[PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

[PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

[Anshuman Khandual]

This series is primarily motivated from an adhoc list from Mark Rutland
during our ID_ISAR6 discussion [1]. Besides, it also includes a patch
which does macro replacement for various open bits shift encodings in
various CPU ID registers. This series is based on linux-next 20200124.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11287805/

Is there anything else apart from these changes which can be accommodated
in this series, please do let me know. Thank you.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Anshuman Khandual (6):
  arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2 CPU register
  arm64/cpufeature: Add DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register
  arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_MMFR4 register
  arm64/cpufeature: Define an explicit ftr_id_isar0[] for ID_ISAR0 register
  arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register
  arm64/cpufeature: Replace all open bits shift encodings with macros

 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h    |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c     |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/6] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2 CPU register

[Anshuman Khandual]

This adds basic building blocks required for ID_PFR2 CPU register which
provides information about the AArch32 programmers model which must be
interpreted along with ID_PFR0 and ID_PFR1 CPU registers.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h    |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  4 ++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 11 +++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c     |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
index b4a40535a3d8..464e828a994d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm64 {
 	u32		reg_id_mmfr3;
 	u32		reg_id_pfr0;
 	u32		reg_id_pfr1;
+	u32		reg_id_pfr2;
 
 	u32		reg_mvfr0;
 	u32		reg_mvfr1;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index b91570ff9db1..054aab7ebf1b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@
 #define SYS_MVFR0_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 0)
 #define SYS_MVFR1_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 1)
 #define SYS_MVFR2_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 2)
+#define SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 4)
 
 #define SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 4, 0)
 #define SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 4, 1)
@@ -717,6 +718,9 @@
 #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT		4
 #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT		0
 
+#define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT		4
+#define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT		0
+
 #define MVFR0_FPROUND_SHIFT		28
 #define MVFR0_FPSHVEC_SHIFT		24
 #define MVFR0_FPSQRT_SHIFT		20
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 0b6715625cf6..c1e837fc8f97 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -348,6 +348,12 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
+static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr2[] = {
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_END,
+};
+
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_dfr0[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0),
 	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0xf),	/* PerfMon */
@@ -429,6 +435,7 @@ static const struct __ftr_reg_entry {
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_MVFR0_EL1, ftr_generic_32bits),
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_MVFR1_EL1, ftr_generic_32bits),
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_MVFR2_EL1, ftr_mvfr2),
+	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1, ftr_id_pfr2),
 
 	/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 4 */
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64pfr0),
@@ -635,6 +642,7 @@ void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
 		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR3_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr3);
 		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr0);
 		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr1);
+		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr2);
 		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR0_EL1, info->reg_mvfr0);
 		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR1_EL1, info->reg_mvfr1);
 		init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR2_EL1, info->reg_mvfr2);
@@ -802,6 +810,8 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
 					info->reg_id_pfr0, boot->reg_id_pfr0);
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR1_EL1, cpu,
 					info->reg_id_pfr1, boot->reg_id_pfr1);
+		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1, cpu,
+					info->reg_id_pfr2, boot->reg_id_pfr2);
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR0_EL1, cpu,
 					info->reg_mvfr0, boot->reg_mvfr0);
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR1_EL1, cpu,
@@ -851,6 +861,7 @@ static u64 __read_sysreg_by_encoding(u32 sys_id)
 	switch (sys_id) {
 	read_sysreg_case(SYS_ID_PFR0_EL1);
 	read_sysreg_case(SYS_ID_PFR1_EL1);
+	read_sysreg_case(SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1);
 	read_sysreg_case(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1);
 	read_sysreg_case(SYS_ID_MMFR0_EL1);
 	read_sysreg_case(SYS_ID_MMFR1_EL1);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index 86136075ae41..cb79b083f97f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
 		info->reg_id_mmfr3 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR3_EL1);
 		info->reg_id_pfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_PFR0_EL1);
 		info->reg_id_pfr1 = read_cpuid(ID_PFR1_EL1);
+		info->reg_id_pfr2 = read_cpuid(ID_PFR2_EL1);
 
 		info->reg_mvfr0 = read_cpuid(MVFR0_EL1);
 		info->reg_mvfr1 = read_cpuid(MVFR1_EL1);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 3e909b117f0c..e266219a35ff 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1431,7 +1431,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	ID_SANITISED(MVFR1_EL1),
 	ID_SANITISED(MVFR2_EL1),
 	ID_UNALLOCATED(3,3),
-	ID_UNALLOCATED(3,4),
+	ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR2_EL1),
 	ID_UNALLOCATED(3,5),
 	ID_UNALLOCATED(3,6),
 	ID_UNALLOCATED(3,7),
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2 CPU register

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This adds basic building blocks required for ID_PFR2 CPU register which
> provides information about the AArch32 programmers model which must be
> interpreted along with ID_PFR0 and ID_PFR1 CPU registers.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

Sorry for the delay !

