From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:42:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201b68a7-10ea-d656-0c1e-5511b1f22674@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none>
On 24/06/21 10:52, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
>> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
>> follow-up patches.
> Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally
> if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
> you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
> one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.
Needing kvm_pfn_page_unwrap is a sign that something might be buggy, so
it's a good idea to move the short name to the common case and the ugly
kvm_pfn_page_unwrap(gfn_to_pfn(...)) for the weird one. In fact I'm not
sure there should be any kvm_pfn_page_unwrap in the end.
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:42:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201b68a7-10ea-d656-0c1e-5511b1f22674@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none>
On 24/06/21 10:52, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
>> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
>> follow-up patches.
> Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally
> if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
> you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
> one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.
Needing kvm_pfn_page_unwrap is a sign that something might be buggy, so
it's a good idea to move the short name to the common case and the ugly
kvm_pfn_page_unwrap(gfn_to_pfn(...)) for the weird one. In fact I'm not
sure there should be any kvm_pfn_page_unwrap in the end.
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:42:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201b68a7-10ea-d656-0c1e-5511b1f22674@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none>
On 24/06/21 10:52, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
>> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
>> follow-up patches.
> Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally
> if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
> you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
> one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.
Needing kvm_pfn_page_unwrap is a sign that something might be buggy, so
it's a good idea to move the short name to the common case and the ugly
kvm_pfn_page_unwrap(gfn_to_pfn(...)) for the weird one. In fact I'm not
sure there should be any kvm_pfn_page_unwrap in the end.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:42:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201b68a7-10ea-d656-0c1e-5511b1f22674@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none>
On 24/06/21 10:52, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
>> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
>> follow-up patches.
> Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally
> if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
> you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
> one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.
Needing kvm_pfn_page_unwrap is a sign that something might be buggy, so
it's a good idea to move the short name to the common case and the ugly
kvm_pfn_page_unwrap(gfn_to_pfn(...)) for the weird one. In fact I'm not
sure there should be any kvm_pfn_page_unwrap in the end.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:42:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201b68a7-10ea-d656-0c1e-5511b1f22674@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none>
On 24/06/21 10:52, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
>> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
>> follow-up patches.
> Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally
> if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
> you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
> one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.
Needing kvm_pfn_page_unwrap is a sign that something might be buggy, so
it's a good idea to move the short name to the common case and the ugly
kvm_pfn_page_unwrap(gfn_to_pfn(...)) for the weird one. In fact I'm not
sure there should be any kvm_pfn_page_unwrap in the end.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:42:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201b68a7-10ea-d656-0c1e-5511b1f22674@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624524331.zsin3qejl9.astroid@bobo.none>
On 24/06/21 10:52, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> For now, wrap all calls to gfn_to_pfn functions in the new helper
>> function. Callers which don't need the page struct will be updated in
>> follow-up patches.
> Hmm. You mean callers that do need the page will be updated? Normally
> if there will be leftover users that don't need the struct page then
> you would go the other way and keep the old call the same, and add a new
> one (gfn_to_pfn_page) just for those that need it.
Needing kvm_pfn_page_unwrap is a sign that something might be buggy, so
it's a good idea to move the short name to the common case and the ugly
kvm_pfn_page_unwrap(gfn_to_pfn(...)) for the weird one. In fact I'm not
sure there should be any kvm_pfn_page_unwrap in the end.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-24 3:57 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64/mmu: " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: mmu: remove over-aggressive warnings David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: use gfn_to_pfn's page instead of pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 10:38 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 4:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU Patchwork
2021-06-24 6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-24 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201b68a7-10ea-d656-0c1e-5511b1f22674@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.