From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>, elic@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: set_features should allow reset to zero Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:53:08 +0800 Message-ID: <ce6b0380-bc4c-bcb8-db82-2605e819702c@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210224014232-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> On 2021/2/24 2:46 下午, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 02:04:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2021/2/24 1:04 下午, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:35:57AM -0800, Si-Wei Liu wrote: >>>> On 2/23/2021 5:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:03:57AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>>> On 2021/2/23 9:12 上午, Si-Wei Liu wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/21/2021 11:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:14:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2021/2/19 7:54 下午, Si-Wei Liu wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Commit 452639a64ad8 ("vdpa: make sure set_features is invoked >>>>>>>>>> for legacy") made an exception for legacy guests to reset >>>>>>>>>> features to 0, when config space is accessed before features >>>>>>>>>> are set. We should relieve the verify_min_features() check >>>>>>>>>> and allow features reset to 0 for this case. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's worth noting that not just legacy guests could access >>>>>>>>>> config space before features are set. For instance, when >>>>>>>>>> feature VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is advertised some modern driver >>>>>>>>>> will try to access and validate the MTU present in the config >>>>>>>>>> space before virtio features are set. >>>>>>>>> This looks like a spec violation: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The following driver-read-only field, mtu only exists if >>>>>>>>> VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is >>>>>>>>> set. >>>>>>>>> This field specifies the maximum MTU for the driver to use. >>>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do we really want to workaround this? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> And also: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The driver MUST follow this sequence to initialize a device: >>>>>>>> 1. Reset the device. >>>>>>>> 2. Set the ACKNOWLEDGE status bit: the guest OS has noticed the device. >>>>>>>> 3. Set the DRIVER status bit: the guest OS knows how to drive the >>>>>>>> device. >>>>>>>> 4. Read device feature bits, and write the subset of feature bits >>>>>>>> understood by the OS and driver to the >>>>>>>> device. During this step the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) >>>>>>>> the device-specific configuration >>>>>>>> fields to check that it can support the device before accepting it. >>>>>>>> 5. Set the FEATURES_OK status bit. The driver MUST NOT accept new >>>>>>>> feature bits after this step. >>>>>>>> 6. Re-read device status to ensure the FEATURES_OK bit is still set: >>>>>>>> otherwise, the device does not >>>>>>>> support our subset of features and the device is unusable. >>>>>>>> 7. Perform device-specific setup, including discovery of virtqueues >>>>>>>> for the device, optional per-bus setup, >>>>>>>> reading and possibly writing the device’s virtio configuration >>>>>>>> space, and population of virtqueues. >>>>>>>> 8. Set the DRIVER_OK status bit. At this point the device is “live”. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so accessing config space before FEATURES_OK is a spec violation, right? >>>>>>> It is, but it's not relevant to what this commit tries to address. I >>>>>>> thought the legacy guest still needs to be supported. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Having said, a separate patch has to be posted to fix the guest driver >>>>>>> issue where this discrepancy is introduced to virtnet_validate() (since >>>>>>> commit fe36cbe067). But it's not technically related to this patch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Siwei >>>>>> I think it's a bug to read config space in validate, we should move it to >>>>>> virtnet_probe(). >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>> I take it back, reading but not writing seems to be explicitly allowed by spec. >>>>> So our way to detect a legacy guest is bogus, need to think what is >>>>> the best way to handle this. >>>> Then maybe revert commit fe36cbe067 and friends, and have QEMU detect legacy >>>> guest? Supposedly only config space write access needs to be guarded before >>>> setting FEATURES_OK. >>>> >>>> -Siwie >>> Detecting it isn't enough though, we will need a new ioctl to notify >>> the kernel that it's a legacy guest. Ugh :( >> >> I'm not sure I get this, how can we know if there's a legacy driver before >> set_features()? > qemu knows for sure. It does not communicate this information to the > kernel right now unfortunately. I may miss something, but I still don't get how the new ioctl is supposed to work. Thanks > >> And I wonder what will hapeen if we just revert the set_features(0)? >> >> Thanks >> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Rejecting reset to 0 >>>>>>>>>> prematurely causes correct MTU and link status unable to load >>>>>>>>>> for the very first config space access, rendering issues like >>>>>>>>>> guest showing inaccurate MTU value, or failure to reject >>>>>>>>>> out-of-range MTU. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Fixes: 1a86b377aa21 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for >>>>>>>>>> supported mlx5 devices") >>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 15 +-------------- >>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c >>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c >>>>>>>>>> index 7c1f789..540dd67 100644 >>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1490,14 +1490,6 @@ static u64 >>>>>>>>>> mlx5_vdpa_get_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev) >>>>>>>>>> return mvdev->mlx_features; >>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>> -static int verify_min_features(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, >>>>>>>>>> u64 features) >>>>>>>>>> -{ >>>>>>>>>> - if (!