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2 CPU register

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:04PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This adds basic building blocks required for ID_PFR2 CPU register which
> provides information about the AArch32 programmers model which must be
> interpreted along with ID_PFR0 and ID_PFR1 CPU registers.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h    |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  4 ++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 11 +++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c     |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> index b4a40535a3d8..464e828a994d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm64 {
>  	u32		reg_id_mmfr3;
>  	u32		reg_id_pfr0;
>  	u32		reg_id_pfr1;
> +	u32		reg_id_pfr2;
>  
>  	u32		reg_mvfr0;
>  	u32		reg_mvfr1;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index b91570ff9db1..054aab7ebf1b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@
>  #define SYS_MVFR0_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 0)
>  #define SYS_MVFR1_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 1)
>  #define SYS_MVFR2_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 2)
> +#define SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 4)
>  
>  #define SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 4, 0)
>  #define SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 4, 1)
> @@ -717,6 +718,9 @@
>  #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT		4
>  #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT		0
>  
> +#define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT		4
> +#define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT		0
> +
>  #define MVFR0_FPROUND_SHIFT		28
>  #define MVFR0_FPSHVEC_SHIFT		24
>  #define MVFR0_FPSQRT_SHIFT		20
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 0b6715625cf6..c1e837fc8f97 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -348,6 +348,12 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
>  	ARM64_FTR_END,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr2[] = {
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT, 4, 0),

Why is CSV3 strict here, but not when we see if in aa64pfr0? I think it
should be non-strict in both cases.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2 CPU register

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 04/09/2020 06:24 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:04PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This adds basic building blocks required for ID_PFR2 CPU register which
>> provides information about the AArch32 programmers model which must be
>> interpreted along with ID_PFR0 and ID_PFR1 CPU registers.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h    |  1 +
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  4 ++++
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 11 +++++++++++
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c     |  1 +
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       |  2 +-
>>  5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
>> index b4a40535a3d8..464e828a994d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm64 {
>>  	u32		reg_id_mmfr3;
>>  	u32		reg_id_pfr0;
>>  	u32		reg_id_pfr1;
>> +	u32		reg_id_pfr2;
>>  
>>  	u32		reg_mvfr0;
>>  	u32		reg_mvfr1;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> index b91570ff9db1..054aab7ebf1b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@
>>  #define SYS_MVFR0_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 0)
>>  #define SYS_MVFR1_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 1)
>>  #define SYS_MVFR2_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 2)
>> +#define SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 4)
>>  
>>  #define SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 4, 0)
>>  #define SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 4, 1)
>> @@ -717,6 +718,9 @@
>>  #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT		4
>>  #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT		0
>>  
>> +#define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT		4
>> +#define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT		0
>> +
>>  #define MVFR0_FPROUND_SHIFT		28
>>  #define MVFR0_FPSHVEC_SHIFT		24
>>  #define MVFR0_FPSQRT_SHIFT		20
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index 0b6715625cf6..c1e837fc8f97 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -348,6 +348,12 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
>>  	ARM64_FTR_END,
>>  };
>>  
>> +static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr2[] = {
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> 
> Why is CSV3 strict here, but not when we see if in aa64pfr0? I think it
> should be non-strict in both cases.

Sure, will do.

