* 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI [NOTE: The summary report of post-2.6.32 regressions will be sent later (hopefully tomorrow).] This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-04-07 48 35 33 2010-03-21 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719 Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de> Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399 Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4 Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717 Subject : bluetooth oops Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4 Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713 Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864 Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4 Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712 Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15711 Subject : 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989 Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> Date : 2010-04-01 17:52 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100401175225.GA6581@fancy-poultry.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127014437406250&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old) Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673 Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (11 days old) Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15672 Subject : KVM bug, git bisected Submitter : Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-27 12:43 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/5beb49305251e5669852ed541e8e2f2f7696c53e Message-ID : <4BADFD74.8060904@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126969385121711&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671 Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (12 days old) Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669 Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (31 days old) Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668 Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 Message-ID : <20100325194100.GA2364@debian> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954607216519&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664 Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661 Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old) Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659 Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (14 days old) Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15655 Subject : corrupt ext3 fs and partial freeze Submitter : Alban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com> Date : 2010-03-30 08:25 (9 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625 Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old) Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624 Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old) Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619 Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old) Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611 Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com> Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (23 days old) Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610 Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (17 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15603 Subject : lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume Submitter : Sami Liedes <sliedes@cc.hut.fi> Date : 2010-03-22 00:03 (17 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601 Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (24 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (26 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15553 Subject : Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45) Submitter : <bugs@kaijauch.de> Date : 2010-03-17 14:35 (22 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old) Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505 Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (29 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310 Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI [NOTE: The summary report of post-2.6.32 regressions will be sent later (hopefully tomorrow).] This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-04-07 48 35 33 2010-03-21 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719 Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de> Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399 Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4 Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717 Subject : bluetooth oops Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4 Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713 Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864 Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4 Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712 Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15711 Subject : 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989 Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> Date : 2010-04-01 17:52 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100401175225.GA6581@fancy-poultry.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127014437406250&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old) Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673 Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (11 days old) Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15672 Subject : KVM bug, git bisected Submitter : Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-27 12:43 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/5beb49305251e5669852ed541e8e2f2f7696c53e Message-ID : <4BADFD74.8060904@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126969385121711&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671 Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (12 days old) Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669 Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (31 days old) Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668 Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 Message-ID : <20100325194100.GA2364@debian> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954607216519&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664 Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661 Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old) Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659 Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (14 days old) Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15655 Subject : corrupt ext3 fs and partial freeze Submitter : Alban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com> Date : 2010-03-30 08:25 (9 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625 Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old) Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624 Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old) Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619 Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old) Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611 Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com> Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (23 days old) Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610 Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (17 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15603 Subject : lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume Submitter : Sami Liedes <sliedes@cc.hut.fi> Date : 2010-03-22 00:03 (17 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601 Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (24 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (26 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15553 Subject : Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45) Submitter : <bugs@kaijauch.de> Date : 2010-03-17 14:35 (22 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old) Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505 Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (29 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310 Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI [NOTE: The summary report of post-2.6.32 regressions will be sent later (hopefully tomorrow).] This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-04-07 48 35 33 2010-03-21 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719 Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de> Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399 Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4 Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717 Subject : bluetooth oops Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4 Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713 Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864 Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4 Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712 Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15711 Subject : 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989 Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> Date : 2010-04-01 17:52 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100401175225.GA6581@fancy-poultry.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127014437406250&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old) Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673 Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (11 days old) Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15672 Subject : KVM bug, git bisected Submitter : Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-27 12:43 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/5beb49305251e5669852ed541e8e2f2f7696c53e Message-ID : <4BADFD74.8060904@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126969385121711&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671 Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (12 days old) Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669 Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (31 days old) Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668 Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 Message-ID : <20100325194100.GA2364@debian> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954607216519&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664 Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (7 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661 Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old) Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659 Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (14 days old) Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15655 Subject : corrupt ext3 fs and partial freeze Submitter : Alban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com> Date : 2010-03-30 08:25 (9 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625 Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old) Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624 Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old) Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619 Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old) Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611 Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com> Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (23 days old) Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610 Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (17 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15603 Subject : lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume Submitter : Sami Liedes <sliedes@cc.hut.fi> Date : 2010-03-22 00:03 (17 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601 Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (24 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (26 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15553 Subject : Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45) Submitter : <bugs@kaijauch.de> Date : 2010-03-17 14:35 (22 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old) Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505 Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (29 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310 Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bjorn Helgaas, Yanko Kaneti This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs @ 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bjorn Helgaas, Yanko Kaneti This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti-jUE9FD3ILm5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 22:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2010-04-07 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Yanko Kaneti On Wednesday 07 April 2010 03:08:37 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 This should be closed. The fix is in Linus' tree: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d558b483d5a73f5718705b270cb2090f66ea48c8 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs @ 2010-04-07 22:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2010-04-07 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Yanko Kaneti On Wednesday 07 April 2010 03:08:37 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti-jUE9FD3ILm5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 This should be closed. The fix is in Linus' tree: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d558b483d5a73f5718705b270cb2090f66ea48c8 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs @ 2010-04-08 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Yanko Kaneti On Thursday 08 April 2010, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wednesday 07 April 2010 03:08:37 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 > > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs > > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> > > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 > > This should be closed. The fix is in Linus' tree: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d558b483d5a73f5718705b270cb2090f66ea48c8 Thanks, closing. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs @ 2010-04-08 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Yanko Kaneti On Thursday 08 April 2010, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wednesday 07 April 2010 03:08:37 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 > > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs > > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti-jUE9FD3ILm5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 > > This should be closed. The fix is in Linus' tree: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d558b483d5a73f5718705b270cb2090f66ea48c8 Thanks, closing. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15553] Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45) 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, bugs This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15553 Subject : Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45) Submitter : <bugs@kaijauch.de> Date : 2010-03-17 14:35 (22 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15553] Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, bugs This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15553 Subject : Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45) Submitter : <bugs@kaijauch.de> Date : 2010-03-17 14:35 (22 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15505] No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Casteyde, Jesse Barnes, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505 Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (29 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15505] No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Casteyde, Jesse Barnes, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505 Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (29 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15518] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (4 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Daniel Vetter This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15551] WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Zhavnerchik This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15551] WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Zhavnerchik This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15600] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Avi Kivity This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15600] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Avi Kivity This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (7 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (26 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15603] lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sami Liedes This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15603 Subject : lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume Submitter : Sami Liedes <sliedes@cc.hut.fi> Date : 2010-03-22 00:03 (17 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15603] lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sami Liedes This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15603 Subject : lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume Submitter : Sami Liedes <sliedes-kf+aQKke1yb1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-22 00:03 (17 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pavel Machek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pavel Machek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15601] [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (10 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, michael-dev@fami-braun.de This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601 Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (24 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 7:16 ` Liang Li -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Liang Li @ 2010-04-08 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it fixed. diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) */ static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) { - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); + return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); } /* But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be: diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 3acf694..d259641 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) */ static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) { - return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING); + return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING); } /* Regards, -Liang Li > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 > Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking > Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking @ 2010-04-08 7:16 ` Liang Li 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Liang Li @ 2010-04-08 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it fixed. diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) */ static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) { - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); + return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); } /* But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be: diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 3acf694..d259641 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) */ static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) { - return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING); + return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING); } /* Regards, -Liang Li > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 > Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking > Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking 2010-04-08 7:16 ` Liang Li @ 2010-04-08 7:50 ` Yong Zhang -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Yong Zhang @ 2010-04-08 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Liang Li Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:16:17PM +0800, Liang Li wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it > fixed. > > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c > index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched.c > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) > */ > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) > { > - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); > + return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); > } Oh, NO. This is wrong. It will introduce other bugs. The right direction is showed in the bug entry. Thanks, Yong > > /* > > But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree > also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be: > > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c > index 3acf694..d259641 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched.c > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) > */ > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) > { > - return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING); > + return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING); > } > > /* > > Regards, > -Liang Li > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 > > Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking > > Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking @ 2010-04-08 7:50 ` Yong Zhang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Yong Zhang @ 2010-04-08 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Liang Li Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:16:17PM +0800, Liang Li wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it > fixed. > > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c > index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched.c > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) > */ > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) > { > - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); > + return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); > } Oh, NO. This is wrong. It will introduce other bugs. The right direction is showed in the bug entry. Thanks, Yong > > /* > > But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree > also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be: > > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c > index 3acf694..d259641 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched.c > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) > */ > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) > { > - return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING); > + return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING); > } > > /* > > Regards, > -Liang Li > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 > > Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking > > Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking @ 2010-04-08 8:20 ` Liang Li 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Liang Li @ 2010-04-08 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yong Zhang Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:50:03PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:16:17PM +0800, Liang Li wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > > of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > > know (either way). > > > > The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it > > fixed. > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c > > index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > > @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) > > */ > > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) > > { > > - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); > > + return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); > > } Seems what I saw was different from this bug. So it is clear that this one line change does not relate to this bug. Sorry for confusion. > > Oh, NO. This is wrong. It will introduce other bugs. > The right direction is showed in the bug entry. Thanks, -Liang Li > > Thanks, > Yong > > > > > /* > > > > But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree > > also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be: > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c > > index 3acf694..d259641 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) > > */ > > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) > > { > > - return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING); > > + return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING); > > } > > > > /* > > > > Regards, > > -Liang