stuff. However
the second issue - UM is broken for CONFIG_SLAB still exists.
So I think we can keep the bug open.
Thanks
Parag
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #16054] UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
[not found] ` <20100621063552.GA16491-f9CnO7I+Q6zU6FkGJEIX5A@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-06-23 22:28 ` Parag Warudkar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Parag Warudkar @ 2010-06-23 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Parag Warudkar, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Maciej Rutecki, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> From: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:48:55PM -0400
> make mrproper
>
> and just to make sure no arch_hweight stuff is left, do
>
> grep -EriIn 'x86.*hweight\.h' arch/um/
>
> You shouldn't be getting any matches. If you do, than try to find out
> why you do because all those intermediary *.o.cmd files shouldn't
> contain any hweight-include files from arch/x86/.
>
Ok. That solves the cfq related crash due to hweight stuff. However
the second issue - UM is broken for CONFIG_SLAB still exists.
So I think we can keep the bug open.
Thanks
Parag
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
(?)
@ 2010-06-26 1:04 ` Christian Kujau
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-06-26 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Jindřich Makovička, Michael Ellerman, Grant Likely,
Alexey Dobriyan
Sorry for the late reply:
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 at 00:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Yes, the bug is still present in 2.6.34 and .35-rc3, but a tested patch is
available, hopefully to be included in 2.6.35.
Thanks,
Christian.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
> Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
--
BOFH excuse #302:
microelectronic Riemannian curved-space fault in write-only file system
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34
2010-06-22 19:36 ` Tim Gardner
@ 2010-06-28 18:22 ` Tim Gardner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Tim Gardner @ 2010-06-28 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: Pavel Roskin, linux-wireless, Rafael J. Wysocki, j
On 06/22/2010 01:36 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 06/21/2010 06:26 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Tim
>> Gardner<tim.gardner@canonical.com> wrote:
>>> On 06/21/2010 04:18 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Pavel Roskin<proski@gnu.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:32 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bug-Entry :
>>>>>>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111 Subject
>>>>>>> : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0
>>>>>>> Submitter : Petr Pisar<petr.pisar@atlas.cz> Date :
>>>>>>> 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The last entry on this one says we are not sure how to fix
>>>>>> this...
>>>>>
>>>>> That was a patch posted for that by Tim Gardner:
>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105008/
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch is applied to wireless-testing
>>>>> (d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46)
>>>>>
>>>>> $ git describe d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46
>>>>> v2.6.34-4694-gd6a574f
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand it was applied after 2.6.34, so it should be
>>>>> backported to 2.6.34 and whatever older kernels are
>>>>> affected.
>>>>
>>>> Tim can this be sent for stable?
>>>>
>>>> Luis, a stable whore
>>>>
>>>
>>> Luis,
>>>
>>> The patch that I sent John is already Cc stable@kernel.org,
>>> though it may not now apply after
>>> 56bf882230d2266a2e07b7f404dc96d157a65daa 'Revert "wireless:
>>> hostap, fix oops due to early probing interrupt"'. I'll check in
>>> the morning and craft a backported patch if necessary.
>>
>> Sweet thanks for the heads up!
>>
>> Luis
>>
>
> Hmm, looks like I'm gonna have to write some backport patches. I'll
> wait until this appears in Linus' tree so I can feed stable the right
> SHA1 info.
>
> rtg
I sent 4 backport patches (from commit
d6a574ff6bfb842bdb98065da053881ff527be46) to stable@kernel.org;
2.6.27.y, 2.6.32.y, 2.6.33.y, and 2.6.34.y. Unfortunately they all
required unique patches in order to cleanly apply since there seemed to
be some fiddling around with driver specific card services macros from
version to version.
