linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	jroedel@suse.de
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, jan.setjeeilers@oracle.com,
	junaids@google.com, oweisse@google.com, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	graf@amazon.de, mgross@linux.intel.com, kuzuno@gmail.com,
	alexandre.chartre@oracle.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pti: Use a different stack canary with the user and kernel page-table
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:47:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116144757.1920077-22-alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116144757.1920077-1-alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>

Using stack protector requires the stack canary to be mapped into
the current page-table. Now that the page-table switch between the
user and kernel page-table is deferred to C code, stack protector can
be used while the user page-table is active and so the stack canary
is mapped into the user page-table.

To prevent leaking the stack canary used with the kernel page-table,
use a different canary with the user and kernel page-table. The stack
canary is changed when switching the page-table.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h   | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h | 35 +++++++++++------
 arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c              | 18 +++++++++
 include/linux/sched.h                 |  8 ++++
 kernel/fork.c                         |  3 ++
 5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h
index e01735a181b8..5b4d0e3237a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h
@@ -96,6 +96,52 @@ static __always_inline void arch_exit_to_user_mode(void)
 #define PTI_USER_PGTABLE_AND_PCID_MASK  \
 	(PTI_USER_PCID_MASK | PTI_USER_PGTABLE_MASK)
 
+/*
+ * Functions to set the stack canary to the kernel or user value:
+ *
+ * The kernel stack canary should be used when running with the kernel
+ * page-table, and the user stack canary should be used when running
+ * with the user page-table. Also the kernel stack canary should not
+ * leak to the user page-table.
+ *
+ * So the stack canary should be set to the kernel value when entering
+ * the kernel from userspace *after* switching to the kernel page-table.
+ * And the stack canary should be set to the user value when returning
+ * to userspace *before* switching to the user page-table.
+ *
+ * In both cases, there is a window (between the page-table switch and
+ * the stack canary setting) where we will be running with the kernel
+ * page-table and the user stack canary. This window should be as small
+ * as possible and, ideally, it should:
+ * - not call functions which require the stack protector to be used;
+ * - have interrupt disabled to prevent interrupt handlers from being
+ *   processed with the user stack canary (but there is nothing we can
+ *   do for NMIs).
+ */
+static __always_inline void set_stack_canary_kernel(void)
+{
+	this_cpu_write(fixed_percpu_data.stack_canary,
+		       current->stack_canary);
+}
+
+static __always_inline void set_stack_canary_user(void)
+{
+	this_cpu_write(fixed_percpu_data.stack_canary,
+		       current->stack_canary_user);
+}
+
+static __always_inline void switch_to_kernel_stack_canary(unsigned long cr3)
+{
+	if (cr3 & PTI_USER_PGTABLE_MASK)
+		set_stack_canary_kernel();
+}
+
+static __always_inline void restore_stack_canary(unsigned long cr3)
+{
+	if (cr3 & PTI_USER_PGTABLE_MASK)
+		set_stack_canary_user();
+}
+
 static __always_inline void write_kernel_cr3(unsigned long cr3)
 {
 	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PCID))
@@ -155,8 +201,10 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long save_and_switch_to_kernel_cr3(void)
 		return 0;
 
 	cr3 = __native_read_cr3();
-	if (cr3 & PTI_USER_PGTABLE_MASK)
+	if (cr3 & PTI_USER_PGTABLE_MASK) {
 		switch_to_kernel_cr3(cr3);
+		set_stack_canary_kernel();
+	}
 
 	return cr3;
 }
@@ -167,6 +215,7 @@ static __always_inline void restore_cr3(unsigned long cr3)
 		return;
 
 	if (cr3 & PTI_USER_PGTABLE_MASK) {
+		set_stack_canary_user();
 		switch_to_user_cr3(cr3);
 	} else {
 		/*
@@ -182,6 +231,7 @@ static __always_inline void user_pagetable_enter(void)
 	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
 		return;
 
+	set_stack_canary_user();
 	switch_to_user_cr3(__native_read_cr3());
 }
 
@@ -191,6 +241,7 @@ static __always_inline void user_pagetable_exit(void)
 		return;
 
 	switch_to_kernel_cr3(__native_read_cr3());
+	set_stack_canary_kernel();
 }
 
 static __always_inline void user_pagetable_return(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -218,6 +269,9 @@ static __always_inline void user_pagetable_exit(void) {};
 static __always_inline void user_pagetable_return(struct pt_regs *regs) {};
 static __always_inline void user_pagetable_escape(struct pt_regs *regs) {};
 
+static __always_inline void switch_to_kernel_stack_canary(unsigned long cr3) {}
+static __always_inline void restore_stack_canary(unsigned long cr3) {}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION */
 #endif /* MODULE */
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
index 7fb482f0f25b..be6c051bafe3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
@@ -52,6 +52,25 @@
 #define GDT_STACK_CANARY_INIT						\
 	[GDT_ENTRY_STACK_CANARY] = GDT_ENTRY_INIT(0x4090, 0, 0x18),
 