Li > > > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 > > > Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking > > > Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com> > > > Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking @ 2010-04-08 8:20 ` Liang Li 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Liang Li @ 2010-04-08 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yong Zhang Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:50:03PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:16:17PM +0800, Liang Li wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > > of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > > know (either way). > > > > The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it > > fixed. > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c > > index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > > @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) > > */ > > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) > > { > > - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); > > + return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)); > > } Seems what I saw was different from this bug. So it is clear that this one line change does not relate to this bug. Sorry for confusion. > > Oh, NO. This is wrong. It will introduce other bugs. > The right direction is showed in the bug entry. Thanks, -Liang Li > > Thanks, > Yong > > > > > /* > > > > But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree > > also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be: > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c > > index 3acf694..d259641 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) > > */ > > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p) > > { > > - return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING); > > + return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING); > > } > > > > /* > > > > Regards, > > -Liang Li > > > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615 > > > Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking > > > Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > > Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old) > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15611] Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rupjyoti Sarmah This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611 Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com> Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (23 days old) Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15611] Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rupjyoti Sarmah This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611 Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah-6mNVq6Owofk@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (23 days old) Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D-oUPhqDSr77q+n3Z1v9ZxkQKt9jNwmMCsAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15610] fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (13 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Ozgur Yuksel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610 Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (17 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (14 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 7:32 ` Fabio Comolli -1 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Fabio Comolli This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619 Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old) Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 7:32 ` Fabio Comolli 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Fabio Comolli @ 2010-04-08 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki disappeared between -rc2 and -rc3 On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619 > Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old) > Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected @ 2010-04-08 7:32 ` Fabio Comolli 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Fabio Comolli @ 2010-04-08 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki disappeared between -rc2 and -rc3 On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619 > Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old) > Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected @ 2010-04-08 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabio Comolli Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Thursday 08 April 2010, Fabio Comolli wrote: > disappeared between -rc2 and -rc3 Thanks, closed. Rafael > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619 > > Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected > > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old) > > Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2 > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected @ 2010-04-08 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabio Comolli Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Thursday 08 April 2010, Fabio Comolli wrote: > disappeared between -rc2 and -rc3 Thanks, closed. Rafael > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619 > > Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected > > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old) > > Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2 > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (15 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-12 3:00 ` Randy Dunlap -1 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Randy Dunlap This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625 Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old) Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-12 3:00 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-04-12 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On 04/07/10 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > This was a one-time occurrence. I don't know your policy of whether it should still be listed or not. I don't tend to ignore one-time bugs. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625 > Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old) > Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2 -- ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) @ 2010-04-12 3:00 ` Randy Dunlap 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-04-12 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On 04/07/10 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > This was a one-time occurrence. I don't know your policy of whether it should still be listed or not. I don't tend to ignore one-time bugs. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625 > Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old) > Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2 -- ~Randy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) @ 2010-04-12 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-12 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Monday 12 April 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/07/10 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > This was a one-time occurrence. I don't know your policy of whether it should still > be listed or not. > > I don't tend to ignore one-time bugs. Let's keep it listed for some time. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) @ 2010-04-12 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-12 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Monday 12 April 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/07/10 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > This was a one-time occurrence. I don't know your policy of whether it should still > be listed or not. > > I don't tend to ignore one-time bugs. Let's keep it listed for some time. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (16 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker -1 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Frederic Weisbecker This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624 Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old) Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-04-07 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624 > Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation > Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old) > Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2 This has been fixed with "eb1e79611cc9bfe21978230e3521e77ea2d7874a" (perf: Correctly align perf event tracing buffer). The ticket can be closed, thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation @ 2010-04-07 21:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-04-07 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624 > Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation > Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old) > Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2 This has been fixed with "eb1e79611cc9bfe21978230e3521e77ea2d7874a" (perf: Correctly align perf event tracing buffer). The ticket can be closed, thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation 2010-04-07 21:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-04-08 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Wednesday 07 April 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624 > > Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation > > Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2 > > > This has been fixed with "eb1e79611cc9bfe21978230e3521e77ea2d7874a" > (perf: Correctly align perf event tracing buffer). > > The ticket can be closed, thanks! Thanks, closing. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation @ 2010-04-08 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Wednesday 07 April 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624 > > Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation > > Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2 > > > This has been fixed with "eb1e79611cc9bfe21978230e3521e77ea2d7874a" > (perf: Correctly align perf event tracing buffer). > > The ticket can be closed, thanks! Thanks, closing. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15664] Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (17 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Villacis Lasso This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664 Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (7 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15659] [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Maciej Rutecki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659 Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (14 days old) Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15659] [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Maciej Rutecki This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659 Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (14 days old) Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15655] corrupt ext3 fs and partial freeze 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (19 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alban Browaeys This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15655 Subject : corrupt ext3 fs and partial freeze Submitter : Alban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com> Date : 2010-03-30 08:25 (9 days old) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (20 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 2:29 ` Yong Zhang -1 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jon Masters This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661 Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old) Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 2:29 ` Yong Zhang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Yong Zhang @ 2010-04-08 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jon Masters On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661 > Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 > Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> > Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2 > Seems a duplicate of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/20/142 and it's reslovled by commit a90110c61073eab95d1986322693c2b9a8a6a5f6 Thanks, Yong > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 @ 2010-04-08 2:29 ` Yong Zhang 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Yong Zhang @ 2010-04-08 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jon Masters On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661 > Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 > Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan-Zp4isUonpHBD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old) > Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2 > Seems a duplicate of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/20/142 and it's reslovled by commit a90110c61073eab95d1986322693c2b9a8a6a5f6 Thanks, Yong > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 @ 2010-04-08 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yong Zhang Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jon Masters On Thursday 08 April 2010, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661 > > Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 > > Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> > > Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old) > > Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2 > > > > Seems a duplicate of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/20/142 > and it's reslovled by commit a90110c61073eab95d1986322693c2b9a8a6a5f6 Thanks, closing. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 @ 2010-04-08 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yong Zhang Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jon Masters On Thursday 08 April 2010, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661 > > Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 > > Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan-Zp4isUonpHBD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old) > > Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2 > > > > Seems a duplicate of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/20/142 > and it's reslovled by commit a90110c61073eab95d1986322693c2b9a8a6a5f6 Thanks, closing. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15673] 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (21 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Thomas Meyer This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673 Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (11 days old) Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15669] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (22 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zdenek Kabelac This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669 Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (31 days old) Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15671] intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (23 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Norbert Preining This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671 Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (12 days old) Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, H. Peter Anvin, Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668 Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 Message-ID : <20100325194100.GA2364@debian> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954607216519&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, H. Peter Anvin, Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668 Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin-66gdRtMMWGc@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 Message-ID : <20100325194100.GA2364@debian> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954607216519&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 22:32 ` H. Peter Anvin -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2010-04-07 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu On 04/07/2010 02:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668 > Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early > Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> > Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 ^^^^ FWIW, this /git is redundant. -hpa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early @ 2010-04-07 22:32 ` H. Peter Anvin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2010-04-07 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu On 04/07/2010 02:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668 > Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early > Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin-66gdRtMMWGc@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 ^^^^ FWIW, this /git is redundant. -hpa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early @ 2010-04-08 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu On Thursday 08 April 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/07/2010 02:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668 > > Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early > > Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> > > Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 > ^^^^ > > FWIW, this /git is redundant. Ah, thanks for the hint. :-) Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early @ 2010-04-08 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu On Thursday 08 April 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 04/07/2010 02:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668 > > Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early > > Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin-66gdRtMMWGc@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 > ^^^^ > > FWIW, this /git is redundant. Ah, thanks for the hint. :-) Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15672] KVM bug, git bisected 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Kent Overstreet, Rik van Riel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15672 Subject : KVM bug, git bisected Submitter : Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-27 12:43 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/5beb49305251e5669852ed541e8e2f2f7696c53e Message-ID : <4BADFD74.8060904@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126969385121711&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15672] KVM bug, git bisected @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Kent Overstreet, Rik van Riel This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15672 Subject : KVM bug, git bisected Submitter : Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-27 12:43 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/5beb49305251e5669852ed541e8e2f2f7696c53e Message-ID : <4BADFD74.8060904-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126969385121711&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15711] 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (26 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Heinz Diehl This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15711 Subject : 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989 Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> Date : 2010-04-01 17:52 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100401175225.GA6581@fancy-poultry.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127014437406250&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (27 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-14 10:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky -1 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sergey Senozhatsky This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old) Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-14 10:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-04-14 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3509 bytes --] Hello, Sorry for the delay, I've been away. On (04/07/10 23:13), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 > Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 > > Yes, bug is still here (though I'm not sure whether it's correct to test with frame size 2048). Here it is: kernel: [ 2292.172886] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing. kernel: [ 2339.999788] ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel: [ 2339.999800] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125() kernel: [ 2339.999803] Hardware name: F3JC kernel: [ 2339.999806] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out kernel: [ 2339.999809] Modules linked in: pktgen ipv6 snd_hwdep snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek sdhci_pci sdhci asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hda_intel mmc_core led_class snd_hda_codec psmouse snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 serio_raw sg evdev rng_core r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbcore ata_piix kernel: [ 2339.999857] Pid: 3720, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-dbg-r8169-git6 #81 kernel: [ 2339.999861] Call Trace: kernel: [ 2339.999868] [<c102e7f7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c kernel: [ 2339.999874] [<c126e4f8>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125 kernel: [ 2339.999879] [<c102e842>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27 kernel: [ 2339.999884] [<c126e4f8>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125 kernel: [ 2339.999891] [<c1040039>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0x26/0x63 kernel: [ 2339.999897] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb kernel: [ 2339.999902] [<c1037181>] run_timer_softirq+0x176/0x1eb kernel: [ 2339.999907] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb kernel: [ 2339.999913] [<c126e437>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x125 kernel: [ 2339.999919] [<c10332a1>] __do_softirq+0x8d/0x117 kernel: [ 2339.999925] [<c1033356>] do_softirq+0x2b/0x43 kernel: [ 2339.999929] [<c103347b>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75 kernel: [ 2339.999936] [<c1015200>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b kernel: [ 2339.999943] [<c12cbcda>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c kernel: [ 2339.999948] [<c104007b>] ? finish_wait+0x5/0x49 kernel: [ 2339.999953] [<c10400d8>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x19/0x5b kernel: [ 2339.999959] [<c105106d>] ? lock_release+0x19a/0x1a1 kernel: [ 2339.999965] [<c12cb259>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x16/0x3f kernel: [ 2339.999972] [<f80ea460>] pktgen_thread_worker+0xe0/0x631 [pktgen] kernel: [ 2339.999978] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f kernel: [ 2339.999983] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f kernel: [ 2339.999989] [<f80ea380>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x631 [pktgen] kernel: [ 2339.999994] [<c103fc8a>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f kernel: [ 2339.999999] [<c103fc20>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f kernel: [ 2340.000005] [<c1002e82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1a kernel: [ 2340.000008] ---[ end trace 25113681b662d02f ]--- Sergey [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c @ 2010-04-14 10:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-04-14 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3564 bytes --] Hello, Sorry for the delay, I've been away. On (04/07/10 23:13), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 > Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old) > Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 > > Yes, bug is still here (though I'm not sure whether it's correct to test with frame size 2048). Here it is: kernel: [ 2292.172886] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing. kernel: [ 2339.999788] ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel: [ 2339.999800] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125() kernel: [ 2339.999803] Hardware name: F3JC kernel: [ 2339.999806] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out kernel: [ 2339.999809] Modules linked in: pktgen ipv6 snd_hwdep snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek sdhci_pci sdhci asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hda_intel mmc_core led_class snd_hda_codec psmouse snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 serio_raw sg evdev rng_core r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbcore