All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] x86/kvm: Enable Secure Memory Encryption of nested page tables
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:35:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160912143555.26lxdu3lv3o5hjp7@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160822223849.29880.35462.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net>

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:38:49PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Update the KVM support to include the memory encryption mask when creating
> and using nested page tables.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    3 ++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c              |    8 ++++++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              |    3 ++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |    3 ++-
>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 33ae3a4..c51c1cb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1039,7 +1039,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask,
> -		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask, u64 p_mask);
> +		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask, u64 p_mask,
> +		u64 me_mask);

Why do you need a separate mask?

arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c::set_spte() ORs in shadow_present_mask
unconditionally. So you can simply do:


	kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(PT_USER_MASK, PT_ACCESSED_MASK,
			      PT_DIRTY_MASK, PT64_NX_MASK, 0,
			      PT_PRESENT_MASK | sme_me_mask);

and have this change much simpler.

>  void kvm_mmu_reset_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 3d4cc8cc..a7040f4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
>  					    * PT32_LEVEL_BITS))) - 1))
>  
>  #define PT64_PERM_MASK (PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK | shadow_user_mask \
> -			| shadow_x_mask | shadow_nx_mask)
> +			| shadow_x_mask | shadow_nx_mask | shadow_me_mask)

This would be sme_me_mask, of course, like with the baremetal masks.

Or am I missing something?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] x86/kvm: Enable Secure Memory Encryption of nested page tables
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:35:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160912143555.26lxdu3lv3o5hjp7@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160822223849.29880.35462.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net>

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:38:49PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Update the KVM support to include the memory encryption mask when creating
> and using nested page tables.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    3 ++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c              |    8 ++++++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              |    3 ++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |    3 ++-
>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 33ae3a4..c51c1cb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1039,7 +1039,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(u64 user_mask, u64 accessed_mask,
> -		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask, u64 p_mask);
> +		u64 dirty_mask, u64 nx_mask, u64 x_mask, u64 p_mask,
> +		u64 me_mask);

Why do you need a separate mask?

arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c::set_spte() ORs in shadow_present_mask
unconditionally. So you can simply do:


	kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes(PT_USER_MASK, PT_ACCESSED_MASK,
			      PT_DIRTY_MASK, PT64_NX_MASK, 0,
			      PT_PRESENT_MASK | sme_me_mask);

and have this change much simpler.

>  void kvm_mmu_reset_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 3d4cc8cc..a7040f4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
>  					    * PT32_LEVEL_BITS))) - 1))
>  
>  #define PT64_PERM_MASK (PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK | shadow_user_mask \
> -			| shadow_x_mask | shadow_nx_mask)
> +			| shadow_x_mask | shadow_nx_mask | shadow_me_mask)

This would be sme_me_mask, of course, like with the baremetal masks.

Or am I missing something?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-12 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 229+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-22 22:35 [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] x86: Documentation for AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02  8:50   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02  8:50     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:02     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:02       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:02       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 15:23       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 15:23         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] x86: Set the write-protect cache mode for full PAT support Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-25  3:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-25  3:58     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) build enablement Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 11:03   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02 11:03     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:03     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:03       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-25 13:04   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-08-25 13:04     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-08-30 13:19     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-30 13:19       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-30 14:57       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 14:57         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 14:57         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-31 13:26         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-31 13:26           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-31 13:26           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] x86: Add the Secure Memory Encryption cpu feature Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 14:09   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02 14:09     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:07     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:07       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 18:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02 18:14     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:11     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:11       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-05  8:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-05  8:48     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:16     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:16       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-05 15:22   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-05 15:22     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:19     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:19       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:19       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-06  9:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-06  9:31     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:30     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:30       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:30       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 15:55       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 15:55         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-08 13:26         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-08 13:26           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-08 13:26           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-08 13:55           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-08 13:55             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 13:43             ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 13:43               ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] x86: Extend the early_memmap support with additional attrs Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] x86: Add support for early encryption/decryption of memory Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-06 16:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-06 16:12     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] x86: Insure that memory areas are encrypted when possible Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 15:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 15:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:05     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:05       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:05       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:33       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:33         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:11         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:11           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:11           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] mm: Access BOOT related data in the clear Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 16:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 16:38     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:14     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:14       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:14       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:35       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:35         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:55   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-12 16:55     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-12 16:55     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-14 14:20     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:20       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:20       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15  9:57       ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-15  9:57         ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-15  9:57         ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-15 16:52         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:52           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:52           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 17:23   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 17:23     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:41     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:41       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:41       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:41         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] x86: Decrypt trampoline area if memory encryption is active Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 17:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 17:34     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:43     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:43       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] x86: DMA support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 10:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 10:58     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:36     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:36       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:36       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] iommu/amd: AMD IOMMU " Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 11:45   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 11:45     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:45     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:45       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:45       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:41         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-15 16:57         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:57           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:57           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-16  7:08           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-16  7:08             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] x86: Check for memory encryption on the APs Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 12:17   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 12:17     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:50     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:50       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:43     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:12     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:12       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:12       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] x86: Do not specify encrypted memory for VGA mapping Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] x86/kvm: Enable Secure Memory Encryption of nested page tables Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 14:35   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-09-12 14:35     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:02     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:02       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] x86: Access the setup data through debugfs un-encrypted Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:59   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:59     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:29     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:29       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:29       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:51       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:51         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-15 17:08         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 17:08           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 17:08           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-16  7:11           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-16  7:11             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] x86: Add support to make use of Secure Memory Encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:39   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:39   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:39   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 17:08   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 17:08     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:31     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:31       ` Tom Lendacky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160912143555.26lxdu3lv3o5hjp7@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.