> 
> Will
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/6] arm64/cpufeature: Add DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

Enable DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487E.a
specification. Except RAS and AMU, all other feature bits are now enabled.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 3 +++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 054aab7ebf1b..469d61c8fabf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -718,6 +718,9 @@
 #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT		4
 #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT		0
 
+#define ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT		24
+#define ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT		16
+
 #define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT		4
 #define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT		0
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index c1e837fc8f97..9e4dab15c608 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar6[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 12, 4, 0),		/* State3 */
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 8, 4, 0),		/* State2 */
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),		/* State1 */
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64/cpufeature: Add DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register

[Suzuki K Poulose]

Cc: Mark Rutland

On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Enable DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487E.a
> specification. Except RAS and AMU, all other feature bits are now enabled.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 3 +++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 2 ++
>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 054aab7ebf1b..469d61c8fabf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -718,6 +718,9 @@
>   #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT		4
>   #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT		0
>   
> +#define ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT		24
> +#define ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT		16
> +
>   #define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT		4
>   #define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT		0
>   
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index c1e837fc8f97..9e4dab15c608 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar6[] = {
>   };
>   
>   static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>   	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 12, 4, 0),		/* State3 */
>   	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 8, 4, 0),		/* State2 */
>   	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),		/* State1 */
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64/cpufeature: Add DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 03/20/2020 11:37 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Cc: Mark Rutland

Sure, will add this to all the patches here. Also add 'Suggested-by'
tags on all the changes proposed by Mark. Should have already added
that in this version as well, my bad.

> 
> On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Enable DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487E.a
>> specification. Except RAS and AMU, all other feature bits are now enabled.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> 
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 3 +++
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 2 ++
>>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> index 054aab7ebf1b..469d61c8fabf 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> @@ -718,6 +718,9 @@
>>   #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT        4
>>   #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT        0
>>   +#define ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT        24
>> +#define ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT        16
>> +
>>   #define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT        4
>>   #define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT        0
>>   diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index c1e837fc8f97..9e4dab15c608 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar6[] = {
>>   };
>>     static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
>> +    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>>       ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 12, 4, 0),        /* State3 */
>>       ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 8, 4, 0),        /* State2 */
>>       ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),        /* State1 */
>>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64/cpufeature: Add DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:05PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Enable DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487E.a
> specification. Except RAS and AMU, all other feature bits are now enabled.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 3 +++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 054aab7ebf1b..469d61c8fabf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -718,6 +718,9 @@
>  #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT		4
>  #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT		0
>  
> +#define ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT		24
> +#define ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT		16
> +
>  #define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT		4
>  #define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT		0
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index c1e837fc8f97..9e4dab15c608 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar6[] = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, 4, 0),

Same comment as CSV3 here. Why is CSV2 being treated as strict here, but not
in the aa64* register?

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64/cpufeature: Add DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 04/09/2020 06:25 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:05PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Enable DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487E.a
>> specification. Except RAS and AMU, all other feature bits are now enabled.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 3 +++
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> index 054aab7ebf1b..469d61c8fabf 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> @@ -718,6 +718,9 @@
>>  #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT		4
>>  #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT		0
>>  
>> +#define ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT		24
>> +#define ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT		16
>> +
>>  #define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT		4
>>  #define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT		0
>>  
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index c1e837fc8f97..9e4dab15c608 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar6[] = {
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> 
> Same comment as CSV3 here. Why is CSV2 being treated as strict here, but not
> in the aa64* register?

Sure, will change.

> 
> Will
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/6] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_MMFR4 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

Enable all remaining feature bits like EVT, CCIDX, LSM, HPDS, CnP, XNX,
SpecSEI in ID_MMFR4 register per ARM DDI 0487E.a.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 8 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 469d61c8fabf..fcbbf287478e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -718,6 +718,14 @@
 #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT		4
 #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT		0
 
+#define ID_MMFR4_EVT_SHIFT		28
+#define ID_MMFR4_CCIDX_SHIFT		24
+#define ID_MMFR4_LSM_SHIFT		20
+#define ID_MMFR4_HPDS_SHIFT		16
+#define ID_MMFR4_CNP_SHIFT		12
+#define ID_MMFR4_XNX_SHIFT		8
+#define ID_MMFR4_SPECSEI_SHIFT		0
+
 #define ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT		24
 #define ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT		16
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 9e4dab15c608..73fc8e02ed99 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -325,7 +325,14 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar5[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_mmfr4[] = {
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_EVT_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_CCIDX_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_LSM_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_HPDS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_CNP_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_XNX_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),	/* ac2 */
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_SPECSEI_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/6] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_MMFR4 register

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Enable all remaining feature bits like EVT, CCIDX, LSM, HPDS, CnP, XNX,
> SpecSEI in ID_MMFR4 register per ARM DDI 0487E.a.

