All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/47] drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:12:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24971783-3ccd-52ba-74d0-d02f7b1e7d01@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210715000622.GA17733@DUT031-TGLY.fm.intel.com>

On 7/14/2021 17:06, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:36:05AM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
>> On 6/24/2021 00:04, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>> Ensure G2H response has space in the buffer before sending H2G CTB as
>>> the GuC can't handle any backpressure on the G2H interface.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h        | 13 +++-
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c     | 76 +++++++++++++++----
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h     |  4 +-
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h   |  4 +
>>>    .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 13 ++--
>>>    5 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>>> index b43ec56986b5..24e7a924134e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>>> @@ -95,11 +95,17 @@ inline int intel_guc_send(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
>>>    }
>>>    #define INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB		BIT(31)
>>> +#define INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_SHIFT	0
>>> +#define INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_MASK	(0xff << INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_SHIFT)
>>> +#define MAKE_SEND_FLAGS(len) \
>>> +	({GEM_BUG_ON(!FIELD_FIT(INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_MASK, len)); \
>>> +	(FIELD_PREP(INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_MASK, len) | INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB);})
>>>    static
>>> -inline int intel_guc_send_nb(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
>>> +inline int intel_guc_send_nb(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>> +			     u32 g2h_len_dw)
>>>    {
>>>    	return intel_guc_ct_send(&guc->ct, action, len, NULL, 0,
>>> -				 INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB);
>>> +				 MAKE_SEND_FLAGS(g2h_len_dw));
>>>    }
>>>    static inline int
>>> @@ -113,6 +119,7 @@ intel_guc_send_and_receive(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>>    static inline int intel_guc_send_busy_loop(struct intel_guc* guc,
>>>    					   const u32 *action,
>>>    					   u32 len,
>>> +					   u32 g2h_len_dw,
>>>    					   bool loop)
>>>    {
>>>    	int err;
>>> @@ -121,7 +128,7 @@ static inline int intel_guc_send_busy_loop(struct intel_guc* guc,
>>>    	might_sleep_if(loop && (!in_atomic() && !irqs_disabled()));
>>>    retry:
>>> -	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len);
>>> +	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw);
>>>    	if (unlikely(err == -EBUSY && loop)) {
>>>    		if (likely(!in_atomic() && !irqs_disabled()))
>>>    			cond_resched();
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>> index 7491f041859e..a60970e85635 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static inline struct drm_device *ct_to_drm(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>    #define CTB_DESC_SIZE		ALIGN(sizeof(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc), SZ_2K)
>>>    #define CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE	(SZ_4K)
>>>    #define CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE	(4 * CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE)
>>> +#define G2H_ROOM_BUFFER_SIZE	(PAGE_SIZE)
>> Any particular reason why PAGE_SIZE instead of SZ_4K? I'm not seeing
>> anything in the code that is actually related to page sizes. Seems like
>> '(CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE / 4)' would be a more correct way to express it.
>> Unless I'm missing something about how it's used?
>>
> Yes, CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE / 4 is better.
>
> Matt
Okay. With that changed:

Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>


>
>> John.
>>
>>
>>>    struct ct_request {
>>>    	struct list_head link;
>>> @@ -129,23 +130,27 @@ static void guc_ct_buffer_desc_init(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc)
>>>    static void guc_ct_buffer_reset(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb)
>>>    {
>>> +	u32 space;
>>> +
>>>    	ctb->broken = false;
>>>    	ctb->tail = 0;
>>>    	ctb->head = 0;
>>> -	ctb->space = CIRC_SPACE(ctb->tail, ctb->head, ctb->size);
>>> +	space = CIRC_SPACE(ctb->tail, ctb->head, ctb->size) - ctb->resv_space;
>>> +	atomic_set(&ctb->space, space);
>>>    	guc_ct_buffer_desc_init(ctb->desc);
>>>    }
>>>    static void guc_ct_buffer_init(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb,
>>>    			       struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc,
