From: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:25:11 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ceb13d48-66a1-803b-ab8e-3ca86bafbd01@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWVVR_-r4K_sx-P+gDWwQ4yS7fAhA=FnL=snqxhd8J7dg@mail.gmail.com> Hi James, Thanks for the patch. On 10/07/2018 02:25 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi James, > > Thanks for your patch! > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:36 PM James Bottomley > <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: >> From 4a614e9440148894207bef5bf69e74071baceb3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> >> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 14:21:56 -0700 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email >> addresses >> >> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing > > that > >> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since >> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch >> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by >> the project to correct this ambiguity. >> >> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> > > Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.") > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> > Acked-by: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> >> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst >> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: >> * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks >> * Public or private harassment >> * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic >> - address, without explicit permission >> + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission >> * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a >> professional setting > thanks, -- Shuah
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:25:11 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ceb13d48-66a1-803b-ab8e-3ca86bafbd01@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWVVR_-r4K_sx-P+gDWwQ4yS7fAhA=FnL=snqxhd8J7dg@mail.gmail.com> Hi James, Thanks for the patch. On 10/07/2018 02:25 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi James, > > Thanks for your patch! > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:36 PM James Bottomley > <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: >> From 4a614e9440148894207bef5bf69e74071baceb3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> >> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 14:21:56 -0700 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email >> addresses >> >> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing > > that > >> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since >> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch >> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by >> the project to correct this ambiguity. >> >> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> > > Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.") > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> > Acked-by: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> >> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst >> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: >> * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks >> * Public or private harassment >> * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic >> - address, without explicit permission >> + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission >> * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a >> professional setting > thanks, -- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-07 15:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-10-06 21:35 [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 0/2] code of conduct fixes James Bottomley 2018-10-06 21:35 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-06 21:36 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses James Bottomley 2018-10-06 21:36 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-07 8:25 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Geert Uytterhoeven 2018-10-07 8:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2018-10-07 15:25 ` Shuah Khan [this message] 2018-10-07 15:25 ` Shuah Khan 2018-10-07 9:04 ` Daniel Vetter 2018-10-07 9:04 ` Daniel Vetter 2018-10-07 9:54 ` Hannes Reinecke 2018-10-07 15:29 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-08 19:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-08 19:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-07 17:53 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-10-07 22:25 ` Dave Airlie 2018-10-07 22:25 ` Dave Airlie 2018-10-07 22:56 ` Al Viro 2018-10-07 23:02 ` Al Viro 2018-10-07 23:37 ` Dave Airlie 2018-10-08 10:14 ` Mark Brown 2018-10-08 10:14 ` Mark Brown 2018-10-08 19:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-08 19:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-08 17:05 ` Luck, Tony 2018-10-08 17:05 ` Luck, Tony 2018-10-08 14:08 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-10 16:36 ` Pavel Machek 2018-10-10 16:36 ` Pavel Machek 2018-10-08 15:20 ` Josh Triplett 2018-10-08 15:20 ` Josh Triplett 2018-10-08 15:30 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-08 19:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-08 19:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-08 19:57 ` Josh Triplett 2018-10-09 10:55 ` Mark Brown 2018-10-09 18:29 ` Rainer Fiebig 2018-10-09 18:56 ` Josh Triplett 2018-10-09 19:38 ` Laurent Pinchart 2018-10-09 19:38 ` Laurent Pinchart 2018-10-09 19:44 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-10 7:22 ` Rainer Fiebig 2018-10-10 5:52 ` Rainer Fiebig 2018-10-10 7:08 ` Rainer Fiebig 2018-10-08 19:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-08 19:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-10 20:48 ` Frank Rowand 2018-10-06 21:37 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion James Bottomley 2018-10-06 21:37 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-06 21:43 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Tim.Bird 2018-10-06 21:43 ` Tim.Bird 2018-10-07 3:33 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-08 13:51 ` Tim.Bird 2018-10-08 13:51 ` Tim.Bird 2018-10-08 14:09 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-08 17:58 ` Tim.Bird 2018-10-08 17:58 ` Tim.Bird 2018-10-08 18:11 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-08 18:54 ` Tim.Bird 2018-10-08 18:54 ` Tim.Bird 2018-10-08 15:03 ` jonsmirl 2018-10-08 15:03 ` jonsmirl 2018-10-08 15:37 ` Alan Cox 2018-10-08 15:37 ` Alan Cox 2018-10-11 7:42 ` Dan Carpenter 2018-10-07 15:32 ` Shuah Khan 2018-10-07 15:32 ` Shuah Khan 2018-10-07 17:56 ` Guenter Roeck 2018-10-07 19:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2018-10-07 19:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2018-10-08 18:15 ` Chris Mason 2018-10-08 18:15 ` Chris Mason 2018-10-08 19:04 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Josh Triplett 2018-10-08 20:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-08 20:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-10 15:53 ` Alan Cox 2018-10-10 15:53 ` Alan Cox 2018-10-10 17:19 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-10 17:19 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-10 20:09 ` Alan Cox 2018-10-10 20:09 ` Alan Cox 2018-10-10 20:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-10 20:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2018-10-10 20:32 ` Dave Airlie 2018-10-07 17:11 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 0/2] code of conduct fixes Daniel Vetter 2018-10-07 17:11 ` Daniel Vetter 2018-10-07 17:40 ` James Bottomley 2018-10-07 17:50 ` jonsmirl 2018-10-07 17:50 ` jonsmirl 2018-10-07 17:52 ` Daniel Vetter 2018-10-10 16:12 ` Pavel Machek 2018-10-10 16:12 ` Pavel Machek 2018-10-10 16:25 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ceb13d48-66a1-803b-ab8e-3ca86bafbd01@kernel.org \ --to=shuah@kernel.org \ --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \ --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \ --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.