It might be worth adding a comment here mentioning why SpecSEI is
HIGHER_SAFE, unlike the majority.

> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

With that:

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/6] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_MMFR4 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 03/20/2020 11:41 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Enable all remaining feature bits like EVT, CCIDX, LSM, HPDS, CnP, XNX,
>> SpecSEI in ID_MMFR4 register per ARM DDI 0487E.a.
> 
> It might be worth adding a comment here mentioning why SpecSEI is
> HIGHER_SAFE, unlike the majority.

Sure, will do.

> 
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> 
> With that:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 4/6] arm64/cpufeature: Define an explicit ftr_id_isar0[] for ID_ISAR0 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

ID_ISAR0[31..28] bits are RES0 in ARMv8, Reserved/UNK in ARMv7. Currently
these bits get exposed through generic_id_ftr32[] which is not desirable.
Hence define an explicit ftr_id_isar0[] array for ID_ISAR0 register where
those bits can be hidden.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  8 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 14 ++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index fcbbf287478e..2bcd574bafb3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -703,6 +703,14 @@
 #define ID_AA64DFR0_TRACEVER_SHIFT	4
 #define ID_AA64DFR0_DEBUGVER_SHIFT	0
 
+#define ID_ISAR0_DIVIDE_SHIFT		24
+#define ID_ISAR0_DEBUG_SHIFT		20
+#define ID_ISAR0_COPROC_SHIFT		16
+#define ID_ISAR0_CMPBRANCH_SHIFT	12
+#define ID_ISAR0_BITFIELD_SHIFT		8
+#define ID_ISAR0_BITCOUNT_SHIFT		4
+#define ID_ISAR0_SWAP_SHIFT		0
+
 #define ID_ISAR5_RDM_SHIFT		24
 #define ID_ISAR5_CRC32_SHIFT		16
 #define ID_ISAR5_SHA2_SHIFT		12
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 73fc8e02ed99..2726bd6441da 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -313,6 +313,16 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_dczid[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
+static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar0[] = {
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_ISAR0_DIVIDE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_ISAR0_DEBUG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_ISAR0_COPROC_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_ISAR0_CMPBRANCH_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_ISAR0_BITFIELD_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_ISAR0_BITCOUNT_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_ISAR0_SWAP_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_END,
+};
 
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar5[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_ISAR5_RDM_SHIFT, 4, 0),
@@ -385,7 +395,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_zcr[] = {
  * Common ftr bits for a 32bit register with all hidden, strict
  * attributes, with 4bit feature fields and a default safe value of
  * 0. Covers the following 32bit registers:
- * id_isar[0-4], id_mmfr[1-3], id_pfr1, mvfr[0-1]
+ * id_isar[1-4], id_mmfr[1-3], id_pfr1, mvfr[0-1]
  */
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_generic_32bits[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0),
@@ -431,7 +441,7 @@ static const struct __ftr_reg_entry {
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR3_EL1, ftr_generic_32bits),
 
 	/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 2 */
-	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1, ftr_generic_32bits),
+	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1, ftr_id_isar0),
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR1_EL1, ftr_generic_32bits),
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR2_EL1, ftr_generic_32bits),
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR3_EL1, ftr_generic_32bits),
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64/cpufeature: Define an explicit ftr_id_isar0[] for ID_ISAR0 register

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> ID_ISAR0[31..28] bits are RES0 in ARMv8, Reserved/UNK in ARMv7. Currently
> these bits get exposed through generic_id_ftr32[] which is not desirable.
> Hence define an explicit ftr_id_isar0[] array for ID_ISAR0 register where
> those bits can be hidden.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 5/6] arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed. Hence lets drop it.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 2726bd6441da..a8ded1f0eeaf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -374,7 +374,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr2[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_dfr0[] = {
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0),
 	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0xf),	/* PerfMon */
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 0),
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed.

... to guests.

  Hence lets drop it.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 2726bd6441da..a8ded1f0eeaf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -374,7 +374,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr2[] = {
>   };
>   
>   static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_dfr0[] = {
> -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0),
>   	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0xf),	/* PerfMon */
>   	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),
>   	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 0),
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 03/20/2020 11:49 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed.
> 
> ... to guests.
> 
>  Hence lets drop it.

