From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:58:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> out_unlock:
> if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> else
> write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> + if (pfnpg.page)
> + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> return r;
> }
How about
kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
Thanks,
Nick
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:58:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> out_unlock:
> if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> else
> write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> + if (pfnpg.page)
> + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> return r;
> }
How about
kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
Thanks,
Nick
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:58:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> out_unlock:
> if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> else
> write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> + if (pfnpg.page)
> + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> return r;
> }
How about
kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:58:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> out_unlock:
> if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> else
> write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> + if (pfnpg.page)
> + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> return r;
> }
How about
kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:58:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> out_unlock:
> if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> else
> write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> + if (pfnpg.page)
> + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> return r;
> }
How about
kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:58:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> out_unlock:
> if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> else
> write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> + if (pfnpg.page)
> + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> return r;
> }
How about
kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-24 3:57 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64/mmu: " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: mmu: remove over-aggressive warnings David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: use gfn_to_pfn's page instead of pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 10:38 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 4:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU Patchwork
2021-06-24 6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-24 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.