From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:43:54 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20110812024353.GA11606@localhost> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1313103367.26866.39.camel@twins> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:56:06AM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 19:20 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > So going by: > > > > write_bw > > ref_bw = dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio * -------- > > dirty_bw > > > > pos_ratio seems to be the feedback on the deviation of the dirty pages > > around its setpoint. So we adjust the reference bw (or rather ratelimit) > > to take account of the shift in output vs input capacity as well as the > > shift in dirty pages around its setpoint. > > > > From that we derive the condition that: > > > > pos_ratio(setpoint) := 1 > > > > Now in order to create a linear function we need one more condition. We > > get one from the fact that once we hit the limit we should hard throttle > > our writers. We get that by setting the ratelimit to 0, because, after > > all, pause = nr_dirtied / ratelimit would yield inf. in that case. Thus: > > > > pos_ratio(limit) := 0 > > > > Using these two conditions we can solve the equations and get your: > > > > limit - dirty > > pos_ratio(dirty) = ---------------- > > limit - setpoint > > > > Now, for some reason you chose not to use limit, but something like > > min(limit, 4*thresh) something to do with the slope affecting the rate > > of adjustment. This wants a comment someplace. > > Ok, so I think that pos_ratio(limit) := 0, is a stronger condition than > your negative slope (df/dx < 0), simply because it implies your > condition and because it expresses our hard stop at limit. Right. That's good point. > Also, while I know this is totally over the top, but.. > > I saw you added a ramp and brake area in future patches, so have you > considered using a third order polynomial instead? No I have not ;) The 3 lines/curves should be a bit more flexible/configurable than the single 3rd order polynomial. However the 3rd order polynomial is sure much more simple and consistent by removing the explicit rampup/brake areas and curves. > The simple: > > f(x) = -x^3 > > has the 'right' shape, all we need is move it so that: > > f(s) = 1 > > and stretch it to put the single root at our limit. You'd get something > like: > > s - x 3 > f(x) := 1 + (-----) > d > > Which, as required, is 1 at our setpoint and the factor d stretches the > middle bit. Which has a single (real) root at: > > x = s + d, > > by setting that to our limit, we get: > > d = l - s > > Making our final function look like: > > s - x 3 > f(x) := 1 + (-----) > l - s Very intuitive reasoning, thanks! I substituted real numbers to the function assuming a mem=2GB system. with limit=thresh: gnuplot> set xrange [60000:80000] gnuplot> plot 1 + (70000.0 - x)**3/(80000-70000.0)**3 with limit=thresh+thresh/DIRTY_SCOPE gnuplot> set xrange [60000:90000] gnuplot> plot 1 + (70000.0 - x)**3/(90000-70000.0)**3 Figures attached. The latter produces reasonably flat slope and I'll give it a spin in the dd tests :) > You can clamp it at [0,2] or so. Looking at the figures, we may even do without the clamp because it's already inside the range [0, 2]. > The implementation wouldn't be too horrid either, something like: > > unsigned long bdi_pos_ratio(..) > { > if (dirty > limit) > return 0; > > if (dirty < 2*setpoint - limit) > return 2 * SCALE; > > x = SCALE * (setpoint - dirty) / (limit - setpoint); > xx = (x * x) / SCALE; > xxx = (xx * x) / SCALE; > > return xxx; > } Looks very neat, much simpler than the three curves solution! Thanks, Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:43:54 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20110812024353.GA11606@localhost> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1313103367.26866.39.camel@twins> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:56:06AM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 19:20 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > So going by: > > > > write_bw > > ref_bw = dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio * -------- > > dirty_bw > > > > pos_ratio seems to be the feedback on the deviation of the dirty pages > > around its setpoint. So we adjust the reference bw (or rather ratelimit) > > to take account of the shift in output vs input capacity as well as the > > shift in dirty pages around its setpoint. > > > > From that we derive the condition that: > > > > pos_ratio(setpoint) := 1 > > > > Now in order to create a linear function we need one more condition. We > > get one from the fact that once we hit the limit we should hard throttle > > our writers. We get that by setting the ratelimit to 0, because, after > > all, pause = nr_dirtied / ratelimit would yield inf. in that case. Thus: > > > > pos_ratio(limit) := 0 > > > > Using these two conditions we can solve the equations and get your: > > > > limit - dirty > > pos_ratio(dirty) = ---------------- > > limit - setpoint > > > > Now, for some reason you chose not to use limit, but something like > > min(limit, 4*thresh) something to do with the slope affecting the rate > > of adjustment. This wants a comment someplace. > > Ok, so I think that pos_ratio(limit) := 0, is a stronger condition than > your negative slope (df/dx < 0), simply because it implies your > condition and because it expresses our hard stop at limit. Right. That's good point. > Also, while I know this is totally over the top, but.. > > I saw you added a ramp and brake area in future patches, so have you > considered using a third order polynomial instead? No I have not ;) The 3 lines/curves should be a bit more flexible/configurable than the single 3rd order polynomial. However the 3rd order polynomial is sure much more simple and consistent by removing the explicit rampup/brake areas and curves. > The simple: > > f(x) = -x^3 > > has the 'right' shape, all we need is move it so that: > > f(s) = 1 > > and stretch it to put the single root at our limit. You'd get something > like: > > s - x 3 > f(x) := 1 + (-----) > d > > Which, as required, is 1 at our setpoint and the factor d stretches the > middle bit. Which has a single (real) root at: > > x = s + d, > > by setting that to our limit, we get: > > d = l - s > > Making our final function look like: > > s - x 3 > f(x) := 1 + (-----) > l - s Very intuitive reasoning, thanks! I substituted real numbers to the function assuming a mem=2GB system. with limit=thresh: gnuplot> set xrange [60000:80000] gnuplot> plot 1 + (70000.0 - x)**3/(80000-70000.0)**3 with limit=thresh+thresh/DIRTY_SCOPE gnuplot> set xrange [60000:90000] gnuplot> plot 1 + (70000.0 - x)**3/(90000-70000.0)**3 Figures attached. The latter produces reasonably flat slope and I'll give it a spin in the dd tests :) > You can clamp it at [0,2] or so. Looking at the figures, we may even do without the clamp because it's already inside the range [0, 2]. > The implementation wouldn't be too horrid either, something like: > > unsigned long bdi_pos_ratio(..) > { > if (dirty > limit) > return 0; > > if (dirty < 2*setpoint - limit) > return 2 * SCALE; > > x = SCALE * (setpoint - dirty) / (limit - setpoint); > xx = (x * x) / SCALE; > xxx = (xx * x) / SCALE; > > return xxx; > } Looks very neat, much simpler than the three curves solution! Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-12 2:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 305+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-08-06 8:44 [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v8 Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 22:47 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 22:47 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 12:28 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 12:28 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 23:05 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 23:05 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 22:34 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-10 22:34 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-11 2:29 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 2:29 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 11:14 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-11 11:14 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-16 8:35 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 8:35 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 13:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 13:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 21:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 21:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-16 8:55 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 8:55 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 22:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-11 22:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-11 22:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 2:43 ` Wu Fengguang [this message] 2011-08-12 2:43 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 3:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 5:45 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 5:45 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 11:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 11:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 11:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 11:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 12:59 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 12:59 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-12 14:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-12 14:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-22 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-22 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-22 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-23 3:40 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-23 3:40 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-23 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-23 