ata_piix kernel: [ 2339.999857] Pid: 3720, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-dbg-r8169-git6 #81 kernel: [ 2339.999861] Call Trace: kernel: [ 2339.999868] [<c102e7f7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c kernel: [ 2339.999874] [<c126e4f8>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125 kernel: [ 2339.999879] [<c102e842>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27 kernel: [ 2339.999884] [<c126e4f8>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125 kernel: [ 2339.999891] [<c1040039>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0x26/0x63 kernel: [ 2339.999897] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb kernel: [ 2339.999902] [<c1037181>] run_timer_softirq+0x176/0x1eb kernel: [ 2339.999907] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb kernel: [ 2339.999913] [<c126e437>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x125 kernel: [ 2339.999919] [<c10332a1>] __do_softirq+0x8d/0x117 kernel: [ 2339.999925] [<c1033356>] do_softirq+0x2b/0x43 kernel: [ 2339.999929] [<c103347b>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75 kernel: [ 2339.999936] [<c1015200>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b kernel: [ 2339.999943] [<c12cbcda>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c kernel: [ 2339.999948] [<c104007b>] ? finish_wait+0x5/0x49 kernel: [ 2339.999953] [<c10400d8>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x19/0x5b kernel: [ 2339.999959] [<c105106d>] ? lock_release+0x19a/0x1a1 kernel: [ 2339.999965] [<c12cb259>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x16/0x3f kernel: [ 2339.999972] [<f80ea460>] pktgen_thread_worker+0xe0/0x631 [pktgen] kernel: [ 2339.999978] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f kernel: [ 2339.999983] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f kernel: [ 2339.999989] [<f80ea380>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x631 [pktgen] kernel: [ 2339.999994] [<c103fc8a>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f kernel: [ 2339.999999] [<c103fc20>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f kernel: [ 2340.000005] [<c1002e82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1a kernel: [ 2340.000008] ---[ end trace 25113681b662d02f ]--- Sergey [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c @ 2010-04-15 17:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-15 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello, > Sorry for the delay, I've been away. > > On (04/07/10 23:13), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 > > Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c > > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 > > > > > > > Yes, bug is still here (though I'm not sure whether it's correct to test with frame size 2048). > > Here it is: > > kernel: [ 2292.172886] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing. > kernel: [ 2339.999788] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel: [ 2339.999800] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125() > kernel: [ 2339.999803] Hardware name: F3JC > kernel: [ 2339.999806] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out > kernel: [ 2339.999809] Modules linked in: pktgen ipv6 snd_hwdep snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek sdhci_pci sdhci asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hda_intel mmc_core > led_class snd_hda_codec psmouse snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 serio_raw sg evdev rng_core r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod cdrom sd_mod > usbcore ata_piix > kernel: [ 2339.999857] Pid: 3720, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-dbg-r8169-git6 #81 > kernel: [ 2339.999861] Call Trace: > kernel: [ 2339.999868] [<c102e7f7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c > kernel: [ 2339.999874] [<c126e4f8>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125 > kernel: [ 2339.999879] [<c102e842>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27 > kernel: [ 2339.999884] [<c126e4f8>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125 > kernel: [ 2339.999891] [<c1040039>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0x26/0x63 > kernel: [ 2339.999897] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb > kernel: [ 2339.999902] [<c1037181>] run_timer_softirq+0x176/0x1eb > kernel: [ 2339.999907] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb > kernel: [ 2339.999913] [<c126e437>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x125 > kernel: [ 2339.999919] [<c10332a1>] __do_softirq+0x8d/0x117 > kernel: [ 2339.999925] [<c1033356>] do_softirq+0x2b/0x43 > kernel: [ 2339.999929] [<c103347b>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75 > kernel: [ 2339.999936] [<c1015200>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b > kernel: [ 2339.999943] [<c12cbcda>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c > kernel: [ 2339.999948] [<c104007b>] ? finish_wait+0x5/0x49 > kernel: [ 2339.999953] [<c10400d8>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x19/0x5b > kernel: [ 2339.999959] [<c105106d>] ? lock_release+0x19a/0x1a1 > kernel: [ 2339.999965] [<c12cb259>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x16/0x3f > kernel: [ 2339.999972] [<f80ea460>] pktgen_thread_worker+0xe0/0x631 [pktgen] > kernel: [ 2339.999978] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f > kernel: [ 2339.999983] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f > kernel: [ 2339.999989] [<f80ea380>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x631 [pktgen] > kernel: [ 2339.999994] [<c103fc8a>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f > kernel: [ 2339.999999] [<c103fc20>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f > kernel: [ 2340.000005] [<c1002e82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1a > kernel: [ 2340.000008] ---[ end trace 25113681b662d02f ]--- Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c @ 2010-04-15 17:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-15 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello, > Sorry for the delay, I've been away. > > On (04/07/10 23:13), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 > > Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c > > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 > > > > > > > Yes, bug is still here (though I'm not sure whether it's correct to test with frame size 2048). > > Here it is: > > kernel: [ 2292.172886] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing. > kernel: [ 2339.999788] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel: [ 2339.999800] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125() > kernel: [ 2339.999803] Hardware name: F3JC > kernel: [ 2339.999806] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out > kernel: [ 2339.999809] Modules linked in: pktgen ipv6 snd_hwdep snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek sdhci_pci sdhci asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hda_intel mmc_core > led_class snd_hda_codec psmouse snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 serio_raw sg evdev rng_core r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod cdrom sd_mod > usbcore ata_piix > kernel: [ 2339.999857] Pid: 3720, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-dbg-r8169-git6 #81 > kernel: [ 2339.999861] Call Trace: > kernel: [ 2339.999868] [<c102e7f7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c > kernel: [ 2339.999874] [<c126e4f8>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125 > kernel: [ 2339.999879] [<c102e842>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27 > kernel: [ 2339.999884] [<c126e4f8>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125 > kernel: [ 2339.999891] [<c1040039>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0x26/0x63 > kernel: [ 2339.999897] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb > kernel: [ 2339.999902] [<c1037181>] run_timer_softirq+0x176/0x1eb > kernel: [ 2339.999907] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb > kernel: [ 2339.999913] [<c126e437>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x125 > kernel: [ 2339.999919] [<c10332a1>] __do_softirq+0x8d/0x117 > kernel: [ 2339.999925] [<c1033356>] do_softirq+0x2b/0x43 > kernel: [ 2339.999929] [<c103347b>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75 > kernel: [ 2339.999936] [<c1015200>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b > kernel: [ 2339.999943] [<c12cbcda>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c > kernel: [ 2339.999948] [<c104007b>] ? finish_wait+0x5/0x49 > kernel: [ 2339.999953] [<c10400d8>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x19/0x5b > kernel: [ 2339.999959] [<c105106d>] ? lock_release+0x19a/0x1a1 > kernel: [ 2339.999965] [<c12cb259>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x16/0x3f > kernel: [ 2339.999972] [<f80ea460>] pktgen_thread_worker+0xe0/0x631 [pktgen] > kernel: [ 2339.999978] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f > kernel: [ 2339.999983] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f > kernel: [ 2339.999989] [<f80ea380>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x631 [pktgen] > kernel: [ 2339.999994] [<c103fc8a>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f > kernel: [ 2339.999999] [<c103fc20>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f > kernel: [ 2340.000005] [<c1002e82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1a > kernel: [ 2340.000008] ---[ end trace 25113681b662d02f ]--- Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15712] [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (28 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pavel Machek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712 Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (7 days old) Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15674] [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (29 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Daniel J Blueman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (30 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 11:56 ` Boaz Harrosh -1 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Al Viro, Boaz Harrosh This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 11:56 ` Boaz Harrosh 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Boaz Harrosh @ 2010-04-08 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Al Viro On 04/08/2010 12:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> > > Fix already in main line: 3e297b613491f0d4928aa652a2cd266aa06dc409 Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Restore LOOKUP_DIRECTORY hint handling in final lookup on open() Boaz ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 @ 2010-04-08 11:56 ` Boaz Harrosh 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Boaz Harrosh @ 2010-04-08 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Al Viro On 04/08/2010 12:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org> > > Fix already in main line: 3e297b613491f0d4928aa652a2cd266aa06dc409 Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org> Restore LOOKUP_DIRECTORY hint handling in final lookup on open() Boaz ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 @ 2010-04-08 20:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Al Viro On Thursday 08 April 2010, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 04/08/2010 12:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 > > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 > > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> > > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 > > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 > > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> > > > > > > Fix already in main line: 3e297b613491f0d4928aa652a2cd266aa06dc409 > Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> > Restore LOOKUP_DIRECTORY hint handling in final lookup on open() Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 @ 2010-04-08 20:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Al Viro On Thursday 08 April 2010, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 04/08/2010 12:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 > > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 > > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 > > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 > > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org> > > > > > > Fix already in main line: 3e297b613491f0d4928aa652a2cd266aa06dc409 > Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org> > Restore LOOKUP_DIRECTORY hint handling in final lookup on open() Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15716] ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Benton, Jeff Garzik This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15716] ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Benton, Jeff Garzik This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Marcel Holtmann, Pavel Machek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717 Subject : bluetooth oops Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4 Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Marcel Holtmann, Pavel Machek This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717 Subject : bluetooth oops Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (25 days old) Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4 Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel-kz+m5ild9QBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter, Pekka Enberg This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713 Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864 Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4 Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter, Pekka Enberg This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713 Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864 Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel-c8rhgrCDLIED0+JXs3kMbRL4W9x8LtSr@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4 Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (34 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 22:05 ` Linus Torvalds -1 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, Linus Torvalds, Shaohua Li, Wu Fengguang This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 22:05 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-04-08 20:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, Shaohua Li, Wu Fengguang On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Reverted by commit d6da1a5abc2bf3a06a5bda08e0f6833409234666 Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio @ 2010-04-08 20:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, Shaohua Li, Wu Fengguang On Thursday 08 April 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 > > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio > > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 > > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 > > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > > Reverted by commit d6da1a5abc2bf3a06a5bda08e0f6833409234666 Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio @ 2010-04-08 20:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, Shaohua Li, Wu Fengguang On Thursday 08 April 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 > > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio > > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 > > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983-U5EdaLXB8smDugQYiPIPGdh3ngVCH38I@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 > > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> > > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Reverted by commit d6da1a5abc2bf3a06a5bda08e0f6833409234666 Thanks, closed. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David S. Miller, Rusty Russell, Shirley Ma, Shirley Ma, Thomas Müller This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719 Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de> Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399 Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4 Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox @ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David S. Miller, Rusty Russell, Shirley Ma, Shirley Ma, Thomas Müller This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719 Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399 Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4 Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-12 8:39 ` Thomas Müller -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Thomas Müller @ 2010-04-12 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David S. Miller, Rusty Russell, Shirley Ma, Shirley Ma Hi, a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6. Regards, Thomas On 07.04.2010 23:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719 > Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox > Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de> > Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399 > Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4 > Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox @ 2010-04-12 8:39 ` Thomas Müller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Thomas Müller @ 2010-04-12 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David S. Miller, Rusty Russell, Shirley Ma, Shirley Ma Hi, a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6. Regards, Thomas On 07.04.2010 23:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719 > Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox > Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de> > Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399 > Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4 > Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox @ 2010-04-12 9:28 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-04-12 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thomas Cc: rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, maciej.rutecki, rusty, mashirle, xma From: Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:39:54 +0200 > Hi, > > a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in > linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6. This bug was only present in -next and net-next-2.6 to the best of my knowledge, so the fix only showing up there is appropriate. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox @ 2010-04-12 9:28 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-04-12 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thomas-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww, mashirle-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA, xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA From: Thomas Müller <thomas-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:39:54 +0200 > Hi, > > a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in > linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6. This bug was only present in -next and net-next-2.6 to the best of my knowledge, so the fix only showing up there is appropriate. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox @ 2010-04-12 9:50 ` Thomas Müller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Thomas Müller @ 2010-04-12 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, maciej.rutecki, rusty, mashirle, xma Hi, On 12.04.2010 11:28, David Miller wrote: >> a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in >> linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6. > > This bug was only present in -next and net-next-2.6 to the best of > my knowledge, so the fix only showing up there is appropriate. I think I have to disagree. I hit this bug with a clean checkout of linux-2.6 and I also bisected against the linux-2.6 repo. (I did however use a Fedora rawhide kernel config as starting point, so presumably there were a lot of debug options activated) When Shirley Ma sent the fix, I did verify that linux-2.6 without the fix did not work, and that everything worked fine with it applied. Regards, Thomas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox @ 2010-04-12 9:50 ` Thomas Müller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Thomas Müller @ 2010-04-12 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Miller Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww, mashirle-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA, xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA Hi, On 12.04.2010 11:28, David Miller wrote: >> a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in >> linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6. > > This bug was only present in -next and net-next-2.6 to the best of > my knowledge, so the fix only showing up there is appropriate. I think I have to disagree. I hit this bug with a clean checkout of linux-2.6 and I also bisected against the linux-2.6 repo. (I did however use a Fedora rawhide kernel config as starting point, so presumably there were a lot of debug options activated) When Shirley Ma sent the fix, I did verify that linux-2.6 without the fix did not work, and that everything worked fine with it applied. Regards, Thomas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox @ 2010-04-13 5:01 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-04-13 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thomas Cc: rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, maciej.rutecki, rusty, mashirle, xma From: Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:50:28 +0200 > I think I have to disagree. Indeed you're right, net-2.6 needs it too. Thanks for catching this, I've cherry picked the commit from net-next-2.6 and added it to net-2.6 Thanks again! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox @ 2010-04-13 5:01 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2010-04-13 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thomas-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww, mashirle-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA, xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA From: Thomas Müller <thomas-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:50:28 +0200 > I think I have to disagree. Indeed you're right, net-2.6 needs it too. Thanks for catching this, I've cherry picked the commit from net-next-2.6 and added it to net-2.6 Thanks again! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (36 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:53 ` John W. Linville -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: John W. Linville @ 2010-04-07 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:08:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551 > Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() > Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old) I sent a pull request with the patch for this to Dave M. today. :-) John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (37 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 21:53 ` John W. Linville -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: John W. Linville @ 2010-04-07 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:08:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551 > Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() > Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old) I sent a pull request with the patch for this to Dave M. today. :-) John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (38 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 > Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 > Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) > Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 > Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd? That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537 as far as I can see. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but.. Al? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 > Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) > Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this, but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit > Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> > Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old) Duplicate entry. See above. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc. Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki ` (39 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-07 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro ` (3 more replies) -1 siblings, 4 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Al Viro On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 > Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 > Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) > Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 > Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd? That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537 as far as I can see. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but.. Al? > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 > Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) > Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this, but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit > Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> > Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old) Duplicate entry. See above. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc. Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:04:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 > > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... > > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) > > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 > > This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but.. No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st case -EDQUOT: case -ENOSPC: case -EROFS: - lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL); - return 1; + return PTR_ERR(state); default: goto out_drop; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:04:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 > > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... > > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) > > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 > > This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but.. No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st case -EDQUOT: case -ENOSPC: case -EROFS: - lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL); - return 1; + return PTR_ERR(state); default: goto out_drop; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro (?) @ 2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Al Viro Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote: > > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc? Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Al Viro Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote: > > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc? Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Al Viro Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote: > > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc? Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-07 23:06 ` Al Viro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:22:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote: > > > > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() > > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has > > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... > > Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc? [PATCH] Have nfs ->d_revalidate() report errors properly If nfs atomic open implementation ends up doing open request from ->d_revalidate() codepath and gets an error from server, return that error to caller explicitly and don't bother with lookup_instantiate_filp() at all. ->d_revalidate() can return an error itself just fine... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> --- diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st case -EDQUOT: case -ENOSPC: case -EROFS: - lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL); - return 1; + return PTR_ERR(state); default: goto out_drop; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-07 23:06 ` Al Viro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:22:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote: > > > > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() > > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has > > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... > > Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc? [PATCH] Have nfs ->d_revalidate() report errors properly If nfs atomic open implementation ends up doing open request from ->d_revalidate() codepath and gets an error from server, return that error to caller explicitly and don't bother with lookup_instantiate_filp() at all. ->d_revalidate() can return an error itself just fine... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org> --- diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st case -EDQUOT: case -ENOSPC: case -EROFS: - lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL); - return 1; + return PTR_ERR(state); default: goto out_drop; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds (?) (?) @ 2010-04-07 23:06 ` Al Viro -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:22:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote: > > > > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() > > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has > > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... > > Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc? [PATCH] Have nfs ->d_revalidate() report errors properly If nfs atomic open implementation ends up doing open request from ->d_revalidate() codepath and gets an error from server, return that error to caller explicitly and don't bother with lookup_instantiate_filp() at all. ->d_revalidate() can return an error itself just fine... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> --- diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st case -EDQUOT: case -ENOSPC: case -EROFS: - lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL); - return 1; + return PTR_ERR(state); default: goto out_drop; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 2010-04-07 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 3 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:04:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 > > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... > > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) > > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 > > This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but.. No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate() return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter... diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st case -EDQUOT: case -ENOSPC: case -EROFS: - lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL); - return 1; + return PTR_ERR(state); default: goto out_drop; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Al Viro On Thursday 08 April 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 > > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 > > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> > > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 > > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 > > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> > > I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 > > Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 > > Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) > > Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 > > Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> > > And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd? > > That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537 > > as far as I can see. Yes, my bad, sorry. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 > > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio > > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 > > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 > > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > > That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 > > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... > > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) > > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 > > This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but.. > > Al? This one has been fixed too, I see, so closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 > > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 > > Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > > Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) > > Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 > > These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this, > but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true > after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 > > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit > > Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> > > Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old) > > Duplicate entry. See above. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 > > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs > > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> > > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 > > These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc. Closed. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI, Al Viro On Thursday 08 April 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 > > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 > > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 > > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 > > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org> > > I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 > > Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 > > Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) > > Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 > > Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> > > And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd? > > That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537 > > as far as I can see. Yes, my bad, sorry. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 > > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio > > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 > > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983-U5EdaLXB8smDugQYiPIPGdh3ngVCH38I@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 > > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> > > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 > > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... > > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) > > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 > > This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but.. > > Al? This one has been fixed too, I see, so closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 > > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 > > Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) > > Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 > > These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this, > but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true > after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 > > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit > > Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old) > > Duplicate entry. See above. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 > > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs > > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti-jUE9FD3ILm5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 > > These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc. Closed. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 2010-04-07 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 3 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki On Thursday 08 April 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718 > > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 > > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> > > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5 > > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4 > > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> > > I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716 > > Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 > > Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old) > > Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4 > > Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> > > And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd? > > That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537 > > as far as I can see. Yes, my bad, sorry. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715 > > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio > > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 > > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4 > > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > > That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674 > > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure... > > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> > > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old) > > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2 > > This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but.. > > Al? This one has been fixed too, I see, so closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600 > > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 > > Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > > Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old) > > Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2 > > These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this, > but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true > after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 > > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit > > Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> > > Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old) > > Duplicate entry. See above. Closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 > > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs > > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> > > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 > > These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc. Closed. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 @ 2010-06-20 22:32 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some post-2.6.33 regressions introduced before 2.6.34, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.33 regressions, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-06-21 114 36 28 2010-06-13 111 40 34 2010-05-09 80 27 24 2010-05-04 76 26 22 2010-04-20 64 35 34 2010-04-07 48 35 33 2010-03-21 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16254 Subject : TCP stream performance regression due to c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6 Submitter : Alex,Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Date : 2010-06-18 7:17 (3 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6 Message-ID : <1276845448.2118.346.camel@debian> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127684931020672&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16233 Subject : Fwd: [2.6.34] INFO: task rsync:20019 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Submitter : Jan De Luyck <mailinglists+linuxkernel_20080830@kcore.org> Date : 2010-06-14 19:49 (7 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTimutyh3WIALv3NIxA8Xt5JtU6tp4EWOnuSqhdyD@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127654498016377&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16207 Subject : Suspend hangs since 2.6.34 Submitter : Tino Keitel <tino.keitel+xorg@tikei.de> Date : 2010-06-09 17:53 (12 days old) Message-ID : <20100609175356.GA17332@x61.home> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610606214060&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16206 Subject : PROBLEM: PPP and other serial port related application hangs in kernel space Submitter : Ales Teska <ales.teska@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-09 20:46 (12 days old) Message-ID : <900E3B14-5B92-4A37-9581-049DB40F4D1C@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127611640301071&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16170 Subject : Leadtek Winfast DTV Dongle (STK7700P based) is not working in 2.6.34 Submitter : <macjariel@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-09 11:11 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16162 Subject : SSD + sata_nv + btrfs oops Submitter : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-01 3:04 (20 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilqsIdlzZgUf7TMLHYKqHDZoVkcs42vcG8wXKEr@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127536149022333&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16158 Subject : winxp guest hangs after idle for ~30 minutes Submitter : <brimhall@pobox.com> Date : 2010-06-08 17:52 (13 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16139 Subject : wait_even_interruptible_timeout(), signal, spin_lock() = system hang Submitter : Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com> Date : 2010-05-28 16:44 (24 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTiliRFydAhxH2-Dp1RKuz6sq7vgWIcMvLMi68ftg@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127506510328758&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16137 Subject : Ooops in BTRFS in 2.6.34 / x86_64 when mounting subvolume by name Submitter : armin walland <a.walland@focusmr.com> Date : 2010-05-27 12:27 (25 days old) Message-ID : <201005271428.01239.a.walland@focusmr.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127496434110736&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16135 Subject : [BUG] kacpi_notify goes into an infinite loop (luckly it calls cond_resched) Submitter : Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date : 2010-05-29 1:01 (23 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fa80945269f312bc609e8384302f58b03c916e12 Message-ID : <1275094882.22648.607.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127509490405845&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111 Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0 Submitter : Petr Pisar <petr.pisar@atlas.cz> Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (19 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16097 Subject : 2.6.34 on Samsung P460: reset after "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated" Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> Date : 2010-05-25 9:12 (27 days old) Message-ID : <4BFB947E.9080509@aixigo.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127477877432254&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16084 Subject : iwl3945 bug in 2.6.34 Submitter : Satish Eerpini <eerpini@gmail.com> Date : 2010-05-23 6:37 (29 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTik_7rxDBc0TKlAfoYyM5S6Cf_Hyxbr4W5ORnTsq@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127459596015626&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16082 Subject : host panic on kernel 2.6.34 Submitter : Hao, Xudong <xudong.hao@intel.com> Date : 2010-05-24 8:23 (28 days old) Message-ID : <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E04DCCCE242@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127468951208864&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16050 Subject : The ibmcam driver is not working Submitter : Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> Date : 2010-05-25 23:02 (27 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16035 Subject : Incorrect initial resolution of (external) vga monitor with KMS Submitter : <andreas.eckstein@gmx.net> Date : 2010-05-23 12:28 (29 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16034 Subject : 2.6.34: dlm: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : CaT <cat@zip.com.au> Date : 2010-05-21 6:59 (31 days old) Message-ID : <20100521065933.GH2657@zip.com.au> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127442519608471&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15977 Subject : WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:866 check_for_stack Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-05-14 8:56 (38 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTikyx2eaxaiUCFDSfpmn1UG0t2GOxArz6F4wp1LJ@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127382742729825&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15936 Subject : Suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.34-rc6 boot on PPC64/p5 processor Submitter : Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2010-05-06 7:29 (46 days old) Message-ID : <1273130279.4898.5.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127313031922395&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15924 Subject : kacpid consumes ~100% CPU, system freezes randomly Submitter : Jaroslav Kameník <jaroslav@kamenik.cz> Date : 2010-05-06 21:12 (46 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862 Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org> Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (55 days old) Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805 Subject : reiserfs locking Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (67 days old) Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2 Handled-By : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717 Subject : bluetooth oops Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (99 days old) Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4 Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (82 days old) Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673 Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (85 days old) Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671 Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (86 days old) Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2 Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669 Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (105 days old) Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664 Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (81 days old) Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16147 Subject : ksoftirq hogs the CPU Submitter : Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com> Date : 2010-06-07 15:17 (14 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/ae74e823cb7d4cd476f623fce9a38f625f6c09a8 Handled-By : Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26732 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16138 Subject : PCMCIA regression Submitter : Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Date : 2010-05-25 20:25 (27 days old) Message-ID : <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005251619020.12278@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127481913909672&w=2 Handled-By : Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26685 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16054 Subject : UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB Submitter : Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com> Date : 2010-05-23 21:40 (29 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005231149100.605@parag-laptop> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127465083806617&w=2 Handled-By : Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Patch : http://git.kernel.org/tip/055c47272b8f5679d08ccc57efea3cb4aaeb5fc6 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16040 Subject : kacpid consumes ~40% of cpu all the time beginning with 2.6.34 Submitter : Mehmet Giritli <mehmet@giritli.eu> Date : 2010-05-24 07:32 (28 days old) Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104903/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104912/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104909/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104911/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104910/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16007 Subject : x86/pci Oops with CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL Submitter : Graham Ramsey <ramsey.graham@ntlworld.com> Date : 2010-05-19 17:09 (33 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105662/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951 Subject : commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff Submitter : Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 13:39 (81 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9630bdd9b15d2f489c646d8bc04b60e53eb5ec78 Message-ID : <20100401133923.GA4104@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127012918316305&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/106701/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863 Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (55 days old) Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2 Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/96096/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old) Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310 Please let the tracking teak know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-06-20 22:32 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, Jindřich Makovička, Michael Ellerman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old) Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, Jindřich Makovička, Michael Ellerman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old) Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh-JsoAwUIsXov1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.orgl.com>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org> Jindřich Makovička <makovick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2010-06-21 22:19 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 2010-06-21 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-06-21 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List [-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1155 bytes --] Hi On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old) > Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> > Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com> > Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html At least the effects on b2c2-flexcop-pci are still valid, in linux-2.6 HEAD and linux-next (next-20100621). Regards Stefan Lippers-Hollmann [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-21 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old) > > Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > > Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> > > Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com> > > Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html > > At least the effects on b2c2-flexcop-pci are still valid, in linux-2.6 > HEAD and linux-next (next-20100621). Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-21 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old) > > Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > > Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org> > > Jindøich Makovièka <makovick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > > Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html > > At least the effects on b2c2-flexcop-pci are still valid, in linux-2.6 > HEAD and linux-next (next-20100621). Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) (?) @ 2010-06-26 1:04 ` Christian Kujau -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-06-26 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jindřich Makovička, Michael Ellerman, Grant Likely, Alexey Dobriyan Sorry for the late reply: On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 at 00:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Yes, the bug is still present in 2.6.34 and .35-rc3, but a tested patch is available, hopefully to be included in 2.6.35. Thanks, Christian. > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old) > Message-ID : < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> > Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com> > Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html -- BOFH excuse #302: microelectronic Riemannian curved-space fault in write-only file system ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 @ 2010-06-13 14:45 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-13 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI [NOTES: * This report has been delayed, because I had to go through all of the entries and filter out the fixed ones, invalid ones etc. Of course, I might have missed some, but hopefully not too many. * E-mail reports from the last 7 days are not included.] This message contains a list of some post-2.6.33 regressions introduced before 2.6.34, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.33 regressions, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-06-13 111 40 34 2010-05-09 80 27 24 2010-05-04 76 26 22 2010-04-20 64 35 34 2010-04-07 48 35 33 2010-03-21 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16170 Subject : Leadtek Winfast DTV Dongle (STK7700P based) is not working in 2.6.34 Submitter : macjariel <macjariel@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-09 11:11 (5 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16162 Subject : SSD + sata_nv + btrfs oops Submitter : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Date : 2010-06-01 3:04 (13 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTilqsIdlzZgUf7TMLHYKqHDZoVkcs42vcG8wXKEr@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127536149022333&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16158 Subject : winxp guest hangs after idle for ~30 minutes Submitter : brimhall <brimhall@pobox.com> Date : 2010-06-08 17:52 (6 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16139 Subject : wait_even_interruptible_timeout(), signal, spin_lock() = system hang Submitter : Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com> Date : 2010-05-28 16:44 (17 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTiliRFydAhxH2-Dp1RKuz6sq7vgWIcMvLMi68ftg@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127506510328758&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16137 Subject : Ooops in BTRFS in 2.6.34 / x86_64 when mounting subvolume by name Submitter : armin walland <a.walland@focusmr.com> Date : 2010-05-27 12:27 (18 days old) Message-ID : <201005271428.01239.a.walland@focusmr.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127496434110736&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16136 Subject : Linux 2.6.34 causes system lockup on Compaq Presario 2200 Laptop Submitter : Jeffrey Merkey <jeffmerkey@gmail.com> Date : 2010-05-27 18:08 (18 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTil6GGSoc8TpzRacr1LZBZS3ee3H1ejYDSqfdul4@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127498375415689&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16135 Subject : [BUG] kacpi_notify goes into an infinite loop (luckly it calls cond_resched) Submitter : Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date : 2010-05-29 1:01 (16 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fa80945269f312bc609e8384302f58b03c916e12 Message-ID : <1275094882.22648.607.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127509490405845&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16134 Subject : 2.6.34 hard lock ppp/do_tty_hangup, regression Submitter : Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org> Date : 2010-05-26 8:48 (19 days old) Message-ID : <20100526084811.GA5890@linux-m68k.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127486354023473&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16111 Subject : hostap_pci: infinite registered netdevice wifi0 Submitter : Petr Pisar <petr.pisar@atlas.cz> Date : 2010-06-02 20:55 (12 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16097 Subject : 2.6.34 on Samsung P460: reset after "Waiting for /dev to be fully populated" Submitter : Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de> Date : 2010-05-25 9:12 (20 days old) Message-ID : <4BFB947E.9080509@aixigo.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127477877432254&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16084 Subject : iwl3945 bug in 2.6.34 Submitter : Satish Eerpini <eerpini@gmail.com> Date : 2010-05-23 6:37 (22 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTik_7rxDBc0TKlAfoYyM5S6Cf_Hyxbr4W5ORnTsq@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127459596015626&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16082 Subject : host panic on kernel 2.6.34 Submitter : Hao, Xudong <xudong.hao@intel.com> Date : 2010-05-24 8:23 (21 days old) Message-ID : <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E04DCCCE242@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127468951208864&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16054 Subject : UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB Submitter : Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com> Date : 2010-05-23 21:40 (22 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005231149100.605@parag-laptop> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127465083806617&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16050 Subject : The ibmcam driver is not working Submitter : Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> Date : 2010-05-25 23:02 (20 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16040 Subject : kacpid consumes ~40% of cpu all the time beginning with 2.6.34 Submitter : Mehmet Giritli <mehmet@giritli.eu> Date : 2010-05-24 07:32 (21 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16035 Subject : Incorrect initial resolution of (external) vga monitor with KMS Submitter : andreas.eckstein <andreas.eckstein@gmx.net> Date : 2010-05-23 12:28 (22 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16034 Subject : 2.6.34: dlm: possible circular locking dependency detected Submitter : CaT <cat@zip.com.au> Date : 2010-05-21 6:59 (24 days old) Message-ID : <20100521065933.GH2657@zip.com.au> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127442519608471&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15977 Subject : WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:866 check_for_stack Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-05-14 8:56 (31 days old) Message-ID : <AANLkTikyx2eaxaiUCFDSfpmn1UG0t2GOxArz6F4wp1LJ@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127382742729825&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15970 Subject : BUG: amd64-agp (2.6.34-rc7) Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2010-05-11 20:56 (34 days old) Message-ID : <4BE9C469.2020901@oracle.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127361149610881&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951 Subject : commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff Submitter : Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 13:39 (74 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9630bdd9b15d2f489c646d8bc04b60e53eb5ec78 Message-ID : <20100401133923.GA4104@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127012918316305&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15936 Subject : Suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.34-rc6 boot on PPC64/p5 processor Submitter : Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2010-05-06 7:29 (39 days old) Message-ID : <1273130279.4898.5.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127313031922395&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15924 Subject : kacpid consumes ~100% CPU, system freezes randomly Submitter : Jaroslav Kameník <jaroslav@kamenik.cz> Date : 2010-05-06 21:12 (39 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862 Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org> Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (48 days old) Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15858 Subject : [2.6.34-rc5] bad page state copying to/from HFS+ filesystem... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-25 21:14 (50 days old) Message-ID : <v2k6278d2221004251414kbbcc41baw78b86120d81dce7d@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127223008621881&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805 Subject : reiserfs locking Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (60 days old) Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2 Handled-By : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717 Subject : bluetooth oops Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (92 days old) Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4 Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713 Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (81 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864 Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4 Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712 Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (74 days old) Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2 Handled-By : Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (75 days old) Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673 Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (78 days old) Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671 Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (79 days old) Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2 Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669 Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (98 days old) Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664 Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (74 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659 Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (81 days old) Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2 Handled-By : Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16147 Subject : ksoftirq hogs the CPU Submitter : Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com> Date : 2010-06-07 15:17 (7 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/ae74e823cb7d4cd476f623fce9a38f625f6c09a8 Handled-By : Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26732 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16138 Subject : PCMCIA regression Submitter : Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Date : 2010-05-25 20:25 (20 days old) Message-ID : <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005251619020.12278@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127481913909672&w=2 Handled-By : Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26685 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16007 Subject : x86/pci Oops with CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL Submitter : Graham Ramsey <ramsey.graham@ntlworld.com> Date : 2010-05-19 17:09 (26 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105662/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15909 Subject : open("a/",O_NOFOLLOW) fails with ELOOP if "a" is a symbolic link to a directory. Submitter : Marius Tolzmann <tolzmann@molgen.mpg.de> Date : 2010-05-05 13:01 (40 days old) Handled-By : OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/99291/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863 Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (48 days old) Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2 Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/96096/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old) Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310 Please let the tracking teak know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-06-13 14:45 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old) Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-13 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old) Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-06-13 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 15:22 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-06-13 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab Hi On Sunday 13 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old) > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> > Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week: From: Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH] DVB flexcop-pci: sanitize driver name to avoid warning on load Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:51:30 +0200 Message-ID: <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com> URL: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html Regards Stefan Lippers-Hollmann ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-13 15:22 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-06-13 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ Hi On Sunday 13 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old) > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org> > Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week: From: Jindřich Makovička <makovick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Subject: [PATCH] DVB flexcop-pci: sanitize driver name to avoid warning on load Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:51:30 +0200 Message-ID: <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom> URL: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html Regards Stefan Lippers-Hollmann ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-13 18:10 ` Christian Kujau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-06-13 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue > for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week: So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues? * http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver. * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go away too. Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually. Thanks, Christian. -- BOFH excuse #363: Out of cards on drive D: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-13 18:10 ` Christian Kujau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-06-13 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue > for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week: So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues? * http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver. * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go away too. Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually. Thanks, Christian. -- BOFH excuse #363: Out of cards on drive D: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-13 19:57 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-13 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: >> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue >> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week: > > So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues? > > * http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html > ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver. > > * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ > ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their > name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go > away too. > > Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that > Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually. On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. I'll pick up the device tree patch, but the flexcop-pci patch should go in by the v4l/dvb tree. g. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-13 19:57 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-13 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: >> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue >> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week: > > So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues? > > * http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html > ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver. > > * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/ > ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their > name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go > away too. > > Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that > Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually. On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. I'll pick up the device tree patch, but the flexcop-pci patch should go in by the v4l/dvb tree. g. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-06-14 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Grant Likely Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt > the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq() ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-06-14 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Grant Likely Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt > the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq() ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-06-14 12:27 ` Jindrich Makovicka -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Jindrich Makovicka @ 2010-06-14 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: kernel-testers, linux-media On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:39:48 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I > > doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. > > It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq() Yes, the latter patch dodges the issue with flexcop driver by simply skipping the directory creation, but both patches should be applied IMO. The former to fix the flexcop driver because we can trivially fix it, the latter to solve problems with any generic bogus firmware. -- Jindrich Makovicka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-14 12:27 ` Jindrich Makovicka 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Jindrich Makovicka @ 2010-06-14 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-media; +Cc: kernel-testers, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, linux-media On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:39:48 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I > > doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. > > It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq() Yes, the latter patch dodges the issue with flexcop driver by simply skipping the directory creation, but both patches should be applied IMO. The former to fix the flexcop driver because we can trivially fix it, the latter to solve problems with any generic bogus firmware. -- Jindrich Makovicka ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-06-14 15:42 ` Grant Likely -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-14 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt >> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. > > It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq() I think we've crossed wires. By second patch I mean the patch that changes OF code. That change has absolutely no bearing on the flexcop-pci driver. The patch to the flexcop-pci driver looks correct to me, but it is completely unrelated to the OF badness. g. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-06-14 15:42 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-14 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt >> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. > > It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq() I think we've crossed wires. By second patch I mean the patch that changes OF code. That change has absolutely no bearing on the flexcop-pci driver. The patch to the flexcop-pci driver looks correct to me, but it is completely unrelated to the OF badness. g. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* 2.6.34-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-05-09 21:13 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-05-09 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-09 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-05-09 80 27 24 2010-05-04 76 26 22 2010-04-20 64 35 34 2010-04-07 48 35 33 2010-03-21 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951 Subject : commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff Submitter : Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 13:39 (39 days old) Message-ID : <20100401133923.GA4104@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127012918316305&w=4 Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15936 Subject : Suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.34-rc6 boot on PPC64/p5 processor Submitter : Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2010-05-06 7:29 (4 days old) Message-ID : <1273130279.4898.5.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127313031922395&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15935 Subject : [BUG] btrfs: report a direct-IO bug Submitter : liubo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Date : 2010-05-06 1:47 (4 days old) Message-ID : <4BE21FC1.1010901@cn.fujitsu.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127311036803487&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15924 Subject : kacpid consumes ~100% CPU, system freezes randomly Submitter : Jaroslav Kameník <jaroslav@kamenik.cz> Date : 2010-05-06 21:12 (4 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15909 Subject : open("a/",O_NOFOLLOW) fails with ELOOP if "a" is a symbolic link to a directory. Submitter : Marius Tolzmann <tolzmann@molgen.mpg.de> Date : 2010-05-05 13:01 (5 days old) Handled-By : OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880 Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def Submitter : Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (11 days old) Message-ID : <loom.20100429T041908-663@post.