All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:52:06 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-3-stevensd@google.com>

Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Return a struct kvm_pfn_page containing both a pfn and an optional
> struct page from the gfn_to_pfn family of functions. This differentiates
> the gup and follow_fault_pfn cases, which allows callers that only need
> a pfn to avoid touching the page struct in the latter case. For callers
> that need a struct page, introduce a helper function that unwraps a
> struct kvm_pfn_page into a struct page. This helper makes the call to
> kvm_get_pfn which had previously been in hva_to_pfn_remapped.
> 
> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
> follow-up patches.

Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally 
if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.

Most kernel code I look at passes back multiple values by updating 
pointers to struct or variables rather than returning a struct, I 
suppose that's not really a big deal and a matter of taste.

Thanks,
Nick


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:52:06 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-3-stevensd@google.com>

Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Return a struct kvm_pfn_page containing both a pfn and an optional
> struct page from the gfn_to_pfn family of functions. This differentiates
> the gup and follow_fault_pfn cases, which allows callers that only need
> a pfn to avoid touching the page struct in the latter case. For callers
> that need a struct page, introduce a helper function that unwraps a
> struct kvm_pfn_page into a struct page. This helper makes the call to
> kvm_get_pfn which had previously been in hva_to_pfn_remapped.
> 
> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
> follow-up patches.

Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally 
if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.

Most kernel code I look at passes back multiple values by updating 
pointers to struct or variables rather than returning a struct, I 
suppose that's not really a big deal and a matter of taste.

Thanks,
Nick


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:52:06 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-3-stevensd@google.com>

Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Return a struct kvm_pfn_page containing both a pfn and an optional
> struct page from the gfn_to_pfn family of functions. This differentiates
> the gup and follow_fault_pfn cases, which allows callers that only need
> a pfn to avoid touching the page struct in the latter case. For callers
> that need a struct page, introduce a helper function that unwraps a
> struct kvm_pfn_page into a struct page. This helper makes the call to
> kvm_get_pfn which had previously been in hva_to_pfn_remapped.
> 
> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
> follow-up patches.

Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally 
if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.

Most kernel code I look at passes back multiple values by updating 
pointers to struct or variables rather than returning a struct, I 
suppose that's not really a big deal and a matter of taste.

Thanks,
Nick

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:52:06 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-3-stevensd@google.com>

Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Return a struct kvm_pfn_page containing both a pfn and an optional
> struct page from the gfn_to_pfn family of functions. This differentiates
> the gup and follow_fault_pfn cases, which allows callers that only need
> a pfn to avoid touching the page struct in the latter case. For callers
> that need a struct page, introduce a helper function that unwraps a
> struct kvm_pfn_page into a struct page. This helper makes the call to
> kvm_get_pfn which had previously been in hva_to_pfn_remapped.
> 
> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
> follow-up patches.

Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally 
if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.

Most kernel code I look at passes back multiple values by updating 
pointers to struct or variables rather than returning a struct, I 
suppose that's not really a big deal and a matter of taste.

Thanks,
Nick


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:52:06 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-3-stevensd@google.com>

Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Return a struct kvm_pfn_page containing both a pfn and an optional
> struct page from the gfn_to_pfn family of functions. This differentiates
> the gup and follow_fault_pfn cases, which allows callers that only need
> a pfn to avoid touching the page struct in the latter case. For callers
> that need a struct page, introduce a helper function that unwraps a
> struct kvm_pfn_page into a struct page. This helper makes the call to
> kvm_get_pfn which had previously been in hva_to_pfn_remapped.
> 
> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
> follow-up patches.

Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally 
if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.

Most kernel code I look at passes back multiple values by updating 
pointers to struct or variables rather than returning a struct, I 
suppose that's not really a big deal and a matter of taste.

Thanks,
Nick

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:52:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-3-stevensd@google.com>

Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Return a struct kvm_pfn_page containing both a pfn and an optional
> struct page from the gfn_to_pfn family of functions. This differentiates
> the gup and follow_fault_pfn cases, which allows callers that only need
> a pfn to avoid touching the page struct in the latter case. For callers
> that need a struct page, introduce a helper function that unwraps a
> struct kvm_pfn_page into a struct page. This helper makes the call to
> kvm_get_pfn which had previously been in hva_to_pfn_remapped.
> 
> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
> follow-up patches.

Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally 
if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.

Most kernel code I look at passes back multiple values by updating 
pointers to struct or variables rather than returning a struct, I 
suppose that's not really a big deal and a matter of taste.

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-24  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24  3:57 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  8:43   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:36       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  8:52   ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:57       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:13         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:21           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:42             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  7:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  8:58   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:06     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:17       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:43       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64/mmu: " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: mmu: remove over-aggressive warnings David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: use gfn_to_pfn's page instead of pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:25   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 10:38   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24  4:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU Patchwork
2021-06-24  6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:57       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 15:35         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-25  0:20           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  7:44         ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-24 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.