* [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom @ 2016-01-13 22:51 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-01-13 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kalle Valo Cc: Rafał Miłecki, Hauke Mehrtens, Michael Buesch, linux-mips, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-arm-kernel Drivers that use the SSB sprom functionality typically 'select SSB_SPROM' from Kconfig, but CONFIG_SSB_HOST_SOC misses this, which results in a build failure unless at least one of the other drivers that selects it is enabled: drivers/built-in.o: In function `ssb_host_soc_get_invariants': (.text+0x459494): undefined reference to `ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback' This adds the same select statement that is used elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 541c9a84cd85 ("ssb: pick SoC invariants code from MIPS BCM47xx arch") --- I'm not sure who the right person is to pick up the fix. The patch that introduced the problem was merged by Kalle through the iwlwifi tree. diff --git a/drivers/ssb/Kconfig b/drivers/ssb/Kconfig index 0c675861623f..d8e4219c2324 100644 --- a/drivers/ssb/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/ssb/Kconfig @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ config SSB_SDIOHOST config SSB_HOST_SOC bool "Support for SSB bus on SoC" depends on SSB && BCM47XX_NVRAM + select SSB_SPROM help Host interface for a SSB directly mapped into memory. This is for some Broadcom SoCs from the BCM47xx and BCM53xx lines. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom @ 2016-01-13 22:51 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-01-13 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Drivers that use the SSB sprom functionality typically 'select SSB_SPROM' from Kconfig, but CONFIG_SSB_HOST_SOC misses this, which results in a build failure unless at least one of the other drivers that selects it is enabled: drivers/built-in.o: In function `ssb_host_soc_get_invariants': (.text+0x459494): undefined reference to `ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback' This adds the same select statement that is used elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 541c9a84cd85 ("ssb: pick SoC invariants code from MIPS BCM47xx arch") --- I'm not sure who the right person is to pick up the fix. The patch that introduced the problem was merged by Kalle through the iwlwifi tree. diff --git a/drivers/ssb/Kconfig b/drivers/ssb/Kconfig index 0c675861623f..d8e4219c2324 100644 --- a/drivers/ssb/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/ssb/Kconfig @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ config SSB_SDIOHOST config SSB_HOST_SOC bool "Support for SSB bus on SoC" depends on SSB && BCM47XX_NVRAM + select SSB_SPROM help Host interface for a SSB directly mapped into memory. This is for some Broadcom SoCs from the BCM47xx and BCM53xx lines. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom 2016-01-13 22:51 ` Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-01-14 6:46 ` Kalle Valo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-14 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Rafał Miłecki, Hauke Mehrtens, Michael Buesch, linux-mips, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-arm-kernel Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > Drivers that use the SSB sprom functionality typically 'select SSB_SPROM' > from Kconfig, but CONFIG_SSB_HOST_SOC misses this, which results in > a build failure unless at least one of the other drivers that selects > it is enabled: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `ssb_host_soc_get_invariants': > (.text+0x459494): undefined reference to `ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback' > > This adds the same select statement that is used elsewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 541c9a84cd85 ("ssb: pick SoC invariants code from MIPS BCM47xx arch") > --- > I'm not sure who the right person is to pick up the fix. The patch that > introduced the problem was merged by Kalle through the iwlwifi tree. I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my wireless-drivers trees. -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom @ 2016-01-14 6:46 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-14 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > Drivers that use the SSB sprom functionality typically 'select SSB_SPROM' > from Kconfig, but CONFIG_SSB_HOST_SOC misses this, which results in > a build failure unless at least one of the other drivers that selects > it is enabled: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `ssb_host_soc_get_invariants': > (.text+0x459494): undefined reference to `ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback' > > This adds the same select statement that is used elsewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 541c9a84cd85 ("ssb: pick SoC invariants code from MIPS BCM47xx arch") > --- > I'm not sure who the right person is to pick up the fix. The patch that > introduced the problem was merged by Kalle through the iwlwifi tree. I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my wireless-drivers trees. -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom 2016-01-14 6:46 ` Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-14 21:46 ` David Miller -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2016-01-14 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kvalo Cc: arnd, zajec5, hauke, m, linux-mips, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-arm-kernel From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:46:29 +0200 > I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my > wireless-drivers trees. +1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom @ 2016-01-14 21:46 ` David Miller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2016-01-14 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:46:29 +0200 > I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my > wireless-drivers trees. +1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused 2016-01-14 6:46 ` Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-14 23:13 ` Arnd Bergmann -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-01-14 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Cc: Kalle Valo, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Rafał Miłecki, linux-kernel, Michael Buesch, netdev The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other ones, which means we can build the framwork without any front-end, but that results in a warning: drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> --- On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: > I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my > wireless-drivers trees. I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take that one too? diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c index cde5ff7529eb..d1a750760cf3 100644 --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c @@ -613,9 +613,10 @@ out: return err; } -static int ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, - ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants, - unsigned long baseaddr) +static int __maybe_unused +ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, + ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants, + unsigned long baseaddr) { int err; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-14 23:13 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-01-14 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other ones, which means we can build the framwork without any front-end, but that results in a warning: drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> --- On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: > I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my > wireless-drivers trees. I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take that one too? diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c index cde5ff7529eb..d1a750760cf3 100644 --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c @@ -613,9 +613,10 @@ out: return err; } -static int ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, - ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants, - unsigned long baseaddr) +static int __maybe_unused +ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, + ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants, + unsigned long baseaddr) { int err; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused 2016-01-14 23:13 ` Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-01-16 12:10 ` Kalle Valo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-16 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Rafał Miłecki, linux-kernel, Michael Buesch, netdev Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >> wireless-drivers trees. > > I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take > that one too? I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for Michael or Rafal :) Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-16 12:10 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-16 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >> wireless-drivers trees. > > I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take > that one too? I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for Michael or Rafal :) Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused 2016-01-16 12:10 ` Kalle Valo (?) @ 2016-01-16 14:44 ` Rafał Miłecki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-16 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kalle Valo Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Michael Buesch, Network Development On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > >> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>> wireless-drivers trees. >> >> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >> that one too? > > I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for > Michael or Rafal :) > > Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC > linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the linux-wireless patchwork. -- Rafał ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-16 14:44 ` Rafał Miłecki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-16 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > >> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>> wireless-drivers trees. >> >> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >> that one too? > > I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for > Michael or Rafal :) > > Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC > linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the linux-wireless patchwork. -- Rafa? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-16 14:44 ` Rafał Miłecki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-16 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kalle Valo Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Michael Buesch, Network Development On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > >> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>> wireless-drivers trees. >> >> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >> that one too? > > I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for > Michael or Rafal :) > > Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC > linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the linux-wireless patchwork. -- Rafał ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused 2016-01-16 14:44 ` Rafał Miłecki (?) (?) @ 2016-01-18 8:26 ` Kalle Valo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-18 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafał Miłecki Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Michael Buesch, Network Development Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes: > On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: >> >>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>>> wireless-drivers trees. >>> >>> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >>> that one too? >> >> I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for >> Michael or Rafal :) >> >> Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC >> linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. > > It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ > > The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the > linux-wireless patchwork. Ah, that's why I missed it. I only follow patchwork, I basically ignore patches which are sent via email. Arnd, can you please resend the patch and CC linux-wireless? Sorry for the trouble. To avoid this in the future I think we should replace netdev with linux-wireless in the MAINTAINERS entry: SONICS SILICON BACKPLANE DRIVER (SSB) M: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: drivers/ssb/ F: include/linux/ssb/ Are people ok with that? Patches welcome :) -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-18 8:26 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-18 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes: > On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: >> >>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>>> wireless-drivers trees. >>> >>> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >>> that one too? >> >> I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for >> Michael or Rafal :) >> >> Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC >> linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. > > It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ > > The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the > linux-wireless patchwork. Ah, that's why I missed it. I only follow patchwork, I basically ignore patches which are sent via email. Arnd, can you please resend the patch and CC linux-wireless? Sorry for the trouble. To avoid this in the future I think we should replace netdev with linux-wireless in the MAINTAINERS entry: SONICS SILICON BACKPLANE DRIVER (SSB) M: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> L: netdev at vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: drivers/ssb/ F: include/linux/ssb/ Are people ok with that? Patches welcome :) -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-18 8:26 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-18 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafał Miłecki Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Michael Buesch, Network Development Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes: > On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: >> >>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>>> wireless-drivers trees. >>> >>> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >>> that one too? >> >> I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for >> Michael or Rafal :) >> >> Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC >> linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. > > It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ > > The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the > linux-wireless patchwork. Ah, that's why I missed it. I only follow patchwork, I basically ignore patches which are sent via email. Arnd, can you please resend the patch and CC linux-wireless? Sorry for the trouble. To avoid this in the future I think we should replace netdev with linux-wireless in the MAINTAINERS entry: SONICS SILICON BACKPLANE DRIVER (SSB) M: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: drivers/ssb/ F: include/linux/ssb/ Are people ok with that? Patches welcome :) -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-18 8:26 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-18 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafał Miłecki Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Michael Buesch, Network Development Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes: > On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: >> >>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>>> wireless-drivers trees. >>> >>> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >>> that one too? >> >> I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for >> Michael or Rafal :) >> >> Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC >> linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. > > It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ > > The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the > linux-wireless patchwork. Ah, that's why I missed it. I only follow patchwork, I basically ignore patches which are sent via email. Arnd, can you please resend the patch and CC linux-wireless? Sorry for the trouble. To avoid this in the future I think we should replace netdev with linux-wireless in the MAINTAINERS entry: SONICS SILICON BACKPLANE DRIVER (SSB) M: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: drivers/ssb/ F: include/linux/ssb/ Are people ok with that? Patches welcome :) -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list 2016-01-18 8:26 ` Kalle Valo ` (2 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2016-01-18 16:53 ` Michael Büsch 2016-01-18 19:09 ` Rafał Miłecki ` (3 more replies) -1 siblings, 4 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Michael Büsch @ 2016-01-18 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kalle Valo Cc: Rafał Miłecki, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Network Development, linux-wireless [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 613 bytes --] ssb patches go through the linux-wireless tree. Set the list to linux-wireless, so linux-wireless patchwork can catch the patches. Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> --- Index: linux/MAINTAINERS =================================================================== --- linux.orig/MAINTAINERS +++ linux/MAINTAINERS @@ -10036,7 +10036,7 @@ F: drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/sonic.* SONICS SILICON BACKPLANE DRIVER (SSB) M: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> -L: netdev@vger.kernel.org +L: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: drivers/ssb/ F: include/linux/ssb/ -- Michael [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list 2016-01-18 16:53 ` ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list Michael Büsch 2016-01-18 19:09 ` Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-18 19:09 ` Rafał Miłecki 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 3 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-18 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Büsch Cc: Kalle Valo, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Network Development, linux-wireless On 18 January 2016 at 17:53, Michael Büsch <m@bues.ch> wrote: > ssb patches go through the linux-wireless tree. > Set the list to linux-wireless, so linux-wireless patchwork can catch the patches. Thanks Michael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list @ 2016-01-18 19:09 ` Rafał Miłecki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-18 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 18 January 2016 at 17:53, Michael B?sch <m@bues.ch> wrote: > ssb patches go through the linux-wireless tree. > Set the list to linux-wireless, so linux-wireless patchwork can catch the patches. Thanks Michael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list @ 2016-01-18 19:09 ` Rafał Miłecki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-18 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Büsch Cc: Kalle Valo, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Network Development, linux-wireless On 18 January 2016 at 17:53, Michael Büsch <m@bues.ch> wrote: > ssb patches go through the linux-wireless tree. > Set the list to linux-wireless, so linux-wireless patchwork can catch the patches. Thanks Michael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list 2016-01-18 19:09 ` Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-19 13:04 ` Kalle Valo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafał Miłecki Cc: Michael Büsch, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Network Development, linux-wireless Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes: > On 18 January 2016 at 17:53, Michael Büsch <m@bues.ch> wrote: > >> ssb patches go through the linux-wireless tree. Set the list to >> linux-wireless, so linux-wireless patchwork can catch the patches. > > Thanks Michael Thanks from me also. I'm planning to send this to 4.5. -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list @ 2016-01-19 13:04 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes: > On 18 January 2016 at 17:53, Michael B?sch <m@bues.ch> wrote: > >> ssb patches go through the linux-wireless tree. Set the list to >> linux-wireless, so linux-wireless patchwork can catch the patches. > > Thanks Michael Thanks from me also. I'm planning to send this to 4.5. -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list 2016-01-18 16:53 ` ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list Michael Büsch @ 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Büsch Cc: linux-mips, Arnd Bergmann, Hauke Mehrtens, Rafał Miłecki, linux-wireless, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Network Development, linux-arm-kernel > ssb patches go through the linux-wireless tree. > Set the list to linux-wireless, so linux-wireless patchwork can catch the patches. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git. Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list @ 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel > ssb patches go through the linux-wireless tree. > Set the list to linux-wireless, so linux-wireless patchwork can catch the patches. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git. Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list 2016-01-18 16:53 ` ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list Michael Büsch 2016-01-18 19:09 ` Rafał Miłecki 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 3 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Büsch Cc: Rafał Miłecki, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Network Development, linux-wireless > ssb patches go through the linux-wireless tree. > Set the list to linux-wireless, so linux-wireless patchwork can catch the patches. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git. Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list 2016-01-18 16:53 ` ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list Michael Büsch ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 3 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Büsch Cc: Rafał Miłecki, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Network Development, linux-wireless > ssb patches go through the linux-wireless tree. > Set the list to linux-wireless, so linux-wireless patchwork can catch the patches. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git. Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH, RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused 2016-01-14 6:46 ` Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-18 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-01-18 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Cc: Kalle Valo, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Rafał Miłecki, linux-kernel, Michael Buesch, netdev, linux-wireless The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other ones, which means we can build the framwork without any front-end, but that results in a warning: drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> --- Resent to linux-wireless as requested diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c index cde5ff7529eb..d1a750760cf3 100644 --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c @@ -613,9 +613,10 @@ out: return err; } -static int ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, - ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants, - unsigned long baseaddr) +static int __maybe_unused +ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, + ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants, + unsigned long baseaddr) { int err; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH, RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-18 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-01-18 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other ones, which means we can build the framwork without any front-end, but that results in a warning: drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first place. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> --- Resent to linux-wireless as requested diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c index cde5ff7529eb..d1a750760cf3 100644 --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c @@ -613,9 +613,10 @@ out: return err; } -static int ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, - ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants, - unsigned long baseaddr) +static int __maybe_unused +ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, + ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants, + unsigned long baseaddr) { int err; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused 2016-01-18 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann (?) @ 2016-01-19 13:03 ` Kalle Valo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Rafał Miłecki, linux-kernel, Michael Buesch, netdev, linux-wireless Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other > ones, which means we can build the framwork without any > front-end, but that results in a warning: > > drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to > shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on > any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build > without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first > place. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") > Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> > --- > Resent to linux-wireless as requested Thanks, and sorry for the hassle. I'm planning to push this to 4.5. -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH, RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-19 13:03 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other > ones, which means we can build the framwork without any > front-end, but that results in a warning: > > drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to > shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on > any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build > without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first > place. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") > Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> > --- > Resent to linux-wireless as requested Thanks, and sorry for the hassle. I'm planning to push this to 4.5. -- Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-19 13:03 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA, Hauke Mehrtens, Rafał Miłecki, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Michael Buesch, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> writes: > The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other > ones, which means we can build the framwork without any > front-end, but that results in a warning: > > drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to > shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on > any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build > without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first > place. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> > Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") > Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> > --- > Resent to linux-wireless as requested Thanks, and sorry for the hassle. I'm planning to push this to 4.5. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused 2016-01-18 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-01-19 19:26 ` Kalle Valo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Rafał Miłecki, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, Michael Buesch, netdev, linux-arm-kernel > The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other > ones, which means we can build the framwork without any > front-end, but that results in a warning: > > drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to > shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on > any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build > without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first > place. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") > Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git. Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused @ 2016-01-19 19:26 ` Kalle Valo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel > The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other > ones, which means we can build the framwork without any > front-end, but that results in a warning: > > drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to > shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on > any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build > without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first > place. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") > Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git. Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused 2016-01-18 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann ` (2 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2016-01-19 19:26 ` Kalle Valo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Rafał Miłecki, linux-kernel, Michael Buesch, netdev, linux-wireless > The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other > ones, which means we can build the framwork without any > front-end, but that results in a warning: > > drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to > shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on > any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build > without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first > place. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") > Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git. Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused 2016-01-18 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann ` (3 preceding siblings ...) (?) @ 2016-01-19 19:26 ` Kalle Valo -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Kalle Valo @ 2016-01-19 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, Hauke Mehrtens, Rafał Miłecki, linux-kernel, Michael Buesch, netdev, linux-wireless > The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other > ones, which means we can build the framwork without any > front-end, but that results in a warning: > > drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to > shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on > any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build > without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first > place. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code") > Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git. Kalle Valo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom 2016-01-13 22:51 ` Arnd Bergmann (?) @ 2016-01-14 8:45 ` Rafał Miłecki -1 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-14 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Kalle Valo, Hauke Mehrtens, Michael Buesch, linux-mips, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Network Development, linux-arm-kernel On 13 January 2016 at 23:51, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > Drivers that use the SSB sprom functionality typically 'select SSB_SPROM' > from Kconfig, but CONFIG_SSB_HOST_SOC misses this, which results in > a build failure unless at least one of the other drivers that selects > it is enabled: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `ssb_host_soc_get_invariants': > (.text+0x459494): undefined reference to `ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback' > > This adds the same select statement that is used elsewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 541c9a84cd85 ("ssb: pick SoC invariants code from MIPS BCM47xx arch") I missed this dependency, thanks, patch looks OK. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom @ 2016-01-14 8:45 ` Rafał Miłecki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-14 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 13 January 2016 at 23:51, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > Drivers that use the SSB sprom functionality typically 'select SSB_SPROM' > from Kconfig, but CONFIG_SSB_HOST_SOC misses this, which results in > a build failure unless at least one of the other drivers that selects > it is enabled: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `ssb_host_soc_get_invariants': > (.text+0x459494): undefined reference to `ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback' > > This adds the same select statement that is used elsewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 541c9a84cd85 ("ssb: pick SoC invariants code from MIPS BCM47xx arch") I missed this dependency, thanks, patch looks OK. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom @ 2016-01-14 8:45 ` Rafał Miłecki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2016-01-14 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Kalle Valo, Hauke Mehrtens, Michael Buesch, linux-mips, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Network Development, linux-arm-kernel On 13 January 2016 at 23:51, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > Drivers that use the SSB sprom functionality typically 'select SSB_SPROM' > from Kconfig, but CONFIG_SSB_HOST_SOC misses this, which results in > a build failure unless at least one of the other drivers that selects > it is enabled: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `ssb_host_soc_get_invariants': > (.text+0x459494): undefined reference to `ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback' > > This adds the same select statement that is used elsewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: 541c9a84cd85 ("ssb: pick SoC invariants code from MIPS BCM47xx arch") I missed this dependency, thanks, patch looks OK. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-19 19:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-01-13 22:51 [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom Arnd Bergmann 2016-01-13 22:51 ` Arnd Bergmann 2016-01-14 6:46 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-14 6:46 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-14 21:46 ` David Miller 2016-01-14 21:46 ` David Miller 2016-01-14 23:13 ` [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann 2016-01-14 23:13 ` Arnd Bergmann 2016-01-16 12:10 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-16 12:10 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-16 14:44 ` Rafał Miłecki 2016-01-16 14:44 ` Rafał Miłecki 2016-01-16 14:44 ` Rafał Miłecki 2016-01-18 8:26 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-18 8:26 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-18 8:26 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-18 8:26 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-18 16:53 ` ssb: Set linux-wireless as MAINTAINERS list Michael Büsch 2016-01-18 19:09 ` Rafał Miłecki 2016-01-18 19:09 ` Rafał Miłecki 2016-01-18 19:09 ` Rafał Miłecki 2016-01-19 13:04 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 13:04 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:25 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-18 19:39 ` [PATCH, RESEND^2] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann 2016-01-18 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann 2016-01-19 13:03 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 13:03 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 13:03 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:26 ` [RESEND^2] " Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:26 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:26 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-19 19:26 ` Kalle Valo 2016-01-14 8:45 ` [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom Rafał Miłecki 2016-01-14 8:45 ` Rafał Miłecki 2016-01-14 8:45 ` Rafał Miłecki
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.