Sure, will do.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> 
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 -
>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index 2726bd6441da..a8ded1f0eeaf 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -374,7 +374,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr2[] = {
>>   };
>>     static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_dfr0[] = {
>> -    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0),
>>       S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0xf),    /* PerfMon */
>>       ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),
>>       ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 0),
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register

[Will Deacon]

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:19:21PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed.
> 
> ... to guests.
> 
>  Hence lets drop it.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

Hmm, doesn't dropping cause it to become NONSTRICT? In general, I'd prefer
that we list all fields in these tables, rather than have implicit behaviour
in their absence.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 04/09/2020 06:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:19:21PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed.
>>
>> ... to guests.
>>
>>  Hence lets drop it.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> 
> Hmm, doesn't dropping cause it to become NONSTRICT? In general, I'd prefer
> that we list all fields in these tables, rather than have implicit behaviour
> in their absence.

Just trying to understand, so we should just leave it unchanged.

ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0)

> 
> Will
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 6/6] arm64/cpufeature: Replace all open bits shift encodings with macros

[Anshuman Khandual]

There are many open bits shift encodings for various CPU ID registers that
are scattered across cpufeature. This replaces them with register specific
sensible macro definitions. This should not have any functional change.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 52 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 2bcd574bafb3..711a6cd09531 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -695,6 +695,7 @@
 #define ID_AA64MMFR2_CNP_SHIFT		0
 
 /* id_aa64dfr0 */
+#define ID_AA64DFR0_DOUBLELOCK_SHIFT	36
 #define ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT	32
 #define ID_AA64DFR0_CTX_CMPS_SHIFT	28
 #define ID_AA64DFR0_WRPS_SHIFT		20
@@ -732,10 +733,32 @@
 #define ID_MMFR4_HPDS_SHIFT		16
 #define ID_MMFR4_CNP_SHIFT		12
 #define ID_MMFR4_XNX_SHIFT		8
+#define ID_MMFR4_AC2_SHIFT		4
 #define ID_MMFR4_SPECSEI_SHIFT		0
 
+#define ID_MMFR0_INNERSHR_SHIFT		28
+#define ID_MMFR0_FCSE_SHIFT		24
+#define ID_MMFR0_AUXREG_SHIFT		20
+#define ID_MMFR0_TCM_SHIFT		16
+#define ID_MMFR0_SHARELVL_SHIFT		12
+#define ID_MMFR0_OUTERSHR_SHIFT		8
+#define ID_MMFR0_PMSA_SHIFT		4
+#define ID_MMFR0_VMSA_SHIFT		0
+
 #define ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT		24
 #define ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT		16
+#define ID_PFR0_STATE3_SHIFT		12
+#define ID_PFR0_STATE2_SHIFT		8
+#define ID_PFR0_STATE1_SHIFT		4
+#define ID_PFR0_STATE0_SHIFT		0
+
+#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT		24
+#define ID_DFR0_MPROFDBG_SHIFT		20
+#define ID_DFR0_MMAPTRC_SHIFT		16
+#define ID_DFR0_COPTRC_SHIFT		12
+#define ID_DFR0_MMAPDBG_SHIFT		8
+#define ID_DFR0_COPSDBG_SHIFT		4
+#define ID_DFR0_COPDBG_SHIFT		0
 
 #define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT		4
 #define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT		0
@@ -758,6 +781,11 @@
 #define MVFR1_FPDNAN_SHIFT		4
 #define MVFR1_FPFTZ_SHIFT		0
 
+#define MVFR2_FPMISC_SHIFT		4
+#define MVFR2_SIMDMISC_SHIFT		0
+
+#define DCZID_DZP_SHIFT			4
+#define DCZID_BS_SHIFT			0
 
 #define ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN4_SHIFT	28
 #define ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN64_SHIFT	24
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index a8ded1f0eeaf..ff7d9e0394a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = {
 	 * make use of *minLine.
 	 * If we have differing I-cache policies, report it as the weakest - VIPT.
 	 */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, 14, 2, ICACHE_POLICY_VIPT),	/* L1Ip */
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, CTR_L1IP_SHIFT, 2, ICACHE_POLICY_VIPT),	/* L1Ip */
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_IMINLINE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
@@ -274,19 +274,19 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 = {
 };
 