+static __always_inline u64 boot_get_random_canary(void)
+{
+	u64 canary;
+	u64 tsc;
+
+	/*
+	 * We both use the random pool and the current TSC as a source
+	 * of randomness. The TSC only matters for very early init,
+	 * there it already has some randomness on most systems. Later
+	 * on during the bootup the random pool has true entropy too.
+	 */
+	get_random_bytes(&canary, sizeof(canary));
+	tsc = rdtsc();
+	canary += tsc + (tsc << 32UL);
+	canary &= CANARY_MASK;
+
+	return canary;
+}
+
 /*
  * Initialize the stackprotector canary value.
  *
@@ -66,23 +85,15 @@
 static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
 {
 	u64 canary;
-	u64 tsc;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct fixed_percpu_data, stack_canary) != 40);
 #endif
-	/*
-	 * We both use the random pool and the current TSC as a source
-	 * of randomness. The TSC only matters for very early init,
-	 * there it already has some randomness on most systems. Later
-	 * on during the bootup the random pool has true entropy too.
-	 */
-	get_random_bytes(&canary, sizeof(canary));
-	tsc = rdtsc();
-	canary += tsc + (tsc << 32UL);
-	canary &= CANARY_MASK;
-
+	canary = boot_get_random_canary();
 	current->stack_canary = canary;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION
+	current->stack_canary_user = boot_get_random_canary();
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	this_cpu_write(fixed_percpu_data.stack_canary, canary);
 #else
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c
index 59fc7c472525..614fbef497bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c
@@ -1387,6 +1387,14 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC_SETUP_STACK(exc_vmm_communication)
 	frame->regs = *regs;
 	frame->saved_cr3 = saved_cr3;
 
+	/*
+	 * save_and_switch_to_kernel_cr3() has switched the stack canary
+	 * to the kernel stack canary. However, depending on the saved
+	 * CR3 value, this function may have been entered with the user
+	 * stack canary. So restore the stack canary before returning.
+	 */
+	restore_stack_canary(saved_cr3);
+
 	return sp;
 }
 
@@ -1394,6 +1402,16 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC(exc_vmm_communication)
 {
 	struct exc_vc_frame *frame = (struct exc_vc_frame *)regs;
 
+	/*
+	 * The VC setup stack function has switched to the kernel CR3
+	 * but not to the kernel stack canary. Switch to the kernel
+	 * stack canary now that we are using the kernel page-table.
+	 *
+	 * The original stack canary will be restored by the
+	 * restore_cr3() function.
+	 */
+	switch_to_kernel_stack_canary(frame->saved_cr3);
+
 	if (likely(!on_vc_fallback_stack(regs)))
 		safe_stack_exc_vmm_communication(regs, error_code);
 	else
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 063cd120b459..a0199c5d8ae1 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -816,6 +816,14 @@ struct task_struct {
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
 	/* Canary value for the -fstack-protector GCC feature: */
 	unsigned long			stack_canary;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION
+	/*
+	 * With PTI, stack_canary_user is used when we are in the
+	 * kernel but using the user page-table. Once we have switched
+	 * to the kernel page-table, stack_canary is used instead.
+	 */
+	unsigned long			stack_canary_user;
+#endif
 #endif
 	/*
 	 * Pointers to the (original) parent process, youngest child, younger sibling,
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 31cd77dbdba3..70eaba4d8191 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -909,6 +909,9 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
 	tsk->stack_canary = get_random_canary();
+#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION
+	tsk->stack_canary_user = get_random_canary();
+#endif
 #endif
 	if (orig->cpus_ptr == &orig->cpus_mask)
 		tsk->cpus_ptr = &tsk->cpus_mask;
-- 
2.18.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-16 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-16 14:47 [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 01/21] x86/syscall: Add wrapper for invoking syscall function Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 02/21] x86/entry: Update asm_call_on_stack to support more function arguments Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 03/21] x86/entry: Consolidate IST entry from userspace Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 04/21] x86/sev-es: Define a setup stack function for the VC idtentry Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 05/21] x86/entry: Implement ret_from_fork body with C code Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 06/21] x86/pti: Provide C variants of PTI switch CR3 macros Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 07/21] x86/entry: Fill ESPFIX stack using C code Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 08/21] x86/pti: Introduce per-task PTI trampoline stack Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 09/21] x86/pti: Function to clone page-table entries from a specified mm Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 10/21] x86/pti: Function to map per-cpu page-table entry Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 11/21] x86/pti: Extend PTI user mappings Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 19:48   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 20:21     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 23:06       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-17  8:42         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 15:49           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-19 19:15           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 12/21] x86/pti: Use PTI stack instead of trampoline stack Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 16:57   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 18:10     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 18:34       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 19:37         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 15:09         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 15:52           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-17 17:01             ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19  1:49               ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-19  8:05                 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 12:06                   ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 16:06                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-19 17:02                       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 21:24       ` David Laight
2020-11-17  8:27         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 19:10       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-19 19:55         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 21:20           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-24  7:20   ` [x86/pti] 5da9e742d1: PANIC:double_fault kernel test robot
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 13/21] x86/pti: Execute syscall functions on the kernel stack Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 14/21] x86/pti: Execute IDT handlers " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 15/21] x86/pti: Execute IDT handlers with error code " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 16/21] x86/pti: Execute system vector handlers " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 17/21] x86/pti: Execute page fault handler " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 18/21] x86/pti: Execute NMI " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 19/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code for IST entries Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 20/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code for non-IST and syscall entries Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` Alexandre Chartre [this message]
2020-11-16 16:56   ` [RFC][PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pti: Use a different stack canary with the user and kernel page-table Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 18:34     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 20:17 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17  7:56   ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 16:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 18:12       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 18:28         ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 19:02           ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 21:23             ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-18  7:08               ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 21:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-18  7:41           ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-18  9:30             ` David Laight
2020-11-18 10:29               ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-18 13:22                 ` David Laight
2020-11-18 17:15                   ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-18 11:29             ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-18 19:37               ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 20:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17  8:19   ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 17:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 18:24       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 19:32     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201116144757.1920077-22-alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --to=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jan.setjeeilers@oracle.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kuzuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oweisse@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).