>>> -			       u32 *cmds, u32 size_in_bytes)
>>> +			       u32 *cmds, u32 size_in_bytes, u32 resv_space)
>>>    {
>>>    	GEM_BUG_ON(size_in_bytes % 4);
>>>    	ctb->desc = desc;
>>>    	ctb->cmds = cmds;
>>>    	ctb->size = size_in_bytes / 4;
>>> +	ctb->resv_space = resv_space / 4;
>>>    	guc_ct_buffer_reset(ctb);
>>>    }
>>> @@ -226,6 +231,7 @@ int intel_guc_ct_init(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>    	struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc;
>>>    	u32 blob_size;
>>>    	u32 cmds_size;
>>> +	u32 resv_space;
>>>    	void *blob;
>>>    	u32 *cmds;
>>>    	int err;
>>> @@ -250,19 +256,23 @@ int intel_guc_ct_init(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>    	desc = blob;
>>>    	cmds = blob + 2 * CTB_DESC_SIZE;
>>>    	cmds_size = CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE;
>>> -	CT_DEBUG(ct, "%s desc %#tx cmds %#tx size %u\n", "send",
>>> -		 ptrdiff(desc, blob), ptrdiff(cmds, blob), cmds_size);
>>> +	resv_space = 0;
>>> +	CT_DEBUG(ct, "%s desc %#tx cmds %#tx size %u/%u\n", "send",
>>> +		 ptrdiff(desc, blob), ptrdiff(cmds, blob), cmds_size,
>>> +		 resv_space);
>>> -	guc_ct_buffer_init(&ct->ctbs.send, desc, cmds, cmds_size);
>>> +	guc_ct_buffer_init(&ct->ctbs.send, desc, cmds, cmds_size, resv_space);
>>>    	/* store pointers to desc and cmds for recv ctb */
>>>    	desc = blob + CTB_DESC_SIZE;
>>>    	cmds = blob + 2 * CTB_DESC_SIZE + CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE;
>>>    	cmds_size = CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE;
>>> -	CT_DEBUG(ct, "%s desc %#tx cmds %#tx size %u\n", "recv",
>>> -		 ptrdiff(desc, blob), ptrdiff(cmds, blob), cmds_size);
>>> +	resv_space = G2H_ROOM_BUFFER_SIZE;
>>> +	CT_DEBUG(ct, "%s desc %#tx cmds %#tx size %u/%u\n", "recv",
>>> +		 ptrdiff(desc, blob), ptrdiff(cmds, blob), cmds_size,
>>> +		 resv_space);
>>> -	guc_ct_buffer_init(&ct->ctbs.recv, desc, cmds, cmds_size);
>>> +	guc_ct_buffer_init(&ct->ctbs.recv, desc, cmds, cmds_size, resv_space);
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -458,7 +468,7 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>    	/* now update descriptor */
>>>    	ctb->tail = tail;
>>>    	WRITE_ONCE(desc->tail, tail);
>>> -	ctb->space -= len + 1;
>>> +	atomic_sub(len + 1, &ctb->space);
>>>    	return 0;
>>> @@ -521,13 +531,34 @@ static inline bool ct_deadlocked(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>    	return ret;
>>>    }
>>> +static inline bool g2h_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len_dw)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.recv;
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * We leave a certain amount of space in the G2H CTB buffer for
>>> +	 * unexpected G2H CTBs (e.g. logging, engine hang, etc...)
>>> +	 */
>>> +	return !g2h_len_dw || atomic_read(&ctb->space) >= g2h_len_dw;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline void g2h_reserve_space(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len_dw)
>>> +{
>>> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ct->ctbs.send.lock);
>>> +
>>> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!g2h_has_room(ct, g2h_len_dw));
>>> +
>>> +	if (g2h_len_dw)
>>> +		atomic_sub(g2h_len_dw, &ct->ctbs.recv.space);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static inline bool h2g_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
>>>    	u32 head;
>>>    	u32 space;
>>> -	if (ctb->space >= len_dw)
>>> +	if (atomic_read(&ctb->space) >= len_dw)
>>>    		return true;
>>>    	head = READ_ONCE(ctb->desc->head);
>>> @@ -540,16 +571,16 @@ static inline bool h2g_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
>>>    	}
>>>    	space = CIRC_SPACE(ctb->tail, head, ctb->size);
>>> -	ctb->space = space;
>>> +	atomic_set(&ctb->space, space);
>>>    	return space >= len_dw;
>>>    }
>>> -static int has_room_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
>>> +static int has_room_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 h2g_dw, u32 g2h_dw)
>>>    {
>>>    	lockdep_assert_held(&ct->ctbs.send.lock);
>>> -	if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ct, len_dw))) {
>>> +	if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ct, h2g_dw) || !g2h_has_room(ct, g2h_dw))) {
>>>    		if (ct->stall_time == KTIME_MAX)
>>>    			ct->stall_time = ktime_get();
>>> @@ -563,6 +594,9 @@ static int has_room_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>> +#define G2H_LEN_DW(f) \
>>> +	FIELD_GET(INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_MASK, f) ? \
>>> +	FIELD_GET(INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_MASK, f) + GUC_CTB_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN : 0
>>>    static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>    		      const u32 *action,
>>>    		      u32 len,
>>> @@ -570,12 +604,13 @@ static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>    {
>>>    	struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
