[PATCH 0/2] Add a PolarFire SoC l2 compatible

[PATCH 0/2] Add a PolarFire SoC l2 compatible

[Conor Dooley]

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Whilst re-running checks before sending my dt-fixes PR today I noticed
that I had introduced another dtbs_check warning by applying one of the
patches in it.

PolarFire SoC has 4 cache interrupts, unlike the fu540 (which the dts
re-uses the compatible of currently) which only has 3. Add a new string
to the binding like should've been done in the first place...

The driver does not care which compatible it matches against, and just
uses as many interrupts as are in the dts so will happily work away
without any needed changes there.

@Palmer, you can take this directly as long as my fixes PR for rc3 is
merged if you like, since the application path for the binding is via
you anyway. I suppose I could take both too, but whatever works best
for you (:

Thanks,
Conor.

Conor Dooley (2):
  dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible
  riscv: dts: microchip: use an mpfs specific l2 compatible

 .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi       |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH 0/2] Add a PolarFire SoC l2 compatible

[Conor Dooley]

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Whilst re-running checks before sending my dt-fixes PR today I noticed
that I had introduced another dtbs_check warning by applying one of the
patches in it.

PolarFire SoC has 4 cache interrupts, unlike the fu540 (which the dts
re-uses the compatible of currently) which only has 3. Add a new string
to the binding like should've been done in the first place...

The driver does not care which compatible it matches against, and just
uses as many interrupts as are in the dts so will happily work away
without any needed changes there.

@Palmer, you can take this directly as long as my fixes PR for rc3 is
merged if you like, since the application path for the binding is via
you anyway. I suppose I could take both too, but whatever works best
for you (:

Thanks,
Conor.

Conor Dooley (2):
  dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible
  riscv: dts: microchip: use an mpfs specific l2 compatible

 .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi       |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Conor Dooley]

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
of:

mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long

Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
 .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
@@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
   acts as directory-based coherency manager.
   All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
 
-allOf:
-  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
-
 select:
   properties:
     compatible:
@@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
 
 properties:
   compatible:
-    items:
-      - enum:
-          - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
-          - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
-      - const: cache
+    oneOf:
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
+              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
+          - const: cache
+      - items:
+          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
+          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
+          - const: cache
 
   cache-block-size:
     const: 64
@@ -72,29 +74,46 @@ properties:
       The reference to the reserved-memory for the L2 Loosely Integrated Memory region.
       The reserved memory node should be defined as per the bindings in reserved-memory.txt.
 
-if:
-  properties:
-    compatible:
-      contains:
-        const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
+allOf:
+  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
 
-then:
-  properties:
-    interrupts:
-      description: |
-        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
-      maxItems: 3
-    cache-sets:
-      const: 1024
-
-else:
-  properties:
-    interrupts:
-      description: |
-        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
-      minItems: 4
-    cache-sets:
-      const: 2048
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
+              - microchip,mpfs-ccache
+
+    then:
+      properties:
+        interrupts:
+          description: |
+            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
+          minItems: 4
+
+    else:
+      properties:
+        interrupts:
+          description: |
+            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
+          maxItems: 3
+
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            const: sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
+
+    then:
+      properties:
+        cache-sets:
+          const: 2048
+
+    else:
+      properties:
+        cache-sets:
+          const: 1024
 
 additionalProperties: false
 
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Conor Dooley]

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
of:

mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long

Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
 .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
@@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
   acts as directory-based coherency manager.
   All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
 
-allOf:
-  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
-
 select:
   properties:
     compatible:
@@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
 
 properties:
   compatible:
-    items:
-      - enum:
-          - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
-          - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
-      - const: cache
+    oneOf:
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
+              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
+          - const: cache
+      - items:
+          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
+          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
+          - const: cache
 
   cache-block-size:
     const: 64
@@ -72,29 +74,46 @@ properties:
       The reference to the reserved-memory for the L2 Loosely Integrated Memory region.
       The reserved memory node should be defined as per the bindings in reserved-memory.txt.
 
