Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>]

Em Mon, 8 Oct 2018 09:37:59 +1000
Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> escreveu:

> On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 08:56, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 08:25:35AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >  
> > > This isn't a legally binding license or anything, but departing from
> > > the upstream wording makes it tricker to merge new upstream versions
> > > if they are considered appropriate.  
> >
> > Nicely done, that - gotta love the passive voice use.  Considered appropriate
> > *by* *whom*?  
> 
> Good question, do we have a CoC maintainer? Is Linus it, Greg, TAB?
> 
> Maybe step one is to find the person who can make changes to the
> kernel CoC (has anyone checked if Linus or Greg will merge this).

If we add it to the MAINTAINERS file (with makes perfect sense to me),
I would like to have a R: entry there, in order to be notified when
people propose changes to it. My personal understanding is that it may 
have legal value under the legislation of the Country I live, and I'd
like to understand changes there that might affect my workflow.

Thanks,
Mauro