>>>    	unsigned long spin_flags;
>>> +	u32 g2h_len_dw = G2H_LEN_DW(flags);
>>>    	u32 fence;
>>>    	int ret;
>>>    	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctb->lock, spin_flags);
>>> -	ret = has_room_nb(ct, len + 1);
>>> +	ret = has_room_nb(ct, len + 1, g2h_len_dw);
>>>    	if (unlikely(ret))
>>>    		goto out;
>>> @@ -584,6 +619,7 @@ static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>    	if (unlikely(ret))
>>>    		goto out;
>>> +	g2h_reserve_space(ct, g2h_len_dw);
>>>    	intel_guc_notify(ct_to_guc(ct));
>>>    out:
>>> @@ -965,10 +1001,22 @@ static void ct_incoming_request_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
>>>    static int ct_handle_event(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *request)
>>>    {
>>>    	const u32 *hxg = &request->msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN];
>>> +	u32 action = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_EVENT_MSG_0_ACTION, hxg[0]);
>>>    	unsigned long flags;
>>>    	GEM_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, hxg[0]) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT);
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Adjusting the space must be done in IRQ or deadlock can occur as the
>>> +	 * CTB processing in the below workqueue can send CTBs which creates a
>>> +	 * circular dependency if the space was returned there.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	switch (action) {
>>> +	case INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_DONE:
>>> +	case INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT_DONE:
>>> +		atomic_add(request->size, &ct->ctbs.recv.space);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>    	spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
>>>    	list_add_tail(&request->link, &ct->requests.incoming);
>>>    	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>> index 9924335e2ee6..660bf37238e2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct intel_guc;
>>>     * @desc: pointer to the buffer descriptor
>>>     * @cmds: pointer to the commands buffer
>>>     * @size: size of the commands buffer in dwords
>>> + * @resv_space: reserved space in buffer in dwords
>>>     * @head: local shadow copy of head in dwords
>>>     * @tail: local shadow copy of tail in dwords
>>>     * @space: local shadow copy of space in dwords
>>> @@ -43,9 +44,10 @@ struct intel_guc_ct_buffer {
>>>    	struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc;
>>>    	u32 *cmds;
>>>    	u32 size;
>>> +	u32 resv_space;
>>>    	u32 tail;
>>>    	u32 head;
>>> -	u32 space;
>>> +	atomic_t space;
>>>    	bool broken;
>>>    };
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
>>> index 4e4edc368b77..94bb1ca6f889 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
>>> @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
>>>    #include "abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h"
>>>    #include "abi/guc_messages_abi.h"
>>> +/* Payload length only i.e. don't include G2H header length */
>>> +#define G2H_LEN_DW_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET	2
>>> +#define G2H_LEN_DW_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT		1
>>> +
>>>    #define GUC_CONTEXT_DISABLE		0
>>>    #define GUC_CONTEXT_ENABLE		1
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>>> index 010e46dd6b16..ef24758c4266 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>>> @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
>>>    	struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
>>>    	u32 action[3];
>>>    	int len = 0;
>>> +	u32 g2h_len_dw = 0;
>>>    	bool enabled = context_enabled(ce);
>>>    	GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&ce->guc_id_ref));
>>> @@ -271,13 +272,13 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
>>>    		action[len++] = GUC_CONTEXT_ENABLE;
>>>    		set_context_pending_enable(ce);
>>>    		intel_context_get(ce);
>>> +		g2h_len_dw = G2H_LEN_DW_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET;
>>>    	} else {
>>>    		action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT;
>>>    		action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
>>>    	}
>>> -	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len);
>>> -
>>> +	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw);
>>>    	if (!enabled && !err) {
>>>    		set_context_enabled(ce);
>>>    	} else if (!enabled) {
>>> @@ -730,7 +731,7 @@ static int __guc_action_register_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>>    		offset,
>>>    	};
>>> -	return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), true);
>>> +	return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, true);
>>>    }
>>>    static int register_context(struct intel_context *ce)
>>> @@ -750,7 +751,8 @@ static int __guc_action_deregister_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>>    		guc_id,