-if:
-  properties:
-    compatible:
-      contains:
-        const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
+allOf:
+  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
 
-then:
-  properties:
-    interrupts:
-      description: |
-        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
-      maxItems: 3
-    cache-sets:
-      const: 1024
-
-else:
-  properties:
-    interrupts:
-      description: |
-        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
-      minItems: 4
-    cache-sets:
-      const: 2048
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
+              - microchip,mpfs-ccache
+
+    then:
+      properties:
+        interrupts:
+          description: |
+            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
+          minItems: 4
+
+    else:
+      properties:
+        interrupts:
+          description: |
+            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
+          maxItems: 3
+
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            const: sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
+
+    then:
+      properties:
+        cache-sets:
+          const: 2048
+
+    else:
+      properties:
+        cache-sets:
+          const: 1024
 
 additionalProperties: false
 
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
> the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
> number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
> of:
> 
> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long

Where is such a message written? I couldn't find the string in 
next-20220825 (git grep -n 'is too long"').

Why should a different number of cache sets require an extra compatible 
string. cache-size is simply a parameter going with the existing 
compatible strings.

I would assume that you only need an extra compatible string if there is 
a functional difference that can not be expressed with the existing 
parameters.

> 
> Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
>   .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
>     acts as directory-based coherency manager.
>     All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
>   
> -allOf:
> -  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
> -
>   select:
>     properties:
>       compatible:
> @@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
>   
>   properties:
>     compatible:
> -    items:
> -      - enum:
> -          - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> -          - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache

Why can't you simply add microchip,mpfs-ccache here?

> -      - const: cache
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> +          - const: cache
> +      - items:
> +          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
> +          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache

Why do we need 'sifive,fu540-c000-ccache' twice?

Best regards

Heinrich

> +          - const: cache
>   
>     cache-block-size:
>       const: 64
> @@ -72,29 +74,46 @@ properties:
>         The reference to the reserved-memory for the L2 Loosely Integrated Memory region.
>         The reserved memory node should be defined as per the bindings in reserved-memory.txt.
>   
> -if:
> -  properties:
> -    compatible:
> -      contains:
> -        const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>   
> -then:
> -  properties:
> -    interrupts:
> -      description: |
> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
> -      maxItems: 3
> -    cache-sets:
> -      const: 1024
> -
> -else:
> -  properties:
> -    interrupts:
> -      description: |
> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
> -      minItems: 4
> -    cache-sets:
> -      const: 2048
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> +              - microchip,mpfs-ccache
> +
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        interrupts:
> +          description: |
> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
> +          minItems: 4
> +
> +    else:
> +      properties:
> +        interrupts:
> +          description: |
> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
> +          maxItems: 3
> +
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            const: sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> +
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        cache-sets:
> +          const: 2048
> +
> +    else:
> +      properties:
> +        cache-sets:
> +          const: 1024
>   
>   additionalProperties: false
>   

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
> the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
> number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
> of:
> 
> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long

Where is such a message written? I couldn't find the string in 
next-20220825 (git grep -n 'is too long"').

Why should a different number of cache sets require an extra compatible 
string. cache-size is simply a parameter going with the existing 
compatible strings.

I would assume that you only need an extra compatible string if there is 
a functional difference that can not be expressed with the existing 
parameters.

> 
> Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
>   .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
>     acts as directory-based coherency manager.
>     All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
>   
> -allOf:
> -  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
> -
>   select:
>     properties:
>       compatible:
> @@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
>   
>   properties:
>     compatible:
> -    items:
> -      - enum:
> -          - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> -          - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache

Why can't you simply add microchip,mpfs-ccache here?

> -      - const: cache
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> +          - const: cache
> +      - items:
> +          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
> +          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache

Why do we need 'sifive,fu540-c000-ccache' twice?

Best regards

Heinrich

> +          - const: cache
>   
>     cache-block-size:
>       const: 64
> @@ -72,29 +74,46 @@ properties:
>         The reference to the reserved-memory for the L2 Loosely Integrated Memory region.
>         The reserved memory node should be defined as per the bindings in reserved-memory.txt.
>   
> -if:
> -  properties:
> -    compatible:
> -      contains:
> -        const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>   
> -then:
> -  properties:
> -    interrupts:
> -      description: |
> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
> -      maxItems: 3
> -    cache-sets:
> -      const: 1024
> -
> -else:
> -  properties:
> -    interrupts:
> -      description: |
> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
> -      minItems: 4
> -    cache-sets:
> -      const: 2048
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> +              - microchip,mpfs-ccache
> +
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        interrupts:
> +          description: |
> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
> +          minItems: 4
> +
> +    else:
> +      properties:
> +        interrupts:
> +          description: |
> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
> +          maxItems: 3
> +
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            const: sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> +
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        cache-sets:
> +          const: 2048
> +
> +    else:
> +      properties:
> +        cache-sets:
> +          const: 1024
>   
>   additionalProperties: false
>   