(features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM))) >>>>>>>>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP; >>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>> - return 0; >>>>>>>>>> -} >>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>> static int setup_virtqueues(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev) >>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>> int err; >>>>>>>>>> @@ -1558,18 +1550,13 @@ static int >>>>>>>>>> mlx5_vdpa_set_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 >>>>>>>>>> features) >>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev = to_mvdev(vdev); >>>>>>>>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev = to_mlx5_vdpa_ndev(mvdev); >>>>>>>>>> - int err; >>>>>>>>>> print_features(mvdev, features, true); >>>>>>>>>> - err = verify_min_features(mvdev, features); >>>>>>>>>> - if (err) >>>>>>>>>> - return err; >>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>> ndev->mvdev.actual_features = features & >>>>>>>>>> ndev->mvdev.mlx_features; >>>>>>>>>> ndev->config.mtu = cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev, ndev->mtu); >>>>>>>>>> ndev->config.status |= cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(mvdev, >>>>>>>>>> VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP); >>>>>>>>>> - return err; >>>>>>>>>> + return 0; >>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>> static void mlx5_vdpa_set_config_cb(struct vdpa_device >>>>>>>>>> *vdev, struct vdpa_callback *cb)
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-02-19 11:54 Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-21 14:44 ` Eli Cohen 2021-02-21 21:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-22 6:05 ` Eli Cohen 2021-02-23 9:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-23 9:48 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 9:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-22 4:14 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-22 7:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-23 1:12 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-23 2:03 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 13:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-23 19:35 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-24 3:20 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 5:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 6:02 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 6:45 ` Eli Cohen 2021-02-24 6:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 6:55 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 7:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 12:40 ` Eli Cohen 2021-02-24 7:17 ` Eli Cohen 2021-02-24 5:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 6:04 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 6:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 6:53 ` Jason Wang [this message] 2021-02-24 7:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [not found] ` <babc654d-8dcd-d8a2-c3b6-d20cc4fc554c@redhat.com> 2021-02-24 8:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-24 9:30 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-28 21:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-03-01 3:53 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 18:24 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-26 0:56 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-28 21:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-03-01 18:08 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-28 21:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-28 21:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-03-01 3:56 ` Jason Wang 2021-03-02 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-03-02 10:53 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-22 17:09 ` Si-Wei Liu 2021-02-23 2:03 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 9:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-23 9:46 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 10:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-23 10:17 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 9:40 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 10:04 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck 2021-02-23 10:31 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 10:58 ` Cornelia Huck 2021-02-24 9:29 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-24 11:12 ` Cornelia Huck 2021-02-25 4:36 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-25 13:26 ` Cornelia Huck 2021-02-25 18:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-02-26 8:19 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-28 21:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2021-03-01 3:51 ` Jason Wang 2021-03-02 12:08 ` Cornelia Huck [not found] ` <5f6972fe-7246-b622-958d-9cab8dd98e21@redhat.com> 2021-03-03 8:29 ` Cornelia Huck 2021-03-04 8:24 ` Jason Wang 2021-03-04 13:50 ` Cornelia Huck 2021-03-05 3:01 ` Jason Wang 2021-02-23 12:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ce6b0380-bc4c-bcb8-db82-2605e819702c@redhat.com \ --to=jasowang@redhat.com \ --cc=elic@nvidia.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \ --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Netdev Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/0 netdev/git/0.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1 netdev/git/1.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 netdev netdev/ https://lore.kernel.org/netdev \ netdev@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index netdev Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.netdev AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git