All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	dpsmith@apertussolutions.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, ardb@kernel.org,
	James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, luto@amacapital.net,
	nivedita@alum.mit.edu, kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com,
	trenchboot-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/14] x86: Secure Launch kernel early boot stub
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 12:26:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230512112623.GE14461@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230504145023.835096-8-ross.philipson@oracle.com>

On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 02:50:16PM +0000, Ross Philipson wrote:

> +static void sl_find_event_log(struct slr_table *slrt)

If this is called after the EFI stub then we're presumably 
post-ExitBootServices and we're copied the TPM event log into a 
configuration table so it's available to the runtime kernel. That also 
means that we should be adding all further measurements to the Final 
Events Table rather than the initial event log. How's that handled here, 
both in terms of ensuring further events (generated by firmware or by 
us) get added to the right place, and in terms of ensuring the event 
logs the kernel has later on were covered appropriately? Or is the SL 
event log an entirely different thing that can be merged in later 
because it only covers the DRTM PCRs?

> +static void sl_extend_setup_data(struct slr_policy_entry *entry)
> +{
> +	struct setup_data *data;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Measuring the boot params measured the fixed e820 memory map.
> +	 * Measure any setup_data entries including e820 extended entries.
> +	 */
> +	data = (struct setup_data *)(unsigned long)entry->entity;
> +	while (data)
> +		data = sl_handle_setup_data(data, entry);
> +}

Is e820 sufficient here? There are cases where we use the EFI memory map 
directly (sorry), but I don't know if any of them are relevant to DRTM 
outcomes.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	dpsmith@apertussolutions.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, ardb@kernel.org,
	James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, luto@amacapital.net,
	nivedita@alum.mit.edu, kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com,
	trenchboot-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/14] x86: Secure Launch kernel early boot stub
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 12:26:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230512112623.GE14461@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230504145023.835096-8-ross.philipson@oracle.com>

On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 02:50:16PM +0000, Ross Philipson wrote:

> +static void sl_find_event_log(struct slr_table *slrt)

If this is called after the EFI stub then we're presumably 
post-ExitBootServices and we're copied the TPM event log into a 
configuration table so it's available to the runtime kernel. That also 
means that we should be adding all further measurements to the Final 
Events Table rather than the initial event log. How's that handled here, 
both in terms of ensuring further events (generated by firmware or by 
us) get added to the right place, and in terms of ensuring the event 
logs the kernel has later on were covered appropriately? Or is the SL 
event log an entirely different thing that can be merged in later 
because it only covers the DRTM PCRs?

> +static void sl_extend_setup_data(struct slr_policy_entry *entry)
> +{
> +	struct setup_data *data;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Measuring the boot params measured the fixed e820 memory map.
> +	 * Measure any setup_data entries including e820 extended entries.
> +	 */
> +	data = (struct setup_data *)(unsigned long)entry->entity;
> +	while (data)
> +		data = sl_handle_setup_data(data, entry);
> +}

Is e820 sufficient here? There are cases where we use the EFI memory map 
directly (sorry), but I don't know if any of them are relevant to DRTM 
outcomes.