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863 Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (13 days old) Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862 Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org> Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (13 days old) Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15858 Subject : [2.6.34-rc5] bad page state copying to/from HFS+ filesystem... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-25 21:14 (15 days old) Message-ID : <v2k6278d2221004251414kbbcc41baw78b86120d81dce7d@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127223008621881&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805 Subject : reiserfs locking Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (25 days old) Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15788 Subject : external usb sound card doesn't work after resume Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be> Date : 2010-04-15 10:16 (25 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717 Subject : bluetooth oops Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (57 days old) Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4 Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713 Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (46 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864 Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4 Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712 Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (39 days old) Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (40 days old) Message-ID : <<<20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673 Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (43 days old) Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671 Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (44 days old) Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669 Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (63 days old) Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664 Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (39 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659 Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (46 days old) Message-ID : <<201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610 Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (49 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601 Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (56 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (57 days old) Message-ID : <<20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old) Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15768 Subject : Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage Submitter : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Date : 2010-04-12 11:24 (28 days old) Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/49989/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729 Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (38 days old) Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2 Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505 Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (61 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310 Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-05-09 21:13 2.6.34-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-09 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-09 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old) Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-05-09 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-09 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old) Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-05-09 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-05-09 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, adobriyan, schwab, michael, linuxppc-dev On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old) > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] which made the warning go away. @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be pushed into mainline? Thanks, Christian. [0] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50557/ diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index ce94801..019581d 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry: return fixed_name; } +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) +{ + char *p, *fixed_name; + + fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!fixed_name) { + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " + "name \"%s\"\n", name); + return name; + } + + p = fixed_name; + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) + *p++ = '_'; + + return fixed_name; +} + /* * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties. */ @@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np, if (duplicate_name(de, p)) p = fixup_name(np, de, p); + if (strstr(p, "/")) + p = unslash_name(p); + ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p); if (ent == NULL) break; -- BOFH excuse #188: ..disk or the processor is on fire. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-05-09 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old) > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] which made the warning go away. @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be pushed into mainline? Thanks, Christian. [0] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50557/ diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index ce94801..019581d 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry: return fixed_name; } +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) +{ + char *p, *fixed_name; + + fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!fixed_name) { + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " + "name \"%s\"\n", name); + return name; + } + + p = fixed_name; + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) + *p++ = '_'; + + return fixed_name; +} + /* * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties. */ @@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np, if (duplicate_name(de, p)) p = fixup_name(np, de, p); + if (strstr(p, "/")) + p = unslash_name(p); + ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p); if (ent == NULL) break; -- BOFH excuse #188: ..disk or the processor is on fire. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-05-09 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old) > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] which made the warning go away. @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be pushed into mainline? Thanks, Christian. [0] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50557/ diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index ce94801..019581d 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry: return fixed_name; } +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) +{ + char *p, *fixed_name; + + fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!fixed_name) { + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " + "name \"%s\"\n", name); + return name; + } + + p = fixed_name; + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) + *p++ = '_'; + + return fixed_name; +} + /* * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties. */ @@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np, if (duplicate_name(de, p)) p = fixup_name(np, de, p); + if (strstr(p, "/")) + p = unslash_name(p); + ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p); if (ent == NULL) break; -- BOFH excuse #188: ..disk or the processor is on fire. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau (?) @ 2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-05-09 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, adobriyan, schwab, linuxppc-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 922 bytes --] On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old) > > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > > The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] > which made the warning go away. > > @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be > pushed into mainline? No, Benh and I decided it's better to just drop those properties all together. But it's too late in this cycle for a patch like that just to fix a warning - so we'll do that patch for 35. cheers [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-05-09 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 977 bytes --] On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old) > > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > > The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] > which made the warning go away. > > @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be > pushed into mainline? No, Benh and I decided it's better to just drop those properties all together. But it's too late in this cycle for a patch like that just to fix a warning - so we'll do that patch for 35. cheers [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-05-09 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 922 bytes --] On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old) > > Message-ID : <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > > The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] > which made the warning go away. > > @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be > pushed into mainline? No, Benh and I decided it's better to just drop those properties all together. But it's too late in this cycle for a patch like that just to fix a warning - so we'll do that patch for 35. cheers [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-05-04 20:49 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-05-04 76 26 22 2010-04-20 64 35 34 2010-04-07 48 35 33 2010-03-21 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880 Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def Submitter : Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (6 days old) Message-ID : <loom.20100429T041908-663@post.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863 Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (8 days old) Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862 Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org> Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (8 days old) Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15858 Subject : [2.6.34-rc5] bad page state copying to/from HFS+ filesystem... Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-25 21:14 (10 days old) Message-ID : <v2k6278d2221004251414kbbcc41baw78b86120d81dce7d@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127223008621881&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805 Subject : reiserfs locking Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (20 days old) Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15790 Subject : Meta-Bug: Regressions Submitter : Florian Mickler <fmickler@gmx.de> Date : 2010-04-15 18:21 (20 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15788 Subject : external usb sound card doesn't work after resume Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be> Date : 2010-04-15 10:16 (20 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717 Subject : bluetooth oops Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (52 days old) Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4 Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713 Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (41 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864 Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4 Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712 Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (34 days old) Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (35 days old) Message-ID : <<20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673 Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (38 days old) Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671 Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (39 days old) Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669 Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (58 days old) Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664 Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (34 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659 Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (41 days old) Message-ID : <<201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625 Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (48 days old) Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611 Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com> Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (50 days old) Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610 Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (44 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601 Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (51 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (52 days old) Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15893 Subject : Alps: No edge-scrolling since 2.6.34-rc5 Submitter : Felix Zweig <f.zweig@yahoo.de> Date : 2010-05-01 16:23 (4 days old) Handled-By : Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26218 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15768 Subject : Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage Submitter : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Date : 2010-04-12 11:24 (23 days old) Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/49989/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729 Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old) Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2 Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505 Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (56 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310 Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-05-04 20:49 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-05-05 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, linux-media Hi On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old) > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2: [ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00 [ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully [ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter. [ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2 [ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 [ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0() [ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3 [ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver' [ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1 [ 8.818833] Call Trace: [ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0 [ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50 [ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0 [ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150 [ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60 [ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130 [ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330 [ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] [ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0 [ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] [ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20 [ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130 [ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80 [ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190 [ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0 [ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0 [ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80 [ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250 [ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130 [ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0 [ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] [ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0 [ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260 [ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]--- [ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device) [ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6 Regards Stefan Lippers-Hollmann ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-05-05 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Hi On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old) > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2: [ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00 [ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully [ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter. [ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2 [ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 [ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0() [ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3 [ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver' [ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1 [ 8.818833] Call Trace: [ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0 [ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50 [ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0 [ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150 [ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60 [ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130 [ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330 [ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] [ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0 [ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] [ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20 [ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130 [ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80 [ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190 [ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0 [ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0 [ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80 [ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250 [ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130 [ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0 [ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] [ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0 [ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260 [ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]--- [ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device) [ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6 Regards Stefan Lippers-Hollmann ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, linux-media On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > Hi > > On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old) > > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > > Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2: > > [ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00 > [ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully > [ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter. > [ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2 > [ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 > [ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0() > [ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3 > [ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver' > [ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] > [ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1 > [ 8.818833] Call Trace: > [ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0 > [ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50 > [ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0 > [ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150 > [ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60 > [ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130 > [ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330 > [ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] > [ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0 > [ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] > [ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20 > [ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130 > [ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80 > [ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190 > [ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0 > [ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0 > [ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80 > [ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250 > [ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130 > [ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0 > [ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] > [ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0 > [ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260 > [ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > [ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]--- > [ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device) > [ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6 Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > Hi > > On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old) > > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > > Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2: > > [ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00 > [ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully > [ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter. > [ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2 > [ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 > [ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0() > [ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3 > [ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver' > [ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] > [ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1 > [ 8.818833] Call Trace: > [ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0 > [ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50 > [ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0 > [ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150 > [ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60 > [ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130 > [ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330 > [ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] > [ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0 > [ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] > [ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20 > [ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130 > [ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80 > [ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190 > [ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0 > [ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0 > [ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80 > [ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250 > [ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130 > [ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0 > [ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] > [ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0 > [ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260 > [ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > [ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]--- > [ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device) > [ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6 Thanks for the update. Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-04-20 3:15 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-20 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-04-20 64 35 34 2010-04-07 48 35 33 2010-03-21 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15812 Subject : utsname.domainname not set in x86_32 processes (causing "YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: domain not bound" errors) Submitter : <adi@hexapodia.org> Date : 2010-04-19 21:28 (1 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805 Subject : reiserfs locking Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (5 days old) Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15796 Subject : [REGRESSION bisected] Sound goes too fast due to commit 7b3a177b0 Submitter : Éric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net> Date : 2010-04-13 21:54 (7 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://kernel.org/git/linus/7b3a177b0d4f92b3431b8dca777313a07533a710 Message-ID : <4BC4E812.6050602@tremplin-utc.net> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127119569009790&w=2 Handled-By : Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15795 Subject : 2.6.34-rc4 : OOPS in unmap_vma Submitter : Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-14 (6 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.00.1004132147260.1881@parag-laptop> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127121006625429&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15790 Subject : Meta-Bug: Regressions Submitter : Florian Mickler <fmickler@gmx.de> Date : 2010-04-15 18:21 (5 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15788 Subject : external usb sound card doesn't work after resume Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be> Date : 2010-04-15 10:16 (5 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15774 Subject : 2.6.34-rc3: eth0 (8139too): transmit queue 0 timed out Submitter : Németh Márton <nm127@freemail.hu> Date : 2010-04-10 12:33 (10 days old) Message-ID : <4BC07022.6000708@freemail.hu> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127090287021976&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15768 Subject : Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage Submitter : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Date : 2010-04-12 11:24 (8 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15744 Subject : [2.6.34-rc1 REGRESSION] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: controller reset failed (0xffffffff) Submitter : Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> Date : 2010-04-06 22:54 (14 days old) Message-ID : <<4BC51312.6080302@oracle.com></desc>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127059449031511&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15730 Subject : Ugly rmap NULL ptr deref oopsie on hibernate (was Linux 2.6.34-rc3) Submitter : Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Date : 2010-04-02 17:59 (18 days old) Message-ID : <20100402175937.GA19690@liondog.tnic> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127023173329741&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729 Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (18 days old) Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719 Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de> Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (24 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399 Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4 Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717 Subject : bluetooth oops Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (37 days old) Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4 Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713 Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (26 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864 Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4 Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712 Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (19 days old) Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15711 Subject : 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989 Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> Date : 2010-04-01 17:52 (19 days old) Message-ID : <20100401175225.GA6581@fancy-poultry.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127014437406250&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704 Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (20 days old) Message-ID : <<20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15698 Subject : Freeze on power-off / suspend to ram Submitter : arond <hector1987@gmail.com> Date : 2010-04-05 13:53 (15 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673 Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (23 days old) Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15672 Subject : KVM bug, git bisected Submitter : Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-27 12:43 (24 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://kernel.org/git/linus/5beb49305251e5669852ed541e8e2f2f7696c53e Message-ID : <4BADFD74.8060904@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126969385121711&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671 Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (24 days old) Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669 Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (43 days old) Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668 Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (26 days old) First-Bad-Commit: http://kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 Message-ID : <20100325194100.GA2364@debian> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954607216519&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664 Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (19 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661 Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (25 days old) Message-ID : <<1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659 Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (26 days old) Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625 Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (33 days old) Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611 Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com> Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (35 days old) Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610 Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com> Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (29 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601 Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (36 days old) Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (37 days old) Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15553 Subject : Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45) Submitter : <bugs@kaijauch.de> Date : 2010-03-17 14:35 (34 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551 Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (35 days old) Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505 Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (41 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310 Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 3:15 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-20 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-20 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) @ 2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, adobriyan, linuxppc-dev, benh, schwab On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old) > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is still printed during boot: device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1" name 'pulses/rev' ------------[ cut here ]------------ Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317 NIP: c00e14b8 LR: c00e14b8 CTR: c01fc2c0 REGS: c045bdc0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.34-rc4) MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR> CR: 22000022 XER: 20000000 TASK = c043b410[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c045a000 GPR00: c00e14b8 c045be70 c043b410 00000024 000012ff ffffffff ffffffff 00000000 GPR08: ef808320 c0458670 00000000 000012ff 42000028 00000000 00cb3ccc 00cb39b8 GPR16: 00cd682c 00cb3ca8 00cb38c8 00cb39ac 00240e18 00240e20 00cb3954 00240e24 GPR24: 00000000 0049b000 c045be98 c045bec8 c0da0a42 c0da0a42 00000006 00000000 NIP [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 LR [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 Call Trace: [c045be70] [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 (unreliable) [c045be90] [c00e1a2c] __proc_create+0x60/0xf0 [c045bec0] [c00e2194] proc_create_data+0x54/0xc4 [c045bee0] [c00e6310] __proc_device_tree_add_prop+0x64/0xd4 [c045bf00] [c00e64b4] proc_device_tree_add_node+0x134/0x164 [c045bf20] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bf40] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bf60] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bf80] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bfa0] [c0421c30] proc_device_tree_init+0x4c/0x78 [c045bfb0] [c0421698] proc_root_init+0xcc/0xf0 [c045bfc0] [c040e798] start_kernel+0x230/0x284 [c045bff0] [00003444] 0x3444 Instruction dump: 93ba0000 38600000 93fb0000 80010024 bb410008 38210020 7c0803a6 4e800020 3c60c03c 7f84e378 386300a8 48273a45 <0fe00000> 80010024 3860fffe bb410008 -- BOFH excuse #37: heavy gravity fluctuation, move computer to floor rapidly ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A, benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old) > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is still printed during boot: device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1" name 'pulses/rev' ------------[ cut here ]------------ Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317 NIP: c00e14b8 LR: c00e14b8 CTR: c01fc2c0 REGS: c045bdc0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.34-rc4) MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR> CR: 22000022 XER: 20000000 TASK = c043b410[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c045a000 GPR00: c00e14b8 c045be70 c043b410 00000024 000012ff ffffffff ffffffff 00000000 GPR08: ef808320 c0458670 00000000 000012ff 42000028 00000000 00cb3ccc 00cb39b8 GPR16: 00cd682c 00cb3ca8 00cb38c8 00cb39ac 00240e18 00240e20 00cb3954 00240e24 GPR24: 00000000 0049b000 c045be98 c045bec8 c0da0a42 c0da0a42 00000006 00000000 NIP [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 LR [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 Call Trace: [c045be70] [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 (unreliable) [c045be90] [c00e1a2c] __proc_create+0x60/0xf0 [c045bec0] [c00e2194] proc_create_data+0x54/0xc4 [c045bee0] [c00e6310] __proc_device_tree_add_prop+0x64/0xd4 [c045bf00] [c00e64b4] proc_device_tree_add_node+0x134/0x164 [c045bf20] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bf40] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bf60] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bf80] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bfa0] [c0421c30] proc_device_tree_init+0x4c/0x78 [c045bfb0] [c0421698] proc_root_init+0xcc/0xf0 [c045bfc0] [c040e798] start_kernel+0x230/0x284 [c045bff0] [00003444] 0x3444 Instruction dump: 93ba0000 38600000 93fb0000 80010024 bb410008 38210020 7c0803a6 4e800020 3c60c03c 7f84e378 386300a8 48273a45 <0fe00000> 80010024 3860fffe bb410008 -- BOFH excuse #37: heavy gravity fluctuation, move computer to floor rapidly ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old) > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is still printed during boot: device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1" name 'pulses/rev' ------------[ cut here ]------------ Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317 NIP: c00e14b8 LR: c00e14b8 CTR: c01fc2c0 REGS: c045bdc0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.34-rc4) MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR> CR: 22000022 XER: 20000000 TASK = c043b410[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c045a000 GPR00: c00e14b8 c045be70 c043b410 00000024 000012ff ffffffff ffffffff 00000000 GPR08: ef808320 c0458670 00000000 000012ff 42000028 00000000 00cb3ccc 00cb39b8 GPR16: 00cd682c 00cb3ca8 00cb38c8 00cb39ac 00240e18 00240e20 00cb3954 00240e24 GPR24: 00000000 0049b000 c045be98 c045bec8 c0da0a42 c0da0a42 00000006 00000000 NIP [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 LR [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 Call Trace: [c045be70] [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 (unreliable) [c045be90] [c00e1a2c] __proc_create+0x60/0xf0 [c045bec0] [c00e2194] proc_create_data+0x54/0xc4 [c045bee0] [c00e6310] __proc_device_tree_add_prop+0x64/0xd4 [c045bf00] [c00e64b4] proc_device_tree_add_node+0x134/0x164 [c045bf20] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bf40] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bf60] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bf80] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164 [c045bfa0] [c0421c30] proc_device_tree_init+0x4c/0x78 [c045bfb0] [c0421698] proc_root_init+0xcc/0xf0 [c045bfc0] [c040e798] start_kernel+0x230/0x284 [c045bff0] [00003444] 0x3444 Instruction dump: 93ba0000 38600000 93fb0000 80010024 bb410008 38210020 7c0803a6 4e800020 3c60c03c 7f84e378 386300a8 48273a45 <0fe00000> 80010024 3860fffe bb410008 -- BOFH excuse #37: heavy gravity fluctuation, move computer to floor rapidly ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau (?) @ 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old) > > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > > Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is > still printed during boot: > > > device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1" > name 'pulses/rev' > ------------[ cut here ]------------ Don't cut here, sigh. > Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317 Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch. cheers diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index f8650dc..9502b48 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: return fixed_name; } +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) +{ + char *p, *fixed_name; + + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); + if (!fixed_name) { + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " + "name \"%s\"\n", name); + return name; + } + + p = fixed_name; + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) + *p++ = '_'; + + return fixed_name; +} + /* * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties. */ @@ -211,6 +229,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np, if (duplicate_name(de, p)) p = fixup_name(np, de, p); + if (strstr(p, "/")) + p = unslash_name(p); + ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p); if (ent == NULL) break; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> > > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old) > > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > > Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is > still printed during boot: > > > device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1" > name 'pulses/rev' > ------------[ cut here ]------------ Don't cut here, sigh. > Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317 Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch. cheers diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index f8650dc..9502b48 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: return fixed_name; } +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) +{ + char *p, *fixed_name; + + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); + if (!fixed_name) { + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " + "name \"%s\"\n", name); + return name; + } + + p = fixed_name; + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) + *p++ = '_'; + + return fixed_name; +} + /* * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties. */ @@ -211,6 +229,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np, if (duplicate_name(de, p)) p = fixup_name(np, de, p); + if (strstr(p, "/")) + p = unslash_name(p); + ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p); if (ent == NULL) break; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old) > > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 > > Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is > still printed during boot: > > > device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1" > name 'pulses/rev' > ------------[ cut here ]------------ Don't cut here, sigh. > Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317 Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch. cheers diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index f8650dc..9502b48 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: return fixed_name; } +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) +{ + char *p, *fixed_name; + + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); + if (!fixed_name) { + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " + "name \"%s\"\n", name); + return name; + } + + p = fixed_name; + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) + *p++ = '_'; + + return fixed_name; +} + /* * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties. */ @@ -211,6 +229,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np, if (duplicate_name(de, p)) p = fixup_name(np, de, p); + if (strstr(p, "/")) + p = unslash_name(p); + ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p); if (ent == NULL) break; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman (?) (?) @ 2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > return fixed_name; > } > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > +{ > + char *p, *fixed_name; > + > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > + if (!fixed_name) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > + return name; > + } > + > + p = fixed_name; > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > + *p++ = '_'; This is wasteful. :-) Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman ` (2 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > return fixed_name; > } > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > +{ > + char *p, *fixed_name; > + > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > + if (!fixed_name) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > + return name; > + } > + > + p = fixed_name; > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > + *p++ = '_'; This is wasteful. :-) Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman ` (3 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > return fixed_name; > } > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > +{ > + char *p, *fixed_name; > + > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > + if (!fixed_name) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > + return name; > + } > + > + p = fixed_name; > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > + *p++ = '_'; This is wasteful. :-) Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman (?) @ 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch. I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away: fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’: fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’ make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2 make: *** [fs] Error 2 And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks! New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/ Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower? I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\ Thanks again, Christian. diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index ce94801..019581d 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry: return fixed_name; } +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) +{ + char *p, *fixed_name; + + fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!fixed_name) { + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " + "name \"%s\"\n", name); + return name; + } + + p = fixed_name; + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) + *p++ = '_'; + + return fixed_name; +} + /* * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties. */ @@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np, if (duplicate_name(de, p)) p = fixup_name(np, de, p); + if (strstr(p, "/")) + p = unslash_name(p); + ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p); if (ent == NULL) break; -- BOFH excuse #369: Virus transmitted from computer to sysadmins. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch. I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away: fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’: fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’ make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2 make: *** [fs] Error 2 And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks! New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/ Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower? I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\ Thanks again, Christian. diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index ce94801..019581d 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry: return fixed_name; } +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) +{ + char *p, *fixed_name; + + fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!fixed_name) { + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " + "name \"%s\"\n", name); + return name; + } + + p = fixed_name; + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) + *p++ = '_'; + + return fixed_name; +} + /* * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties. */ @@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np, if (duplicate_name(de, p)) p = fixup_name(np, de, p); + if (strstr(p, "/")) + p = unslash_name(p); + ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p); if (ent == NULL) break; -- BOFH excuse #369: Virus transmitted from computer to sysadmins. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch. I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away: fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function =E2=80=98unslash_name=E2=80=99: fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function =E2=80=98k= strdup=E2=80=99 make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2 make: *** [fs] Error 2 And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks!=20 New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/ Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower?= =20 I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the=20 warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\ Thanks again, Christian. diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index ce94801..019581d 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry: =09return fixed_name; } =20 +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) +{ +=09char *p, *fixed_name; + +=09fixed_name =3D kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); +=09if (!fixed_name) { +=09=09printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " +=09=09=09=09"name \"%s\"\n", name); +=09return name; +=09} + +=09p =3D fixed_name; +=09while ((p =3D strstr(p, "/"))) +=09=09*p++ =3D '_'; + +=09return fixed_name; +} + /* * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties. */ @@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np, =09=09if (duplicate_name(de, p)) =09=09=09p =3D fixup_name(np, de, p); =20 +=09=09if (strstr(p, "/")) +=09=09=09p =3D unslash_name(p); + =09=09ent =3D __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p); =09=09if (ent =3D=3D NULL) =09=09=09break; --=20 BOFH excuse #369: Virus transmitted from computer to sysadmins. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau (?) @ 2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-04-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Michael Ellerman, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> writes: > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) You want to use strchr. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-04-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Michael Ellerman, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> writes: > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) You want to use strchr. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-04-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> writes: > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) You want to use strchr. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau (?) @ 2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --] On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:15 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch. > > I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away: > > fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’: > fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’ > make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2 > make: *** [fs] Error 2 Yeah oops, told you I hadn't built it. > And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks! > New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on: > > http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/ Cool, and we see: ./uni-n@f8000000/i2c@f8001000/i2c-bus@1/fan@5c/pulses_rev Which is the one that needed fixing. > Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower? > I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the > warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\ Maybe a little. It has to check every string to see if it contains a "/". But then you save the cost of taking an exeception for the WARN, which might make up the difference. But it's a one time fixup at boot, so it's not going to be noticeable. cheers [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --] On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:15 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch. > > I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away: > > fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’: > fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’ > make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2 > make: *** [fs] Error 2 Yeah oops, told you I hadn't built it. > And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks! > New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on: > > http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/ Cool, and we see: ./uni-n@f8000000/i2c@f8001000/i2c-bus@1/fan@5c/pulses_rev Which is the one that needed fixing. > Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower? > I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the > warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\ Maybe a little. It has to check every string to see if it contains a "/". But then you save the cost of taking an exeception for the WARN, which might make up the difference. But it's a one time fixup at boot, so it's not going to be noticeable. cheers [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Kujau Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --] On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:15 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch. > > I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away: > > fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’: > fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’ > make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2 > make: *** [fs] Error 2 Yeah oops, told you I hadn't built it. > And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks! > New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on: > > http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/ Cool, and we see: ./uni-n@f8000000/i2c@f8001000/i2c-bus@1/fan@5c/pulses_rev Which is the one that needed fixing. > Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower? > I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the > warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\ Maybe a little. It has to check every string to see if it contains a "/". But then you save the cost of taking an exeception for the WARN, which might make up the difference. But it's a one time fixup at boot, so it's not going to be noticeable. cheers [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman (?) @ 2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-21 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > return fixed_name; > } > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > +{ > + char *p, *fixed_name; > + > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > + if (!fixed_name) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > + return name; > + } > + > + p = fixed_name; > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > + *p++ = '_'; This is wasteful. :-) Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > return fixed_name; > } > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > +{ > + char *p, *fixed_name; > + > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > + if (!fixed_name) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > + return name; > + } > + > + p = fixed_name; > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > + *p++ = '_'; This is wasteful. :-) Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-21 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > return fixed_name; > } > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > +{ > + char *p, *fixed_name; > + > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > + if (!fixed_name) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > + return name; > + } > + > + p = fixed_name; > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > + *p++ = '_'; This is wasteful. :-) Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan (?) @ 2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --] On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > > return fixed_name; > > } > > > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > > +{ > > + char *p, *fixed_name; > > + > > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > > + if (!fixed_name) { > > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > > + return name; > > + } > > + > > + p = fixed_name; > > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > > + *p++ = '_'; > > This is wasteful. :-) Whatever, patches welcome :) > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit it or something. The error handling in there is a bit dubious, if the alloc fails we just return the old name, which we know is bogus. It should probably return NULL and the calling code can check - same for fixup_name(). cheers [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --] On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > > return fixed_name; > > } > > > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > > +{ > > + char *p, *fixed_name; > > + > > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > > + if (!fixed_name) { > > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > > + return name; > > + } > > + > > + p = fixed_name; > > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > > + *p++ = '_'; > > This is wasteful. :-) Whatever, patches welcome :) > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit it or something. The error handling in there is a bit dubious, if the alloc fails we just return the old name, which we know is bogus. It should probably return NULL and the calling code can check - same for fixup_name(). cheers [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --] On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > > return fixed_name; > > } > > > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > > +{ > > + char *p, *fixed_name; > > + > > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > > + if (!fixed_name) { > > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > > + return name; > > + } > > + > > + p = fixed_name; > > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > > + *p++ = '_'; > > This is wasteful. :-) Whatever, patches welcome :) > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit it or something. The error handling in there is a bit dubious, if the alloc fails we just return the old name, which we know is bogus. It should probably return NULL and the calling code can check - same for fixup_name(). cheers [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman (?) @ 2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-21 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: michael Cc: Alexey Dobriyan, Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > > > return fixed_name; > > > } > > > > > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > > > +{ > > > + char *p, *fixed_name; > > > + > > > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > > > + if (!fixed_name) { > > > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > > > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > > > + return name; > > > + } > > > + > > > + p = fixed_name; > > > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > > > + *p++ = '_'; > > > > This is wasteful. :-) > > Whatever, patches welcome :) > > > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. > > We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit > it or something. OK Is anyone going to post a clean patch for that with a sign-off? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-21 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg Cc: Alexey Dobriyan, Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > > > return fixed_name; > > > } > > > > > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > > > +{ > > > + char *p, *fixed_name; > > > + > > > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > > > + if (!fixed_name) { > > > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > > > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > > > + return name; > > > + } > > > + > > > + p = fixed_name; > > > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > > > + *p++ = '_'; > > > > This is wasteful. :-) > > Whatever, patches welcome :) > > > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. > > We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit > it or something. OK Is anyone going to post a clean patch for that with a sign-off? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 @ 2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-21 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: michael Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan, Maciej Rutecki On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > > > return fixed_name; > > > } > > > > > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > > > +{ > > > + char *p, *fixed_name; > > > + > > > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > > > + if (!fixed_name) { > > > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > > > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > > > + return name; > > > + } > > > + > > > + p = fixed_name; > > > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > > > + *p++ = '_'; > > > > This is wasteful. :-) > > Whatever, patches welcome :) > > > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. > > We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit > it or something. OK Is anyone going to post a clean patch for that with a sign-off? Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (?) (?) @ 2010-04-30 2:44 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann -1 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-04-30 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, linux-media, Trent Piepho Hi On Friday 30 April 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old) > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 This also continues to be a problem with b2c2-flexcop and 2.6.34-rc5-git10: [ 10.119807] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully [ 10.129183] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter. [ 10.129187] flexcop-pci: card revision 2 [ 10.129195] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 [ 10.129239] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 10.129244] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc5/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0() [ 10.129246] Hardware name: EP45-DS3 [ 10.129247] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver' [ 10.129248] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) ath9k_common b2c2_flexcop v4l1_compat snd_timer radeon(+) dvb_core ar9170usb(+) ath9k_hw snd_seq_device ir_common tveeprom ttm v4l2_compat_ioctl32 snd drm_kms_helper ir_core ath mac80211 soundcore videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 drm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc videobuf_core cx24113 s5h1420 cfg80211 rfkill evdev i2c_core tpm_tis btcx_risc tpm led_class pcspkr tpm_bios rtc_cmos button rtc_core intel_agp rtc_lib processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd firewire_ohci firewire_core ahci r8169 ehci_hcd mii libata crc_itu_t scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 10.129279] Pid: 1124, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5-sidux-amd64 #1 [ 10.129281] Call Trace: [ 10.129285] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0 [ 10.129287] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50 [ 10.129290] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0 [ 10.129292] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150 [ 10.129294] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60 [ 10.129297] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130 [ 10.129300] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330 [ 10.129303] [<ffffffffa011b160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] [ 10.129305] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0 [ 10.129308] [<ffffffffa011b495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] [ 10.129312] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20 [ 10.129314] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130 [ 10.129317] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80 [ 10.129320] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190 [ 10.129322] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0 [ 10.129324] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0 [ 10.129326] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80 [ 10.129328] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250 [ 10.129330] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130 [ 10.129332] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0 [ 10.129335] [<ffffffffa012e000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci] [ 10.129338] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0 [ 10.129341] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260 [ 10.129344] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 10.129345] ---[ end trace 370a62256537c67a ]--- [ 10.134144] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device) [ 10.135610] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6 Regards Stefan Lippers-Hollmann ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 @ 2010-03-21 19:58 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI [NOTES: * In this cycle the regressions reported by e-mail will only be put into the Bugzilla 1 week after they have been submitted, if not fixed in the meantime. The reason is that some regressions are fixed in less than a week time and there's no point listing them. [We also hope that people will try to fix bugs faster to avoid being listed. ;-)] If that works, we'll adopt it as a general rule. * All of the regressions reported by e-mail that are listed below have been put into the Bugzilla by Maciej, because I literally didn't have the time to do that (that's also why the summary reports are delayed). Thanks Maciej!] This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2010-03-21 15 13 10 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (8 days old) Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (9 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15584 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: lockdep warning on geode subnotebook Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Date : 2010-03-13 10:51 (9 days old) Message-ID : <20100313105109.GA9966@elf.ucw.cz> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126847750927601&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15555 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989! Submitter : Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-10 8:29 (12 days old) Message-ID : <2375c9f91003100029q7d64bbf7xce15eee97f7e2190@mail.gmail.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126820979017089&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15549 Subject : [2.6.34-rc1][libata] regression? Submitter : Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr> Date : 2010-03-09 21:47 (13 days old) Message-ID : <4B96C202.6050606@numericable.fr> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126817180811846&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15548 Subject : BUG: key f70f4b50 not in .data Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-09 10:27 (13 days old) Message-ID : <20100309102754.GA3316@swordfish.minsk.epam.com> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126813046113130&w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15533 Subject : i915 fails to set mode in 2.6.34-rc1, ok in 2.6.33-rc8 Submitter : Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@yahoo.com> Date : 2010-03-13 20:37 (9 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518 Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (11 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15496 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Date : 2010-03-09 19:40 (13 days old) Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15495 Subject : Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> Date : 2010-03-09 16:47 (13 days old) Regressions with patches ------------------------ Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1 hangs for 30 seconds when trying to access the disk Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com> Date : 2010-03-14 23:26 (8 days old) Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25516 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505 Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr> Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (12 days old) Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480 Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (13 days old) Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512 For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in references. As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions. There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33, unresolved as well as resolved, at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310 Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to the list in there. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 2010-03-21 19:58 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 183+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589 Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (9 days old) Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 183+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-26 1:05 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 183+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-04-07 21:08 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:08 ` [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 22:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2010-04-07 22:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2010-04-08 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15553] Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45) Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15505] No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15518] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15551] WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]() Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15600] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15603] lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15601] [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 7:16 ` Liang Li 2010-04-08 7:16 ` Liang Li 2010-04-08 7:50 ` Yong Zhang 2010-04-08 7:50 ` Yong Zhang 2010-04-08 8:20 ` Liang Li 2010-04-08 8:20 ` Liang Li 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15611] Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15610] fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 7:32 ` Fabio Comolli 2010-04-08 7:32 ` Fabio Comolli 2010-04-08 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-12 3:00 ` Randy Dunlap 2010-04-12 3:00 ` Randy Dunlap 2010-04-12 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-12 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2010-04-07 21:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2010-04-08 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15664] Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15659] [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15655] corrupt ext3 fs and partial freeze Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 2:29 ` Yong Zhang 2010-04-08 2:29 ` Yong Zhang 2010-04-08 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15673] 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15669] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15671] intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 22:32 ` H. Peter Anvin 2010-04-07 22:32 ` H. Peter Anvin 2010-04-08 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15672] KVM bug, git bisected Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15711] 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-14 10:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 2010-04-14 10:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 2010-04-15 17:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-15 17:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15712] [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15674] [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 11:56 ` Boaz Harrosh 2010-04-08 11:56 ` Boaz Harrosh 2010-04-08 20:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 20:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15716] ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 22:05 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-04-08 20:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 20:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-12 8:39 ` Thomas Müller 2010-04-12 8:39 ` Thomas Müller 2010-04-12 9:28 ` David Miller 2010-04-12 9:28 ` David Miller 2010-04-12 9:50 ` Thomas Müller 2010-04-12 9:50 ` Thomas Müller 2010-04-13 5:01 ` David Miller 2010-04-13 5:01 ` David Miller 2010-04-07 21:53 ` 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 John W. Linville 2010-04-07 21:53 ` John W. Linville 2010-04-07 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-04-07 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro 2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-04-07 23:06 ` Al Viro 2010-04-07 23:06 ` Al Viro 2010-04-07 23:06 ` Al Viro 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2010-06-20 22:32 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-20 22:32 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-20 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-21 22:19 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 2010-06-21 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-21 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-26 1:04 ` Christian Kujau 2010-06-13 14:45 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-13 14:45 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-13 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-06-13 15:22 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 2010-06-13 15:22 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 2010-06-13 18:10 ` Christian Kujau 2010-06-13 18:10 ` Christian Kujau 2010-06-13 19:57 ` Grant Likely 2010-06-13 19:57 ` Grant Likely 2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan 2010-06-14 6:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan 2010-06-14 12:27 ` Jindrich Makovicka 2010-06-14 12:27 ` Jindrich Makovicka 2010-06-14 15:42 ` Grant Likely 2010-06-14 15:42 ` Grant Likely 2010-05-09 21:13 2.6.34-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-05-09 21:17 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-05-09 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau 2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau 2010-05-09 22:27 ` Christian Kujau 2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-05-09 23:34 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-05-04 20:49 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-20 3:15 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-20 3:19 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau 2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau 2010-04-20 6:45 ` Christian Kujau 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-04-20 12:18 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan 2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan 2010-04-20 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau 2010-04-20 18:15 ` Christian Kujau 2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab 2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab 2010-04-20 20:53 ` Andreas Schwab 2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-04-21 0:25 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan 2010-04-20 15:54 ` Alexey Dobriyan 2010-04-21 15:55 ` Alexey Dobriyan 2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-04-21 0:21 ` Michael Ellerman 2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-21 4:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-04-30 2:44 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann 2010-03-21 19:58 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.