From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:26:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819152610.GA28431@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8sOKOs6iQBu7iBdFWW8GymTGR8XSXOceorxzoEoyddNA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:23:58PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 August 2013 23:18, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > But doesn't that mean that there is _currently_ no problem ? If so,
> > we can introduce the additional code when the problem really shows up.
> > Being Preemptive is good, but if it is not really needed today
> > I would rather have today's problems resolved and bother about tomorrow's
> > when they show up.
>
> Conceptually the two parts go together: rely on correct
> irq routing, tell qemu we rely on correct irq routing.
> It's only one extra line...
>
Possibly, but the lack of progress suggests that by tying both parts
together we might get neither accepted.
Old saying - surgery successful, patient dead.
Guenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:26:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819152610.GA28431@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8sOKOs6iQBu7iBdFWW8GymTGR8XSXOceorxzoEoyddNA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:23:58PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 August 2013 23:18, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > But doesn't that mean that there is _currently_ no problem ? If so,
> > we can introduce the additional code when the problem really shows up.
> > Being Preemptive is good, but if it is not really needed today
> > I would rather have today's problems resolved and bother about tomorrow's
> > when they show up.
>
> Conceptually the two parts go together: rely on correct
> irq routing, tell qemu we rely on correct irq routing.
> It's only one extra line...
>
Possibly, but the lack of progress suggests that by tying both parts
together we might get neither accepted.
Old saying - surgery successful, patient dead.
Guenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 08:26:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819152610.GA28431@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8sOKOs6iQBu7iBdFWW8GymTGR8XSXOceorxzoEoyddNA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:23:58PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 August 2013 23:18, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > But doesn't that mean that there is _currently_ no problem ? If so,
> > we can introduce the additional code when the problem really shows up.
> > Being Preemptive is good, but if it is not really needed today
> > I would rather have today's problems resolved and bother about tomorrow's
> > when they show up.
>
> Conceptually the two parts go together: rely on correct
> irq routing, tell qemu we rely on correct irq routing.
> It's only one extra line...
>
Possibly, but the lack of progress suggests that by tying both parts
together we might get neither accepted.
Old saying - surgery successful, patient dead.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-11 15:54 SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Guenter Roeck
2013-08-11 15:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-11 22:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-11 22:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 0:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 0:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 0:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 16:24 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 16:24 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 16:24 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 16:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 16:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 16:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 20:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 21:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 21:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 21:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 21:36 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 21:36 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 21:36 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 23:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 23:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 23:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:44 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:44 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:44 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:56 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:56 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:56 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] memory reads and writes Herbei Dacian
2013-08-12 17:48 ` [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 17:48 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 17:48 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 8:37 ` Rob Landley
2013-08-13 8:37 ` Rob Landley
2013-08-13 8:37 ` Rob Landley
2013-08-13 9:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 9:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 9:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-13 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-13 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-13 3:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-13 3:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-13 3:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 16:45 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 16:45 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 16:45 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 17:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 17:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 17:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 18:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 18:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 18:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 20:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 20:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 20:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 21:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 21:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 21:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 22:23 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 22:23 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 22:23 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 23:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 23:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 23:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-19 15:26 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-08-19 15:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-19 15:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 19:02 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-12 19:02 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-12 19:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-12 20:58 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:58 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130819152610.GA28431@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.