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-23 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-23 14:15 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-23 14:15 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-23 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-23 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-24 0:12 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-24 0:12 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-24 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-24 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 0:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 0:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 10:04 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 10:04 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 10:52 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 10:52 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 11:26 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 12:11 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 12:11 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 12:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 12:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 13:13 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 13:18 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 13:18 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 13:24 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 13:24 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-24 18:00 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-24 18:00 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-25 3:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-25 3:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-25 22:20 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-25 22:20 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-26 1:56 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 1:56 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-26 9:53 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-26 9:53 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-29 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-29 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-29 13:37 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-29 13:37 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-09-02 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-09-02 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-09-06 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-09-06 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-24 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-24 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-24 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-25 5:30 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-25 5:30 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-23 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-23 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 2:08 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 2:08 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-16 8:59 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 8:59 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 14:54 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 14:54 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 3:42 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 3:42 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 11:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 11:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-15 14:08 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-15 14:08 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 15:50 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 15:50 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 14:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 14:07 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 14:00 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 14:00 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-15 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-15 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 14:10 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 14:15 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 14:15 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 14:35 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-06 14:35 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-07 6:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-07 6:19 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:21 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:21 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 23:32 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 23:32 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:23 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:23 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-08 22:38 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-08 22:38 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-13 16:28 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-13 16:28 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-15 14:21 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-15 14:26 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-15 14:26 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-09 17:46 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 17:46 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 3:29 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 3:29 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 0:55 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 0:55 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 3:40 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 3:40 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 11:13 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 11:13 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 8:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 14:48 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-06 14:48 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-06 14:48 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-07 6:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-07 6:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-07 6:44 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-06 16:46 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-06 16:46 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-07 7:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-07 9:50 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-07 9:50 ` Andrea Righi 2011-08-09 18:15 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 18:15 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-09 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra 2011-08-10 3:22 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 3:22 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 3:26 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-10 3:26 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 19:16 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 19:16 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 4:33 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-09 2:01 ` [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v8 Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 2:01 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 5:55 ` Dave Chinner 2011-08-09 5:55 ` Dave Chinner 2011-08-09 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-09 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 7:41 ` Greg Thelen 2011-08-10 7:41 ` Greg Thelen 2011-08-10 7:41 ` Greg Thelen 2011-08-10 18:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 18:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-10 18:40 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 3:21 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 3:21 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-11 20:42 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 20:42 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 21:00 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-11 21:00 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-16 2:20 [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v9 Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 2:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 2:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 2:20 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-16 19:41 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-16 19:41 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-17 13:23 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-17 13:49 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-17 13:49 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-17 20:24 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-17 20:24 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-18 4:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-18 4:18 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-18 4:41 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-18 4:41 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-18 19:16 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-18 19:16 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-24 3:16 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-24 3:16 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-19 2:53 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-19 2:53 ` Vivek Goyal 2011-08-19 3:25 ` Wu Fengguang 2011-08-19 3:25 ` Wu Fengguang [not found] <CAFdhcLRKvfqBnXCXLwq-Qe1eNAGC-8XJ3BtHpQKzaa3RhHyp6A@mail.gmail.com> 2011-08-17 6:40 ` David Horner 2011-08-17 12:03 ` Jan Kara 2011-08-17 12:35 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20110812024353.GA11606@localhost \ --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=arighi@develer.com \ --cc=david@fromorbit.com \ --cc=gthelen@google.com \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=jack@suse.cz \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.