From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:44:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8u_c=seOQ+y44H2Vpefyx4EisiZ-ZqBxuPsyoYjCt3vQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 14 August 2013 11:33, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
>> or do we need a test on real hardware ?
>
> Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing
> to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another
> change to this.
>
> Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so
> it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.
Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we
land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been
thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my
desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing
(currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually
boot a kernel).
thanks
-- PMM
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:44:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8u_c=seOQ+y44H2Vpefyx4EisiZ-ZqBxuPsyoYjCt3vQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 14 August 2013 11:33, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
>> or do we need a test on real hardware ?
>
> Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing
> to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another
> change to this.
>
> Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so
> it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.
Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we
land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been
thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my
desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing
(currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually
boot a kernel).
thanks
-- PMM
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: peter.maydell@linaro.org (Peter Maydell)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:44:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA8u_c=seOQ+y44H2Vpefyx4EisiZ-ZqBxuPsyoYjCt3vQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 14 August 2013 11:33, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
>> or do we need a test on real hardware ?
>
> Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing
> to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another
> change to this.
>
> Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so
> it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.
Yes, I definitely think we should test on the hardware before we
land yet another change to this PCI code that hasn't really been
thoroughly tested on anything. I have the board/backplane on my
desk but it'll be later in the week before I can do the testing
(currently still messing with uboot config to get it to actually
boot a kernel).
thanks
-- PMM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-11 15:54 SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Guenter Roeck
2013-08-11 15:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-11 22:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-11 22:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 0:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 0:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 0:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 16:24 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 16:24 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 16:24 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 16:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 16:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 16:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 20:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 21:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 21:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 21:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 21:36 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 21:36 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 21:36 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 23:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 23:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 23:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:44 ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2013-08-14 12:44 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:44 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:56 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:56 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:56 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] memory reads and writes Herbei Dacian
2013-08-12 17:48 ` [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 17:48 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 17:48 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 8:37 ` Rob Landley
2013-08-13 8:37 ` Rob Landley
2013-08-13 8:37 ` Rob Landley
2013-08-13 9:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 9:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 9:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-13 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-13 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-13 3:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-13 3:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-13 3:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 16:45 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 16:45 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 16:45 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 17:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 17:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 17:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 18:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 18:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 18:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 20:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 20:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 20:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 21:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 21:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 21:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 22:23 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 22:23 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 22:23 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 23:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 23:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 23:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-19 15:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-19 15:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-19 15:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 19:02 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-12 19:02 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-12 19:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-12 20:58 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:58 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFEAcA8u_c=seOQ+y44H2Vpefyx4EisiZ-ZqBxuPsyoYjCt3vQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.