All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:43:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4816287a-b9a9-d3f4-f844-06922d696e06@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524156.04etgk7zmz.astroid@bobo.none>

On 24/06/21 10:43, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Changelog? This looks like a bug, should it have a Fixes: tag?

Probably has been there forever... The best way to fix the bug would be 
to nuke mmu_audit.c, which I've threatened to do many times but never 
followed up on.

Paolo

> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> index cedc17b2f60e..97ff184084b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
>>   		audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "levels %d pfn %llx hpa %llx "
>>   			     "ent %llxn", vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level, pfn,
>>   			     hpa, *sptep);
>> +
>> +	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
>> -- 
>> 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
>>
>>
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:43:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4816287a-b9a9-d3f4-f844-06922d696e06@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524156.04etgk7zmz.astroid@bobo.none>

On 24/06/21 10:43, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Changelog? This looks like a bug, should it have a Fixes: tag?

Probably has been there forever... The best way to fix the bug would be 
to nuke mmu_audit.c, which I've threatened to do many times but never 
followed up on.

Paolo

> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> index cedc17b2f60e..97ff184084b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
>>   		audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "levels %d pfn %llx hpa %llx "
>>   			     "ent %llxn", vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level, pfn,
>>   			     hpa, *sptep);
>> +
>> +	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
>> -- 
>> 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
>>
>>
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:43:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4816287a-b9a9-d3f4-f844-06922d696e06@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524156.04etgk7zmz.astroid@bobo.none>

On 24/06/21 10:43, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Changelog? This looks like a bug, should it have a Fixes: tag?

Probably has been there forever... The best way to fix the bug would be 
to nuke mmu_audit.c, which I've threatened to do many times but never 
followed up on.

Paolo

> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> index cedc17b2f60e..97ff184084b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
>>   		audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "levels %d pfn %llx hpa %llx "
>>   			     "ent %llxn", vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level, pfn,
>>   			     hpa, *sptep);
>> +
>> +	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
>> -- 
>> 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
>>
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:43:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4816287a-b9a9-d3f4-f844-06922d696e06@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524156.04etgk7zmz.astroid@bobo.none>

On 24/06/21 10:43, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Changelog? This looks like a bug, should it have a Fixes: tag?

Probably has been there forever... The best way to fix the bug would be 
to nuke mmu_audit.c, which I've threatened to do many times but never 
followed up on.

Paolo

> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> index cedc17b2f60e..97ff184084b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
>>   		audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "levels %d pfn %llx hpa %llx "
>>   			     "ent %llxn", vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level, pfn,
>>   			     hpa, *sptep);
>> +
>> +	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
>> -- 
>> 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
>>
>>
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:43:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4816287a-b9a9-d3f4-f844-06922d696e06@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524156.04etgk7zmz.astroid@bobo.none>

On 24/06/21 10:43, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Changelog? This looks like a bug, should it have a Fixes: tag?

Probably has been there forever... The best way to fix the bug would be 
to nuke mmu_audit.c, which I've threatened to do many times but never 
followed up on.

Paolo

> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> index cedc17b2f60e..97ff184084b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
>>   		audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "levels %d pfn %llx hpa %llx "
>>   			     "ent %llxn", vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level, pfn,
>>   			     hpa, *sptep);
>> +
>> +	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
>> -- 
>> 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
>>
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:43:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4816287a-b9a9-d3f4-f844-06922d696e06@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524156.04etgk7zmz.astroid@bobo.none>

On 24/06/21 10:43, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> 
> Changelog? This looks like a bug, should it have a Fixes: tag?

Probably has been there forever... The best way to fix the bug would be 
to nuke mmu_audit.c, which I've threatened to do many times but never 
followed up on.

Paolo

> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> index cedc17b2f60e..97ff184084b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
>> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
>>   		audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "levels %d pfn %llx hpa %llx "
>>   			     "ent %llxn", vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level, pfn,
>>   			     hpa, *sptep);
>> +
>> +	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
>> -- 
>> 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
>>
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-24  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24  3:57 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  8:43   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:43     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:36       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  8:52   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:57       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:13         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:21           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:42             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  7:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  8:58   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:06     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:17       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:43       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64/mmu: " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: mmu: remove over-aggressive warnings David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: use gfn_to_pfn's page instead of pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:25   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 10:38   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24  4:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU Patchwork
2021-06-24  6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:57       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 15:35         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-25  0:20           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  7:44         ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-24 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4816287a-b9a9-d3f4-f844-06922d696e06@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.