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Conor.Dooley]

On 25/08/2022 19:36, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>
>> The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
>> the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
>> number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
>> of:
>>
>> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
> 
> Where is such a message written? I couldn't find the string in
> next-20220825 (git grep -n 'is too long"').

dtbs_check on next-20220825 (with dt-schema v22.08 FWIW):
mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long

I should have caught this before applying, but I got distracted
by the unusable system.

> 
> Why should a different number of cache sets require an extra
> compatible string. cache-size is simply a parameter going with> the existing compatible strings.

s/cache sets/interrupts
Because the correct value for the fu540 is 3 & this is regulated by
the binding. The alternative would be relaxing the binding to not
regulate the number of interrupts.

> 
> I would assume that you only need an extra compatible string if
> there is a functional difference that can not be expressed with
> the existing parameters.
> 
>>
>> Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
>>   1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>> index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>> @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
>>     acts as directory-based coherency manager.
>>     All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
>>   -allOf:
>> -  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>> -
>>   select:
>>     properties:
>>       compatible:
>> @@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
>>     properties:
>>     compatible:
>> -    items:
>> -      - enum:
>> -          - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>> -          - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> 
> Why can't you simply add microchip,mpfs-ccache here?

I *could* but I opted not to because the fu540 supports a compatible
subset of the features & keeping the compatible for it allows systems
with a newer dts to work with an older kernel.

> 
>> -      - const: cache
>> +    oneOf:
>> +      - items:
>> +          - enum:
>> +              - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>> +          - const: cache
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
>> +          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> 
> Why do we need 'sifive,fu540-c000-ccache' twice?

Is there a better way to write it given the above caveat?

Thanks,
Conor.


> 
>> +          - const: cache
>>       cache-block-size:
>>       const: 64
>> @@ -72,29 +74,46 @@ properties:
>>         The reference to the reserved-memory for the L2 Loosely Integrated Memory region.
>>         The reserved memory node should be defined as per the bindings in reserved-memory.txt.
>>   -if:
>> -  properties:
>> -    compatible:
>> -      contains:
>> -        const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>> +allOf:
>> +  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>>   -then:
>> -  properties:
>> -    interrupts:
>> -      description: |
>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>> -      maxItems: 3
>> -    cache-sets:
>> -      const: 1024
>> -
>> -else:
>> -  properties:
>> -    interrupts:
>> -      description: |
>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>> -      minItems: 4
>> -    cache-sets:
>> -      const: 2048
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            enum:
>> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>> +              - microchip,mpfs-ccache
>> +
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        interrupts:
>> +          description: |
>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>> +          minItems: 4
>> +
>> +    else:
>> +      properties:
>> +        interrupts:
>> +          description: |
>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>> +          maxItems: 3
>> +
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            const: sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>> +
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        cache-sets:
>> +          const: 2048
>> +
>> +    else:
>> +      properties:
>> +        cache-sets:
>> +          const: 1024
>>     additionalProperties: false
>>   

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Conor.Dooley]

On 25/08/2022 19:36, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>
>> The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
>> the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
>> number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
>> of:
>>
>> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
> 
> Where is such a message written? I couldn't find the string in
> next-20220825 (git grep -n 'is too long"').

dtbs_check on next-20220825 (with dt-schema v22.08 FWIW):
mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long

I should have caught this before applying, but I got distracted
by the unusable system.

> 
> Why should a different number of cache sets require an extra
> compatible string. cache-size is simply a parameter going with> the existing compatible strings.

s/cache sets/interrupts
Because the correct value for the fu540 is 3 & this is regulated by
the binding. The alternative would be relaxing the binding to not
regulate the number of interrupts.