>>>    	};
>>> -	return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), true);
>>> +	return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
>>> +					G2H_LEN_DW_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT, true);
>>>    }
>>>    static int deregister_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 guc_id)
>>> @@ -889,7 +891,8 @@ static void __guc_context_sched_disable(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>>    	intel_context_get(ce);
>>> -	intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), true);
>>> +	intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
>>> +				 G2H_LEN_DW_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET, true);
>>>    }
>>>    static u16 prep_context_pending_disable(struct intel_context *ce)


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/47] drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:12:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24971783-3ccd-52ba-74d0-d02f7b1e7d01@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210715000622.GA17733@DUT031-TGLY.fm.intel.com>

On 7/14/2021 17:06, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:36:05AM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
>> On 6/24/2021 00:04, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>> Ensure G2H response has space in the buffer before sending H2G CTB as
>>> the GuC can't handle any backpressure on the G2H interface.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h        | 13 +++-
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c     | 76 +++++++++++++++----
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h     |  4 +-
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h   |  4 +
>>>    .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 13 ++--
>>>    5 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>>> index b43ec56986b5..24e7a924134e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
>>> @@ -95,11 +95,17 @@ inline int intel_guc_send(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
>>>    }
>>>    #define INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB		BIT(31)
>>> +#define INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_SHIFT	0
>>> +#define INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_MASK	(0xff << INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_SHIFT)
>>> +#define MAKE_SEND_FLAGS(len) \
>>> +	({GEM_BUG_ON(!FIELD_FIT(INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_MASK, len)); \
>>> +	(FIELD_PREP(INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_MASK, len) | INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB);})
>>>    static
>>> -inline int intel_guc_send_nb(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
>>> +inline int intel_guc_send_nb(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>> +			     u32 g2h_len_dw)
>>>    {
>>>    	return intel_guc_ct_send(&guc->ct, action, len, NULL, 0,
>>> -				 INTEL_GUC_SEND_NB);
>>> +				 MAKE_SEND_FLAGS(g2h_len_dw));
>>>    }
>>>    static inline int
>>> @@ -113,6 +119,7 @@ intel_guc_send_and_receive(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>>>    static inline int intel_guc_send_busy_loop(struct intel_guc* guc,
>>>    					   const u32 *action,
>>>    					   u32 len,
>>> +					   u32 g2h_len_dw,
>>>    					   bool loop)
>>>    {
>>>    	int err;
>>> @@ -121,7 +128,7 @@ static inline int intel_guc_send_busy_loop(struct intel_guc* guc,
>>>    	might_sleep_if(loop && (!in_atomic() && !irqs_disabled()));
>>>    retry:
>>> -	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len);
>>> +	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw);
>>>    	if (unlikely(err == -EBUSY && loop)) {
>>>    		if (likely(!in_atomic() && !irqs_disabled()))
>>>    			cond_resched();
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>> index 7491f041859e..a60970e85635 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
>>> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static inline struct drm_device *ct_to_drm(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>    #define CTB_DESC_SIZE		ALIGN(sizeof(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc), SZ_2K)
>>>    #define CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE	(SZ_4K)
>>>    #define CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE	(4 * CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE)
>>> +#define G2H_ROOM_BUFFER_SIZE	(PAGE_SIZE)
>> Any particular reason why PAGE_SIZE instead of SZ_4K? I'm not seeing
>> anything in the code that is actually related to page sizes. Seems like
>> '(CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE / 4)' would be a more correct way to express it.
>> Unless I'm missing something about how it's used?
>>
> Yes, CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE / 4 is better.
>
> Matt
Okay. With that changed:

Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>


>
>> John.
