From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:34:27 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20110810223427.GA18227@quack.suse.cz> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1312910427.1083.68.camel@twins> On Tue 09-08-11 19:20:27, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:32 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > origin - dirty > > > pos_ratio = -------------- > > > origin - goal > > > > > which comes from the below [*] control line, so that when (dirty == goal), > > > pos_ratio == 1.0: > > > > OK, so basically you want a linear function for which: > > > > f(goal) = 1 and has a root somewhere > goal. > > > > (that one line is much more informative than all your graphs put > > together, one can start from there and derive your function) > > > > That does indeed get you the above function, now what does it mean? > > So going by: > > write_bw > ref_bw = dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio * -------- > dirty_bw Actually, thinking about these formulas, why do we even bother with computing all these factors like write_bw, dirty_bw, pos_ratio, ... Couldn't we just have a feedback loop (probably similar to the one computing pos_ratio) which will maintain single value - ratelimit? When we are getting close to dirty limit, we will scale ratelimit down, when we will be getting significantly below dirty limit, we will scale the ratelimit up. Because looking at the formulas it seems to me that the net effect is the same - pos_ratio basically overrules everything... > pos_ratio seems to be the feedback on the deviation of the dirty pages > around its setpoint. So we adjust the reference bw (or rather ratelimit) > to take account of the shift in output vs input capacity as well as the > shift in dirty pages around its setpoint. > > From that we derive the condition that: > > pos_ratio(setpoint) := 1 > > Now in order to create a linear function we need one more condition. We > get one from the fact that once we hit the limit we should hard throttle > our writers. We get that by setting the ratelimit to 0, because, after > all, pause = nr_dirtied / ratelimit would yield inf. in that case. Thus: > > pos_ratio(limit) := 0 > > Using these two conditions we can solve the equations and get your: > > limit - dirty > pos_ratio(dirty) = ---------------- > limit - setpoint > > Now, for some reason you chose not to use limit, but something like > min(limit, 4*thresh) something to do with the slope affecting the rate > of adjustment. This wants a comment someplace. > > > Now all of the above would seem to suggest: > > dirty_ratelimit := ref_bw > > However for that you use: > > if (pos_bw < dirty_ratelimit && ref_bw < dirty_ratelimit) > dirty_ratelimit = max(ref_bw, pos_bw); > > if (pos_bw > dirty_ratelimit && ref_bw > dirty_ratelimit) > dirty_ratelimit = min(ref_bw, pos_bw); > > You have: > > pos_bw = dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio > > Which is ref_bw without the write_bw/dirty_bw factor, this confuses me.. > why are you ignoring the shift in output vs input rate there? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> SUSE Labs, CR
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:34:27 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20110810223427.GA18227@quack.suse.cz> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1312910427.1083.68.camel@twins> On Tue 09-08-11 19:20:27, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:32 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > origin - dirty > > > pos_ratio = -------------- > > > origin - goal > > > > > which comes from the below [*] control line, so that when (dirty == goal), > > > pos_ratio == 1.0: > > > > OK, so basically you want a linear function for which: > > > > f(goal) = 1 and has a root somewhere > goal. > > > > (that one line is much more informative than all your graphs put > > together, one can start from there and derive your function) > > > > That does indeed get you the above function, now what does it mean? > > So going by: > > write_bw > ref_bw = dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio * -------- > dirty_bw Actually, thinking about these formulas, why do we even bother with computing all these factors like write_bw, dirty_bw, pos_ratio, ... Couldn't we just have a feedback loop (probably similar to the one computing pos_ratio) which will maintain single value - ratelimit? When we are getting close to dirty limit, we will scale ratelimit down, when we will be getting significantly below dirty limit, we will scale the ratelimit up. Because looking at the formulas it seems to me that the net effect is the same - pos_ratio basically overrules everything... > pos_ratio seems to be the feedback on the deviation of the dirty pages > around its setpoint. So we adjust the reference bw (or rather ratelimit) > to take account of the shift in output vs input capacity as well as the > shift in dirty pages around its setpoint. > > From that we derive the condition that: > > pos_ratio(setpoint) := 1 > > Now in order to create a linear function we need one more condition. We > get one from the fact that once we hit the limit we should hard throttle > our writers. We get that by setting the ratelimit to 0, because, after > all, pause = nr_dirtied / ratelimit would yield inf. in that case. Thus: > > pos_ratio(limit) := 0 > > Using these two conditions we can solve the equations and get your: > > limit - dirty > pos_ratio(dirty) = ---------------- > limit - setpoint > > Now, for some reason you chose not to use limit, but something like > min(limit, 4*thresh) something to do with the slope affecting the rate > of adjustment. This wants a comment someplace. > > > Now all of the above would seem to suggest: > > dirty_ratelimit := ref_bw > > However for that you use: > > if (pos_bw < dirty_ratelimit && ref_bw < dirty_ratelimit) > dirty_ratelimit = max(ref_bw, pos_bw); > > if (pos_bw > dirty_ratelimit && ref_bw > dirty_ratelimit) > dirty_ratelimit = min(ref_bw, pos_bw); > > You have: > > pos_bw = dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio > > Which is ref_bw without the write_bw/dirty_bw factor, this confuses me.. > why are you ignoring the shift in output vs input rate there? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-10 22:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 305+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-08-06 8:44 [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v8 Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 22:47 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 22:47 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 12:28 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 12:28 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 23:05 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 23:05 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 22:34 ` Jan Kara [this message] 2011-08-10 22:34 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-11 2:29 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 2:29 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 11:14 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-11 11:14 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-16 8:35 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 8:35 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 13:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 13:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 21:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 21:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-16 8:55 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 8:55 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 22:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-11 22:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-11 22:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 2:43 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 2:43 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 3:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 5:45 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 5:45 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 11:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 11:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 11:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 11:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 12:59 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 12:59 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 14:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 14:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-22 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-22 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-22 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-23 3:40 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-23 3:40 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-23 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-23 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-23 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-23 14:15 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-23 14:15 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-23 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-23 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-24 0:12 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-24 0:12 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-24 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-24 