From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "X86 ML" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:26:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <386eadac-b6eb-747e-65e7-1ffa4cfd7210@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVoiM3bskfWrg4c8ttHr467Us9xdXuxw=T6Dkr0PFo18g@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/30/2016 09:57 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2016 6:34 AM, "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/25/2016 08:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>>
>>>> Provide support for Secure Memory Encryption (SME). This initial support
>>>> defines the memory encryption mask as a variable for quick access and an
>>>> accessor for retrieving the number of physical addressing bits lost if
>>>> SME is enabled.
>>>
>>> What is the reason that this needs to live in assembly code?
>>
>> In later patches this code is expanded and deals with a lot of page
>> table manipulation, cpuid/rdmsr instructions, etc. and so I thought it
>> was best to do it this way.
>
> None of that sounds like it needs to be in asm, though.
>
> I, at least, have a strong preference for minimizing the amount of asm
> in the low-level arch code.
I can take a look at converting it over to C code.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> --Andy
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:26:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <386eadac-b6eb-747e-65e7-1ffa4cfd7210@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVoiM3bskfWrg4c8ttHr467Us9xdXuxw=T6Dkr0PFo18g@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/30/2016 09:57 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2016 6:34 AM, "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/25/2016 08:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>>
>>>> Provide support for Secure Memory Encryption (SME). This initial support
>>>> defines the memory encryption mask as a variable for quick access and an
>>>> accessor for retrieving the number of physical addressing bits lost if
>>>> SME is enabled.
>>>
>>> What is the reason that this needs to live in assembly code?
>>
>> In later patches this code is expanded and deals with a lot of page
>> table manipulation, cpuid/rdmsr instructions, etc. and so I thought it
>> was best to do it this way.
>
> None of that sounds like it needs to be in asm, though.
>
> I, at least, have a strong preference for minimizing the amount of asm
> in the low-level arch code.
I can take a look at converting it over to C code.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> --Andy
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "X86 ML" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:26:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <386eadac-b6eb-747e-65e7-1ffa4cfd7210@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVoiM3bskfWrg4c8ttHr467Us9xdXuxw=T6Dkr0PFo18g@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/30/2016 09:57 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2016 6:34 AM, "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/25/2016 08:04 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>>
>>>> Provide support for Secure Memory Encryption (SME). This initial support
>>>> defines the memory encryption mask as a variable for quick access and an
>>>> accessor for retrieving the number of physical addressing bits lost if
>>>> SME is enabled.
>>>
>>> What is the reason that this needs to live in assembly code?
>>
>> In later patches this code is expanded and deals with a lot of page
>> table manipulation, cpuid/rdmsr instructions, etc. and so I thought it
>> was best to do it this way.
>
> None of that sounds like it needs to be in asm, though.
>
> I, at least, have a strong preference for minimizing the amount of asm
> in the low-level arch code.
I can take a look at converting it over to C code.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> --Andy
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 229+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-22 22:35 [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (AMD) Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] x86: Documentation for AMD Secure Memory Encryption (SME) Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 8:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02 8:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:02 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:02 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:02 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 15:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 15:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] x86: Set the write-protect cache mode for full PAT support Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-25 3:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-25 3:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) build enablement Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:35 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 11:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02 11:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] x86: Secure Memory Encryption (SME) support Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-25 13:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-08-25 13:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-08-30 13:19 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-30 13:19 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-30 14:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 14:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-30 14:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-08-31 13:26 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2016-08-31 13:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-31 13:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] x86: Add the Secure Memory Encryption cpu feature Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 14:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02 14:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:07 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:07 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] x86: Handle reduction in physical address size with SME Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-02 18:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-02 18:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-05 8:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-05 8:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:16 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-05 15:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-05 15:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:19 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:19 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:19 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-06 9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-06 9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 14:30 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:30 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 14:30 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-07 15:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-07 15:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-08 13:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-08 13:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-08 13:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-08 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-08 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 13:43 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 13:43 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] x86: Extend the early_memmap support with additional attrs Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] x86: Add support for early encryption/decryption of memory Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-06 16:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-06 16:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] x86: Insure that memory areas are encrypted when possible Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:05 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:05 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:05 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] mm: Access BOOT related data in the clear Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 16:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 16:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:14 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:14 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:14 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-12 16:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-12 16:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-09-14 14:20 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:20 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:20 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 9:57 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-15 9:57 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-15 9:57 ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-15 16:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:52 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 17:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 17:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:41 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] x86: Decrypt trampoline area if memory encryption is active Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-09 17:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-09 17:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 15:43 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 15:43 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] x86: DMA support for memory encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 10:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 10:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:36 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] iommu/amd: AMD IOMMU " Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 11:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 11:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:45 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:45 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:45 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-15 16:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 16:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-16 7:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-16 7:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] x86: Check for memory encryption on the APs Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 12:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 12:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 13:50 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 13:50 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] x86: Do not specify encrypted memory for VGA mapping Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] x86/kvm: Enable Secure Memory Encryption of nested page tables Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 14:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 14:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:02 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:02 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] x86: Access the setup data through debugfs un-encrypted Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:29 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-15 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-15 17:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-16 7:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-16 7:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-22 22:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] x86: Add support to make use of Secure Memory Encryption Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-08-22 22:39 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-12 17:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-12 17:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-09-14 14:31 ` Tom Lendacky
2016-09-14 14:31 ` Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=386eadac-b6eb-747e-65e7-1ffa4cfd7210@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.