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan
@ 2010-06-14 15:42 ` Grant Likely
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-14 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Dobriyan
Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt
>> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
>
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()
I think we've crossed wires. By second patch I mean the patch that
changes OF code. That change has absolutely no bearing on the
flexcop-pci driver. The patch to the flexcop-pci driver looks correct
to me, but it is completely unrelated to the OF badness.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-14 15:42 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-14 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Dobriyan
Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt
>> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
>
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()
I think we've crossed wires. By second patch I mean the patch that
changes OF code. That change has absolutely no bearing on the
flexcop-pci driver. The patch to the flexcop-pci driver looks correct
to me, but it is completely unrelated to the OF badness.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan
@ 2010-06-14 12:27 ` Jindrich Makovicka
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Jindrich Makovicka @ 2010-06-14 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: kernel-testers, linux-media
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:39:48 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I
> > doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
>
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()
Yes, the latter patch dodges the issue with flexcop driver by simply
skipping the directory creation, but both patches should be applied IMO.
The former to fix the flexcop driver because we can trivially fix it,
the latter to solve problems with any generic bogus firmware.
--
Jindrich Makovicka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-14 12:27 ` Jindrich Makovicka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Jindrich Makovicka @ 2010-06-14 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-media; +Cc: kernel-testers, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, linux-media
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:39:48 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I
> > doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
>
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()
Yes, the latter patch dodges the issue with flexcop driver by simply
skipping the directory creation, but both patches should be applied IMO.
The former to fix the flexcop driver because we can trivially fix it,
the latter to solve problems with any generic bogus firmware.
--
Jindrich Makovicka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-06-14 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely
Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt
> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-06-14 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely
Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt
> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 19:57 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-13 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
>> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
>
> So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues?
>
> * http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
> ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver.
>
> * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
> ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their
> name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go
> away too.
>
> Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that
> Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually.
On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt
the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. I'll pick up the
device tree patch, but the flexcop-pci patch should go in by the
v4l/dvb tree.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 19:57 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-13 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
>> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
>
> So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues?
>
> * http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
> ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver.
>
> * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
> ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their
> name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go
> away too.
>
> Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that
> Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually.
On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt
the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. I'll pick up the
device tree patch, but the flexcop-pci patch should go in by the
v4l/dvb tree.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 18:10 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-06-13 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman,
linux-media, mchehab
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues?
* http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver.
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their
name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go
away too.
Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that
Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually.
Thanks,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #363:
Out of cards on drive D:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 18:10 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-06-13 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman,
linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues?
* http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver.
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their
name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go
away too.
Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that
Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually.
Thanks,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #363:
Out of cards on drive D:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-06-13 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-13 15:22 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-06-13 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old)
> Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
From: Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] DVB flexcop-pci: sanitize driver name to avoid warning on load
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:51:30 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>
URL: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 15:22 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-06-13 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman,
linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old)
> Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
From: Jindřich Makovička <makovick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH] DVB flexcop-pci: sanitize driver name to avoid warning on load
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:51:30 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom>
URL: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-06-13 14:45 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-13 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old)
Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old)
Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau
(?)
@ 2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-05-09 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, adobriyan, schwab,
linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 922 bytes --]
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
>
> The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0]
> which made the warning go away.
>
> @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be
> pushed into mainline?
No, Benh and I decided it's better to just drop those properties all
together. But it's too late in this cycle for a patch like that just to
fix a warning - so we'll do that patch for 35.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-05-09 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev,
schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 922 bytes --]
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
>
> The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0]
> which made the warning go away.
>
> @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be
> pushed into mainline?
No, Benh and I decided it's better to just drop those properties all
together. But it's too late in this cycle for a patch like that just to
fix a warning - so we'll do that patch for 35.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-05-09 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 977 bytes --]
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
>
> The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0]
> which made the warning go away.
>
> @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be
> pushed into mainline?
No, Benh and I decided it's better to just drop those properties all
together. But it's too late in this cycle for a patch like that just to
fix a warning - so we'll do that patch for 35.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-05-09 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-05-09 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
adobriyan, schwab, michael, linuxppc-dev
On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0]
which made the warning go away.
@Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be
pushed into mainline?
Thanks,
Christian.
[0] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50557/
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
return fixed_name;
}
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+ char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+ fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!fixed_name) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+ "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ p = fixed_name;
+ while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+ *p++ = '_';
+
+ return fixed_name;
+}
+
/*
* Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
*/
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
if (duplicate_name(de, p))
p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
+ if (strstr(p, "/"))
+ p = unslash_name(p);
+
ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
if (ent == NULL)
break;
--
BOFH excuse #188:
..disk or the processor is on fire.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-05-09 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab,
Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0]
which made the warning go away.
@Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be
pushed into mainline?
Thanks,
Christian.
[0] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50557/
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
return fixed_name;
}
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+ char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+ fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!fixed_name) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+ "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ p = fixed_name;
+ while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+ *p++ = '_';
+
+ return fixed_name;
+}
+
/*
* Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
*/
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
if (duplicate_name(de, p))
p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
+ if (strstr(p, "/"))
+ p = unslash_name(p);
+
ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
if (ent == NULL)
break;
--
BOFH excuse #188:
..disk or the processor is on fire.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-05-09 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g,
michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A
On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0]
which made the warning go away.
@Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be
pushed into mainline?
Thanks,
Christian.
[0] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50557/
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
return fixed_name;
}
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+ char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+ fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!fixed_name) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+ "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ p = fixed_name;
+ while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+ *p++ = '_';
+
+ return fixed_name;
+}
+
/*
* Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
*/
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
if (duplicate_name(de, p))
p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
+ if (strstr(p, "/"))
+ p = unslash_name(p);
+
ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
if (ent == NULL)
break;
--
BOFH excuse #188:
..disk or the processor is on fire.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-05-09 21:13 2.6.34-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-09 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-09 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-09 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-09 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, linux-media
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
>
> Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:
>
> [ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
> [ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
> [ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
> [ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
> [ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
> [ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
> [ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
> [ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
> [ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> [ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
> [ 8.818833] Call Trace:
> [ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
> [ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
> [ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
> [ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
> [ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
> [ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
> [ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
> [ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
> [ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
> [ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
> [ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
> [ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
> [ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
> [ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
> [ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
> [ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
> [ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
> [ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
> [ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
> [ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
> [ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
> [ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
> [ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
>
> Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:
>
> [ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
> [ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
> [ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
> [ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
> [ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
> [ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
> [ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
> [ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
> [ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> [ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
> [ 8.818833] Call Trace:
> [ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
> [ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
> [ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
> [ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
> [ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
> [ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
> [ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
> [ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
> [ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
> [ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
> [ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
> [ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
> [ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
> [ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
> [ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
> [ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
> [ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
> [ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
> [ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
> [ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
> [ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
> [ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
> [ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-05-05 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, linux-media
Hi
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:
[ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
[ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
[ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
[ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
[ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
[ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
[ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
[ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
[ 8.818833] Call Trace:
[ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
[ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
[ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
[ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
[ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
[ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
[ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
[ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
[ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
[ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
[ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
[ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
[ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
[ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
[ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
[ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
[ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
[ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
[ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
[ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
[ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
[ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
[ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-05-05 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Hi
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:
[ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
[ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
[ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
[ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
[ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
[ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
[ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
[ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
[ 8.818833] Call Trace:
[ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
[ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
[ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
[ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
[ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
[ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
[ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
[ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
[ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
[ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
[ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
[ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
[ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
[ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
[ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
[ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
[ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
[ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
[ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
[ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
[ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
[ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
[ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-05-04 20:49 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
(?)
@ 2010-04-30 2:44 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-04-30 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, linux-media, Trent Piepho
Hi
On Friday 30 April 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
This also continues to be a problem with b2c2-flexcop and 2.6.34-rc5-git10:
[ 10.119807] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
[ 10.129183] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
[ 10.129187] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
[ 10.129195] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[ 10.129239] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 10.129244] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc5/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
[ 10.129246] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
[ 10.129247] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
[ 10.129248] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) ath9k_common b2c2_flexcop v4l1_compat snd_timer radeon(+) dvb_core ar9170usb(+) ath9k_hw snd_seq_device ir_common tveeprom ttm v4l2_compat_ioctl32 snd drm_kms_helper ir_core ath mac80211 soundcore videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 drm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc videobuf_core cx24113 s5h1420 cfg80211 rfkill evdev i2c_core tpm_tis btcx_risc tpm led_class pcspkr tpm_bios rtc_cmos button rtc_core intel_agp rtc_lib processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd firewire_ohci firewire_core ahci r8169 ehci_hcd mii libata crc_itu_t scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 10.129279] Pid: 1124, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5-sidux-amd64 #1
[ 10.129281] Call Trace:
[ 10.129285] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
[ 10.129287] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
[ 10.129290] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
[ 10.129292] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
[ 10.129294] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
[ 10.129297] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
[ 10.129300] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
[ 10.129303] [<ffffffffa011b160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 10.129305] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
[ 10.129308] [<ffffffffa011b495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 10.129312] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
[ 10.129314] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
[ 10.129317] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
[ 10.129320] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
[ 10.129322] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
[ 10.129324] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
[ 10.129326] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
[ 10.129328] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
[ 10.129330] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
[ 10.129332] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
[ 10.129335] [<ffffffffa012e000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 10.129338] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
[ 10.129341] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
[ 10.129344] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 10.129345] ---[ end trace 370a62256537c67a ]---
[ 10.134144] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
[ 10.135610] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
(?)