> 
> I would assume that you only need an extra compatible string if
> there is a functional difference that can not be expressed with
> the existing parameters.
> 
>>
>> Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
>>   1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>> index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>> @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
>>     acts as directory-based coherency manager.
>>     All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
>>   -allOf:
>> -  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>> -
>>   select:
>>     properties:
>>       compatible:
>> @@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
>>     properties:
>>     compatible:
>> -    items:
>> -      - enum:
>> -          - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>> -          - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> 
> Why can't you simply add microchip,mpfs-ccache here?

I *could* but I opted not to because the fu540 supports a compatible
subset of the features & keeping the compatible for it allows systems
with a newer dts to work with an older kernel.

> 
>> -      - const: cache
>> +    oneOf:
>> +      - items:
>> +          - enum:
>> +              - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>> +          - const: cache
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
>> +          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> 
> Why do we need 'sifive,fu540-c000-ccache' twice?

Is there a better way to write it given the above caveat?

Thanks,
Conor.


> 
>> +          - const: cache
>>       cache-block-size:
>>       const: 64
>> @@ -72,29 +74,46 @@ properties:
>>         The reference to the reserved-memory for the L2 Loosely Integrated Memory region.
>>         The reserved memory node should be defined as per the bindings in reserved-memory.txt.
>>   -if:
>> -  properties:
>> -    compatible:
>> -      contains:
>> -        const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>> +allOf:
>> +  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>>   -then:
>> -  properties:
>> -    interrupts:
>> -      description: |
>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>> -      maxItems: 3
>> -    cache-sets:
>> -      const: 1024
>> -
>> -else:
>> -  properties:
>> -    interrupts:
>> -      description: |
>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>> -      minItems: 4
>> -    cache-sets:
>> -      const: 2048
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            enum:
>> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>> +              - microchip,mpfs-ccache
>> +
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        interrupts:
>> +          description: |
>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>> +          minItems: 4
>> +
>> +    else:
>> +      properties:
>> +        interrupts:
>> +          description: |
>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>> +          maxItems: 3
>> +
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            const: sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>> +
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        cache-sets:
>> +          const: 2048
>> +
>> +    else:
>> +      properties:
>> +        cache-sets:
>> +          const: 1024
>>     additionalProperties: false
>>   
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 8/25/22 20:56, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> On 25/08/2022 19:36, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>>
>>> The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
>>> the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
>>> number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
>>> of:
>>>
>>> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
>>
>> Where is such a message written? I couldn't find the string in
>> next-20220825 (git grep -n 'is too long"').
> 
> dtbs_check on next-20220825 (with dt-schema v22.08 FWIW):
> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
> mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
> 
> I should have caught this before applying, but I got distracted
> by the unusable system.
> 
>>
>> Why should a different number of cache sets require an extra
>> compatible string. cache-size is simply a parameter going with> the existing compatible strings.
> 
> s/cache sets/interrupts
> Because the correct value for the fu540 is 3 & this is regulated by
> the binding. The alternative would be relaxing the binding to not
> regulate the number of interrupts.
> 
>>
>> I would assume that you only need an extra compatible string if
>> there is a functional difference that can not be expressed with
>> the existing parameters.
>>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>> ---
>>>    .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
>>>    1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>>> index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>>> @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
>>>      acts as directory-based coherency manager.
>>>      All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
>>>    -allOf:
>>> -  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>>> -
>>>    select:
>>>      properties:
>>>        compatible:
>>> @@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
>>>      properties:
>>>      compatible:
>>> -    items:
>>> -      - enum:
>>> -          - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>>> -          - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>
>> Why can't you simply add microchip,mpfs-ccache here?
> 
> I *could* but I opted not to because the fu540 supports a compatible
> subset of the features & keeping the compatible for it allows systems
> with a newer dts to work with an older kernel.

That makes it clearer.