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_mmfr0[] = {
-	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0xf),	/* InnerShr */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0),	/* FCSE */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),	/* AuxReg */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 0),	/* TCM */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 12, 4, 0),	/* ShareLvl */
-	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 8, 4, 0xf),	/* OuterShr */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),	/* PMSA */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 0, 4, 0),	/* VMSA */
+	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_INNERSHR_SHIFT, 4, 0xf),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_FCSE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_AUXREG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_TCM_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_SHARELVL_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_OUTERSHR_SHIFT, 4, 0xf),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_PMSA_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_VMSA_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 36, 28, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_DOUBLELOCK_SHIFT, 28, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_CTX_CMPS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_WRPS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
@@ -302,14 +302,14 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_mvfr2[] = {
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),		/* FPMisc */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 0, 4, 0),		/* SIMDMisc */
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, MVFR2_FPMISC_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, MVFR2_SIMDMISC_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_dczid[] = {
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 4, 1, 1),		/* DZP */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 0, 4, 0),	/* BS */
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, DCZID_DZP_SHIFT, 1, 1),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, DCZID_BS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_mmfr4[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_HPDS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_CNP_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_XNX_SHIFT, 4, 0),
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),	/* ac2 */
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_AC2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, ID_MMFR4_SPECSEI_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
@@ -360,10 +360,10 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar6[] = {
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 12, 4, 0),		/* State3 */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 8, 4, 0),		/* State2 */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),		/* State1 */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 0, 4, 0),		/* State0 */
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_STATE3_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_STATE2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_STATE1_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_STATE0_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
@@ -374,13 +374,13 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr2[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_dfr0[] = {
-	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0xf),	/* PerfMon */
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 0),
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 12, 4, 0),
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 8, 4, 0),
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),
-	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 0, 4, 0),
+	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT, 4, 0xf),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_DFR0_MPROFDBG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_DFR0_MMAPTRC_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_DFR0_COPTRC_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_DFR0_MMAPDBG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_DFR0_COPSDBG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_DFR0_COPDBG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64/cpufeature: Replace all open bits shift encodings with macros

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> There are many open bits shift encodings for various CPU ID registers that
> are scattered across cpufeature. This replaces them with register specific
> sensible macro definitions. This should not have any functional change.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---


> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = {
>   	 * make use of *minLine.
>   	 * If we have differing I-cache policies, report it as the weakest - VIPT.
>   	 */
> -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, 14, 2, ICACHE_POLICY_VIPT),	/* L1Ip */
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, CTR_L1IP_SHIFT, 2, ICACHE_POLICY_VIPT),	/* L1Ip */
>   	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_IMINLINE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>   	ARM64_FTR_END,
>   };
> @@ -274,19 +274,19 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 = {
>   };
>   
>   static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_mmfr0[] = {
> -	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0xf),	/* InnerShr */
> -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0),	/* FCSE */
> -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),	/* AuxReg */
> -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 0),	/* TCM */
> -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 12, 4, 0),	/* ShareLvl */
> -	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 8, 4, 0xf),	/* OuterShr */
> -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),	/* PMSA */
> -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 0, 4, 0),	/* VMSA */
> +	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_INNERSHR_SHIFT, 4, 0xf),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_FCSE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_AUXREG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_TCM_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_SHARELVL_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_OUTERSHR_SHIFT, 4, 0xf),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_PMSA_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_VMSA_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>   	ARM64_FTR_END,
>   };
>   
>   static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
> -	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 36, 28, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_DOUBLELOCK_SHIFT, 28, 0),

This must be a signed feature, as we have the following possible values :

	0b0000 - Double lock implemented
	0b1111 - Double lock not implemented.

So, in case of a conflict we want the safe value as 0b1111.

Please could you fix this as well ?


