From: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: "Thomas Schreiber" <tschreibe@gmail.com>, "Russell King - ARM Linux admin" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, "Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>, "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: sfp: add workaround for Realtek RTL8672 and RTL9601C chips Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:55:32 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210106145532.xynhoufpfyzmurd5@pali> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210103024132.fpvjumilazrxiuzj@pali> On Sunday 03 January 2021 03:41:32 Pali Rohár wrote: > Hello! > > On Sunday 03 January 2021 03:25:23 Thomas Schreiber wrote: > > Hi Pali, > > I have a CarlitoxxPro module and I reported an issue about RX_LOS pin > > to the manufacturer. > > It looks to me that the module asserts "inverted LOS" through EEPROM > > but does not implement it. > > So, it is broken :-( But I'm not surprised. > > Anyway, I think you could be interested in this discussion about my > patch series, but I forgot to CC you on the first patch/cover letter. > You can read whole discussion on public archive available at: > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201230154755.14746-1-pali@kernel.org/t/#u > > If you have any comments, let me know so I can fix it for V2. > > Those RTL8672/RTL9601C SFP are extremely broken and I do not think that > "rebrander" CarlitoxxPro would do anything with it. > > > Consequently, the SFP state machine of my > > host router stays in check los state and link is not set up for the > > host interface. > > So link does not work at all? > > > Below is a dump of the module's EEPROM: > > > > [root@clearfog-gt-8k ~]# ethtool -m eth0 > > Identifier : 0x03 (SFP) > > Extended identifier : 0x04 (GBIC/SFP defined by > > 2-wire interface ID) > > Connector : 0x01 (SC) > > Transceiver codes : 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 > > 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 > > Encoding : 0x03 (NRZ) > > BR, Nominal : 1200MBd > > Rate identifier : 0x00 (unspecified) > > Length (SMF,km) : 20km > > Length (SMF) : 20000m > > Length (50um) : 0m > > Length (62.5um) : 0m > > Length (Copper) : 0m > > Length (OM3) : 0m > > Laser wavelength : 1310nm > > Vendor name : VSOL > > Vendor OUI : 00:00:00 > > Vendor PN : V2801F > > Vendor rev : 1.0 > > Option values : 0x00 0x1c > > Option : RX_LOS implemented, inverted > > Option : TX_FAULT implemented > > Option : TX_DISABLE implemented > > BR margin, max : 0% > > BR margin, min : 0% > > Vendor SN : CP202003180377 > > Date code : 200408 > > Optical diagnostics support : Yes > > Laser bias current : 0.000 mA > > Laser output power : 0.0000 mW / -inf dBm > > Receiver signal average optical power : 0.0000 mW / -inf dBm > > Module temperature : 31.00 degrees C / 87.80 degrees F > > Module voltage : 0.0000 V > > Alarm/warning flags implemented : Yes > > Laser bias current high alarm : Off > > Laser bias current low alarm : On > > Laser bias current high warning : Off > > Laser bias current low warning : Off > > Laser output power high alarm : Off > > Laser output power low alarm : On > > Laser output power high warning : Off > > Laser output power low warning : Off > > Module temperature high alarm : Off > > Module temperature low alarm : Off > > Module temperature high warning : Off > > Module temperature low warning : Off > > Module voltage high alarm : Off > > Module voltage low alarm : Off > > Module voltage high warning : Off > > Module voltage low warning : Off > > Laser rx power high alarm : Off > > Laser rx power low alarm : Off > > Laser rx power high warning : Off > > Laser rx power low warning : Off > > Laser bias current high alarm threshold : 74.752 mA > > Laser bias current low alarm threshold : 0.000 mA > > Laser bias current high warning threshold : 0.000 mA > > Laser bias current low warning threshold : 0.000 mA > > Laser output power high alarm threshold : 0.0000 mW / -inf dBm > > Laser output power low alarm threshold : 0.0000 mW / -inf dBm > > Laser output power high warning threshold : 0.0000 mW / -inf dBm > > Laser output power low warning threshold : 0.0000 mW / -inf dBm > > Module temperature high alarm threshold : 90.00 degrees C / 194.00 degrees F > > Module temperature low alarm threshold : 0.00 degrees C / 32.00 degrees F > > Module temperature high warning threshold : 0.00 degrees C / 32.00 degrees F > > Module temperature low warning threshold : 0.00 degrees C / 32.00 degrees F > > Module voltage high alarm threshold : 0.0000 V > > Module voltage low alarm threshold : 0.0000 V > > Module voltage high warning threshold : 0.0000 V > > Module voltage low warning threshold : 0.0000 V > > Laser rx power high alarm threshold : 0.1536 mW / -8.14 dBm > > Laser rx power low alarm threshold : 0.0000 mW / -inf dBm > > Laser rx power high warning threshold : 0.0000 mW / -inf dBm > > Laser rx power low warning threshold : 0.0000 mW / -inf dBm > > > > > > Le sam. 2 janv. 2021 à 02:49, Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org> a écrit : > > > > > > On Thursday 31 December 2020 18:13:38 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > > > Looking at sfp_module_info(), adding a check for i2c_block_size < 2 > > > > > > when determining what length to return. ethtool should do the right > > > > > > thing, know that the second page has not been returned to user space. > > > > > > > > > > But if we limit length of eeprom then userspace would not be able to > > > > > access those TX_DISABLE, LOS and other bits from byte 110 at address A2. > > > > > > > > Have you tested these bits to see if they actually work? If they don't > > > > work... > > > > > > On Ubiquiti module that LOS bit does not work. > > > > > > I think that on CarlitoxxPro module LOS bit worked. But I cannot test it > > > right now as I do not have access to testing OLT unit. On my tested CarlitoxxPro module is: Option values : 0x00 0x1c Option : RX_LOS implemented, inverted Option : TX_FAULT implemented Option : TX_DISABLE implemented When cable is disconnected then in EEPROM at position 0x16e is value 0x82. If I call 'ip link set eth1 up' then value changes to 0x02, module itself has a link and I can connect to its internal telnet/webserver to configure it. When cable is connected but connection is not established by OLT then this value is 0x80. If I call 'ip link set eth1 up' then value changes to 0x00 and kernel does not see a link (no carrier). So it seems that RX_LOS (bit 1 of 0x16e EEPROM) and also TX_DISABLE (bit 7 of 0x16e EEPROM) is implemented and working properly. And therefore we should allow access to these bits. I also tested UBNT module and result is: Option values : 0x00 0x06 Option : RX_LOS implemented Option : RX_LOS implemented, inverted Which means that those bits are not implemented. Anyway I check position 0x16e and value on its value is randomly either 0x79 or 0xff independently of the state of the GPON module. So it is really not implemented on UBNT. > > > Adding Thomas to loop. Can you check if CarlitoxxPro GPON ONT module > > > supports LOS or other bits at byte offset 110 at address A2?