All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 10:25:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWVVR_-r4K_sx-P+gDWwQ4yS7fAhA=FnL=snqxhd8J7dg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com>

Hi James,

Thanks for your patch!

On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:36 PM James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> From 4a614e9440148894207bef5bf69e74071baceb3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 14:21:56 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email
>  addresses
>
> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing

that

> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour.  Since
> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
> the project to correct this ambiguity.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
>  * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
>  * Public or private harassment
>  * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
> -  address, without explicit permission
> +  address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission
>  * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
>    professional setting

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 10:25:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWVVR_-r4K_sx-P+gDWwQ4yS7fAhA=FnL=snqxhd8J7dg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1538861799.4088.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com>

Hi James,

Thanks for your patch!

On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:36 PM James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> From 4a614e9440148894207bef5bf69e74071baceb3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 14:21:56 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email
>  addresses
>
> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing

that

> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour.  Since
> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
> the project to correct this ambiguity.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
>  * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
>  * Public or private harassment
>  * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
> -  address, without explicit permission
> +  address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission
>  * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
>    professional setting

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-07  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-06 21:35 [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 0/2] code of conduct fixes James Bottomley
2018-10-06 21:35 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-06 21:36 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses James Bottomley
2018-10-06 21:36   ` James Bottomley
2018-10-07  8:25   ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2018-10-07  8:25     ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-07 15:25     ` Shuah Khan
2018-10-07 15:25       ` Shuah Khan
2018-10-07  9:04   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-07  9:04     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-07  9:54     ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-10-07 15:29     ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 19:49       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-08 19:49         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-07 17:53   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-10-07 22:25   ` Dave Airlie
2018-10-07 22:25     ` Dave Airlie
2018-10-07 22:56     ` Al Viro
2018-10-07 23:02       ` Al Viro
2018-10-07 23:37       ` Dave Airlie
2018-10-08 10:14         ` Mark Brown
2018-10-08 10:14           ` Mark Brown
2018-10-08 19:32         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-08 19:32           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-08 17:05       ` Luck, Tony
2018-10-08 17:05         ` Luck, Tony
2018-10-08 14:08     ` James Bottomley
2018-10-10 16:36     ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-10 16:36       ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-08 15:20   ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-08 15:20     ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-08 15:30     ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 19:23       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-08 19:23         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-08 19:57         ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-09 10:55           ` Mark Brown
2018-10-09 18:29     ` Rainer Fiebig
2018-10-09 18:56       ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-09 19:38         ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-09 19:38           ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-09 19:44           ` James Bottomley
2018-10-10  7:22             ` Rainer Fiebig
2018-10-10  5:52           ` Rainer Fiebig
2018-10-10  7:08         ` Rainer Fiebig
2018-10-08 19:24   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-08 19:24     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 20:48   ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-06 21:37 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion James Bottomley
2018-10-06 21:37   ` James Bottomley
2018-10-06 21:43   ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Tim.Bird
2018-10-06 21:43     ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-07  3:33     ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 13:51       ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 13:51         ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 14:09         ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 17:58           ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 17:58             ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 18:11             ` James Bottomley
2018-10-08 18:54               ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 18:54                 ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 15:03         ` jonsmirl
2018-10-08 15:03           ` jonsmirl
2018-10-08 15:37       ` Alan Cox
2018-10-08 15:37         ` Alan Cox
2018-10-11  7:42         ` Dan Carpenter
2018-10-07 15:32   ` Shuah Khan
2018-10-07 15:32     ` Shuah Khan
2018-10-07 17:56   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-10-07 19:51   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-07 19:51     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-08 18:15   ` Chris Mason
2018-10-08 18:15     ` Chris Mason
2018-10-08 19:04     ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Josh Triplett
2018-10-08 20:23   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-08 20:23     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 15:53     ` Alan Cox
2018-10-10 15:53       ` Alan Cox
2018-10-10 17:19       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 17:19         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 20:09         ` Alan Cox
2018-10-10 20:09           ` Alan Cox
2018-10-10 20:30           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 20:30             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 20:32           ` Dave Airlie
2018-10-07 17:11 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 0/2] code of conduct fixes Daniel Vetter
2018-10-07 17:11   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-07 17:40   ` James Bottomley
2018-10-07 17:50     ` jonsmirl
2018-10-07 17:50       ` jonsmirl
2018-10-07 17:52     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-10 16:12     ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-10 16:12       ` Pavel Machek
2018-10-10 16:25       ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdWVVR_-r4K_sx-P+gDWwQ4yS7fAhA=FnL=snqxhd8J7dg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.