> 
>>
>>> -      - const: cache
>>> +    oneOf:
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>>> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>> +          - const: cache
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
>>> +          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>>
>> Why do we need 'sifive,fu540-c000-ccache' twice?
> 
> Is there a better way to write it given the above caveat?
> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.
> 
> 
>>
>>> +          - const: cache
>>>        cache-block-size:
>>>        const: 64
>>> @@ -72,29 +74,46 @@ properties:
>>>          The reference to the reserved-memory for the L2 Loosely Integrated Memory region.
>>>          The reserved memory node should be defined as per the bindings in reserved-memory.txt.
>>>    -if:
>>> -  properties:
>>> -    compatible:
>>> -      contains:
>>> -        const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>>> +allOf:
>>> +  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>>>    -then:
>>> -  properties:
>>> -    interrupts:
>>> -      description: |
>>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>>> -      maxItems: 3
>>> -    cache-sets:
>>> -      const: 1024
>>> -
>>> -else:
>>> -  properties:
>>> -    interrupts:
>>> -      description: |
>>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>>> -      minItems: 4
>>> -    cache-sets:
>>> -      const: 2048
>>> +  - if:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        compatible:
>>> +          contains:
>>> +            enum:
>>> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>> +              - microchip,mpfs-ccache
>>> +
>>> +    then:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        interrupts:
>>> +          description: |
>>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>>> +          minItems: 4

Above you indicated that you want strict limits for the interrupt count. 
You expect exactly 4 items here. Having 5 entries would not be correct.
Please, add 'maxItems: 4'.

>>> +
>>> +    else:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        interrupts:
>>> +          description: |
>>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>>> +          maxItems: 3

The item count should be exactly 3. Having 2 entries would not be correct.
Please, add 'minItems: 3'.

Best regards

Heinrich

>>> +
>>> +  - if:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        compatible:
>>> +          contains:
>>> +            const: sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>> +
>>> +    then:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        cache-sets:
>>> +          const: 2048
>>> +
>>> +    else:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        cache-sets:
>>> +          const: 1024
>>>      additionalProperties: false
>>>    

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 8/25/22 20:56, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> On 25/08/2022 19:36, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>>
>>> The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
>>> the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
>>> number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
>>> of:
>>>
>>> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
>>
>> Where is such a message written? I couldn't find the string in
>> next-20220825 (git grep -n 'is too long"').
> 
> dtbs_check on next-20220825 (with dt-schema v22.08 FWIW):
> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
> mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
> 
> I should have caught this before applying, but I got distracted
> by the unusable system.
> 
>>
>> Why should a different number of cache sets require an extra
>> compatible string. cache-size is simply a parameter going with> the existing compatible strings.
> 
> s/cache sets/interrupts
> Because the correct value for the fu540 is 3 & this is regulated by
> the binding. The alternative would be relaxing the binding to not
> regulate the number of interrupts.
> 
>>
>> I would assume that you only need an extra compatible string if
>> there is a functional difference that can not be expressed with
>> the existing parameters.
>>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>> ---
>>>    .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
>>>    1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>>> index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
>>> @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
>>>      acts as directory-based coherency manager.
>>>      All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
>>>    -allOf:
>>> -  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>>> -
>>>    select:
>>>      properties:
>>>        compatible:
>>> @@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
>>>      properties:
>>>      compatible:
>>> -    items:
>>> -      - enum:
>>> -          - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>>> -          - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>
>> Why can't you simply add microchip,mpfs-ccache here?
> 
> I *could* but I opted not to because the fu540 supports a compatible
> subset of the features & keeping the compatible for it allows systems
> with a newer dts to work with an older kernel.

That makes it clearer.

> 
>>
>>> -      - const: cache
>>> +    oneOf:
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>>> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>> +          - const: cache
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
>>> +          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>>
>> Why do we need 'sifive,fu540-c000-ccache' twice?
> 
> Is there a better way to write it given the above caveat?
> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.
> 
> 
>>
>>> +          - const: cache
>>>        cache-block-size:
>>>        const: 64
>>> @@ -72,29 +74,46 @@ properties:
>>>          The reference to the reserved-memory for the L2 Loosely Integrated Memory region.
>>>          The reserved memory node should be defined as per the bindings in reserved-memory.txt.
>>>    -if:
>>> -  properties:
>>> -    compatible:
>>> -      contains:
>>> -        const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>>> +allOf:
>>> +  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>>>    -then:
>>> -  properties:
>>> -    interrupts:
>>> -      description: |
>>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>>> -      maxItems: 3
>>> -    cache-sets:
>>> -      const: 1024
>>> -
>>> -else:
>>> -  properties:
>>> -    interrupts:
>>> -      description: |
>>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>>> -      minItems: 4
>>> -    cache-sets:
>>> -      const: 2048
>>> +  - if:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        compatible:
>>> +          contains:
>>> +            enum:
>>> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>> +              - microchip,mpfs-ccache
>>> +
>>> +    then:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        interrupts:
>>> +          description: |
>>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>>> +          minItems: 4

Above you indicated that you want strict limits for the interrupt count. 
You expect exactly 4 items here. Having 5 entries would not be correct.
Please, add 'maxItems: 4'.

