From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:06:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> > out_unlock:
> > if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> > read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > else
> > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> > + if (pfnpg.page)
> > + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> > return r;
> > }
>
> How about
>
> kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:06:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> > out_unlock:
> > if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> > read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > else
> > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> > + if (pfnpg.page)
> > + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> > return r;
> > }
>
> How about
>
> kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:06:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> > out_unlock:
> > if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> > read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > else
> > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> > + if (pfnpg.page)
> > + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> > return r;
> > }
>
> How about
>
> kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:06:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> > out_unlock:
> > if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> > read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > else
> > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> > + if (pfnpg.page)
> > + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> > return r;
> > }
>
> How about
>
> kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:06:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> > out_unlock:
> > if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> > read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > else
> > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> > + if (pfnpg.page)
> > + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> > return r;
> > }
>
> How about
>
> kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:06:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> > out_unlock:
> > if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> > read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > else
> > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> > + if (pfnpg.page)
> > + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> > return r;
> > }
>
> How about
>
> kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:06:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524744.2sr7o7ix86.astroid@bobo.none>
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm:
> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
> > out_unlock:
> > if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> > read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > else
> > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> > + if (pfnpg.page)
> > + put_page(pfnpg.page);
> > return r;
> > }
>
> How about
>
> kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg);
I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it
doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct.
Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so
bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-24 3:57 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64/mmu: " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: mmu: remove over-aggressive warnings David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: use gfn_to_pfn's page instead of pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 10:38 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 4:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU Patchwork
2021-06-24 6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-24 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mtrfinks.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.