>>
>>
>>>    struct ct_request {
>>>    	struct list_head link;
>>> @@ -129,23 +130,27 @@ static void guc_ct_buffer_desc_init(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc)
>>>    static void guc_ct_buffer_reset(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb)
>>>    {
>>> +	u32 space;
>>> +
>>>    	ctb->broken = false;
>>>    	ctb->tail = 0;
>>>    	ctb->head = 0;
>>> -	ctb->space = CIRC_SPACE(ctb->tail, ctb->head, ctb->size);
>>> +	space = CIRC_SPACE(ctb->tail, ctb->head, ctb->size) - ctb->resv_space;
>>> +	atomic_set(&ctb->space, space);
>>>    	guc_ct_buffer_desc_init(ctb->desc);
>>>    }
>>>    static void guc_ct_buffer_init(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb,
>>>    			       struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc,
>>> -			       u32 *cmds, u32 size_in_bytes)
>>> +			       u32 *cmds, u32 size_in_bytes, u32 resv_space)
>>>    {
>>>    	GEM_BUG_ON(size_in_bytes % 4);
>>>    	ctb->desc = desc;
>>>    	ctb->cmds = cmds;
>>>    	ctb->size = size_in_bytes / 4;
>>> +	ctb->resv_space = resv_space / 4;
>>>    	guc_ct_buffer_reset(ctb);
>>>    }
>>> @@ -226,6 +231,7 @@ int intel_guc_ct_init(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>    	struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc;
>>>    	u32 blob_size;
>>>    	u32 cmds_size;
>>> +	u32 resv_space;
>>>    	void *blob;
>>>    	u32 *cmds;
>>>    	int err;
>>> @@ -250,19 +256,23 @@ int intel_guc_ct_init(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>    	desc = blob;
>>>    	cmds = blob + 2 * CTB_DESC_SIZE;
>>>    	cmds_size = CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE;
>>> -	CT_DEBUG(ct, "%s desc %#tx cmds %#tx size %u\n", "send",
>>> -		 ptrdiff(desc, blob), ptrdiff(cmds, blob), cmds_size);
>>> +	resv_space = 0;
>>> +	CT_DEBUG(ct, "%s desc %#tx cmds %#tx size %u/%u\n", "send",
>>> +		 ptrdiff(desc, blob), ptrdiff(cmds, blob), cmds_size,
>>> +		 resv_space);
>>> -	guc_ct_buffer_init(&ct->ctbs.send, desc, cmds, cmds_size);
>>> +	guc_ct_buffer_init(&ct->ctbs.send, desc, cmds, cmds_size, resv_space);
>>>    	/* store pointers to desc and cmds for recv ctb */
>>>    	desc = blob + CTB_DESC_SIZE;
>>>    	cmds = blob + 2 * CTB_DESC_SIZE + CTB_H2G_BUFFER_SIZE;
>>>    	cmds_size = CTB_G2H_BUFFER_SIZE;
>>> -	CT_DEBUG(ct, "%s desc %#tx cmds %#tx size %u\n", "recv",
>>> -		 ptrdiff(desc, blob), ptrdiff(cmds, blob), cmds_size);
>>> +	resv_space = G2H_ROOM_BUFFER_SIZE;
>>> +	CT_DEBUG(ct, "%s desc %#tx cmds %#tx size %u/%u\n", "recv",
>>> +		 ptrdiff(desc, blob), ptrdiff(cmds, blob), cmds_size,
>>> +		 resv_space);
>>> -	guc_ct_buffer_init(&ct->ctbs.recv, desc, cmds, cmds_size);
>>> +	guc_ct_buffer_init(&ct->ctbs.recv, desc, cmds, cmds_size, resv_space);
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -458,7 +468,7 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>    	/* now update descriptor */
>>>    	ctb->tail = tail;
>>>    	WRITE_ONCE(desc->tail, tail);
>>> -	ctb->space -= len + 1;
>>> +	atomic_sub(len + 1, &ctb->space);
>>>    	return 0;
>>> @@ -521,13 +531,34 @@ static inline bool ct_deadlocked(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
>>>    	return ret;
>>>    }
>>> +static inline bool g2h_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len_dw)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.recv;
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * We leave a certain amount of space in the G2H CTB buffer for
>>> +	 * unexpected G2H CTBs (e.g. logging, engine hang, etc...)