>>> +
>>> +    else:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        interrupts:
>>> +          description: |
>>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>>> +          maxItems: 3

The item count should be exactly 3. Having 2 entries would not be correct.
Please, add 'minItems: 3'.

Best regards

Heinrich

>>> +
>>> +  - if:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        compatible:
>>> +          contains:
>>> +            const: sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>> +
>>> +    then:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        cache-sets:
>>> +          const: 2048
>>> +
>>> +    else:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        cache-sets:
>>> +          const: 1024
>>>      additionalProperties: false
>>>    

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Conor.Dooley]

On 25/08/2022 20:49, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 8/25/22 20:56, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 25/08/2022 19:36, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

>>>> +allOf:
>>>> +  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>>>>    -then:
>>>> -  properties:
>>>> -    interrupts:
>>>> -      description: |
>>>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>>>> -      maxItems: 3
>>>> -    cache-sets:
>>>> -      const: 1024
>>>> -
>>>> -else:
>>>> -  properties:
>>>> -    interrupts:
>>>> -      description: |
>>>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>>>> -      minItems: 4
>>>> -    cache-sets:
>>>> -      const: 2048
>>>> +  - if:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        compatible:
>>>> +          contains:
>>>> +            enum:
>>>> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>>> +              - microchip,mpfs-ccache
>>>> +
>>>> +    then:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        interrupts:
>>>> +          description: |
>>>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>>>> +          minItems: 4
> 
> Above you indicated that you want strict limits for the interrupt count.
> You expect exactly 4 items here. Having 5 entries would not be correct.
> Please, add 'maxItems: 4'.

Outside of this diff, because of how the particular binding was
structured, there is:
  interrupts:
    minItems: 3
    items:
      - description: DirError interrupt
      - description: DataError interrupt
      - description: DataFail interrupt
      - description: DirFail interrupt

AFAIU, "maxItems: 4" is redundant because all possible items are listed.

> 
>>>> +
>>>> +    else:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        interrupts:
>>>> +          description: |
>>>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>>>> +          maxItems: 3
> 
> The item count should be exactly 3. Having 2 entries would not be correct.
> Please, add 'minItems: 3'.

Again, this is set by the section I pasted above - although this time
explicitly.

Hope that explains things, not the easiest binding to understand from
a diff alone. Possibly I should have passed a "-U" argument while
creating the patches to get an easier-to-follow diff.

Thanks for your (prompt) reviews,
Conor.

>>>> +
>>>> +  - if:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        compatible:
>>>> +          contains:
>>>> +            const: sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>>> +
>>>> +    then:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        cache-sets:
>>>> +          const: 2048
>>>> +
>>>> +    else:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        cache-sets:
>>>> +          const: 1024
>>>>      additionalProperties: false
>>>>    

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Conor.Dooley]

On 25/08/2022 20:49, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 8/25/22 20:56, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 25/08/2022 19:36, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

>>>> +allOf:
>>>> +  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
>>>>    -then:
>>>> -  properties:
>>>> -    interrupts:
>>>> -      description: |
>>>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>>>> -      maxItems: 3
>>>> -    cache-sets:
>>>> -      const: 1024
>>>> -
>>>> -else:
>>>> -  properties:
>>>> -    interrupts:
>>>> -      description: |
>>>> -        Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>>>> -      minItems: 4
>>>> -    cache-sets:
>>>> -      const: 2048
>>>> +  - if:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        compatible:
>>>> +          contains:
>>>> +            enum:
>>>> +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>>> +              - microchip,mpfs-ccache
>>>> +
>>>> +    then:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        interrupts:
>>>> +          description: |
>>>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError, DataFail, DirFail signals.
>>>> +          minItems: 4
> 
> Above you indicated that you want strict limits for the interrupt count.
> You expect exactly 4 items here. Having 5 entries would not be correct.
> Please, add 'maxItems: 4'.

