From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: "Christoph Müllner" <christophm30@gmail.com>, "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>, "Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>, linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Guo Ren" <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>, "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, jonas@southpole.se, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, shorne@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] locking: Generic ticket-lock Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:45:43 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YHbj987Ks0JOKw/X@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YHbBBuVFNnI4kjj3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:05:24AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > That made me look at the qspinlock code, and queued_spin_*lock() uses > > atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(), which means any arch that uses qspinlock > > and has RCpc atomics will give us massive pain. > > > > Current archs using qspinlock are: x86, arm64, power, sparc64, mips and > > openrisc (WTF?!). > > > > Of those, x86 and sparc are TSO archs with SC atomics, arm64 has RCsc > > atomics, power has RCtso atomics (and is the arch we all hate for having > > RCtso locks). > > > > Now MIPS has all sorts of ill specified barriers, but last time looked > > at it it didn't actually use any of that and stuck to using smp_mb(), so > > it will have RCsc atomics. > > > > /me goes look at wth openrisc is.. doesn't even appear to have > > asm/barrier.h :-/ Looking at wikipedia it also doesn't appear to > > actually have hardware ... > > FWIW this is broken, anything SMP *MUST* define mb(), at the very least. As near as I can tell this should do. The arch spec only lists this one instruction and the text makes it sound like a completion barrier. --- arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7538294721be --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __ASM_BARRIER_H +#define __ASM_BARRIER_H + +#define mb() asm volatile ("l.msync" ::: "memory") + +#include <asm-generic/barrier.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_BARRIER_H */
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: "Christoph Müllner" <christophm30@gmail.com>, "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>, "Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>, linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Guo Ren" <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>, "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, jonas@southpole.se, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, shorne@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] locking: Generic ticket-lock Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:45:43 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YHbj987Ks0JOKw/X@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YHbBBuVFNnI4kjj3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:05:24AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > That made me look at the qspinlock code, and queued_spin_*lock() uses > > atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(), which means any arch that uses qspinlock > > and has RCpc atomics will give us massive pain. > > > > Current archs using qspinlock are: x86, arm64, power, sparc64, mips and > > openrisc (WTF?!). > > > > Of those, x86 and sparc are TSO archs with SC atomics, arm64 has RCsc > > atomics, power has RCtso atomics (and is the arch we all hate for having > > RCtso locks). > > > > Now MIPS has all sorts of ill specified barriers, but last time looked > > at it it didn't actually use any of that and stuck to using smp_mb(), so > > it will have RCsc atomics. > > > > /me goes look at wth openrisc is.. doesn't even appear to have > > asm/barrier.h :-/ Looking at wikipedia it also doesn't appear to > > actually have hardware ... > > FWIW this is broken, anything SMP *MUST* define mb(), at the very least. As near as I can tell this should do. The arch spec only lists this one instruction and the text makes it sound like a completion barrier. --- arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7538294721be --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/barrier.h @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __ASM_BARRIER_H +#define __ASM_BARRIER_H + +#define mb() asm volatile ("l.msync" ::: "memory") + +#include <asm-generic/barrier.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_BARRIER_H */ _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 12:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-24 10:14 [PATCH] riscv: locks: introduce ticket-based spinlock implementation guoren 2021-03-24 10:14 ` guoren 2021-03-24 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-03-24 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-03-24 12:10 ` Guo Ren 2021-03-24 12:10 ` Guo Ren [not found] ` <CAM4kBBK7_s9U2vJbq68yC8WdDEfPQTaCOvn1xds3Si5B-Wpw+A@mail.gmail.com> 2021-03-24 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-03-24 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-03-24 12:24 ` Guo Ren 2021-03-24 12:24 ` Guo Ren 2021-03-24 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-03-24 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-03-24 12:28 ` Anup Patel 2021-03-24 12:28 ` Anup Patel 2021-03-24 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-03-24 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-03-24 12:53 ` Anup Patel 2021-03-24 12:53 ` Anup Patel 2021-04-11 21:11 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2021-04-11 21:11 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2021-04-12 13:32 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-12 13:32 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-12 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-12 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-12 21:21 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-12 21:21 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-12 17:33 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2021-04-12 17:33 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2021-04-12 21:54 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-12 21:54 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-13 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-13 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-13 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-13 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 2:26 ` Guo Ren 2021-04-14 2:26 ` Guo Ren 2021-04-14 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 10:16 ` [RFC][PATCH] locking: Generic ticket-lock Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 12:39 ` Guo Ren 2021-04-14 12:39 ` Guo Ren 2021-04-14 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 15:59 ` David Laight 2021-04-14 15:59 ` David Laight 2021-04-14 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message] 2021-04-14 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-14 21:02 ` Stafford Horne 2021-04-14 21:02 ` Stafford Horne 2021-04-14 20:47 ` Stafford Horne 2021-04-14 20:47 ` Stafford Horne 2021-04-15 8:09 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-15 8:09 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-15 9:02 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-04-15 9:02 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-04-15 9:22 ` Will Deacon 2021-04-15 9:22 ` Will Deacon 2021-04-15 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-15 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-19 17:35 ` Will Deacon 2021-04-19 17:35 ` Will Deacon 2021-04-23 6:44 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2021-04-23 6:44 ` Palmer Dabbelt 2021-04-13 9:22 ` [PATCH] riscv: locks: introduce ticket-based spinlock implementation Christoph Müllner 2021-04-13 9:22 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-13 9:30 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-04-13 9:30 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-04-13 9:55 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-13 9:55 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-14 0:23 ` Guo Ren 2021-04-14 0:23 ` Guo Ren 2021-04-14 9:17 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-04-14 9:17 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-04-13 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-13 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-04-13 10:25 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-13 10:25 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-13 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-04-13 10:45 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-04-13 10:54 ` David Laight 2021-04-13 10:54 ` David Laight 2021-04-14 5:54 ` Guo Ren 2021-04-14 5:54 ` Guo Ren 2021-04-13 11:04 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-13 11:04 ` Christoph Müllner 2021-04-13 13:19 ` Guo Ren 2021-04-13 13:19 ` Guo Ren
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YHbj987Ks0JOKw/X@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \ --to=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=anup@brainfault.org \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=christophm30@gmail.com \ --cc=guoren@kernel.org \ --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \ --cc=jonas@southpole.se \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \ --cc=shorne@gmail.com \ --cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.