This patch as such looks fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64/cpufeature: Replace all open bits shift encodings with macros

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 03/21/2020 12:10 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> There are many open bits shift encodings for various CPU ID registers that
>> are scattered across cpufeature. This replaces them with register specific
>> sensible macro definitions. This should not have any functional change.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
> 
> 
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = {
>>        * make use of *minLine.
>>        * If we have differing I-cache policies, report it as the weakest - VIPT.
>>        */
>> -    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, 14, 2, ICACHE_POLICY_VIPT),    /* L1Ip */
>> +    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, CTR_L1IP_SHIFT, 2, ICACHE_POLICY_VIPT),    /* L1Ip */
>>       ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_IMINLINE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>>       ARM64_FTR_END,
>>   };
>> @@ -274,19 +274,19 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0 = {
>>   };
>>     static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_it will not be a good idea to id_mmfr0[] = {
>> -    S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0xf),    /* InnerShr */
>> -    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0),    /* FCSE */
>> -    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0),    /* AuxReg */
>> -    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 0),    /* TCM */
>> -    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 12, 4, 0),    /* ShareLvl */
>> -    S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 8, 4, 0xf),    /* OuterShr */
>> -    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 4, 4, 0),    /* PMSA */
>> -    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 0, 4, 0),    /* VMSA */
>> +    S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_INNERSHR_SHIFT, 4, 0xf),
>> +    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_FCSE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_AUXREG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_TCM_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_SHARELVL_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +    S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_OUTERSHR_SHIFT, 4, 0xf),
>> +    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_PMSA_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_MMFR0_VMSA_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>>       ARM64_FTR_END,
>>   };
>>     static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
>> -    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 36, 28, 0),
>> +    ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_DOUBLELOCK_SHIFT, 28, 0),
> 
> This must be a signed feature, as we have the following possible values :
> 
>     0b0000 - Double lock implemented
>     0b1111 - Double lock not implemented.
> 
> So, in case of a conflict we want the safe value as 0b1111.
> 
> Please could you fix this as well ?

Sure but in a separate patch, as would like to prevent mixing any
actual code change from macro replacement.

> 
> 
> This patch as such looks fine to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 01/28/2020 06:09 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This series is primarily motivated from an adhoc list from Mark Rutland
> during our ID_ISAR6 discussion [1]. Besides, it also includes a patch
> which does macro replacement for various open bits shift encodings in
> various CPU ID registers. This series is based on linux-next 20200124.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11287805/
> 
> Is there anything else apart from these changes which can be accommodated
> in this series, please do let me know. Thank you.

Just a gentle ping. Any updates, does this series looks okay ? Is there
anything else related to CPU ID register feature bits, which can be added
up here. FWIW, the series still applies on v5.6-rc1.

> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Anshuman Khandual (6):
>   arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2 CPU register
>   arm64/cpufeature: Add DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register
>   arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_MMFR4 register
>   arm64/cpufeature: Define an explicit ftr_id_isar0[] for ID_ISAR0 register
>   arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register
>   arm64/cpufeature: Replace all open bits shift encodings with macros
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h    |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c     |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

[Peter Maydell]

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 04:23, Anshuman Khandual
<anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/28/2020 06:09 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > This series is primarily motivated from an adhoc list from Mark Rutland
> > during our ID_ISAR6 discussion [1]. Besides, it also includes a patch
> > which does macro replacement for various open bits shift encodings in
> > various CPU ID registers. This series is based on linux-next 20200124.
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11287805/
> >
> > Is there anything else apart from these changes which can be accommodated
> > in this series, please do let me know. Thank you.
>
> Just a gentle ping. Any updates, does this series looks okay ? Is there
> anything else related to CPU ID register feature bits, which can be added
> up here. FWIW, the series still applies on v5.6-rc1.

I just ran into some "32-bit KVM doesn't expose all the ID
registers to userspace via the ONE_REG API" issues today.
I don't know if they'd be reasonable as something to include
in this patchset or if they're unrelated.

Anyway, missing stuff I have noticed specifically:
 * MVFR2
 * ID_MMFR4
 * ID_ISAR6

More generally I would have expected all these 32-bit registers
to exist and read-as-zero for the purpose of the ONE_REG APIs,
because that's what the architecture says is supposed to happen
and it means we have compatibility and QEMU doesn't gradually
build up lots of "kernel doesn't support this yet" conditionals...
I think we get this right for 64-bit KVM, but can we do it for
32-bit as well?

thanks
-- PMM

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 02/14/2020 09:28 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 04:23, Anshuman Khandual
> <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/28/2020 06:09 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> This series is primarily motivated from an adhoc list from Mark Rutland
>>> during our ID_ISAR6 discussion [1]. Besides, it also includes a patch
>>> which does macro replacement for various open bits shift encodings in
>>> various CPU ID registers. This series is based on linux-next 20200124.
>>>
>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11287805/
>>>
>>> Is there anything else apart from these changes which can be accommodated
>>> in this series, please do let me know. Thank you.
>>
>> Just a gentle ping. Any updates, does this series looks okay ? Is there
>> anything else related to CPU ID register feature bits, which can be added
>> up here. FWIW, the series still applies on v5.6-rc1.