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-06 14:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-12-30 15:47 [PATCH 0/4] net: sfp: add support for GPON RTL8672/RTL9601C and Ubiquiti U-Fiber Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 15:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: sfp: add workaround for Realtek RTL8672 and RTL9601C chips Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 16:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2020-12-30 16:56 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 17:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2020-12-30 17:13 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-12-30 17:43 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 19:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2020-12-30 19:49 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-12-31 12:14 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-31 15:09 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-12-31 15:40 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-31 15:30 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-12-31 17:00 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-31 17:13 ` Andrew Lunn 2021-01-02 1:49 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-03 2:25 ` Thomas Schreiber 2021-01-03 2:41 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-06 14:55 ` Pali Rohár [this message] 2021-01-06 15:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2021-01-06 15:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2021-01-06 15:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2021-01-06 15:35 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 19:30 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-12-30 19:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2020-12-30 17:31 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 19:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2020-12-30 15:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: sfp: allow to use also SFP modules which are detected as SFF Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 16:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2020-12-30 17:06 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 17:27 ` Marek Behún 2020-12-30 19:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2020-12-31 13:52 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 15:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: sfp: assume that LOS is not implemented if both LOS normal and inverted is set Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 16:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2020-12-30 16:57 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 17:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2020-12-30 17:17 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-12-30 17:32 ` Pali Rohár 2020-12-30 15:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] net: sfp: add mode quirk for GPON module Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant Pali Rohár 2021-01-06 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] net: sfp: add support for GPON RTL8672/RTL9601C and Ubiquiti U-Fiber Pali Rohár 2021-01-06 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] net: sfp: add workaround for Realtek RTL8672 and RTL9601C chips Pali Rohár 2021-01-07 2:02 ` Andrew Lunn 2021-01-07 9:08 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-07 17:19 ` Andrew Lunn 2021-01-07 17:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2021-01-07 19:18 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-07 19:17 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-07 19:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2021-01-07 20:21 ` Marek Behún 2021-01-08 0:49 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-06 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] net: sfp: assume that LOS is not implemented if both LOS normal and inverted is set Pali Rohár 2021-01-07 16:54 ` Andrew Lunn 2021-01-09 15:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2021-01-09 15:54 ` Andrew Lunn 2021-01-09 16:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2021-01-09 19:14 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-09 23:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2021-01-09 23:50 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-06 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] net: sfp: add mode quirk for GPON module Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant Pali Rohár 2021-01-07 16:51 ` Andrew Lunn 2021-01-11 11:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] net: sfp: add support for GPON RTL8672/RTL9601C and Ubiquiti U-Fiber Pali Rohár 2021-01-11 11:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] net: sfp: add workaround for Realtek RTL8672 and RTL9601C chips Pali Rohár 2021-01-11 15:28 ` Marek Behún 2021-01-11 11:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net: sfp: add mode quirk for GPON module Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant Pali Rohár 2021-01-11 15:32 ` Marek Behún 2021-01-12 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] net: sfp: add support for GPON RTL8672/RTL9601C and Ubiquiti U-Fiber Pali Rohár 2021-01-18 9:34 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-25 14:09 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-25 14:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2021-01-25 14:23 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-25 14:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin 2021-01-25 14:47 ` Pali Rohár 2021-01-25 15:41 ` Andrew Lunn 2021-01-25 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 " Pali Rohár 2021-01-25 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] net: sfp: add workaround for Realtek RTL8672 and RTL9601C chips Pali Rohár 2021-01-25 15:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] net: sfp: add mode quirk for GPON module Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant Pali Rohár 2021-01-28 21:50 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] net: sfp: add support for GPON RTL8672/RTL9601C and Ubiquiti U-Fiber patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210106145532.xynhoufpfyzmurd5@pali \ --to=pali@kernel.org \ --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \ --cc=kabel@kernel.org \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=tschreibe@gmail.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: sfp: add workaround for Realtek RTL8672 and RTL9601C chips' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).