All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:43:29 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624531381.4bht02wxsj.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Excerpts from Marc Zyngier's message of June 24, 2021 8:06 pm:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> >  out_unlock:
>> >  	if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
>> >  		read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> >  	else
>> >  		write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> > -	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>> > +	if (pfnpg.page)
>> > +		put_page(pfnpg.page);
>> >  	return r;
>> >  }
>> 
>> How about
>> 
>>   kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
> 
> I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
> doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
> 
> Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
> bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.

That seems like a fine name to me. A little better than bob.

Thanks,
Nick

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:43:29 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624531381.4bht02wxsj.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Excerpts from Marc Zyngier's message of June 24, 2021 8:06 pm:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> >  out_unlock:
>> >  	if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
>> >  		read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> >  	else
>> >  		write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> > -	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>> > +	if (pfnpg.page)
>> > +		put_page(pfnpg.page);
>> >  	return r;
>> >  }
>> 
>> How about
>> 
>>   kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
> 
> I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
> doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
> 
> Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
> bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.

That seems like a fine name to me. A little better than bob.

Thanks,
Nick

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:43:29 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624531381.4bht02wxsj.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Excerpts from Marc Zyngier's message of June 24, 2021 8:06 pm:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> >  out_unlock:
>> >  	if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
>> >  		read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> >  	else
>> >  		write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> > -	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>> > +	if (pfnpg.page)
>> > +		put_page(pfnpg.page);
>> >  	return r;
>> >  }
>> 
>> How about
>> 
>>   kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
> 
> I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
> doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
> 
> Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
> bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.

That seems like a fine name to me. A little better than bob.

Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:43:29 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624531381.4bht02wxsj.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Excerpts from Marc Zyngier's message of June 24, 2021 8:06 pm:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> >  out_unlock:
>> >  	if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
>> >  		read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> >  	else
>> >  		write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> > -	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>> > +	if (pfnpg.page)
>> > +		put_page(pfnpg.page);
>> >  	return r;
>> >  }
>> 
>> How about
>> 
>>   kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
> 
> I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
> doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
> 
> Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
> bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.

That seems like a fine name to me. A little better than bob.

Thanks,
Nick

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:43:29 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624531381.4bht02wxsj.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Excerpts from Marc Zyngier's message of June 24, 2021 8:06 pm:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> >  out_unlock:
>> >  	if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
>> >  		read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> >  	else
>> >  		write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> > -	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>> > +	if (pfnpg.page)
>> > +		put_page(pfnpg.page);
>> >  	return r;
>> >  }
>> 
>> How about
>> 
>>   kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
> 
> I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
> doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
> 
> Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
> bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.

That seems like a fine name to me. A little better than bob.

Thanks,
Nick

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:43:29 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624531381.4bht02wxsj.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Excerpts from Marc Zyngier's message of June 24, 2021 8:06 pm:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> >  out_unlock:
>> >  	if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
>> >  		read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> >  	else
>> >  		write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> > -	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>> > +	if (pfnpg.page)
>> > +		put_page(pfnpg.page);
>> >  	return r;
>> >  }
>> 
>> How about
>> 
>>   kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
> 
> I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
> doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
> 
> Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
> bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.

That seems like a fine name to me. A little better than bob.

Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:43:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624531381.4bht02wxsj.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Excerpts from Marc Zyngier's message of June 24, 2021 8:06 pm:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
>> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>> >  out_unlock:
>> >  	if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
>> >  		read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> >  	else
>> >  		write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
>> > -	kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>> > +	if (pfnpg.page)
>> > +		put_page(pfnpg.page);
>> >  	return r;
>> >  }
>> 
>> How about
>> 
>>   kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
> 
> I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
> doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
> 
> Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
> bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.

That seems like a fine name to me. A little better than bob.

Thanks,
Nick

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-24 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24  3:57 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  8:43   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:36       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  8:52   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:57       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:13         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:21           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:42             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  7:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  8:58   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:06     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:17       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:43       ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64/mmu: " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: mmu: remove over-aggressive warnings David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: use gfn_to_pfn's page instead of pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:25   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 10:38   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24  4:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU Patchwork
2021-06-24  6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:57       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 15:35         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-25  0:20           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  7:44         ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-24 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1624531381.4bht02wxsj.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.