From: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"jan.setjeeilers@oracle.com" <jan.setjeeilers@oracle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
"oweisse@google.com" <oweisse@google.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.de>,
"mgross@linux.intel.com" <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
"kuzuno@gmail.com" <kuzuno@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 12/21] x86/pti: Use PTI stack instead of trampoline stack
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:27:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6e168db-5d16-66a6-e817-6d23ea0bf1eb@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <985e90259d654d7c9eb74398c5d927ee@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On 11/16/20 10:24 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Alexandre Chartre
>> Sent: 16 November 2020 18:10
>>
>> On 11/16/20 5:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:47 AM Alexandre Chartre
>>> <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When entering the kernel from userland, use the per-task PTI stack
>>>> instead of the per-cpu trampoline stack. Like the trampoline stack,
>>>> the PTI stack is mapped both in the kernel and in the user page-table.
>>>> Using a per-task stack which is mapped into the kernel and the user
>>>> page-table instead of a per-cpu stack will allow executing more code
>>>> before switching to the kernel stack and to the kernel page-table.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> When executing more code in the kernel, we are likely to reach a point
>> where we need to sleep while we are using the user page-table, so we need
>> to be using a per-thread stack.
>
> Isn't that going to allocate a lot more kernel memory?
That's one of my concern, hence this RFC. The current code is doubling the
task stack (this was an easy solution), so that's +8KB per task. See my
reply to Boris, it has a bit more details.
alex.
> ISTR some thoughts about using dynamically allocated kernel
> stacks when (at least some) wakeups are done by directly
> restarting the system call - so that the sleeping thread
> doesn't even need a kernel stack.
> (I can't remember if that was linux or one of the BSDs)
>
> David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-17 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-16 14:47 [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 01/21] x86/syscall: Add wrapper for invoking syscall function Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 02/21] x86/entry: Update asm_call_on_stack to support more function arguments Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 03/21] x86/entry: Consolidate IST entry from userspace Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 04/21] x86/sev-es: Define a setup stack function for the VC idtentry Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 05/21] x86/entry: Implement ret_from_fork body with C code Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 06/21] x86/pti: Provide C variants of PTI switch CR3 macros Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 07/21] x86/entry: Fill ESPFIX stack using C code Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 08/21] x86/pti: Introduce per-task PTI trampoline stack Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 09/21] x86/pti: Function to clone page-table entries from a specified mm Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 10/21] x86/pti: Function to map per-cpu page-table entry Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 11/21] x86/pti: Extend PTI user mappings Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 19:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 20:21 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 23:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-17 8:42 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 15:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-19 19:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 12/21] x86/pti: Use PTI stack instead of trampoline stack Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 16:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 18:10 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 18:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 19:37 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 15:09 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 15:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-17 17:01 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 1:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-19 8:05 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 12:06 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 16:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-19 17:02 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 21:24 ` David Laight
2020-11-17 8:27 ` Alexandre Chartre [this message]
2020-11-19 19:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-19 19:55 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 21:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-24 7:20 ` [x86/pti] 5da9e742d1: PANIC:double_fault kernel test robot
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 13/21] x86/pti: Execute syscall functions on the kernel stack Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 14/21] x86/pti: Execute IDT handlers " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 15/21] x86/pti: Execute IDT handlers with error code " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 16/21] x86/pti: Execute system vector handlers " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 17/21] x86/pti: Execute page fault handler " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 18/21] x86/pti: Execute NMI " Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 19/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code for IST entries Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 20/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code for non-IST and syscall entries Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pti: Use a different stack canary with the user and kernel page-table Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 16:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-16 18:34 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 20:17 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] x86/pti: Defer CR3 switch to C code Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 7:56 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 16:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 18:12 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 18:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 19:02 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 21:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-18 7:08 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 21:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-18 7:41 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-18 9:30 ` David Laight
2020-11-18 10:29 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-18 13:22 ` David Laight
2020-11-18 17:15 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-18 11:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-18 19:37 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 20:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 8:19 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-17 17:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-17 18:24 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-19 19:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6e168db-5d16-66a6-e817-6d23ea0bf1eb@oracle.com \
--to=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jan.setjeeilers@oracle.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=junaids@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kuzuno@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oweisse@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).