All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:20:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624580015.hf7udh0vc3.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81d99029-ec40-19c5-5647-20607d78dab0@redhat.com>

Excerpts from Paolo Bonzini's message of June 25, 2021 1:35 am:
> On 24/06/21 14:57, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> KVM: Fix page ref underflow for regions with valid but non-refcounted pages
> 
> It doesn't really fix the underflow, it disallows mapping them in the 
> first place.  Since in principle things can break, I'd rather be 
> explicit, so let's go with "KVM: do not allow mapping valid but 
> non-reference-counted pages".
> 
>> It's possible to create a region which maps valid but non-refcounted
>> pages (e.g., tail pages of non-compound higher order allocations). These
>> host pages can then be returned by gfn_to_page, gfn_to_pfn, etc., family
>> of APIs, which take a reference to the page, which takes it from 0 to 1.
>> When the reference is dropped, this will free the page incorrectly.
>> 
>> Fix this by only taking a reference on the page if it was non-zero,
> 
> s/on the page/on valid pages/ (makes clear that invalid pages are fine 
> without refcounting).

That seems okay, you can adjust the title or changelog as you like.

> Thank you *so* much, I'm awful at Linux mm.

Glad to help. Easy to see why you were taking this approach because the 
API really does need to be improved and even a pretty intwined with mm 
subsystem like KVM shouldn't _really_ be doing this kind of trick (and
it should go away when old API is removed).

Thanks,
Nick

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:20:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624580015.hf7udh0vc3.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81d99029-ec40-19c5-5647-20607d78dab0@redhat.com>

Excerpts from Paolo Bonzini's message of June 25, 2021 1:35 am:
> On 24/06/21 14:57, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> KVM: Fix page ref underflow for regions with valid but non-refcounted pages
> 
> It doesn't really fix the underflow, it disallows mapping them in the 
> first place.  Since in principle things can break, I'd rather be 
> explicit, so let's go with "KVM: do not allow mapping valid but 
> non-reference-counted pages".
> 
>> It's possible to create a region which maps valid but non-refcounted
>> pages (e.g., tail pages of non-compound higher order allocations). These
>> host pages can then be returned by gfn_to_page, gfn_to_pfn, etc., family
>> of APIs, which take a reference to the page, which takes it from 0 to 1.
>> When the reference is dropped, this will free the page incorrectly.
>> 
>> Fix this by only taking a reference on the page if it was non-zero,
> 
> s/on the page/on valid pages/ (makes clear that invalid pages are fine 
> without refcounting).

That seems okay, you can adjust the title or changelog as you like.

> Thank you *so* much, I'm awful at Linux mm.

Glad to help. Easy to see why you were taking this approach because the 
API really does need to be improved and even a pretty intwined with mm 
subsystem like KVM shouldn't _really_ be doing this kind of trick (and
it should go away when old API is removed).

Thanks,
Nick

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:20:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624580015.hf7udh0vc3.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81d99029-ec40-19c5-5647-20607d78dab0@redhat.com>

Excerpts from Paolo Bonzini's message of June 25, 2021 1:35 am:
> On 24/06/21 14:57, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> KVM: Fix page ref underflow for regions with valid but non-refcounted pages
> 
> It doesn't really fix the underflow, it disallows mapping them in the 
> first place.  Since in principle things can break, I'd rather be 
> explicit, so let's go with "KVM: do not allow mapping valid but 
> non-reference-counted pages".
> 
>> It's possible to create a region which maps valid but non-refcounted
>> pages (e.g., tail pages of non-compound higher order allocations). These
>> host pages can then be returned by gfn_to_page, gfn_to_pfn, etc., family
>> of APIs, which take a reference to the page, which takes it from 0 to 1.
>> When the reference is dropped, this will free the page incorrectly.
>> 
>> Fix this by only taking a reference on the page if it was non-zero,
> 
> s/on the page/on valid pages/ (makes clear that invalid pages are fine 
> without refcounting).

That seems okay, you can adjust the title or changelog as you like.

> Thank you *so* much, I'm awful at Linux mm.

Glad to help. Easy to see why you were taking this approach because the 
API really does need to be improved and even a pretty intwined with mm 
subsystem like KVM shouldn't _really_ be doing this kind of trick (and
it should go away when old API is removed).

Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
	 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:20:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624580015.hf7udh0vc3.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81d99029-ec40-19c5-5647-20607d78dab0@redhat.com>

Excerpts from Paolo Bonzini's message of June 25, 2021 1:35 am:
> On 24/06/21 14:57, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> KVM: Fix page ref underflow for regions with valid but non-refcounted pages
> 
> It doesn't really fix the underflow, it disallows mapping them in the 
> first place.  Since in principle things can break, I'd rather be 
> explicit, so let's go with "KVM: do not allow mapping valid but 
> non-reference-counted pages".
> 
>> It's possible to create a region which maps valid but non-refcounted
>> pages (e.g., tail pages of non-compound higher order allocations). These
>> host pages can then be returned by gfn_to_page, gfn_to_pfn, etc., family
>> of APIs, which take a reference to the page, which takes it from 0 to 1.
>> When the reference is dropped, this will free the page incorrectly.
>> 
>> Fix this by only taking a reference on the page if it was non-zero,
> 
> s/on the page/on valid pages/ (makes clear that invalid pages are fine 
> without refcounting).

That seems okay, you can adjust the title or changelog as you like.

> Thank you *so* much, I'm awful at Linux mm.

Glad to help. Easy to see why you were taking this approach because the 
API really does need to be improved and even a pretty intwined with mm 
subsystem like KVM shouldn't _really_ be doing this kind of trick (and
it should go away when old API is removed).

Thanks,
Nick

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:20:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624580015.hf7udh0vc3.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81d99029-ec40-19c5-5647-20607d78dab0@redhat.com>

Excerpts from Paolo Bonzini's message of June 25, 2021 1:35 am:
> On 24/06/21 14:57, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> KVM: Fix page ref underflow for regions with valid but non-refcounted pages
> 
> It doesn't really fix the underflow, it disallows mapping them in the 
> first place.  Since in principle things can break, I'd rather be 
> explicit, so let's go with "KVM: do not allow mapping valid but 
> non-reference-counted pages".
> 
>> It's possible to create a region which maps valid but non-refcounted
>> pages (e.g., tail pages of non-compound higher order allocations). These
>> host pages can then be returned by gfn_to_page, gfn_to_pfn, etc., family
>> of APIs, which take a reference to the page, which takes it from 0 to 1.
>> When the reference is dropped, this will free the page incorrectly.
>> 
>> Fix this by only taking a reference on the page if it was non-zero,
> 
> s/on the page/on valid pages/ (makes clear that invalid pages are fine 
> without refcounting).

That seems okay, you can adjust the title or changelog as you like.

> Thank you *so* much, I'm awful at Linux mm.

Glad to help. Easy to see why you were taking this approach because the 
API really does need to be improved and even a pretty intwined with mm 
subsystem like KVM shouldn't _really_ be doing this kind of trick (and
it should go away when old API is removed).

Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:20:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624580015.hf7udh0vc3.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81d99029-ec40-19c5-5647-20607d78dab0@redhat.com>

Excerpts from Paolo Bonzini's message of June 25, 2021 1:35 am:
> On 24/06/21 14:57, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> KVM: Fix page ref underflow for regions with valid but non-refcounted pages
> 
> It doesn't really fix the underflow, it disallows mapping them in the 
> first place.  Since in principle things can break, I'd rather be 
> explicit, so let's go with "KVM: do not allow mapping valid but 
> non-reference-counted pages".
> 
>> It's possible to create a region which maps valid but non-refcounted
>> pages (e.g., tail pages of non-compound higher order allocations). These
>> host pages can then be returned by gfn_to_page, gfn_to_pfn, etc., family
>> of APIs, which take a reference to the page, which takes it from 0 to 1.
>> When the reference is dropped, this will free the page incorrectly.
>> 
>> Fix this by only taking a reference on the page if it was non-zero,
> 
> s/on the page/on valid pages/ (makes clear that invalid pages are fine 
> without refcounting).

That seems okay, you can adjust the title or changelog as you like.

> Thank you *so* much, I'm awful at Linux mm.

Glad to help. Easy to see why you were taking this approach because the 
API really does need to be improved and even a pretty intwined with mm 
subsystem like KVM shouldn't _really_ be doing this kind of trick (and
it should go away when old API is removed).

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-25  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24  3:57 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  8:43   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:43     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:36       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  8:52   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:52     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:42       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  9:57       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:13         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:21           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:42             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  9:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  9:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  7:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  7:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  8:58   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  8:58     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:06     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:17       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:43       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64/mmu: " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: mmu: remove over-aggressive warnings David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: use gfn_to_pfn's page instead of pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  3:57   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28   ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24  4:28     ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:25   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 10:38   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24  4:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU Patchwork
2021-06-24  6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24  6:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:57       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 15:35         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-25  0:20           ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  0:20             ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25  7:44         ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25  7:44           ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-24 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1624580015.hf7udh0vc3.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
    --cc=stevensd@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.