All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christoph Müllner" <christophm30@gmail.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Guo Ren" <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	jonas@southpole.se, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi,
	shorne@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] locking: Generic ticket-lock
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:45:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHbj987Ks0JOKw/X@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YHbBBuVFNnI4kjj3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:05:24AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > That made me look at the qspinlock code, and queued_spin_*lock() uses
> > atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(), which means any arch that uses qspinlock
> > and has RCpc atomics will give us massive pain.
> > 
> > Current archs using qspinlock are: x86, arm64, power, sparc64, mips and
> > openrisc (WTF?!).
> > 
> > Of those, x86 and sparc are TSO archs with SC atomics, arm64 has RCsc
> > atomics, power has RCtso atomics (and is the arch we all hate for having
> > RCtso locks).
> > 
> > Now MIPS has all sorts of ill specified barriers, but last time looked
> > at it it didn't actually use any of that and stuck to using smp_mb(), so
> > it will have RCsc atomics.
> > 
> > /me goes look at wth openrisc is..  doesn't even appear to have
> > asm/barrier.h :-/ Looking at wikipedia it also doesn't appear to
> > actually have hardware ...
> 
> FWIW this is broken, anything SMP *MUST* define mb(), at the very least.

As near as I can tell this should do. The arch spec only lists this one
instruction and the text makes it sound like a completion barrier.

---
 arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7538294721be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_BARRIER_H
+#define __ASM_BARRIER_H
+
+#define mb() asm volatile ("l.msync" ::: "memory")
+
+#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
+
+#endif /* __ASM_BARRIER_H */

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christoph Müllner" <christophm30@gmail.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Guo Ren" <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	jonas@southpole.se, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi,
	shorne@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] locking: Generic ticket-lock
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:45:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHbj987Ks0JOKw/X@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YHbBBuVFNnI4kjj3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:05:24AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > That made me look at the qspinlock code, and queued_spin_*lock() uses
> > atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(), which means any arch that uses qspinlock
> > and has RCpc atomics will give us massive pain.
> > 
> > Current archs using qspinlock are: x86, arm64, power, sparc64, mips and
> > openrisc (WTF?!).
> > 
> > Of those, x86 and sparc are TSO archs with SC atomics, arm64 has RCsc
> > atomics, power has RCtso atomics (and is the arch we all hate for having
> > RCtso locks).
> > 
> > Now MIPS has all sorts of ill specified barriers, but last time looked
> > at it it didn't actually use any of that and stuck to using smp_mb(), so
> > it will have RCsc atomics.
> > 
> > /me goes look at wth openrisc is..  doesn't even appear to have
> > asm/barrier.h :-/ Looking at wikipedia it also doesn't appear to
> > actually have hardware ...
> 
> FWIW this is broken, anything SMP *MUST* define mb(), at the very least.

As near as I can tell this should do. The arch spec only lists this one
instruction and the text makes it sound like a completion barrier.

---
 arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7538294721be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ASM_BARRIER_H
+#define __ASM_BARRIER_H
+
+#define mb() asm volatile ("l.msync" ::: "memory")
+
+#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
+
+#endif /* __ASM_BARRIER_H */

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24 10:14 [PATCH] riscv: locks: introduce ticket-based spinlock implementation guoren
2021-03-24 10:14 ` guoren
2021-03-24 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 11:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:10   ` Guo Ren
2021-03-24 12:10     ` Guo Ren
     [not found] ` <CAM4kBBK7_s9U2vJbq68yC8WdDEfPQTaCOvn1xds3Si5B-Wpw+A@mail.gmail.com>
2021-03-24 12:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:24   ` Guo Ren
2021-03-24 12:24     ` Guo Ren
2021-03-24 12:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:28 ` Anup Patel
2021-03-24 12:28   ` Anup Patel
2021-03-24 12:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:53     ` Anup Patel
2021-03-24 12:53       ` Anup Patel
2021-04-11 21:11       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-11 21:11         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-12 13:32         ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-12 13:32           ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-12 14:51           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-12 14:51             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-12 21:21             ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-12 21:21               ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-12 17:33           ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-12 17:33             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-12 21:54             ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-12 21:54               ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13  8:03               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-13  8:03                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-13  8:17                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-13  8:17                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14  2:26                   ` Guo Ren
2021-04-14  2:26                     ` Guo Ren
2021-04-14  7:08                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14  7:08                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14  9:05                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14  9:05                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 10:16                         ` [RFC][PATCH] locking: Generic ticket-lock Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 10:16                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 12:39                           ` Guo Ren
2021-04-14 12:39                             ` Guo Ren
2021-04-14 12:55                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 12:55                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 13:08                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 13:08                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 15:59                               ` David Laight
2021-04-14 15:59                                 ` David Laight
2021-04-14 12:45                           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-04-14 12:45                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 21:02                             ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-14 21:02                               ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-14 20:47                           ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-14 20:47                             ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-15  8:09                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-15  8:09                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-15  9:02                               ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15  9:02                                 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15  9:22                                 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-15  9:22                                   ` Will Deacon
2021-04-15  9:24                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-15  9:24                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-19 17:35                           ` Will Deacon
2021-04-19 17:35                             ` Will Deacon
2021-04-23  6:44                           ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-23  6:44                             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-13  9:22                 ` [PATCH] riscv: locks: introduce ticket-based spinlock implementation Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13  9:22                   ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13  9:30                   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-13  9:30                     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-13  9:55                     ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13  9:55                       ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-14  0:23                     ` Guo Ren
2021-04-14  0:23                       ` Guo Ren
2021-04-14  9:17                       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-14  9:17                         ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-13  9:35                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-13  9:35                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-13 10:25                     ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13 10:25                       ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13 10:45                       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-13 10:45                         ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-13 10:54                         ` David Laight
2021-04-13 10:54                           ` David Laight
2021-04-14  5:54                           ` Guo Ren
2021-04-14  5:54                             ` Guo Ren
2021-04-13 11:04                         ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13 11:04                           ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13 13:19                       ` Guo Ren
2021-04-13 13:19                         ` Guo Ren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YHbj987Ks0JOKw/X@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophm30@gmail.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.