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-12 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 200+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-04 14:50 [PATCH v6 00/14] x86: Trenchboot secure dynamic launch Linux kernel support Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50 ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] x86/boot: Place kernel_info at a fixed offset Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] Documentation/x86: Secure Launch kernel documentation Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 16:19   ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 16:19     ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 17:32     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 17:32       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-06  8:48   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-05-06  8:48     ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-05-10 15:41     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-10 15:41       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 10:47   ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 10:47     ` Matthew Garrett
2023-06-16 16:44     ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-06-16 16:44       ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-06-16 16:54       ` Matthew Garrett
2023-06-16 16:54         ` Matthew Garrett
2023-06-16 18:21         ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-06-16 18:21           ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-12 13:19   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-12 13:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] x86: Secure Launch Kconfig Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] x86: Secure Launch Resource Table header file Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 16:22   ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 16:22     ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 17:34     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 17:34       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-10 23:04   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-10 23:04     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-15 20:58     ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-15 20:58       ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-12 10:55   ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 10:55     ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-15 21:15     ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-15 21:15       ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-15 21:22       ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-15 21:22         ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-16  0:41         ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-16  0:41           ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-16  1:43           ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-16  1:43             ` Matthew Garrett
2023-06-16 20:01             ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-06-16 20:01               ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-06-16 20:15               ` Matthew Garrett
2023-06-16 20:15                 ` Matthew Garrett
2023-07-07 19:31                 ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-07-07 19:31                   ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] x86: Secure Launch main " Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 16:25   ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 16:25     ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 17:37     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 17:37       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 11:00   ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 11:00     ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 16:10     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 16:10       ` Ross Philipson
2023-10-31 21:37       ` ross.philipson
2023-10-31 21:37         ` ross.philipson
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] x86: Add early SHA support for Secure Launch early measurements Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 16:34   ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 16:34     ` Simon Horman
2023-05-09 16:09     ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-09 16:09       ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-10  1:21   ` Eric Biggers
2023-05-10  1:21     ` Eric Biggers
2023-05-10 22:28     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-10 22:28       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-12 11:04     ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 11:04       ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 11:18       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-12 11:18         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-12 11:28         ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 11:28           ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 11:58           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-12 11:58             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-12 12:24             ` Andrew Cooper
2023-05-12 12:24               ` Andrew Cooper
2023-05-14 18:18               ` Eric Biggers
2023-05-14 18:18                 ` Eric Biggers
2023-05-14 19:11                 ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-14 19:11                   ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 13:24           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-12 13:24             ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-12 16:13             ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 16:13               ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 18:17               ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-12 18:17                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-12 19:12                 ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 19:12                   ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 19:42                   ` Andrew Cooper
2023-05-12 19:42                     ` Andrew Cooper
2023-05-15 21:23     ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-15 21:23       ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-11  3:33   ` Herbert Xu
2023-05-11  3:33     ` Herbert Xu
2023-05-16  0:50     ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-16  0:50       ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] x86: Secure Launch kernel early boot stub Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 17:47   ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 17:47     ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 18:58     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 18:58       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 19:46       ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 19:46         ` Simon Horman
2023-05-12 11:26   ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2023-05-12 11:26     ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 16:17     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 16:17       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 16:27       ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 16:27         ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-16  1:11       ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-16  1:11         ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-16  1:45         ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-16  1:45           ` Matthew Garrett
2023-06-15 18:00           ` Ross Philipson
2023-06-15 18:00             ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 18:04   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-12 18:04     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-15 20:13     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-15 20:13       ` Ross Philipson
2023-09-20 21:40     ` ross.philipson
2023-09-20 21:40       ` ross.philipson
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] x86: Secure Launch kernel late " Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 17:52   ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 17:52     ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 18:59     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 18:59       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-10 23:02   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-10 23:02     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-12 15:58     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 15:58       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-24  2:55       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-24  2:55         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-12 15:44   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-12 15:44     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-15 20:06     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-15 20:06       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] x86: Secure Launch SMP bringup support Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 17:54   ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 17:54     ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 18:59     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 18:59       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-10 22:55   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-10 22:55     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-11 16:21     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-11 16:21       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 18:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-12 18:02     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-15 20:19     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-15 20:19       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] kexec: Secure Launch kexec SEXIT support Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] reboot: Secure Launch SEXIT support on reboot paths Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 11:40   ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 11:40     ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-15 18:16     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-15 18:16       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-16  1:23       ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-16  1:23         ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] x86: Secure Launch late initcall platform module Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 19:42   ` Simon Horman
2023-05-05 19:42     ` Simon Horman
2023-05-08 15:07     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-08 15:07       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-10 22:39   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-10 22:39     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-12 15:53     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 15:53       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-10 22:40   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-10 22:40     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-05-12 15:54     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 15:54       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] tpm: Allow locality 2 to be set when initializing the TPM for Secure Launch Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 11:43   ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 11:43     ` Matthew Garrett
2023-05-12 16:22     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-12 16:22       ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-16  1:37       ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-16  1:37         ` Daniel P. Smith
2023-05-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] x86: EFI stub DRTM launch support " Ross Philipson
2023-05-04 14:50   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05  8:39 ` [PATCH v6 00/14] x86: Trenchboot secure dynamic launch Linux kernel support Bagas Sanjaya
2023-05-05  8:39   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-05-05 15:45   ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-05 15:45     ` Ross Philipson
2023-05-06  7:56     ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-05-06  7:56       ` Bagas Sanjaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230512112623.GE14461@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dpsmith@apertussolutions.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=ross.philipson@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=trenchboot-devel@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.