Sorry for the delay in response, was distracted on some other patches.

> 
> I just ran into some "32-bit KVM doesn't expose all the ID
> registers to userspace via the ONE_REG API" issues today.
> I don't know if they'd be reasonable as something to include
> in this patchset or if they're unrelated.

IMHO, they are bit unrelated.

> 
> Anyway, missing stuff I have noticed specifically:
>  * MVFR2
>  * ID_MMFR4
>  * ID_ISAR6
> 
> More generally I would have expected all these 32-bit registers
> to exist and read-as-zero for the purpose of the ONE_REG APIs,
> because that's what the architecture says is supposed to happen
> and it means we have compatibility and QEMU doesn't gradually
> build up lots of "kernel doesn't support this yet" conditionals...
> I think we get this right for 64-bit KVM, but can we do it for
> 32-bit as well?

I am not very familiar with 32-bit KVM but will definitely keep these
suggestions noted for later, also try and accommodate if possible.

> thanks
> -- PMM
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

[Suzuki K Poulose]

Hi Anshuman

On 02/14/2020 04:23 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/28/2020 06:09 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This series is primarily motivated from an adhoc list from Mark Rutland
>> during our ID_ISAR6 discussion [1]. Besides, it also includes a patch
>> which does macro replacement for various open bits shift encodings in
>> various CPU ID registers. This series is based on linux-next 20200124.
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11287805/
>>
>> Is there anything else apart from these changes which can be accommodated
>> in this series, please do let me know. Thank you.
> 
> Just a gentle ping. Any updates, does this series looks okay ? Is there
> anything else related to CPU ID register feature bits, which can be added
> up here. FWIW, the series still applies on v5.6-rc1.

Sorry for the delay ! The series looks good to me, except for some minor
comments. Please see the individual patches.

Cheers
Suzuki

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:03PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This series is primarily motivated from an adhoc list from Mark Rutland
> during our ID_ISAR6 discussion [1]. Besides, it also includes a patch
> which does macro replacement for various open bits shift encodings in
> various CPU ID registers. This series is based on linux-next 20200124.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11287805/
> 
> Is there anything else apart from these changes which can be accommodated
> in this series, please do let me know. Thank you.

The latest Arm ARM also talks about DFR1 and MMFR5. Please can you include
those too? Might also be worth checking to see if anything is missing on
the 64-bit side as well (I didn't look).

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 04/06/2020 10:39 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:03PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This series is primarily motivated from an adhoc list from Mark Rutland
>> during our ID_ISAR6 discussion [1]. Besides, it also includes a patch
>> which does macro replacement for various open bits shift encodings in
>> various CPU ID registers. This series is based on linux-next 20200124.
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11287805/
>>
>> Is there anything else apart from these changes which can be accommodated
>> in this series, please do let me know. Thank you.
> 
> The latest Arm ARM also talks about DFR1 and MMFR5. Please can you include

Sure, will do.

> those too? Might also be worth checking to see if anything is missing on
> the 64-bit side as well (I didn't look).

Yeah. Now there some missing ones, will add those as well.

> 
> Will
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce ID_PFR2 and other CPU feature changes

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 02:20:20PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/06/2020 10:39 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:03PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> This series is primarily motivated from an adhoc list from Mark Rutland
> >> during our ID_ISAR6 discussion [1]. Besides, it also includes a patch
> >> which does macro replacement for various open bits shift encodings in
> >> various CPU ID registers. This series is based on linux-next 20200124.
> >>
> >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11287805/
> >>
> >> Is there anything else apart from these changes which can be accommodated
> >> in this series, please do let me know. Thank you.
> > 
> > The latest Arm ARM also talks about DFR1 and MMFR5. Please can you include
> 
> Sure, will do.
> 
> > those too? Might also be worth checking to see if anything is missing on
> > the 64-bit side as well (I didn't look).
> 
> Yeah. Now there some missing ones, will add those as well.

Thanks. Just as a heads up that I've also got a handful of changes in
this area, but we can resolve the conflicts at -rc1.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=sanity-checks

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel