All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:26:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc8f22db-b6f9-951f-145c-fed919098cbe@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160907155535.i7wh46uxxa2bj3ik@pd.tnic>

On 09/07/2016 10:55 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:30:54AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> _PAGE_ENC is #defined as sme_me_mask and sme_me_mask has already been
>> set (or not set) at this point - so it will be the mask if SME is
>> active or 0 if SME is not active.
> 
> Yeah, I remember :-)
> 
>> sme_early_init() is merely propagating the mask to other structures.
>> Since early_pmd_flags is mainly used in this file (one line in
>> head_64.S is the other place) I felt it best to modify it here. But it
>> can always be moved if you feel that is best.
> 
> Hmm, so would it work then if you stick it in early_pmd_flags'
> definition like you do with the other masks? I.e.,
> 
> pmdval_t early_pmd_flags = __PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE | _PAGE_ENC & ~(_PAGE_GLOBAL | _PAGE_NX);

When does this value get initialized?  Since _PAGE_ENC is #defined to
sme_me_mask, which is not set until the boot process begins, I'm afraid
we'd end up using the initial value of sme_me_mask, which is zero.  Do
I have that right?

Thanks,
Tom

> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	kasan-dev-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org>,
	"Matt Fleming"
	<matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk"
	<konrad.wilk-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin"
	<aryabinin-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Paolo Bonzini"
	<pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Alexander Potapenko"
	<glider-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:26:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc8f22db-b6f9-951f-145c-fed919098cbe@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160907155535.i7wh46uxxa2bj3ik-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org>

On 09/07/2016 10:55 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:30:54AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> _PAGE_ENC is #defined as sme_me_mask and sme_me_mask has already been
>> set (or not set) at this point - so it will be the mask if SME is
>> active or 0 if SME is not active.
> 
> Yeah, I remember :-)
> 
>> sme_early_init() is merely propagating the mask to other structures.
>> Since early_pmd_flags is mainly used in this file (one line in
>> head_64.S is the other place) I felt it best to modify it here. But it
>> can always be moved if you feel that is best.
> 
> Hmm, so would it work then if you stick it in early_pmd_flags'
> definition like you do with the other masks? I.e.,
> 
> pmdval_t early_pmd_flags = __PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE | _PAGE_ENC & ~(_PAGE_GLOBAL | _PAGE_NX);

When does this value get initialized?  Since _PAGE_ENC is #defined to
sme_me_mask, which is not set until the boot process begins, I'm afraid
we'd end up using the initial value of sme_me_mask, which is zero.  Do
I have that right?

Thanks,
Tom

> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:26:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc8f22db-b6f9-951f-145c-fed919098cbe@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160907155535.i7wh46uxxa2bj3ik@pd.tnic>

On 09/07/2016 10:55 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:30:54AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> _PAGE_ENC is #defined as sme_me_mask and sme_me_mask has already been
>> set (or not set) at this point - so it will be the mask if SME is
>> active or 0 if SME is not active.
> 
> Yeah, I remember :-)
> 
>> sme_early_init() is merely propagating the mask to other structures.
>> Since early_pmd_flags is mainly used in this file (one line in
>> head_64.S is the other place) I felt it best to modify it here. But it
>> can always be moved if you feel that is best.
> 
> Hmm, so would it work then if you stick it in early_pmd_flags'
> definition like you do with the other masks? I.e.,
> 
> pmdval_t early_pmd_flags = __PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE | _PAGE_ENC & ~(_PAGE_GLOBAL | _PAGE_NX);

When does this value get initialized?  Since _PAGE_ENC is #defined to
sme_me_mask, which is not set until the boot process begins, I'm afraid
we'd end up using the initial value of sme_me_mask, which is zero.  Do
I have that right?

Thanks,
Tom

> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-08 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 229+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-22 22:35 [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] x86: Documentation for AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02  8:50   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02  8:50     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:02     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:02       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:02       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 15:23       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 15:23         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] x86: Set the write-protect cache mode for full PAT support Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-25  3:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-25  3:58     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) build enablement Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 11:03   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02 11:03     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:03     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:03       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-25 13:04   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-08-25 13:04     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-08-30 13:19     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-30 13:19       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-30 14:57       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 14:57         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 14:57         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-31 13:26         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-31 13:26           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-31 13:26           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] x86: Add the Secure Memory Encryption cpu feature Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 14:09   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02 14:09     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:07     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:07       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 18:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02 18:14     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:11     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:11       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-05  8:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-05  8:48     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:16     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:16       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-05 15:22   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-05 15:22     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:19     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:19       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:19       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-06  9:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-06  9:31     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:30     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:30       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:30       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 15:55       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 15:55         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-08 13:26         ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2016-09-08 13:26           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-08 13:26           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-08 13:55           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-08 13:55             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 13:43             ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 13:43               ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] x86: Extend the early_memmap support with additional attrs Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] x86: Add support for early encryption/decryption of memory Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-06 16:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-06 16:12     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] x86: Insure that memory areas are encrypted when possible Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 15:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 15:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:05     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:05       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:05       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:33       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:33         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:11         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:11           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:11           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] mm: Access BOOT related data in the clear Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 16:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 16:38     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:14     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:14       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:14       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:35       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:35         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:55   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-12 16:55     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-12 16:55     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-14 14:20     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:20       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:20       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15  9:57       ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-15  9:57         ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-15  9:57         ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-15 16:52         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:52           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:52           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 17:23   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 17:23     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:41     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:41       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:41       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:41         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] x86: Decrypt trampoline area if memory encryption is active Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 17:34   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 17:34     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:43     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:43       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] x86: DMA support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 10:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 10:58     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:36     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:36       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:36       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] iommu/amd: AMD IOMMU " Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 11:45   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 11:45     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:45     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:45       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:45       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:41       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:41         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-15 16:57         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:57           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:57           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-16  7:08           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-16  7:08             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] x86: Check for memory encryption on the APs Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 12:17   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 12:17     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:50     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:50       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:43     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:12     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:12       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:12       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] x86: Do not specify encrypted memory for VGA mapping Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] x86/kvm: Enable Secure Memory Encryption of nested page tables Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 14:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 14:35     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:02     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:02       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] x86: Access the setup data through debugfs un-encrypted Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:59   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:59     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:29     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:29       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:29       ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:51       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:51         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-15 17:08         ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 17:08           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 17:08           ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-16  7:11           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-16  7:11             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] x86: Add support to make use of Secure Memory Encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:39   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:39   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:39   ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 17:08   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 17:08     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:31     ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:31       ` Tom Lendacky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc8f22db-b6f9-951f-145c-fed919098cbe@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.