>>> +	 */
>>> +	return !g2h_len_dw || atomic_read(&ctb->space) >= g2h_len_dw;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline void g2h_reserve_space(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len_dw)
>>> +{
>>> +	lockdep_assert_held(&ct->ctbs.send.lock);
>>> +
>>> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!g2h_has_room(ct, g2h_len_dw));
>>> +
>>> +	if (g2h_len_dw)
>>> +		atomic_sub(g2h_len_dw, &ct->ctbs.recv.space);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static inline bool h2g_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
>>>    	u32 head;
>>>    	u32 space;
>>> -	if (ctb->space >= len_dw)
>>> +	if (atomic_read(&ctb->space) >= len_dw)
>>>    		return true;
>>>    	head = READ_ONCE(ctb->desc->head);
>>> @@ -540,16 +571,16 @@ static inline bool h2g_has_room(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
>>>    	}
>>>    	space = CIRC_SPACE(ctb->tail, head, ctb->size);
>>> -	ctb->space = space;
>>> +	atomic_set(&ctb->space, space);
>>>    	return space >= len_dw;
>>>    }
>>> -static int has_room_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
>>> +static int has_room_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 h2g_dw, u32 g2h_dw)
>>>    {
>>>    	lockdep_assert_held(&ct->ctbs.send.lock);
>>> -	if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ct, len_dw))) {
>>> +	if (unlikely(!h2g_has_room(ct, h2g_dw) || !g2h_has_room(ct, g2h_dw))) {
>>>    		if (ct->stall_time == KTIME_MAX)
>>>    			ct->stall_time = ktime_get();
>>> @@ -563,6 +594,9 @@ static int has_room_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, u32 len_dw)
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>> +#define G2H_LEN_DW(f) \
>>> +	FIELD_GET(INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_MASK, f) ? \
>>> +	FIELD_GET(INTEL_GUC_SEND_G2H_DW_MASK, f) + GUC_CTB_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN : 0
>>>    static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>    		      const u32 *action,
>>>    		      u32 len,
>>> @@ -570,12 +604,13 @@ static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>    {
>>>    	struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs.send;
>>>    	unsigned long spin_flags;
>>> +	u32 g2h_len_dw = G2H_LEN_DW(flags);
>>>    	u32 fence;
>>>    	int ret;
>>>    	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctb->lock, spin_flags);
>>> -	ret = has_room_nb(ct, len + 1);
>>> +	ret = has_room_nb(ct, len + 1, g2h_len_dw);
>>>    	if (unlikely(ret))
>>>    		goto out;
>>> @@ -584,6 +619,7 @@ static int ct_send_nb(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
>>>    	if (unlikely(ret))
>>>    		goto out;
>>> +	g2h_reserve_space(ct, g2h_len_dw);
>>>    	intel_guc_notify(ct_to_guc(ct));
>>>    out:
>>> @@ -965,10 +1001,22 @@ static void ct_incoming_request_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
>>>    static int ct_handle_event(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *request)
>>>    {
>>>    	const u32 *hxg = &request->msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN];
>>> +	u32 action = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_EVENT_MSG_0_ACTION, hxg[0]);
>>>    	unsigned long flags;
>>>    	GEM_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, hxg[0]) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT);
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Adjusting the space must be done in IRQ or deadlock can occur as the
>>> +	 * CTB processing in the below workqueue can send CTBs which creates a
>>> +	 * circular dependency if the space was returned there.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	switch (action) {
>>> +	case INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_DONE:
>>> +	case INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT_DONE:
>>> +		atomic_add(request->size, &ct->ctbs.recv.space);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>    	spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
>>>    	list_add_tail(&request->link, &ct->requests.incoming);
>>>    	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>> index 9924335e2ee6..660bf37238e2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
>>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct intel_guc;
>>>     * @desc: pointer to the buffer descriptor
>>>     * @cmds: pointer to the commands buffer
>>>     * @size: size of the commands buffer in dwords
>>> + * @resv_space: reserved space in buffer in dwords
>>>     * @head: local shadow copy of head in dwords
>>>     * @tail: local shadow copy of tail in dwords
>>>     * @space: local shadow copy of space in dwords
>>> @@ -43,9 +44,10 @@ struct intel_guc_ct_buffer {
>>>    	struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc;
>>>    	u32 *cmds;
>>>    	u32 size;
>>> +	u32 resv_space;
>>>    	u32 tail;
>>>    	u32 head;
>>> -	u32 space;
>>> +	atomic_t space;
>>>    	bool broken;
>>>    };
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
>>> index 4e4edc368b77..94bb1ca6f889 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
>>> @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
>>>    #include "abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h"
>>>    #include "abi/guc_messages_abi.h"
>>> +/* Payload length only i.e. don't include G2H header length */
>>> +#define G2H_LEN_DW_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET	2
>>> +#define G2H_LEN_DW_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT		1
>>> +
>>>    #define GUC_CONTEXT_DISABLE		0
>>>    #define GUC_CONTEXT_ENABLE		1
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>>> index 010e46dd6b16..ef24758c4266 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
>>> @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
>>>    	struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
>>>    	u32 action[3];
>>>    	int len = 0;
>>> +	u32 g2h_len_dw = 0;
>>>    	bool enabled = context_enabled(ce);
>>>    	GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&ce->guc_id_ref));
>>> @@ -271,13 +272,13 @@ static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
>>>    		action[len++] = GUC_CONTEXT_ENABLE;
>>>    		set_context_pending_enable(ce);
>>>    		intel_context_get(ce);
>>> +		g2h_len_dw = G2H_LEN_DW_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET;
>>>    	} else {
>>>    		action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT;
>>>    		action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
>>>    	}
>>> -	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len);
>>> -
>>> +	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len, g2h_len_dw);
>>>    	if (!enabled && !err) {
>>>    		set_context_enabled(ce);
>>>    	} else if (!enabled) {
>>> @@ -730,7 +731,7 @@ static int __guc_action_register_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>>    		offset,
>>>    	};
>>> -	return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), true);
>>> +	return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, true);
>>>    }
>>>    static int register_context(struct intel_context *ce)
>>> @@ -750,7 +751,8 @@ static int __guc_action_deregister_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>>    		guc_id,
>>>    	};
>>> -	return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), true);
>>> +	return intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
>>> +					G2H_LEN_DW_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT, true);
>>>    }
>>>    static int deregister_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 guc_id)
>>> @@ -889,7 +891,8 @@ static void __guc_context_sched_disable(struct intel_guc *guc,
>>>    	intel_context_get(ce);
>>> -	intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), true);
>>> +	intel_guc_send_busy_loop(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action),
>>> +				 G2H_LEN_DW_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET, true);
>>>    }
>>>    static u16 prep_context_pending_disable(struct intel_context *ce)

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-15  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 336+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24  7:04 [PATCH 00/47] GuC submission support Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 01/47] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:23   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 17:23     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 02/47] drm/i915/guc: Improve error message for unsolicited CT response Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 11:58   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 11:58     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 03/47] drm/i915/guc: Increase size of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 13:49   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 13:49     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 15:41     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 15:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 12:03       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 12:03         ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 04/47] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 14:48   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 14:48     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 15:49     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 15:49       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:02       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 17:02         ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 22:41         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 22:41           ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 11:50           ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 11:50             ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 17:53             ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 17:53               ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 22:47         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 22:47           ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 05/47] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:37   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 17:37     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 23:01     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 23:01       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 06/47] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 13:09   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 13:09     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 18:26     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 18:26       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 20:28     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 20:28       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 07/47] drm/i915/guc: Module load failure test for CT buffer creation Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 08/47] drm/i915/guc: Add new GuC interface defines and structures Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 21:11   ` John Harrison
2021-06-29 21:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-30  0:30     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-30  0:30       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 09/47] drm/i915/guc: Remove GuC stage descriptor, add lrc descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 19:44   ` John Harrison
2021-06-25 19:44     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 10/47] drm/i915/guc: Add lrc descriptor context lookup array Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 13:17   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 13:17     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 17:26     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 17:26       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 21:20       ` John Harrison
2021-06-29 21:20         ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 11/47] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 22:04   ` John Harrison
2021-06-29 22:04     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-30  0:41     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-30  0:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 12/47] drm/i915/guc: Add bypass tasklet submission path to GuC Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 22:09   ` John Harrison
2021-06-29 22:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 13/47] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC context operations for new inteface Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 13:25   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 13:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 17:46     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 17:46       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 14/47] drm/i915/guc: Insert fence on context when deregistering Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:39   ` John Harrison
2021-07-09 22:39     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 15/47] drm/i915/guc: Defer context unpin until scheduling is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:48   ` John Harrison
2021-07-09 22:48     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 16/47] drm/i915/guc: Disable engine barriers with GuC during unpin Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:53   ` John Harrison
2021-07-09 22:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-10  3:00     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-10  3:00       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 17:57       ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 17:57         ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-12 18:11         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-12 18:11           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 17/47] drm/i915/guc: Extend deregistration fence to schedule disable Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:59   ` John Harrison
2021-07-09 22:59     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-10  3:36     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-10  3:36       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 17:54       ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 17:54         ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 18/47] drm/i915: Disable preempt busywait when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 23:03   ` John Harrison
2021-07-09 23:03     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 19/47] drm/i915/guc: Ensure request ordering via completion fences Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  1:51   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-07-15  1:51     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 20/47] drm/i915/guc: Disable semaphores when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 23:53   ` John Harrison
2021-07-09 23:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-15  0:07     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  0:07       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 21/47] drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-13 18:36   ` John Harrison
2021-07-13 18:36     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-15  0:06     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  0:06       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  0:12       ` John Harrison [this message]
2021-07-15  0:12         ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 22/47] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-10  0:16   ` John Harrison
2021-07-10  0:16     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-10  3:55     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-10  3:55       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-17  4:09       ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-17  4:09         ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 23/47] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC debugfs to support new GuC Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:05   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 18:05     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:59     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 20:59       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:37       ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 21:37         ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-13  8:51   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-13  8:51     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-14 23:56     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-14 23:56       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 24/47] drm/i915/guc: Add several request trace points Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:08   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 18:08     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-13  9:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-13  9:06     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-20  1:59     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-20  1:59       ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-22 13:55       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-22 13:55         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 25/47] drm/i915: Add intel_context tracing Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:10   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 18:10     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-12 21:47     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:47       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:51       ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 21:51         ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 26/47] drm/i915/guc: GuC virtual engines Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  1:21   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-07-15  1:21     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 27/47] drm/i915: Track 'serial' counts for " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:11   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 18:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:06     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 20:06       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 28/47] drm/i915: Hold reference to intel_context over life of i915_request Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:23   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 18:23     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:05     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 20:05       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:36       ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:36         ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:48         ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 21:48           ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 29/47] drm/i915/guc: Disable bonding extension with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:23   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 18:23     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [PATCH 30/47] drm/i915/guc: Direct all breadcrumbs for a class to single breadcrumbs Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 19:19   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 19:19     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 31/47] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 19:58   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 19:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-15  0:53     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  0:53       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  9:36   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-15  9:36     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-26 22:48     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-26 22:48       ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-27  8:56       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-27  8:56         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-27 18:30         ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-27 18:30           ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 32/47] drm/i915: Reset GPU immediately if submission is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 20:01   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:01     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 33/47] drm/i915/guc: Add disable interrupts to guc sanitize Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 20:11   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 34/47] drm/i915/guc: Suspend/resume implementation for new interface Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 22:56   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 22:56     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 35/47] drm/i915/guc: Handle context reset notification Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 22:58   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 22:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-15  0:32     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  0:32       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 36/47] drm/i915/guc: Handle engine reset failure notification Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 22:59   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 22:59     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 37/47] drm/i915/guc: Enable the timer expired interrupt for GuC Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 23:00   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 23:00     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 38/47] drm/i915/guc: Provide mmio list to be saved/restored on engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 39/47] drm/i915/guc: Don't complain about reset races Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 15:55   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 15:55     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 40/47] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 16:19   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 16:19     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 41/47] drm/i915/guc: Capture error state on context reset Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 23:05   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 23:05     ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 42/47] drm/i915/guc: Fix for error capture after full GPU reset with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  0:43   ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  0:43     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 43/47] drm/i915/guc: Hook GuC scheduling policies up Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-25  0:59   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25  0:59     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 19:10     ` John Harrison
2021-06-25 19:10       ` John Harrison
2021-07-10 18:56       ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-10 18:56         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 44/47] drm/i915/guc: Connect reset modparam updates to GuC policy flags Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-25  1:10   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25  1:10     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 45/47] drm/i915/guc: Include scheduling policies in the debugfs state dump Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 16:34   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 16:34     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 46/47] drm/i915/guc: Add golden context to GuC ADS Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [PATCH 47/47] drm/i915/guc: Unblock GuC submission on Gen11+ Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-06-30  8:22   ` Martin Peres
2021-06-30  8:22     ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-06-30 18:00     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-30 18:00       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-07-01 18:24       ` Martin Peres
2021-07-01 18:24         ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-07-02  8:13         ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02  8:13           ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-07-02 13:06           ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-02 13:06             ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-02 13:12             ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02 13:12               ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-07-02 14:08               ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-02 14:08                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-30 18:58     ` John Harrison
2021-06-30 18:58       ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison
2021-07-01  8:14       ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-01  8:14         ` [Intel-gfx] " Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-01 18:27         ` Martin Peres
2021-07-01 18:27           ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Peres
2021-07-01 19:28           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-01 19:28             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-02  7:29             ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-02  7:29               ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-02  8:09               ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02  8:09                 ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02 15:07                 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-02 15:07                   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-03  8:21                   ` Martin Peres
2021-07-03  8:21                     ` Martin Peres
2021-07-07  0:57                     ` John Harrison
2021-07-07  0:57                       ` John Harrison
2021-07-07  7:47                       ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-07  7:47                         ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-07 10:11                       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-07 10:11                         ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-15  0:49   ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  0:49     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for GuC submission support Patchwork
2021-06-24  7:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-06-24  7:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-12 19:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for GuC submission support (rev2) Patchwork
2021-10-22  9:35 ` [PATCH 00/47] GuC submission support Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-22  9:35   ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-22 16:42   ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-22 16:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-25  9:37     ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-25  9:37       ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-25 15:15       ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-25 15:15         ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-26  8:59         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-26  8:59           ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-26 15:43           ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-26 15:43             ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-26 15:51           ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-26 15:51             ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Brost
2021-10-27  9:21             ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-27  9:21               ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-25 17:06       ` John Harrison
2021-10-25 17:06         ` [Intel-gfx] " John Harrison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24971783-3ccd-52ba-74d0-d02f7b1e7d01@intel.com \
    --to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.