linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
	jan.setjeeilers@oracle.com, junaids@google.com,
	oweisse@google.com, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, graf@amazon.de,
	mgross@linux.intel.com, kuzuno@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:56:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44a88648-738a-4a4b-9c25-6b70000e037c@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116201711.GE1131@zn.tnic>


On 11/16/20 9:17 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 03:47:36PM +0100, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
>> This RFC proposes to defer the PTI CR3 switch until we reach C code.
>> The benefit is that this simplifies the assembly entry code, and make
>> the PTI CR3 switch code easier to understand. This also paves the way
>> for further possible projects such an easier integration of Address
>> Space Isolation (ASI), or the possibility to execute some selected
>> syscall or interrupt handlers without switching to the kernel page-table
> 
> What for? What is this going to be used for in the end?
> 

In addition to simplify the assembly entry code, this will also simplify
the integration of Address Space Isolation (ASI) which will certainly be
the primary beneficiary of this change. The main goal of ASI is to provide
KVM address space isolation to mitigate guest-to-host speculative attacks
like L1TF or MDS. Current proposal of ASI is plugged into the CR3 switch
assembly macro which make the code brittle and complex. (see [1])

I am also expected this might help with some other ideas like having
syscall (or interrupt handler) which can run without switching the
page-table.


>> (and thus avoid the PTI page-table switch overhead).
> 
> Overhead of how much? Why do we care?
> 

PTI has a measured overhead of roughly 5% for most workloads, but it can
be much higher in some cases. The overhead is mostly due to the page-table
switch (even with PCID) so if we can run a syscall or an interrupt handler
without switching the page-table then we can get this kind of performance
back.


> What is the big picture justfication for this diffstat
> 
>>   21 files changed, 874 insertions(+), 314 deletions(-)
> 
> and the diffstat for the ASI enablement?
> 

The latest ASI RFC (RFC v4) is here [1]. This RFC has ASI plugged directly into
the CR3 switch assembly macro. We are working on a new implementation, based
on these changes which avoid having to deal with assembly code and makes the
implementation more robust.

alex.

[1] ASI RFCv4 - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200504144939.11318-1-alexandre.chartre@oracle.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-17  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-16 14:47 [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 01/21] x86/syscall: Add wrapper for invoking syscall function Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 02/21] x86/entry: Update asm_call_on_stack to support more function arguments Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 03/21] x86/entry: Consolidate IST entry from userspace Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 04/21] x86/sev-es: Define a setup stack function for the VC idtentry Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 05/21] x86/entry: Implement ret_from_fork body with C code Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 06/21] x86/pti: Provide C variants of PTI switch CR3 macros Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 07/21] x86/entry: Fill ESPFIX stack using C code Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 08/21] x86/pti: Introduce per-task PTI trampoline stack Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 09/21] x86/pti: Function to clone page-table entries from a specified mm Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 10/21] x86/pti: Function to map per-cpu page-table entry Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 11/21] x86/pti: Extend PTI user mappings Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 19:48   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 20:21     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 23:06       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-17  8:42         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 15:49           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-19 19:15           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 12/21] x86/pti: Use PTI stack instead of trampoline stack Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 16:57   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 18:10     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 18:34       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 19:37         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 15:09         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 15:52           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-17 17:01             ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19  1:49               ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-19  8:05                 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 12:06                   ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 16:06                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-19 17:02                       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 21:24       ` David Laight
2020-11-17  8:27         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 19:10       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-19 19:55         ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 21:20           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-24  7:20   ` [x86/pti] 5da9e742d1: PANIC:double_fault kernel test robot
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 13/21] x86/pti: Execute syscall functions on the kernel stack Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 14/21] x86/pti: Execute IDT handlers " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 15/21] x86/pti: Execute IDT handlers with error code " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 16/21] x86/pti: Execute system vector handlers " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 17/21] x86/pti: Execute page fault handler " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 18/21] x86/pti: Execute NMI " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 19/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code for IST entries Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 20/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code for non-IST and syscall entries Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pti: Use a different stack canary with the user and kernel page-table Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 16:56   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 18:34     ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 20:17 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17  7:56   ` Alexandre Chartre [this message]
2020-11-17 16:55     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 18:12       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 18:28         ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 19:02           ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 21:23             ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-18  7:08               ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 21:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-18  7:41           ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-18  9:30             ` David Laight
2020-11-18 10:29               ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-18 13:22                 ` David Laight
2020-11-18 17:15                   ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-18 11:29             ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-18 19:37               ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 20:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17  8:19   ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 17:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 18:24       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 19:32     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44a88648-738a-4a4b-9c25-6b70000e037c@oracle.com \
    --to=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jan.setjeeilers@oracle.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kuzuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oweisse@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).