@ 2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-21 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> return fixed_name;
> }
>
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> + char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> + if (!fixed_name) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> + return name;
> + }
> +
> + p = fixed_name;
> + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> + *p++ = '_';
This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-21 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki,
linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> return fixed_name;
> }
>
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> + char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> + if (!fixed_name) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> + return name;
> + }
> +
> + p = fixed_name;
> + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> + *p++ = '_';
This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman
(?)
@ 2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-21 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: michael
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan, Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> > > return fixed_name;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > > +{
> > > + char *p, *fixed_name;
> > > +
> > > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > > + if (!fixed_name) {
> > > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > > + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > > + return name;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + p = fixed_name;
> > > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > > + *p++ = '_';
> >
> > This is wasteful. :-)
>
> Whatever, patches welcome :)
>
> > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
>
> We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
> it or something.
OK
Is anyone going to post a clean patch for that with a sign-off?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-21 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: michael
Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab,
Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> > > return fixed_name;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > > +{
> > > + char *p, *fixed_name;
> > > +
> > > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > > + if (!fixed_name) {
> > > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > > + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > > + return name;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + p = fixed_name;
> > > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > > + *p++ = '_';
> >
> > This is wasteful. :-)
>
> Whatever, patches welcome :)
>
> > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
>
> We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
> it or something.
OK
Is anyone going to post a clean patch for that with a sign-off?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-21 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan, Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> > > return fixed_name;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > > +{
> > > + char *p, *fixed_name;
> > > +
> > > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > > + if (!fixed_name) {
> > > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > > + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > > + return name;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + p = fixed_name;
> > > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > > + *p++ = '_';
> >
> > This is wasteful. :-)
>
> Whatever, patches welcome :)
>
> > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
>
> We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
> it or something.
OK
Is anyone going to post a clean patch for that with a sign-off?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau
(?)
@ 2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev,
schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --]
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:15 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
>
> I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
>
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
> make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
> make: *** [fs] Error 2
Yeah oops, told you I hadn't built it.
> And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks!
> New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:
>
> http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/
Cool, and we see:
./uni-n@f8000000/i2c@f8001000/i2c-bus@1/fan@5c/pulses_rev
Which is the one that needed fixing.
> Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower?
> I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the
> warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\
Maybe a little. It has to check every string to see if it contains a
"/". But then you save the cost of taking an exeception for the WARN,
which might make up the difference. But it's a one time fixup at boot,
so it's not going to be noticeable.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev,
schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --]
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:15 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
>
> I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
>
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
> make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
> make: *** [fs] Error 2
Yeah oops, told you I hadn't built it.
> And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks!
> New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:
>
> http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/
Cool, and we see:
./uni-n@f8000000/i2c@f8001000/i2c-bus@1/fan@5c/pulses_rev
Which is the one that needed fixing.
> Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower?
> I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the
> warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\
Maybe a little. It has to check every string to see if it contains a
"/". But then you save the cost of taking an exeception for the WARN,
which might make up the difference. But it's a one time fixup at boot,
so it's not going to be noticeable.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --]
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:15 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
>
> I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
>
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
> make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
> make: *** [fs] Error 2
Yeah oops, told you I hadn't built it.
> And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks!
> New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:
>
> http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/
Cool, and we see:
./uni-n@f8000000/i2c@f8001000/i2c-bus@1/fan@5c/pulses_rev
Which is the one that needed fixing.
> Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower?
> I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the
> warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\
Maybe a little. It has to check every string to see if it contains a
"/". But then you save the cost of taking an exeception for the WARN,
which might make up the difference. But it's a one time fixup at boot,
so it's not going to be noticeable.
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
(?)
@ 2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Dobriyan
Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --]
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> > return fixed_name;
> > }
> >
> > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > +{
> > + char *p, *fixed_name;
> > +
> > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > + if (!fixed_name) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > + return name;
> > + }
> > +
> > + p = fixed_name;
> > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > + *p++ = '_';
>
> This is wasteful. :-)
Whatever, patches welcome :)
> Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
it or something.
The error handling in there is a bit dubious, if the alloc fails we just
return the old name, which we know is bogus. It should probably return
NULL and the calling code can check - same for fixup_name().
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Dobriyan
Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki,
linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --]
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> > return fixed_name;
> > }
> >
> > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > +{
> > + char *p, *fixed_name;
> > +
> > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > + if (!fixed_name) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > + return name;
> > + }
> > +
> > + p = fixed_name;
> > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > + *p++ = '_';
>
> This is wasteful. :-)
Whatever, patches welcome :)
> Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
it or something.
The error handling in there is a bit dubious, if the alloc fails we just
return the old name, which we know is bogus. It should probably return
NULL and the calling code can check - same for fixup_name().
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Dobriyan
Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --]
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> > return fixed_name;
> > }
> >
> > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > +{
> > + char *p, *fixed_name;
> > +
> > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > + if (!fixed_name) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > + return name;
> > + }
> > +
> > + p = fixed_name;
> > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > + *p++ = '_';
>
> This is wasteful. :-)
Whatever, patches welcome :)
> Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
it or something.
The error handling in there is a bit dubious, if the alloc fails we just
return the old name, which we know is bogus. It should probably return
NULL and the calling code can check - same for fixup_name().
cheers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau
(?)
@ 2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-04-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> writes:
> + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
You want to use strchr.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-04-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev,
Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> writes:
> + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
You want to use strchr.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-04-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A, Kernel Testers List,
adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki
Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> writes:
> + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
You want to use strchr.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
(?)
@ 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev,
schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2
And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks!
New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:
http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/
Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower?
I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the
warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\
Thanks again,
Christian.
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
return fixed_name;
}
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+ char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+ fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!fixed_name) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+ "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ p = fixed_name;
+ while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+ *p++ = '_';
+
+ return fixed_name;
+}
+
/*
* Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
*/
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
if (duplicate_name(de, p))
p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
+ if (strstr(p, "/"))
+ p = unslash_name(p);
+
ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
if (ent == NULL)
break;
--
BOFH excuse #369:
Virus transmitted from computer to sysadmins.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev,
schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function =E2=80=98unslash_name=E2=80=99:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function =E2=80=98k=
strdup=E2=80=99
make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2
And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks!=20
New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:
http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/
Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower?=
=20
I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the=20
warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\
Thanks again,
Christian.
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
=09return fixed_name;
}
=20
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+=09char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+=09fixed_name =3D kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+=09if (!fixed_name) {
+=09=09printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+=09=09=09=09"name \"%s\"\n", name);
+=09return name;
+=09}
+
+=09p =3D fixed_name;
+=09while ((p =3D strstr(p, "/")))
+=09=09*p++ =3D '_';
+
+=09return fixed_name;
+}
+
/*
* Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
*/
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
=09=09if (duplicate_name(de, p))
=09=09=09p =3D fixup_name(np, de, p);
=20
+=09=09if (strstr(p, "/"))
+=09=09=09p =3D unslash_name(p);
+
=09=09ent =3D __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
=09=09if (ent =3D=3D NULL)
=09=09=09break;
--=20
BOFH excuse #369:
Virus transmitted from computer to sysadmins.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2
And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks!
New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:
http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/
Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower?
I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the
warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\
Thanks again,
Christian.