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 0:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 0:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 10:04 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 10:04 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 10:52 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 10:52 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 11:26 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 12:11 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 12:11 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 12:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 12:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 13:13 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 13:18 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 13:18 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 13:24 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 13:24 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-24 18:00 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-24 18:00 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-25 3:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-25 3:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-25 22:20 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-25 22:20 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-26 1:56 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 1:56 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 9:53 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 9:53 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-29 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-29 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-29 13:37 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-29 13:37 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-09-02 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-09-02 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-09-06 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-09-06 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-24 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-24 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-24 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-25 5:30 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-25 5:30 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-23 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-23 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 2:08 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 2:08 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-16 8:59 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 8:59 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 14:54 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 14:54 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 3:42 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 3:42 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 11:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 11:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-15 14:08 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-15 14:08 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 15:50 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 15:50 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 14:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 14:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 14:00 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 14:00 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-15 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-15 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 14:10 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 14:15 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 14:15 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 14:35 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-06 14:35 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-07 6:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-07 6:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:21 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:21 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 23:32 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 23:32 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:23 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:23 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 22:38 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 22:38 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-13 16:28 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-13 16:28 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-15 14:21 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-15 14:26 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-15 14:26 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-09 17:46 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 17:46 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 3:29 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 3:29 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 0:55 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 0:55 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 3:40 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 3:40 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 11:13 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 11:13 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 14:48 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-06 14:48 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-06 14:48 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-07 6:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-07 6:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-07 6:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 16:46 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-06 16:46 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-07 7:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-07 9:50 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-07 9:50 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-09 18:15 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 18:15 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 3:22 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 3:22 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 3:26 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 3:26 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 19:16 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 19:16 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 4:33 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 2:01 ` [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v8 Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 2:01 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 5:55 ` Dave Chinner 2011-08-09 5:55 ` Dave Chinner 2011-08-09 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 7:41 ` Greg Thelen 2011-08-10 7:41 ` Greg Thelen 2011-08-10 7:41 ` Greg Thelen 2011-08-10 18:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 18:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 18:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 3:21 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 3:21 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 20:42 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 20:42 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 21:00 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 21:00 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-16 2:20 [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v9 Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 2:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 2:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 2:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 19:41 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-16 19:41 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-17 13:23 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-17 13:49 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-17 13:49 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-17 20:24 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-17 20:24 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-18 4:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-18 4:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-18 4:41 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-18 4:41 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-18 19:16 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-18 19:16 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-24 3:16 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-24 3:16 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-19 2:53 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-19 2:53 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-19 3:25 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-19 3:25 ` Wu Fengguang [not found] <CAFdhcLRKvfqBnXCXLwq-Qe1eNAGC-8XJ3BtHpQKzaa3RhHyp6A@mail.gmail.com> 2011-08-17 6:40 ` David Horner 2011-08-17 12:03 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-17 12:35 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20110810223427.GA18227@quack.suse.cz \ --to=jack@suse.cz \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=arighi@develer.com \ --cc=david@fromorbit.com \ --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \ --cc=gthelen@google.com \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.