All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>,
	"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"jingoohan1@gmail.com" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/7] PCI: imx6: Fix the regulator dump when link never came up
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 03:58:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AS8PR04MB8676CF52F4D8E9E4E6C07F758C879@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YXqOcAIO2aYkr1sM@sirena.org.uk>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 7:50 PM
> To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>;
> l.stach@pengutronix.de; bhelgaas@google.com;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; jingoohan1@gmail.com;
> linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> kernel@pengutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] PCI: imx6: Fix the regulator dump when link
> never came up
> 
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:50:58AM +0000, Richard Zhu wrote:
> 
> > > I would be really surprised to see PCI hardware that was able to
> > > support a supply being physically absent, and this use of
> > > _is_enabled() is quite simply not how any of this is supposed to
> > > work in the regulator API even for regulators that can be optional.
> 
> > [Richard Zhu] Actually, this regulator is one GPIO fixed regulator.
> > Controlled by SW to turn on (GPIO high) or turn off (GPIO low) the
> supply.
> > In some boards designs, this supply might be always on(GPIO high).
> > So, in point of SW driver view, this regulator is optional.
> 
> No, it's not.  The regulator API supports the systems where the regualtor
> is always on perfectly well, the client driver should not need to do
> anything to support them.
[Richard Zhu] Hi Mark: Thanks for your explains.
To disable the regulator explicitly, is a part of power save of i.MX PCIe port
 usage when link is down.
Because that this regulator might not be present at all on some boards
 (e.x: powered directly when board is powered up), so this regulator is
 optional from SW view.
> 
> > > Perhaps it's not causing problems in this design but if the supply
> > > is ever shared with anything else then the software will run into
> trouble.
> > > There will also be problems with the error handling on a system
> > > where the regulator needs to be controlled.
> 
> > [Richard Zhu] This GPIO fixed regulator is only used by controller driver.
> > It makes sense to disable the enabled regulator when driver probe is
> failed.
> 
> The driver should undo any enables it did itself, it should not undo any
> enables that anything else did which means it should never be basing
> decisions on regulator_is_enabled().  While the regulator may not be
> shared in the particular board you're looking at it may be shared in other
> systems.
[Richard Zhu] Understood. Thanks.
Can I disabled this regulator in PCIe probe failure handler without the
 regulator_is_enabled() check?

BR
Richard

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>,
	"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"jingoohan1@gmail.com" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/7] PCI: imx6: Fix the regulator dump when link never came up
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 03:58:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AS8PR04MB8676CF52F4D8E9E4E6C07F758C879@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YXqOcAIO2aYkr1sM@sirena.org.uk>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 7:50 PM
> To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>;
> l.stach@pengutronix.de; bhelgaas@google.com;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; jingoohan1@gmail.com;
> linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> kernel@pengutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] PCI: imx6: Fix the regulator dump when link
> never came up
> 
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:50:58AM +0000, Richard Zhu wrote:
> 
> > > I would be really surprised to see PCI hardware that was able to
> > > support a supply being physically absent, and this use of
> > > _is_enabled() is quite simply not how any of this is supposed to
> > > work in the regulator API even for regulators that can be optional.
> 
> > [Richard Zhu] Actually, this regulator is one GPIO fixed regulator.
> > Controlled by SW to turn on (GPIO high) or turn off (GPIO low) the
> supply.
> > In some boards designs, this supply might be always on(GPIO high).
> > So, in point of SW driver view, this regulator is optional.
> 
> No, it's not.  The regulator API supports the systems where the regualtor
> is always on perfectly well, the client driver should not need to do
> anything to support them.
[Richard Zhu] Hi Mark: Thanks for your explains.
To disable the regulator explicitly, is a part of power save of i.MX PCIe port
 usage when link is down.
Because that this regulator might not be present at all on some boards
 (e.x: powered directly when board is powered up), so this regulator is
 optional from SW view.
> 
> > > Perhaps it's not causing problems in this design but if the supply
> > > is ever shared with anything else then the software will run into
> trouble.
> > > There will also be problems with the error handling on a system
> > > where the regulator needs to be controlled.
> 
> > [Richard Zhu] This GPIO fixed regulator is only used by controller driver.
> > It makes sense to disable the enabled regulator when driver probe is
> failed.
> 
> The driver should undo any enables it did itself, it should not undo any
> enables that anything else did which means it should never be basing
> decisions on regulator_is_enabled().  While the regulator may not be
> shared in the particular board you're looking at it may be shared in other
> systems.
[Richard Zhu] Understood. Thanks.
Can I disabled this regulator in PCIe probe failure handler without the
 regulator_is_enabled() check?

BR
Richard

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-29  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-22  7:12 [PATCH v3 0/7] PCI: imx6: refine codes and add compliance tests mode support Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12 ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] PCI: imx6: Encapsulate the clock enable into one standalone function Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12   ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] PCI: imx6: Add the error propagation from host_init Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12   ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] PCI: imx6: Fix the regulator dump when link never came up Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12   ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-25 11:13   ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-10-25 11:13     ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-10-25 11:23     ` Mark Brown
2021-10-25 11:23       ` Mark Brown
2021-10-26  2:18       ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-26  2:18         ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-26  8:52         ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-10-26  8:52           ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-10-26  9:06           ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-26  9:06             ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-26  9:11             ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-10-26  9:11               ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-10-26  9:18               ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-26  9:18                 ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-26  9:48                 ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-10-26  9:48                   ` Francesco Dolcini
2021-10-28  6:48                   ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-28  6:48                     ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-26 10:58         ` Mark Brown
2021-10-26 10:58           ` Mark Brown
2021-10-28  6:50           ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-28  6:50             ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-28 11:50             ` Mark Brown
2021-10-28 11:50               ` Mark Brown
2021-10-29  3:58               ` Richard Zhu [this message]
2021-10-29  3:58                 ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-29 11:46                 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-29 11:46                   ` Mark Brown
2021-11-01  1:46                   ` Richard Zhu
2021-11-01  1:46                     ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-26  1:57     ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-26  1:57       ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] PCI: imx6: move the clock disable function to a proper place Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12   ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] PCI: dwc: add a new callback host exit function into host ops Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12   ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] PCI: imx6: Fix the reference handling unbalance when link never came up Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12   ` Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] PCI: imx6: Add the compliance tests mode support Richard Zhu
2021-10-22  7:12   ` Richard Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AS8PR04MB8676CF52F4D8E9E4E6C07F758C879@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=francesco.dolcini@toradex.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.