Outside of this diff, because of how the particular binding was
structured, there is:
  interrupts:
    minItems: 3
    items:
      - description: DirError interrupt
      - description: DataError interrupt
      - description: DataFail interrupt
      - description: DirFail interrupt

AFAIU, "maxItems: 4" is redundant because all possible items are listed.

> 
>>>> +
>>>> +    else:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        interrupts:
>>>> +          description: |
>>>> +            Must contain entries for DirError, DataError and DataFail signals.
>>>> +          maxItems: 3
> 
> The item count should be exactly 3. Having 2 entries would not be correct.
> Please, add 'minItems: 3'.

Again, this is set by the section I pasted above - although this time
explicitly.

Hope that explains things, not the easiest binding to understand from
a diff alone. Possibly I should have passed a "-U" argument while
creating the patches to get an easier-to-follow diff.

Thanks for your (prompt) reviews,
Conor.

>>>> +
>>>> +  - if:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        compatible:
>>>> +          contains:
>>>> +            const: sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>>>> +
>>>> +    then:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        cache-sets:
>>>> +          const: 2048
>>>> +
>>>> +    else:
>>>> +      properties:
>>>> +        cache-sets:
>>>> +          const: 1024
>>>>      additionalProperties: false
>>>>    
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 1:36 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
<heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >
> > The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
> > the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
> > number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
> > of:
> >
> > mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
>
> Where is such a message written? I couldn't find the string in
> next-20220825 (git grep -n 'is too long"').
>
> Why should a different number of cache sets require an extra compatible
> string. cache-size is simply a parameter going with the existing
> compatible strings.
>
> I would assume that you only need an extra compatible string if there is
> a functional difference that can not be expressed with the existing
> parameters.

Correct, but you have to account for unknown functional differences
aka errata as well. Otherwise, we need firmware updates to enable the
OS to handle errata.

> > Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > ---
> >   .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
> >   1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> > index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> > @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
> >     acts as directory-based coherency manager.
> >     All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
> >
> > -allOf:
> > -  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
> > -
> >   select:
> >     properties:
> >       compatible:
> > @@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
> >
> >   properties:
> >     compatible:
> > -    items:
> > -      - enum:
> > -          - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> > -          - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>
> Why can't you simply add microchip,mpfs-ccache here?
>
> > -      - const: cache
> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - items:
> > +          - enum:
> > +              - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> > +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> > +          - const: cache
> > +      - items:
> > +          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
> > +          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>
> Why do we need 'sifive,fu540-c000-ccache' twice?

Because it is in 2 different positions. While we can express that the
last N entries in a list are optional, there is no way in json-schema
to express entries at the beginning or in the middle are optional.

Rob

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 1:36 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
<heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >
> > The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
> > the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
> > number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
> > of:
> >
> > mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
>
> Where is such a message written? I couldn't find the string in
> next-20220825 (git grep -n 'is too long"').
>
> Why should a different number of cache sets require an extra compatible
> string. cache-size is simply a parameter going with the existing
> compatible strings.
>
> I would assume that you only need an extra compatible string if there is
> a functional difference that can not be expressed with the existing
> parameters.

Correct, but you have to account for unknown functional differences
aka errata as well. Otherwise, we need firmware updates to enable the
OS to handle errata.

> > Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > ---
> >   .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
> >   1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> > index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> > @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
> >     acts as directory-based coherency manager.
> >     All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
> >
> > -allOf:
> > -  - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
> > -
> >   select:
> >     properties:
> >       compatible:
> > @@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
> >
> >   properties:
> >     compatible:
> > -    items:
> > -      - enum:
> > -          - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> > -          - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>
> Why can't you simply add microchip,mpfs-ccache here?
>
> > -      - const: cache
> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - items:
> > +          - enum:
> > +              - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> > +              - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> > +          - const: cache
> > +      - items:
> > +          - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
> > +          - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>
> Why do we need 'sifive,fu540-c000-ccache' twice?