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
return fixed_name;
}
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+ char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+ fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!fixed_name) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+ "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ p = fixed_name;
+ while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+ *p++ = '_';
+
+ return fixed_name;
+}
+
/*
* Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
*/
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
if (duplicate_name(de, p))
p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
+ if (strstr(p, "/"))
+ p = unslash_name(p);
+
ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
if (ent == NULL)
break;
--
BOFH excuse #369:
Virus transmitted from computer to sysadmins.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki,
linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> return fixed_name;
> }
>
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> + char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> + if (!fixed_name) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> + return name;
> + }
> +
> + p = fixed_name;
> + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> + *p++ = '_';
This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki,
linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> return fixed_name;
> }
>
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> + char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> + if (!fixed_name) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> + return name;
> + }
> +
> + p = fixed_name;
> + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> + *p++ = '_';
This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
(?)
(?)
@ 2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> return fixed_name;
> }
>
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> + char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> + if (!fixed_name) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> + return name;
> + }
> +
> + p = fixed_name;
> + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> + *p++ = '_';
This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> return fixed_name;
> }
>
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> + char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> + fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> + if (!fixed_name) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> + "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> + return name;
> + }
> +
> + p = fixed_name;
> + while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> + *p++ = '_';
This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau
(?)
@ 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev,
schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
>
> Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is
> still printed during boot:
>
>
> device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
> name 'pulses/rev'
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
Don't cut here, sigh.
> Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317
Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
cheers
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index f8650dc..9502b48 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
return fixed_name;
}
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+ char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+ fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
+ if (!fixed_name) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+ "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ p = fixed_name;
+ while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+ *p++ = '_';
+
+ return fixed_name;
+}
+
/*
* Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
*/
@@ -211,6 +229,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
if (duplicate_name(de, p))
p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
+ if (strstr(p, "/"))
+ p = unslash_name(p);
+
ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
if (ent == NULL)
break;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev,
schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
>
> Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is
> still printed during boot:
>
>
> device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
> name 'pulses/rev'
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
Don't cut here, sigh.
> Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317
Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
cheers
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index f8650dc..9502b48 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
return fixed_name;
}
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+ char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+ fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
+ if (!fixed_name) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+ "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ p = fixed_name;
+ while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+ *p++ = '_';
+
+ return fixed_name;
+}
+
/*
* Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
*/
@@ -211,6 +229,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
if (duplicate_name(de, p))
p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
+ if (strstr(p, "/"))
+ p = unslash_name(p);
+
ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
if (ent == NULL)
break;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Kujau
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
>
> Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is
> still printed during boot:
>
>
> device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
> name 'pulses/rev'
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
Don't cut here, sigh.
> Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317
Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
cheers
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index f8650dc..9502b48 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
return fixed_name;
}
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+ char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+ fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
+ if (!fixed_name) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+ "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+ return name;
+ }
+
+ p = fixed_name;
+ while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+ *p++ = '_';
+
+ return fixed_name;
+}
+
/*
* Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
*/
@@ -211,6 +229,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
if (duplicate_name(de, p))
p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
+ if (strstr(p, "/"))
+ p = unslash_name(p);
+
ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
if (ent == NULL)
break;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
adobriyan, linuxppc-dev, benh, schwab
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is
still printed during boot:
device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
name 'pulses/rev'
------------[ cut here ]------------
Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317
NIP: c00e14b8 LR: c00e14b8 CTR: c01fc2c0
REGS: c045bdc0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.34-rc4)
MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR> CR: 22000022 XER: 20000000
TASK = c043b410[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c045a000
GPR00: c00e14b8 c045be70 c043b410 00000024 000012ff ffffffff ffffffff 00000000
GPR08: ef808320 c0458670 00000000 000012ff 42000028 00000000 00cb3ccc 00cb39b8
GPR16: 00cd682c 00cb3ca8 00cb38c8 00cb39ac 00240e18 00240e20 00cb3954 00240e24
GPR24: 00000000 0049b000 c045be98 c045bec8 c0da0a42 c0da0a42 00000006 00000000
NIP [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
LR [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
Call Trace:
[c045be70] [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 (unreliable)
[c045be90] [c00e1a2c] __proc_create+0x60/0xf0
[c045bec0] [c00e2194] proc_create_data+0x54/0xc4
[c045bee0] [c00e6310] __proc_device_tree_add_prop+0x64/0xd4
[c045bf00] [c00e64b4] proc_device_tree_add_node+0x134/0x164
[c045bf20] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf40] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf60] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf80] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bfa0] [c0421c30] proc_device_tree_init+0x4c/0x78
[c045bfb0] [c0421698] proc_root_init+0xcc/0xf0
[c045bfc0] [c040e798] start_kernel+0x230/0x284
[c045bff0] [00003444] 0x3444
Instruction dump:
93ba0000 38600000 93fb0000 80010024 bb410008 38210020 7c0803a6 4e800020
3c60c03c 7f84e378 386300a8 48273a45 <0fe00000> 80010024 3860fffe bb410008
--
BOFH excuse #37:
heavy gravity fluctuation, move computer to floor rapidly
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab,
Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is
still printed during boot:
device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
name 'pulses/rev'
------------[ cut here ]------------
Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317
NIP: c00e14b8 LR: c00e14b8 CTR: c01fc2c0
REGS: c045bdc0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.34-rc4)
MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR> CR: 22000022 XER: 20000000
TASK = c043b410[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c045a000
GPR00: c00e14b8 c045be70 c043b410 00000024 000012ff ffffffff ffffffff 00000000
GPR08: ef808320 c0458670 00000000 000012ff 42000028 00000000 00cb3ccc 00cb39b8
GPR16: 00cd682c 00cb3ca8 00cb38c8 00cb39ac 00240e18 00240e20 00cb3954 00240e24
GPR24: 00000000 0049b000 c045be98 c045bec8 c0da0a42 c0da0a42 00000006 00000000
NIP [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
LR [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
Call Trace:
[c045be70] [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 (unreliable)
[c045be90] [c00e1a2c] __proc_create+0x60/0xf0
[c045bec0] [c00e2194] proc_create_data+0x54/0xc4
[c045bee0] [c00e6310] __proc_device_tree_add_prop+0x64/0xd4
[c045bf00] [c00e64b4] proc_device_tree_add_node+0x134/0x164
[c045bf20] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf40] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf60] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf80] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bfa0] [c0421c30] proc_device_tree_init+0x4c/0x78
[c045bfb0] [c0421698] proc_root_init+0xcc/0xf0
[c045bfc0] [c040e798] start_kernel+0x230/0x284
[c045bff0] [00003444] 0x3444
Instruction dump:
93ba0000 38600000 93fb0000 80010024 bb410008 38210020 7c0803a6 4e800020
3c60c03c 7f84e378 386300a8 48273a45 <0fe00000> 80010024 3860fffe bb410008
--
BOFH excuse #37:
heavy gravity fluctuation, move computer to floor rapidly
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r,
schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is
still printed during boot:
device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
name 'pulses/rev'
------------[ cut here ]------------
Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317
NIP: c00e14b8 LR: c00e14b8 CTR: c01fc2c0
REGS: c045bdc0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.34-rc4)
MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR> CR: 22000022 XER: 20000000
TASK = c043b410[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c045a000
GPR00: c00e14b8 c045be70 c043b410 00000024 000012ff ffffffff ffffffff 00000000
GPR08: ef808320 c0458670 00000000 000012ff 42000028 00000000 00cb3ccc 00cb39b8
GPR16: 00cd682c 00cb3ca8 00cb38c8 00cb39ac 00240e18 00240e20 00cb3954 00240e24
GPR24: 00000000 0049b000 c045be98 c045bec8 c0da0a42 c0da0a42 00000006 00000000
NIP [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
LR [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
Call Trace:
[c045be70] [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 (unreliable)
[c045be90] [c00e1a2c] __proc_create+0x60/0xf0
[c045bec0] [c00e2194] proc_create_data+0x54/0xc4
[c045bee0] [c00e6310] __proc_device_tree_add_prop+0x64/0xd4
[c045bf00] [c00e64b4] proc_device_tree_add_node+0x134/0x164
[c045bf20] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf40] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf60] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf80] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bfa0] [c0421c30] proc_device_tree_init+0x4c/0x78
[c045bfb0] [c0421698] proc_root_init+0xcc/0xf0
[c045bfc0] [c040e798] start_kernel+0x230/0x284
[c045bff0] [00003444] 0x3444
Instruction dump:
93ba0000 38600000 93fb0000 80010024 bb410008 38210020 7c0803a6 4e800020
3c60c03c 7f84e378 386300a8 48273a45 <0fe00000> 80010024 3860fffe bb410008
--
BOFH excuse #37:
heavy gravity fluctuation, move computer to floor rapidly
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-20 3:15 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-20 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-20 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-07 21:08 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (26 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-03-21 19:58 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-03-21 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 147+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (9 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 147+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-28 18:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 147+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-20 22:32 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:32 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-21 22:19 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-06-21 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-21 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-26 1:04 ` Christian Kujau
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15805] reiserfs locking Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-21 15:55 ` Pavel Machek
2010-06-21 15:55 ` Pavel Machek
2010-06-22 13:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-22 13:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-21 10:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-21 10:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-21 18:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-21 18:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15669] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15671] intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15673] 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15664] Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15924] kacpid consumes ~100% CPU, system freezes randomly Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-22 21:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-22 21:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-22 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-22 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-22 22:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-22 22:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-23 0:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-23 0:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15862] 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15936] Suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.34-rc6 boot on PPC64/p5 processor Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16007] x86/pci Oops with CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15977] WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:866 check_for_stack Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #15951] commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16050] The ibmcam driver is not working Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16040] kacpid consumes ~40% of cpu all the time beginning with 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16035] Incorrect initial resolution of (external) vga monitor with KMS Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16034] 2.6.34: dlm: possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16084] iwl3945 bug in 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16054] UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <AANLkTiks4DUvSLQLHb1Tr6cO_Mma-9UcDRqJ5uafdt1R@mail.gmail.com>
2010-06-21 6:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-06-23 22:28 ` Parag Warudkar
[not found] ` <20100621063552.GA16491-f9CnO7I+Q6zU6FkGJEIX5A@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-23 22:28 ` Parag Warudkar
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16082] host panic on kernel 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16097] 2.6.34 on Samsung P460: reset after "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated" Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16135] [BUG] kacpi_notify goes into an infinite loop (luckly it calls cond_resched) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16111] hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16138] PCMCIA regression Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16137] Ooops in BTRFS in 2.6.34 / x86_64 when mounting subvolume by name Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16139] wait_even_interruptible_timeout(), signal, spin_lock() = system hang Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16158] winxp guest hangs after idle for ~30 minutes Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16147] ksoftirq hogs the CPU Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16170] Leadtek Winfast DTV Dongle (STK7700P based) is not working in 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16162] SSD + sata_nv + btrfs oops Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16206] PROBLEM: PPP and other serial port related application hangs in kernel space Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16254] TCP stream performance regression due to c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16207] Suspend hangs since 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` [Bug #16233] Fwd: [2.6.34] INFO: task rsync:20019 blocked for more than 120 seconds Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-21 18:32 ` 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-06-21 22:01 ` Pavel Roskin
2010-06-21 22:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-06-22 0:14 ` Tim Gardner
2010-06-22 0:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-06-22 19:36 ` Tim Gardner
2010-06-28 18:22 ` Tim Gardner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-13 14:45 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-13 14:45 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-13 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-13 15:22 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-06-13 15:22 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-06-13 18:10 ` Christian Kujau
2010-06-13 18:10 ` Christian Kujau
2010-06-13 19:57 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-13 19:57 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-06-14 12:27 ` Jindrich Makovicka
2010-06-14 12:27 ` Jindrich Makovicka
2010-06-14 15:42 ` Grant Likely
2010-06-14 15:42 ` Grant Likely
2010-05-09 21:13 2.6.34-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-09 21:17 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-09 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau
2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau
2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau
2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-04 20:49 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-20 3:15 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-20 3:19 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-20 15:54 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-30 2:44 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-04-07 21:08 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 19:58 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.