Because it is in 2 different positions. While we can express that the
last N entries in a list are optional, there is no way in json-schema
to express entries at the beginning or in the middle are optional.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:04:17 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
> the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
> number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
> of:
> 
> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
> 
> Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:04:17 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
> the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
> number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
> of:
> 
> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
> 
> Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml       | 79 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

[PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: microchip: use an mpfs specific l2 compatible

[Conor Dooley]

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

PolarFire SoC does not have the same l2 cache controller as the fu540,
featuring an extra interrupt. Appease the devicetree checker overlords
by adding a PolarFire SoC specific compatible to fix the below sort of
warnings:

mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long

Fixes: 0fa6107eca41 ("RISC-V: Initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board")
Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
index 718d077b2549..3a00e4c765a5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ soc {
 		ranges;
 
 		cctrllr: cache-controller@2010000 {
-			compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-ccache", "cache";
+			compatible = "microchip,mpfs-ccache", "sifive,fu540-c000-ccache", "cache";
 			reg = <0x0 0x2010000 0x0 0x1000>;
 			cache-block-size = <64>;
 			cache-level = <2>;
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: microchip: use an mpfs specific l2 compatible

[Conor Dooley]

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

PolarFire SoC does not have the same l2 cache controller as the fu540,
featuring an extra interrupt. Appease the devicetree checker overlords
by adding a PolarFire SoC specific compatible to fix the below sort of
warnings:

mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long

Fixes: 0fa6107eca41 ("RISC-V: Initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board")
Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
index 718d077b2549..3a00e4c765a5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ soc {
 		ranges;
 
 		cctrllr: cache-controller@2010000 {
-			compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-ccache", "cache";
+			compatible = "microchip,mpfs-ccache", "sifive,fu540-c000-ccache", "cache";
 			reg = <0x0 0x2010000 0x0 0x1000>;
 			cache-block-size = <64>;
 			cache-level = <2>;
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: microchip: use an mpfs specific l2 compatible

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> PolarFire SoC does not have the same l2 cache controller as the fu540,
> featuring an extra interrupt. Appease the devicetree checker overlords
> by adding a PolarFire SoC specific compatible to fix the below sort of
> warnings:
> 
> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
> 
> Fixes: 0fa6107eca41 ("RISC-V: Initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board")
> Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>

Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: microchip: use an mpfs specific l2 compatible

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> PolarFire SoC does not have the same l2 cache controller as the fu540,
> featuring an extra interrupt. Appease the devicetree checker overlords
> by adding a PolarFire SoC specific compatible to fix the below sort of
> warnings:
> 
> mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller@2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
> 
> Fixes: 0fa6107eca41 ("RISC-V: Initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board")
> Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add a PolarFire SoC l2 compatible

[Conor Dooley]

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:04:16 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> Whilst re-running checks before sending my dt-fixes PR today I noticed
> that I had introduced another dtbs_check warning by applying one of the
> patches in it.
> 
> PolarFire SoC has 4 cache interrupts, unlike the fu540 (which the dts
> re-uses the compatible of currently) which only has 3. Add a new string
> to the binding like should've been done in the first place...
> 
> [...]

@Palmer, I have applied these to my dt-fixes, branch as the commit they
fix is there too. As I mentioned on IRC, patches for this dt-binding are
usually merged via the riscv tree so I have taken the liberty of bundling
it with the dts change. You may get this in a PR friday morning, but more
likely early next week.

Conor.


[1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible
      https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/17e4732d1d8a
[2/2] riscv: dts: microchip: use an mpfs specific l2 compatible
      https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/0dec364ffeb6

Thanks,
Conor.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add a PolarFire SoC l2 compatible

[Conor Dooley]

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:04:16 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> Whilst re-running checks before sending my dt-fixes PR today I noticed
> that I had introduced another dtbs_check warning by applying one of the
> patches in it.
> 
> PolarFire SoC has 4 cache interrupts, unlike the fu540 (which the dts
> re-uses the compatible of currently) which only has 3. Add a new string
> to the binding like should've been done in the first place...
> 
> [...]

@Palmer, I have applied these to my dt-fixes, branch as the commit they
fix is there too. As I mentioned on IRC, patches for this dt-binding are
usually merged via the riscv tree so I have taken the liberty of bundling
it with the dts change. You may get this in a PR friday morning, but more
likely early next week.

Conor.


[1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible
      https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/17e4732d1d8a
[2/2] riscv: dts: microchip: use an mpfs specific l2 compatible
      https://git.kernel.org/conor/c/0dec364ffeb6

Thanks,
Conor.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv